Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Yellow nail syndrome with chylothorax after coronary artery bypass grafting

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery201813:93

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0784-8

  • Received: 11 June 2018
  • Accepted: 30 August 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Yellow nail syndrome is a rare condition considered secondary to functional anomalies of lymphatic drainage. Yellow nail syndrome is diagnosed through the triad of intrathoracic findings (30% being pleural effusions), nail discoloration, and lymphedema, with any two features sufficient for diagnosis. We report the second case of post-operative yellow nail syndrome.

Case presentation

After coronary artery bypass grafting, our patient presented with chylothorax on post-operative day 13 and yellow toenail discoloration on post-operative day 28, diagnosing yellow nail syndrome. Initial conservative management with pigtail catheter drainage and low-fat diet with medium-chain triglycerides reduced chylous drainage from 350 mL/day on post-operative day 14 to < 100 mL/day on post-operative day 17. However, by post-operative day 18, drainage returned to 350 mL/day that persisted despite attempts to readjust the catheter position, replacement of catheter with chest tube, and transition to total parenteral nutrition and octreotide while nil per os. Lymphangiogram on post-operative day 32 did not identify the thoracic duct or cisterna chyli, precluding embolization. Talc and doxycycline pleurodeses performed on post-operative days 33 and 38, respectively, resolved his chylothorax and nail discoloration.

Conclusions

Both yellow nail syndrome and chylothorax as a complication of coronary artery bypass grafting are rare entities. The proposed mechanism of post-operative chylothorax is iatrogenic injury to thoracic duct or collateral lymphatic vessels. Diagnosing yellow nail syndrome in patients with post-operative chylothorax (through co-existing yellow nail discoloration and/or lymphedema) may suggest predisposition to impaired lymphatic drainage, portending a difficult recovery and potentially indicating need for surgical management.

Keywords

  • Yellow nail syndrome
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting complications
  • Post-operative chylothorax

Background

Yellow nail syndrome (YNS) is a rare condition of unclear etiology considered secondary to functional anomalies of lymphatic drainage. YNS is characterized by the triad of nail changes, intrathoracic findings (30% being pleural effusions), and lymphedema, with only two of the triad elements required for diagnosis (typically nail discoloration with one of the other findings) [1]. Most cases of YNS have been associated with malignancies, especially lymphoma; autoimmune disorders; immunodeficiencies; endocrine diseases; and others. We report the second case, to our knowledge, of YNS associated with surgery; the first reported case of post-operative YNS was also diagnosed after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We also review the literature on the 41 prior reported cases of chylothorax diagnosed after CABG.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old man with coronary artery disease underwent four-vessel CABG including left internal thoracic artery (ITA) to left anterior descending artery. The patient was discharged on postoperative day (POD) 6 after an uneventful postoperative course with low chest tube output and trace pleural effusions.

On POD 13, the patient was readmitted after four days of moderate chest pain and exertional dyspnea. Diminished respiratory sounds were noted over the full left lung field. Chest radiograph confirmed a large left pleural effusion (Fig. 1). A left pigtail catheter drained 2.3 l of milky fluid with a triglyceride level of 1604 mg/dL, diagnosing chylothorax.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Chest radiograph detected a large pleural effusion over the left lung field on post-operative day 13 after coronary artery bypass grafting

Conservative management was attempted with continued catheter drainage and initiation of a low-fat diet with medium-chain triglycerides on POD 14. Drainage gradually decreased over the next three days to < 100 ml/day, but by POD 18, drainage increased to 350 mL/day that continued for two days despite attempts to readjust the catheter position. On POD 20, the pigtail catheter was replaced with a chest tube, and the patient was transitioned to total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and octreotide while nil per os, but chest tube drainage persisted at 200–360 ml/day. On POD 28, the patient noted new, bilateral yellow toenail discoloration (Fig. 2). The yellow nail discoloration was not associated with any disfiguring features such as nail thickening or separation from nail bed. No lymphedema was found. Presence of yellow nails and chylothorax resulted in diagnosis of YNS.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

On post-operative day 28 after coronary artery bypass grafting, the patient noted yellow toenail discoloration not present prior to admission

