Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Late thrombosis of a Transcatheter aortic valve: the border between a proactive and reactive management

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery201813:126

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0816-4

  • Received: 27 September 2018
  • Accepted: 3 December 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Valve thrombosis – either biological or mechanical – is proved to increase patient’s morbidity and mortality. No consensus exist on the best management in such cases.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 69-year-old man presenting with a late thrombosis of a transcatheter aortic valve who was medically managed until he acutely worsened, developing myocardial ischemia and cardiogenic shock.

Conclusion

This unlucky case raises a word of caution about the safety of a reactive management.

Keywords

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  • Valve thrombosis
  • ECMO

Background

Prosthetic valve thrombosis is known to carry relevant morbidity and mortality. Little is known about its occurrence after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); all the information we have are derived from case reports and relatively small series of patients [1].

The current postoperative management suggests dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to reduce the risk of valve thrombosis, even if more and more evidences reveal the potential superiority of oral anticoagulation [2] A more serious issue regards the appropriate management once the valve thrombosis has occurred.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old man was referred to our Emergency Department for resting dyspnea after 2 months progressive shortness of breath, 2 years after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

In 1994 he underwent aortic valve replacement with a 23 mm Biocor™ valve (St. Jude, MN, USA) for native valve endocarditis. Eleven years later (2015) he was re-operated for structural valve deterioration. In that occasion – due to the presence of extreme calcification of the aortic annulus and root – we had to replace the prosthesis with a 23 mm Edwards Sapien 3 transcatheter valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) under direct view, as previously described [3].

The patient revealed anticoagulants discontinuation due to excessive bleeding after surgery for a chordoma of the nose within the last 2 months (he was on anticoagulant after an episode of atrial fibrillation). He took Aspirin 100 mg/day with a good compliance. He had no history of hyper-coagulation state or previous documented thrombosis.

The transthoracic echocardiogram showed increased trans-valvular gradients (mean left ventricular outflow tract/aorta gradient of 62 mmHg with 0,43cm2 of valvular area) and ipo-echogenic images evocative of intra-valvular thrombosis. A thoracic computed tomography (CT) confirmed the presence of valvular thrombosis (Fig. 1) in the presence of diseased-free coronary anatomy. After discussion in the Heart Team setting it was decided to attempt systemic anticoagulation with heparin to achieve dissolution of the thrombus. After 1 week of systemic anticoagulation a control CT did not show any evidence of improvement, so we planned a surgical re-intervention. The day before the scheduled surgery the patient suddenly experienced thoracic pain and electrocardiographic signs of myocardial ischemia. An urgent coronary angiography was performed while the clinical and hemodynamic state worsened. He had a cardiac arrest during the procedure; an immediate cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed while a peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support was instituted and the patient transferred into the operating room for an emergent surgery.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a The echocardiogram was suggestive for valve thrombosis (arrow). b & c. The finding was confirmed on thoracic computed tomography (arrows)

After cardioplegic cardiac arrest and transverse aortotomy the thrombosed transcatheter valve was excised and a new 23 mm Edwards Sapien 3 valve was deployed in an off-label fashion under direct view with good echocardiographic result (Fig. 2). The valve thrombosis was confirmed once excised (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Intraoperative images. The new transcatheter valve deployed under direct view (arrow)

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Intraoperative image of the excised transcatheter valve with the adherent thrombus (arrow)

Unfortunately he developed an incoercible cardiogenic and septic shock and finally died on the 10th postoperative day.

Discussion

Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) accounts for any thrombus formation attached to or near a prosthetic valve that is not caused by infection and determining some degree of valve obstruction and dysfunction and that carries significant morbidity and mortality to the patient.

Some degree of reduced leaflet motion is a detected in 10 to 15% of TAVR patients and generally resolves after anticoagulation therapy. [4] Although currently either the North American and European Society of Cardiology suggest DAPT following TAVR procedures, more and more clinical evidences seem to propose a more appropriate management by oral anticoagulants after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

No consensus exists regarding the best treatment option once the thrombus has developed.

In this case the biggest challenge was balancing a potential life–threatening condition caused by valve thrombosis and its initial dysfunction and the extremely elevated surgical risk due to the third cardiac operation after surgical implantation of a transcatheter valve due to porcelain aortic root and annulus. Thus, the first-line we choose was trying to manage the patient conservatively with systemic heparinization and close clinical and instrumental monitoring.

In this case the localized aggressive tumor and the relevant postoperative bleeding may have impaired the hemostatic status of the patient, shifting it toward a pro-coagulant one.

We speculate that the transcatheter valve forced against the stiff aortic ring of the previous transcatheter valve and the rigidity and narrowing of the degenerated homograft has caused a progressive thrombosis occurred within the stented portion of the valve towards the leaflets once the hemostasis perturbation occurred leading to the catastrophic consequence.

Conclusion

From this unlucky case a word of caution arises about the medical management of such TAVR population; although a single case report does not provide wider conclusion we believe that a very close monitoring of the clinical ad morphologic valve features are mandatory while the surgical option still remains valid once an early evidence of no improvement after adequate anticoagulation therapy.

Abbreviations

CPR: 

Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation

DAPT: 

Dual antiplatelet therapy

ECMO: 

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

NOACs: 

The novel anti coagulants

PVT: 

Prosthetic valve thrombosis

TAVR: 

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

We state no funding for this paper.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

MG: clinical management, idea and writing; GP: supervision; MP: supervision; FA: clinical management; AA: data collection; MA: supervisor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

We have obtained the consent for anonymous publication of data and figures from the relatives of the patient.

Competing interests

Marco Gennari MD is Consultant to Medtronic.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Via Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy
(2)
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

References

  1. Cota L, Stabile E, Agrusta M, Sorropago G, Pucciarelli A, et al. Bioprostheses "thrombosis" after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(7):789–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chakravarty T, Søndergaard L, Friedman J, De Backer O, Berman D, et al. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis in surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves: an observational study. Lancet. 2017;S0140–6736(17):30757–2.Google Scholar
  3. Tessari C, D'Onofrio A, Guglielmi C, Gerosa G. Sapien XT implantation under direct vision as a bail-out procedure in case of hostile aortic root: a reasonable alternative for stentless bioprosthesis reoperation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(3):e36–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(4):732–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement