Although esophageal leiomyoma is rarely symptomatic, the most common symptoms are dysphagia, pain, and weight loss [1]. If esophageal leiomyoma is symptomatic or if there is a strong clinical suspicion for malignancy, it should be resected [1]. The conventional surgical approach especially for giant esophageal leiomyoma has been open thoracotomy or tumor resection through thoracoabdominal incision and sometimes along with gastroesophagostomy [3]. Minimally invasive surgery, VATS (video assisted thoracoscopic surgery), for enucleation of esophageal leiomyoma has been reported since 1992 and it has widely gained acceptance in the last few years [3]. With the development of endoscopic resection technology, STER and ESE are nowadays both adopted by endoscopists to resect gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) [2]. STER offers advantages of a very good view of the dissection through the submucosal tunnel, and submucosal tunneling maintains the integrity of the mucosal layer over the tumor [4]. The main features of this case included big size, locating in the upper esophagus (adjacent esophagus entrance) and originating from the deep layer of muscularis propria. Hence, no enough length to construct an esophageal tunnel limited the use of STER in this case. Direct ESE also has a high risk of huge iatrogenic perforation difficult to be sutured with conventional endoclips. Closure could not even be achieved using fully covered self-expandable metal stent because this lesion is too close to the esophagus entrance.
The secure closure has been considered to be the major obstacle of endoscopic iatrogenic perforation and endoscopic full-thickness resection. The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system or the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device may be selected, but the high cost and difficult operation limits their application. Recently, the endoscopic purse-string suture method via a two-channel endoscopy is proved to be an effective and safe technique for the closure of large perforation [5]. However, the two separate channels of this kind of dual-channel gastroscope are parallel, and it is not easy for the instruments placed within the two different channels to work together, therefore making it difficult to clip the nylon loop around the edge of the perforation [6]. Moreover, OTSC system, the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device and dual-channel endoscope are not usually available in most Chinese endoscopy units. Therefore, there are many limitations to their use and most endoscopists have less experience in such technologies.
In our case, after en bloc endoscopic full-thickness resection, we performed successful closure with a purse-string suture using the LeCamp™ endoloop and the endoclips fixed to the full thickness of the defect’s distal margin. Compared with the traditional nylon string, the LeCamp™ endoloop does not need to be preloaded and can be applied easily using the single channel endoscope. The endoclips fixed to the full thickness of the defect’s distal margin could prevent the clips from tearing the mucous membrane and shedding. This technique of endoscopic full-thickness resection combined with purse-string suture using the LeCamp™ endoloop through the common single-channel endoscope may be an alternative to avoid surgery for the removal of a giant upper esophagus tumor from muscularis propria layer.