Lymphangiogram on POD 32 noted well-opacified pelvic lymphatic channels, but cisterna chyli and thoracic duct were not identified (Fig. 3), precluding embolization. Tiny droplets of lipiodol were present in the left pleural space, but the leak location could not be identified.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

On post-operative day 32, lymphangiogram detected patchy areas of contrast (lipiodol) accumulation in the mediastinum (a) without identifying a clearly defined point of lymphatic injury and without identifying the cisterna chyli or thoracic duct (precluding embolization) even though the pelvic lymphatic channels were well-opacified (b). Sternal wires and left chest tube were also visible

On POD 33, thoracoscopic left pleurodesis was performed using aerosolized talc (4 g). Prior to talc administration, half-and-half (300 mL) was administered via nasogastric tube, but no chyle leak was found on thoracoscopic examination after two hours. Since lymphangiogram did not identify a thoracic duct, thoracic duct ligation was not attempted. Five days after pleurodesis, since chest tube output remained high (> 200–300 ml/day), doxycycline pleurodesis was performed via existing chest tube. Output subsequently decreased, allowing transition to low-fat diet seven days later and discharge home two days after that.

At 2- and 8-week follow-ups, chest radiograph showed trace pleural effusion with no recurrence of chylothorax. Although still on a low-fat diet at both visits, the patient was gradually increasing fat intake. Yellow toenail discoloration had resolved by the 8-week follow-up.

Discussion

YNS is diagnosed clinically through the triad of characteristic nail changes, intrathoracic findings (30% being pleural effusions), and lymphedema. Presence of any two features (typically nail discoloration with another finding) is sufficient for diagnosis [1], with the full triad observed in one-third of cases [2]. About 30% of YNS-associated pleural effusions are chylothoraces [3].

Since the first report in 1964 [4], fewer than 400 cases of YNS have been described in the literature. The etiology remains unknown, with prior associations including malignancies (especially lymphoma), immunodeficiency disorders, tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, Guillan-Barré syndrome, and others. This is the second report of YNS associated with surgery; the first reported case was also diagnosed after CABG [5].

Although debated, the pathophysiology of YNS is attributed to functional lymphatic defects, with lymphangiogram and lymphoscintigraphy findings of hypoplastic lymphatic vessels [4] and reduced lymphatic drainage in extremities [6]. Nail discoloration results from lipofuscin pigment from oxidation of lipid precursors in soft tissue lymph collections. The conditions associated with YNS are considered to be second insults causing functionally anomalous lymphatics to present clinically through intrathoracic findings, nail changes, and/or edema.

Our report indicates that traumatic disruption of lymphatic vessels may be another trigger causing functionally anomalous lymphatics to manifest clinically as YNS. Intra-operative damage to thoracic duct or other lymphatic tributaries may have overwhelmed the lymphatic network, causing accumulation of chyle in the pleural space as chylothorax and in lower extremity soft tissues manifesting as yellow nails. Although our patient did not have visible lymphedema, a previous study showed that patients with YNS without edema still had significantly reduced lymphatic drainage in lower extremities on lymphoscintigraphy compared with control patients [6]; this suggests that our patient’s lymph collection may have been sufficient to cause lipofuscin accumulation but not edema.

Post-CABG chylothorax is also rare, with 41 other reported cases (Table 1). The proposed mechanism is iatrogenic injury to the thoracic duct or collateral lymphatic vessels. A strong association exists with left ITA harvesting (involving 81.0% of the 42 cases including ours) due to close proximity between the left ITA origin and thoracic duct. Another risk factor is use of electrocautery during harvesting; due to low protein in lymph (compared with blood), electrocautery of lymphatics increases risk of leakage rather than achieving lymphostasis [7].
Table 1

Reported cases of chylothorax diagnosed after coronary artery bypass grafting

Reference

Year

Sex

Age

Procedure

L ITA

R ITA

Chylothorax site

POD

Outcome with conservative tx

Octreotide?

