Comparison of conventional and primary sutureless surgery for repairing supracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage

Total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage (TAPVD) is an uncommon cardiac malformation wherein no pulmonary veins directly connect to the left atrium, instead connecting only to the right atrium or one of its tributaries. Roughly 45% of TAPVD cases are supracardiac, while one quarter are cardiac, one quarter are infracardiac, and the remaining 5% are of mixed etiology [1–5]. The connection in supracardiac TAPVD is usually to a left vertical vein draining into the left brachiocephalic vein, or more uncommonly into the superior vena cava, where it connects with the right atrium. In rare instances, it may instead connect with the azygos vein.

The most serious complication after TAPVD repair is pulmonary vein obstruction, which may be pulmonary vein intrinsic at the anastomosis. 8 to 54% of cases were reported to occur PVO after operations [6–9]. Comparing the occurrence rate of PVO after operations gradually becomes an important criterion to evaluate the effect of operations.

The general procedure for conducting a sutureless repair of anomalous pulmonary veins is as follows. Initially, a neo-left atrium (LA) is generated via anastomosis of the posterior pericardium to the LA instead of anastomosing the LA directly to the pulmonary venous confluence. This approach has become an increasingly common surgical approach for repairing PVO following TAPVD since it was developed in 1998 [10–12]. Considering effectiveness of this new surgical technique, some researchers had made efforts to apply primary sutureless techniques to TAPVD patients. However, it remains unclear which technique is better. Osami Honjo, Bobby Yanagawa and some other authors compared the two techniques in the repair of TAPVD, however the conclusions were controversial and no consensus have been reached [13, 14].

We hypothesized that the use of such primary sutureless approaches in those patients who have supracardiac TAPVD may allow for better outcomes than conventional surgery, reducing rates of PVO owing to a reduction in confluences. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcomes for patients over 4 year period that had supracardiac TAPVD, with a particular focus on how primary sutureless technique was related to survival and PVO rates.

A total of 43 patients diagnosed with supracardiac TAPVD formed the study cohort (Fig. 2). Sutureless techniques were performed on 20 patients and conventional on the other 23 patients. PVS was evaluated 0.1 ± 0.3 in sutureless group, 0.1 ± 0.3 in conventional group, showing no statistic differences. Sex, age, weight, LVEF were comparable between these two groups (Table 1).

There were no significant differences in postoperative characteristics between groups. PVS in two groups were both 0.2 ± 0.5, postoperative LVEF (%) showed no differences among two groups (68.6 ± 13.4 vs 70.4 ± 12.9, P > 0.05). Average length of ICU stay of sutureless group was 11 days (range 5 to 41 days), 12 days (range 5 to 45 days) in conventional group, there were no statistic differences (Table 2).

Patients were followed for a median of 2.9 (0.1–4) years for those undergoing conventional surgery and 2.8(0.1–3.8) years for those that underwent the sutureless technique. One patient in the sutureless group needed to undergo a second operation to treat PVO (5%) and survived to the last follow up without PVO, The same one in the conventional repair group (4.8%). One patient died in sutureless group for postoperative PVO (5%) two months after the surgery, one died in conventional group for postoperative infection (4.8%) one week after the surgery and another died in conventional group for postoperative PVO (4.8%) two weeks after the surgery. Overall mortality or freedom from reoperation did not differ significantly between these two groups.

Although initially employed as a means of treating postoperative PVO, sutureless approaches have been more recently utilized for primary TAPVD repair in high risk patients like to develop PVO following the repair operation, with the goal of improving their long-term survival. Patients at particular risk of PVO include those who have preoperative hypoplastic pulmonary veins, are of a young age at the time of the initial surgery, as well as those who have TAPVD with right atrial isomerism, cardiac TAPVD with preexisting PVO, or mixed TAPVD [15–18]. A potential advantage of sutureless technique is a more limited reactive intimal proliferation because the suture line is not directly on the pulmonary vein. There are also advantages with respect to no direct suture line distortion or narrowing of the veins, particularly if they are small. Optimal flow characteristics for a given vein are therefore intact.Following conventional surgery, post-operative PVO can develop as a consequence of either fibrosis or inflammation at the site of the suture between LA and pulmonary veins, besides, mismatching of anastomotic confluent between LA and pulmonary vein may be the cause of post-PVO, sutureless technique allowed the aggressive resection of the obstructed pulmonary veins tissue and avoided surgically induced distortion of the pulmonary veins, which may help to prevent subsequent PVO.

Yoshimura et al. have suggested that the use of the sutureless approach may be less technical than the conventional surgical approach [19] A potential advantage of sutureless technique is a more limited reactive intimal proliferation because the suture line is not directly on the pulmonary vein. There are also advantages with respect to no direct suture line distortion or narrowing of the veins, particularly if they are small. Optimal flow characteristics for a given vein are therefore intact. As a result, the suretureless technique is supposed to call for less CPB and aortic cross-clamp time. However, we found no significant difference on CPB time or aortic cross-clamp time, and indeed on the contrary the average CPB time was longer than conventional technique (96.2 ± 32.6 min vs 75.6 ± 28.2 min, P < 0.05). The longer cross clamp and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest times for sutureless repair were most likely related to surgeon bias because the surgeon who performed some sutureless repairs chose to do so with circulatory arrest. Surgical complexity or unstable situation of patients may be another reason for longer CPB time. ICU stays are related to the post-operative recovery, there were no significant differences between two groups. The total hospitalization time is mainly determined by ICU management and accurate preoperative diagnosis, so standard ICU management and diagnosis should be conducted during perioperative period.

Mauro Lo Rito et al. analyzed 195 patients who underwent TAPVD repair during 1990 to 2012 and concluded that there was a lower PVO incidence in their primary sutureless group relative to their standard repair group, particularly in those TAPVD patients of the infracardiac or mixed type, with a lower pulmonary vein score [20]. Bobby Yanagawa et al. enrolled 57 patients TAPVD repair during 1997 to 2009, and come to a conclusion that sutureless technique is a useful technique for surgeons to employ, particularly in complicated cases, including infracardiac TAPVD [14]. Our results showed no significant differences in mortality and post PVO between two groups in supracardiac TAPVD, Ages at operation in our research were about 200 days old. However, age at operation of TAPVD is neonate or early infant. That may be associated with our encouraging results.

There are no significant differences in mortality and post PVO between sutureless technique group and conventional technique group in supracardiac TAPVD patients. Sutureless technique can be used for supracardiac TAPVC with good results. The main reason for postoperative mortality is Post-PVO.