Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [4]. Surgical resection is one of the mainstays for treatment of NSCLC together with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and recent immunotherapy. Surgical treatment of NSCLC involving the proximal bronchi or PA can be challenging. Pneumonectomy is the most extensive pulmonary resection with which to ensure complete resection for these patients. However, pneumonectomy is associated with high complication rates, especially for patients with compromised pulmonary function. In recent years, the resectability of locally advanced lung cancer has been improving with advances in perioperative care, surgical techniques [5,6,7], and induction therapy [8,9,10], which downstages the tumors to render them resectable. Thus, avoidance of pneumonectomy can be achieved in selected patients at an early disease stage. The first sleeve lobectomy was performed by Prince-Thomas in 1942 [11], and the oncologic value of lobectomy with pulmonary arterioplasty was initially reported by Vogt-Moykopf et al. [12] in 1986. These procedures have since been accepted as valuable options to avoid pneumonectomy in selected patients. Many retrospective analyses have evaluated the operative mortality and morbidity of pneumonectomy and pulmonary function-preserving surgeries such as sleeve lobectomy [1,2,3] or PA reconstruction [13] in patients with NSCLC.
Previously, Okada and colleagues classified fifteen patients who underwent extended sleeve lobectomy into three groups according to the surgical procedure of reconstruction [14]. And Miyoshi and colleagues also reported three types of anastomotic techniques [15]. One is to use two adjusting stitches in the membranous part of the larger stump. The second technique is a telescoping anastomosis. The third technique is to make a cuff on the smaller stump by trimming the bronchus. Comparing with these procedures, the latter technique requires some adjustment of making cuff without remnant cancer cells. Before surgery, radiographic and endoscopic evaluations are needed to make a success of anastomosis. In this case, we planned to make a cuff using head-sided left main bronchus, which was cancer free side. Of course we should confirm and indeed had confirmed the pathological free margin during surgery. Okada and colleagues [14] described that resection points were determined with at least 1 cm of the macroscopically unaffected distance of the bronchus. We followed the resection point of this case according to this report [14]. Amazingly, this cuff technique was termed “wine cup stoma” by Maeda and colleagues [16] almost three decades ago and we called this simple procedure same as the above. This technique is relatively simple and postoperative complications such as anastomotic stenosis or kinking are avoidable. Toyooka and colleagues [17] also recommended this bronchial cuff technique rather than adjusting stitches.
For the indication of extended sleeve lobectomy, previous reports showed that invasion of the bronchus with N0 and N1 disease were the most suitable indication [18, 19]. According this recommendation, we performed type C extended sleeve lobectomy for this patient and achieved successful results to date.
In conclusions, we experienced a successful anastomosis of left sleeve lingular segmentectomy and lower lobectomy (type C extended sleeve lobectomy) with bronchial wall flap (wine cup stoma) for central-type lung cancer. This technique might be useful for other extended sleeve lobectomy and lung transplantation to avoid anastomotic complications.