Surgical tx

Weber [10]

1981

M

55

CABG

Yes

No

L & M

2

Resolved after 12d

No

None

Zakhour [11]

1981

M

73

CABG

Yes

No

L

90

Resolved after 21d

No

None

Zakhour [11]

1981

M

59

CABG

No

No

L & M

2

Resolved after 5d

No

None

Kshettry [12]

1981

M

51

CABG

No

No

L

30

Resolved after 4d

No

None

Teba [13]

1985

F

51

CABG/MVR

No

No

L

7

Resolved after 17d

No

None

Di Lello [14]

1987

M

53

CABG

Yes

No

L

9

Failed after 31d

No

L thoracotomy-fibrin glue

Czarnecki [15]

1988

F

61

CABG

Yes

Yes

R

42

Failed after 10d

No

R thoracotomy-ligation at diaphragm

Chaiyaroji [16]

1991

F

69

CABG

Yes

No

L

6

Failed after 18d

No

L thoracotomy-ligation at injury

Inderbitzi [17]

1992

M

69

CABG/Redo

UK

UK

L

2

Failed after 21d

No

Left VATS - fibrin glue

Bogers [18]

1993

M

41

CABG

Yes

No

L

1

Failed after 35d

No

L thoracotomy-ligation at injury

Janssen [19]

1994

M

58

CABG

Yes

No

L

35

Failed after 14d

No

L VATS-ligation at injury

Davies [20]

1994

M

48

CABG

Yes

No

L

21

Resolved after 28d

No

None

Wood [21]

1994

M

69

CABG

Yes

No

L

3

Failed after 7d

No

L VATS-ligation at injury

Smith [22]

1994

M

60

CABG

Yes

No

L

14

Resolved after 15d

No

None

Smith [22]

1994

M

47

CABG

Yes

No

L

7

Resolved after 14d

No

None

Zaidenstein [23]

1996

F

70

CABG

Yes

No

L

42

Resolved after 16d

No

None

Felz [24]

1997

F

50

CABG

Yes

No

L

56

Resolved after 59d

No

None

Mohanty [25]

1998

M

56

CABG

Yes

No

L

8

Resolved after 22d

No

Attempted wiring of dehisced sternum on day 9 after diagnosis

Sharpe [26]

1999

F

63

CABG

No

No

L & M

11

Resolved after 14d

No

None

Perez [27]

1999

M

68

CABG/AVR

UK

UK

L

10

Resolved after 10d

No

None

Pego-Fernandez [28]

1999

M

38

CABG

Yes

No

L

90

Resolved after 17d

No

None

Kelly [29]

2000

M

77

CABG

Yes

No

L

18

Resolved after 14d

Yes

None

Fahimi [30]

2001

M

49

CABG

Yes

No

L

UK

Failed after 14d

No

L VATS-fibrin glue

Fahimi [30]

2001

M

51

CABG

Yes

No

L

UK

Resolved after 14d

No

None

Brancaccio [31]

2001

M

64

CABG

Yes

No

L

6

Resolved after 11d

No

None

Abid [32]

2003

M

58

CABG

Yes

No

L

3

Failed after 8d

No

Talc slurry pleurodesis

Riquet [33]

2004

F

59

CABG

Yes

No

L

UK

Failed after 78d

No

L thoracotomy-ligation at injury

Gabbieri [34]

2004

F

67

CABG

Yes

No

L

10

Resolved after 28d

Yes

None

Kilic [35]

2005

F

66

CABG

Yes

No

L

12

Resolved after 10d

Yes

None

Falode [36]

2005

F

68

CABG/ASD

Yes

No

L

3

Failed after 60d

No

L VATS-dry talc pleurodesis

Barbetakis [37]

2005

M

78

CABG

Yes

No

L

27

Resolved after 13d

Yes

None

Halldorsson [38]

2006

F

47

CABG

No

No

R

10

Resolved after 10d

No

None

Choong [39]

2006

M

63

CABG

Yes

No

L

2

Failed after 35d

No

R thoracotomy-ligation at diaphragm

Narayan [40]

2007

F

65

CABG/MVR

Yes

No

UK

1

Failed after 3d

Yes

Median sternotomy-ligation at injury

Paul [41]

2009

M

65

CABG

UK

UK

L

UK

Failed after 14d

UK

R thoracotomy-thoracic duct ligation

Karimi [42]

2010

M

53

CABG

Yes

No

L

2

Resolved after 27d

No

None

Deguchi [43]

2013

F

78

CABG

Yes

Yes

R

3

Failed after 10d

Yes

Median sternotomy-ligation at injury

Altun [44]

2015

M

60

CABG

Yes

No

UK

2

Resolved after 13d

Yes

None

Altun [44]

2015

M

46

CABG

Yes

No

UK

3

Resolved after 14d

Yes

None

Owais [45]

2015

F

76

CABG

Yes

No

L

15

Resolved after 7d

Yes

None

Sabzi [7]

2017

M

43

CABG

Yes

No

L

0

Resolved after 10d

No

None

Abbreviations: M = Male, F = Female, ITA = internal thoracic artery, L = Left, R = Right, M = Mediastinum, UK = Unknown, POD = “post-operative day” when chylothorax was diagnosed, d = days, tx = treatment, CABG = coronary artery bypass graft, MVR = mitral valve replacement, AVR = Aortic Valve Replacement, ASD = Atrial Septal Defect repair, VATS = video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

An updated adaptation from Halldorsson [38] and Deguchi [43]

Management of post-operative chylothorax starts with conservative measures, including chest tube for effusion drainage. Efforts to decrease chyle production include a trial of low-fat diet with medium-chain triglycerides (absorbed directly into portal system) with transition to TPN and somatostatin or octreotide if output remains high [8]. Conservative management has failed if output exceeds 1 L/day for five days; drainage persists for more than fourteen days; or nutritional status declines. Of the 41 prior cases with post-CABG chylothorax, 26 (63.4%) succeeded with conservative management with all but one resolving in less than 30 days; the other 15 (36.6%) underwent surgery after a median (range) of 14 (3–78) days. In our patient’s case, conservative measures with pigtail catheter drainage and low-fat diet were initially successful at reducing chylous drainage during the first four days of management; however, drainage increased by the fifth day of management likely due to a malfunction of the catheter. Additional conservative measures (chest tube drainage, total parenteral nutrition, and octreotide while nil per os) were continued for an additional 14 days before attempting lymphangiogram; of the 26 reported post-CABG chylothoraces that resolved without surgical intervention, 14 (53.8%) required 14–28 days of conservative management before resolving (see Table 1).

When conservative management fails, thoracoscopic or open thoracic duct ligation with chemical pleurodesis can be done [9]. In chylothorax management at our medical center, it is institutional practice to start with lymphangiogram and minimally-invasive thoracic duct embolization before attempting surgical thoracic duct ligation as our Department of Interventional Radiology has a history of success with the less invasive procedure; in the event that duct embolization fails, lymphangiogram may guide future surgical measures. In our patient’s case, the lymphangiogram guided the surgical team to attempt pleurodesis without thoracic duct ligation since the thoracic duct was not identified.

Although this is the second report, to our knowledge, of post-CABG yellow nail syndrome, it is possible that the other YNS features (yellow nails and lymphedema) have previously been missed in patients with post-CABG chylothorax since the findings are subtle. Other cases may have been misdiagnosed as fungal infections. In our patient’s case, the close temporal association between the development of chylothorax and appearance of yellow nail discoloration and the temporal proximity of their resolution were more consistent with YNS. Furthermore, the appearance of his nails was less consistent with onychomycosis. Other than yellow discoloration, his nails had no disfiguring features such as thickening, chipping, or separation from the nail bed; his nails also demonstrated a uniform yellow discoloration without black debris. Overall, the appearance of his nails was not consistent with any of the major subtypes of onychomycosis (such as distal and lateral subungual; proximal subungual; endonyx subungual; superficial; or total dystrophic onychomycosis) [10].

Although diagnosing YNS does not alter management, we propose that concurrence of chylothorax with yellow nails and/or lymphedema may suggest predisposition to impaired lymphatic drainage and serve as a marker of degree of lymphatic leakage, portending a difficult recovery course and potentially indicating need for surgical intervention. As our patient’s recovery was challenging (failing conservative treatment and requiring both talc and doxycycline pleurodeses), it is possible that he had a lymphatic aberrancy predisposing to YNS, with intraoperative thoracic duct injury serving as the second insult that caused YNS to manifest clinically.

Conclusions

Chylothorax as a complication of coronary artery bypass grafting is rare, with the most likely mechanism being iatrogenic injury to the thoracic duct or collateral lymphatic vessels. During management of post-operative chylothorax, diagnosis of yellow nail syndrome (through concurrent presence of yellow nail discoloration and/or lymphedema) may suggest a predisposition to impaired lymphatic drainage, potentially indicating the need for surgical management.

Abbreviations

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass grafting

ITA: 

Internal thoracic artery

POD: 

Post-operative day

TPN: 

Total parenteral nutrition

YNS: 

Yellow nail syndrome

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All authors were involved in patient care. SW, JC, and NL participated in manuscript preparation. All authors participated in manuscript revisions and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

We have obtained written consent from the patient to publish the medical data in this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
(2)
Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
(3)
Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
(4)
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
(5)
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

References

  1. Hiller E, Rosenow EC, Olsen AM. Pulmonary manifestations of the yellow nail syndrome. Chest. 1972;61(5):452–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Emerson PA. Yellow nails, lymphoedema, and pleural effusions. Thorax. 1966;21(3):247–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Maldonado F, Tazelaar HD, Wang CW, Ryu JH. Yellow nail syndrome: analysis of 41 consecutive patients. Chest. 2008;134(2):375–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Samman PD, White WF. The “yellow nail” syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 1964;76:153–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Banta DP, Dandamudi N, Parekh HJ, Anholm JD. Yellow nail syndrome following thoracic surgery: a new association? J Postgr Med. 2009;55(4):270–1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bull RH, Fenton DA, Mortimer PS. Lymphatic function in the yellow nail syndrome. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134(2):307–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sabzi F, Faraji R. Early Chylothorax after coronary artery bypass grafting. Zahedan J Res Med Sci 2017;In press:e9067.Google Scholar
  8. Owais T, Back D, Girdauskas E, Kuntze T. Postoperative Chylothorax: is octreotide a valid therapy? J Case Reports Stud. 2015;3(3).Google Scholar
  9. McGrath EE, Blades Z, Anderson PB. Chylothorax: Aetiology, diagnosis and therapeutic options. Respir Med. 2010;104(1):1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Westerberg DP, Voyack MJ. Onychomycosis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2013;88(11):762–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Weber DO, Del Mastro P, Yarnoz MD. Chylothorax after myocardial revascularization with internal mammary graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 1981;32(5):499–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zakhour B, Drucker M, Franco A. Chylothorax as a complication of aortocoronary bypass. Two case reports and a review of the literature. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;22(1):93–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kshettry V, Rebello R. Chylothorax after coronary artery bypass grafting. Thorax. 1982;37:954.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Teba L, Dedhia HV, Bowen R, Alexander JC. Chylothorax review. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(1):49–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Lello F, Werner PH, Kleinman LH, Mullen DC, Flemma RJ. Life-threatening Chylothorax after left internal mammary artery dissection: therapeutic considerations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44(6):660–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Czarnecki DJ, Kehoe ME, Tector AJ. Lymphangiographic evaluation of chylothorax after myocardial revascularization. Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(5):1054–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chaiyaroj S, Mullerworth MH, Tatoulis J. Surgery in the management of chylothorax after coronary artery bypass with left internal mammary artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106(4):754–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Inderbitzi RG, Krebs T, Stirneman T, Ulrich A. Treatment of postoperative chylothorax by fibrin glue application under thoracoscopic view with use of local anesthesia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;104(1):209–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bogers AJ, Pardijs WH, Van Herwerden LA, Bos E. Chylothorax as a complication of harvesting the left internal thoracic artery in coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 1993;7(10)Google Scholar
  20. Janssen JP, Joosten HJM, Postmus PE. Thoracoscopic treatment of postoperative chylothorax after coronary bypass surgery. Thorax. 1994;49(12):1273.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Davies MJ, Spyt TJ. Chylothorax and wound lymphocele formation as a complication of myocardial revascularization with the internal thoracic artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108(6):1155–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wood MK, Ullyot DJ. Chylothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108(6):1156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith JA, Goldstein J, Oyer PE. Chylothorax complicating coronary artery by-pass grafting. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;35(4):307–9.Google Scholar
  24. Zaidenstein R, Cohen N, Dish V, Alon I, Golik A, Modai D. Chylothorax following median sternotomy. Clin Cardiol. 1996;19(11):910–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Felz MW, Neely J. Beware the left-sided effusion. J Fam Pract. 1997;45(6):519–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mohanty B, Craddock D, Stubberfield J. Chylothorax: an unusual complication following coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal mammary artery. Asia Pacific Hear J. 1998;7(3):220–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharpe DA, Pullen MD, McGoldrick JP. A minimally invasive approach to chylopericardium after coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(3):1062–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pérez J, Casal J, Rodríguez W. Always remember chylothorax. South Med J. 1999;92(8):833–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pêgo-Fernandes PM, Ebaid GX, Nouer GH, Munhoz RT, Jatene FB, Jatene AD. Chylothorax after myocardial revascularization with the left internal thoracic artery. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1999;73(4):383–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelly RF, Shumway SJ. Conservative management of postoperative chylothorax using somatostatin. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(6):1944–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fahimi H, Casselman FP, Mariani MA, et al. Current management of postoperative chylothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(2):448–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Brancaccio G, Prifti E, Cricco AM, Totaro M, Antonazzo A, Miraldi F. Chylothorax: a complication after internal thoracic artery harvesting. Ital Heart J. 2001;2(7):559–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Abid Q, Millner RW. Chylothorax following coronary bypass grafting: treatment by talc pleurodesis. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2003;11(4):355–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Riquet M, Assouad J, D’Attellis N, Gandjbakhch I. Chylothorax and re-expansion pulmonary edema following myocardial re-vascularization: role of lymph vessel insufficiency. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2004;3(3):423–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gabbieri D, Bavutti L, Zaca F, Turinetto B, Ghidoni I. Conservative treatment of postoperative chylothorax with octreotide. Ital Heart J. 2004;5(6):479–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kilic D, Sahin E, Gulcan O, Bolat B, Turkoz R, Hatipoglu A. Octreotide for treating chylothorax after cardiac surgery. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(3):437–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Falode O, Hunt I, Young CP. Chylothorax after coronary artery bypass surgery. J R Soc Med. 2005;98(7):314–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Barbetakis N, Xenikakis T, Efstathiou A, Fessatidis I. Successful octreotide treatment of chylothorax following coronary artery bypass grafting procedure. A case report and review of the literature. Hell J Cardiol. 2006;47(2):118–22.Google Scholar
  39. Halldorsson A. Chylothorax after coronary artery bypass grafting. Int Surg. 94(2):119–29.Google Scholar
  40. Choong CK, Martinez C, Barner HB. Chylothorax after internal thoracic artery harvest. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(4):1507–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Narayan P, Rahaman N, Molnar TF, Caputo M. Chylothorax following cardiac surgery caused by unusual lymphatic anatomy. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2007;15(5):e58–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Paul S, Altorkl NK, Port JL, Stiles BM, Lee PC. Surgical management of chylothorax. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;57(4):226–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Karimi A, Salehiomran A, Yazdanifard P. Chylothorax after coronary artery bypass and internal mammary artery harvesting: a case report. East Mediterr Heal J. 2010;16(10):1103–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Deguchi K, Yamauchi T, Maeda S, Takeuchi M, Kin K, Takano H. Chylothorax after coronary artery bypass grafting using the right internal thoracic artery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63(7):416–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Altun G, Pulathan Z, Kutanis D, Hemsinli D, Erturk E, Civelek A. Conservative Management of Chylothorax after coronary artery bypass grafting. Texas Hear Inst J. 2015;42(2):148–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement