Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.

Prospective evaluating the appropriate use of piperacillin /tazobactam in cardiac center of a tertiary care hospital

Abstract

Background

The appropriate use of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (Pip/Taz), including the correct dose, escalating and or de-escalation according to the microbiological culture is essential to reduce the antibiotic resistance. Resistant to antimicrobials in a major global problem and contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality and cost of care. Guidelines exists to ensure appropriate use of Pip/Taz. Antibiotics Stewardship guidelines (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329404/9789241515481-eng.pdf) provides a detailed recommendation with regards to initiation, monitoring and escalation and de-escalation based on final culture results. Appling such guidelines ensures a more proper utilization of the empiric uses of antibiotics used in the hospital-based setting. Use of Pip/Taz in cases of suspected infection postoperatively is common practice in the cardiac surgery ward where this study was conducted.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study involving all patients who were admitted to the cardiac surgery unit of a tertiary care center. All patient prescribed at least 1 day of Pip/Taz as an empirical therapy were included and prospectively observed. We aimed to evaluate the use of Pip/Taz and its appropriateness based on Antibiotics Stewardship guidelines (ASG). Any deviation from the guidelines in initiation, escalation, de-escalation based on culture and sensitivity results was considered inappropriate use. Four patients died (1.3%) early as result of complications for surgery but included in the analysis. The study was conducted from October 2017 to October 2018.

Results

Of the 300 patients who received Pip/Taz Cultures were done in 250 patients (83%). The overall appropriate use of Pip/Taz was seen in 166 patients (55.3%).

Conclusion

The empirical use of Pip/Taz in the surgical cardiac unit was largely inappropriate and not entirely driven by the culture test results. Interventions are needed to optimize the use of Pip/Taz including appropriate culture and sensitivity driven use and timely de-escalation or de-escalation when indicated. This will prevent emergence of resistance and reduce the patient toxicity and financial costs.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as Pip/Taz, play an essential role in the empirical therapy of serious infections [1].

Pip /taz is a combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor and has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity including most Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic bacteria and anaerobic bacteria and is effective for many polymicrobial infections [1].

Pip/Taz is useful against a variety of respiratory infection, intra-abdominal, skin and soft tissue infections, febrile neutropenia, and bloodstream infections (BSI) which are among the most frequent complications in neutropenic cancer patients caused by Gram-negative rods which associated with high mortality [2].

Improper use of these antibiotics is common and costly, as physicians often use broad-spectrum antibiotics when a narrower-spectrum agent would work. Overuse of broad-spectrum agents also has an important role in growing worldwide bacterial resistance which has become a serious problem and adds to the overall costs of medical care with increased side effects [3].

.

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has published stewardship guidelines to optimize antibiotic use, using cost-effective interventions, to minimize antibiotic resistance, minimize side effects and control Clostridium difficile infections [4,5,6].

Various strategies have offered for antimicrobial stewardship programs. Like staff education, formulary restrictions and substitutions, early de-escalating, early converting parenteral to oral, and practice guidelines that consider local microbiology and resistance [7].

One useful strategy is to decrease inappropriate use of broad spectrum antibiotics by restricting its use to infectious diseases consultant to get approval for dispensing [8,9,10].

By identifying the inappropriate use of pip /taz, further regulations can be implemented to optimize the use of this medication and thus decreasing the antimicrobial drug resistance which contribute to better patient outcomes. In addition, if appropriate use of Pip/Taz is established, unnecessary hospital costs can be reduced. Hence, we conducted this study to estimate the appropriate use of Pip/Taz utilization in the surgical cardiac unit using Antibiotic stewardship guidelines as a reference.

Methods

We included all patients who were prescribed Pip/Taz for more than 24 h in cardiac surgery unit of a tertiary hospital. The patient’s demographic data, microbiology tests, renal function tests and the dose adjustment were all recorded from patients’ electronic medical records.

We prospectively followed their clinical course after the empiric initiation. Final microbial culture and sensitivity and escalation or de-escalation/discontinuation based on results and (ASG). The overall appropriate use was measured.

Analysis of the appropriateness of Pip/Taz indication, dose, frequency and duration of therapy was based on the available ASG by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

The guidelines summary is detailed below.

Pip/Taz prescription was deemed appropriate if:

  1. 1.

    Pip/ Taz was selected as an empirical therapy according to the hospital’s guidelines

  2. 2.

    It was used as an alternative antibiotic with a narrow spectrum after culture result.

  3. 3.

    The dose was adjusted with renal function of the patient.

  4. 4.

    Pip/ Taz was discontinued once the culture was negative or showed a resistant organism.

  5. 5.

    If one of these conditions was not met, the prescription was considered inappropriate.

Inclusion criteria

All adult patients 18 years or older who were admitted to cardiac surgery ward from October 2017 to February 2019 and had received Pip/Taz for 1 day or more were included in the study. An informed consent was obtained.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who had received Pip/Taz for less than 1 day.

Patients less than 18 years old or who refused to give consent.

Data analysis

The analysis was performed using SPSS software version 21. Analysis was done by using simple descriptive statistics using mean and median for continuous data.

The institutional review board at KFMC approved the study.

Results

A total of 300 patients who received at least one of day of Pip/Taz were included. Baseline characteristics, and indication of the received Pip/Taz are illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics (N = 147)

Four patients died shortly post-surgery, their initial empiric therapy was considered appropriate and were included in the study. The main reason for the initiation of Pip/Taz was empirical therapy. Only 14 cases (6.7%) were prescribed PipTaz according to culture and sensitivity tests from the beginning. Two hundred eighty-six patients (95.3%) of the cases were prescribed empirically for one spike of fever, Chest x-ray suggestive of post-operative pneumonia and or high white blood cell count (WBC). With regards to empiric use thirty six (12%) was considered inappropriate as patients continued these antibiotics for more than 5 days without any microbial test or ID (Infectious disease) consultation. In 250 patients (83.3%) culture was sent and empiric use was deemed appropriate. Subsequent follow up showed that Pip/tazo use was appropriate in 166 (55.30%).

After the culture-test results, 130 (43.3%) had no microbial growth on any culture. In 64 (21.3%) pip/taz was discontinued based on the results and hence deemed appropriate. While 66 (22%) patient continued the Pip/Taz despite negative cultures and deemed inappropriate (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Consort diagram: The overall flow of patients

One hundred twenty patients had a positive microbial culture, de-escalation to narrow spectrum antibiotics was indicated in 54 (18%) patients and was done on time (within 24 h) in 22 pts. (7.3%) but delayed > 24 h after the availability of culture-sensitivity test results was continued in 32 (10.6%) patients and deemed inappropriate.

Sixteen cases (5.3%) were resistant to Pip/Taz according to sensitivity test and Pip/Taz was changed to Meropenem and were considered appropriate. 50 (16.7%) cases were sensitive to Pip /Taz and other broad-spectrum antibiotics and continuation of treatment was justified.

Fourteen patients (4.7%) required dose adjustment based on renal functions. Most inappropriateness in dosing (8 cases) was mainly due to low dose in renal replacement therapy (5 cases) as about 25–30% of the drug is removed by dialysis and there is a need to add 0.75 mg post dialysis three times /week, while three patients had renal impairment and needed to adjust the dose with renal clearance. In 6 patients with renal issues the dosing remained appropriate.

In summary Antibiotics use was considered inappropriate if they are prescribed empirically without a culture-test request, dose was not adjusted with renal function o renal replacement therapy, if their use continued in the presence of a negative culture-test result in cases of delayed de-escalation (Fig. 1) (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 Culture and Infectious consultation
Table 3 Summary of Piperacillin/Tazobactam appropriate usage

Discussion

Pip/Taz plays an important role as empiric therapy for serious infections post-surgery. Available clinical trials have marked the safety and efficacy of Pip/Taz monotherapy in the treatment of moderate to severe infections including bacteremia associated with post-operative nosocomial infections, intravenous line associated, nosocomial respiratory tract infections, febrile neutropenia, intra-abdominal and peritoneal infections, and complicated wound infections [11, 12].

We attempted to prospectively study the journey the postoperative cardiac patient who is started on empiric Pip/taz and address the appropriateness of use of Pip/Taz in these patient and potential areas of improvement.

The empiric use of pip/taz as monotherapy was common in postoperative patients demonstrating signs of possible infection. The main reasons for initiating Pip/Taz was use was fever, or high level of white blood cells (WBCs). However potential for inappropriate use exists in complicated post-operative cardiac cases.

We were able to demonstrate the potential inappropriate use is this setting is a genuine concern.

Overall appropriate use was demonstrated in 55% of cases.

The common causes include inadequate initial work up, failure to adjust dosing and inappropriate de-escalation of antibiotics after the microbial culture results. At the time of initiation 12% of cases Pip/Taz use was inappropriate as the antibiotic was started without a culture and sensitivity test.

In a review of the literature. A study by Thomas 2015 addressed the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy in adult ICUs, 333 of 660 (50%) of the empiric antibiotics were continued for at least 72 h and half of all empiric antibiotics ordered in critically ill patients are continued for at least 72 h in absence of adjudicated infection [13].

A study by Rattanaumpawan and Youssif concluded that Piperacillin/tazobactam, Imipenem, and Meropenem were inappropriately used in 50% of hospitalized patients similar to our study [14, 15].

Two studies by Khan and Wiskirchen the rate of appropriate prescription of Pip/Taz as empiric therapy was 57.0% Most inappropriate prescriptions were found mostly in surgical wards and the surgical intensive care units which seems similar to the setting of our patients [16, 17].

Another study by Youssif found that the continuation of antibiotics based on culture and sensitivity results was justified in only 22 patients out of 163 and only 33/64 patient the antibiotics was de-escalated when indicated by culture and sensitivity results. They concluded that the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in surgical floors at a tertiary care hospital was largely unjustified by culture-test result [15].

The rate of Pip/Taz appropriate use post-cultures was 62.4%. The inappropriateness after the culture and sensitivity results was mainly due to the inability to de-escalate therapy in many cases, and the continuation of Pip/Taz therapy despite negative cultures.

As compared to the other studies, our study showed a relatively high percentage of negative cultures post culture work-up. Most patients enrolled in other studies were elderly while mean age in our study was 62.9+/− 11.3. Nonspecific sepsis like symptoms, renal impairment, metabolic acidosis, and dehydration are toxic effects of pip/Taz common in the elderly population. Failure to discontinue antibiotics post negative cultures expose this group of patients to unnecessary potential toxicity [16].

Special care is needed in patients with renal impairment or those requiring renal replacement therapies. Although not a major cause of inappropriate use in our study. Other studies have show this to be n important cause. With regards of appropriate dosing of Pip/Taz a study involving 185 patients the rate of appropriateness of dosing in renal impaired patients was 77.8%.

Finally, we noticed about 15% patients were prescribed Pip/Taz without a culture, sensitivity test request. We found that the improper empirical prescribe of Pip/Taz without culture work up is a common practice among cardiac surgeons with risk of infection after surgery, or even in patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis like fever and elevated white-blood-cell count.

The utilization and appropriate use of empiric antibiotics can be improved. Application of guidelines have been associated with better overall appropriate use, antibiotics Stewardship guidelines application has shown to improve overall correct use of antibiotics and potentially the overall cost [18].

In general, the physicians require good knowledge and experience about the use of antibiotics for management of nosocomial infections as per available guidelines. Differential diagnosis and the comorbidities of the critical ill subjects involved should be considered. It is important to modify antimicrobial therapy according to the sensitivity results in order to reduce costs, decrease the development of resistance and minimize the incidence of side effects and shortage [17, 19,20,21].

Physicians should be vigilant about the need to stop and deescalate therapy when appropriate and early consultations with infectious disease services should be encouraged when nosocomial infections are suspected or documented. Modifications or de-escalation of antimicrobials help in minimizing the cost and reduce resistance.

Conclusion

Our study highlights that there is a major potential for improvement in the appropriate utilization of use of Pip/Taz specially in surgical wards. This improvement can be a multilevel starting with appropriate initiation of empiric therapy to observing the culture and sensitivity results, appropriate escalations and de-escalations according to results. Early discontinuations when appropriate and being vigilant for dose modifications as many patients can have renal impairment post operatively. These multistep interventions will result is overall appropriate utilization of these antibiotics. It will certainly reduce the incidence of overall resistance, potentially reduce toxicity and can reduce the overall health care costs. Also the application of guidelines like implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship program will help in improving the clinical practice. Education and training the staff aiming at a more appropriate use of antibiotics use has been identified [22, 23].

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

IDSA:

Infectious Disease Society of America

IRB:

The Institutional Review Board

WBCs:

White Blood Cells

References

  1. 1.

    Machka K, Dickert H, Braveny I. In vitro activity of piperacillin compared with that of ampicillin, ticarcillin, azlocillin, and mezlocillin. Arzneimittelforschung. 1980;30(2):304–7.

  2. 2.

    File TM Jr, Tan JS. Efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam in skin and soft tissue infections. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994;573:51–5.

  3. 3.

    Takamuro M, Watanabe A. Clinical studies on tazobactam/piperacillin (YP-14) in the pediatric field. Jpn J Antibiot. 1998;51(5):319–24.

  4. 4.

    Di Pentima MC, et al. Antimicrobial prescription errors in hospitalized children: role of antimicrobial stewardship program in detection and intervention. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009;48(5):505–12.

  5. 5.

    Mehta JM, et al. Comparison of prior authorization and prospective audit with feedback for antimicrobial stewardship. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(9):1092–9.

  6. 6.

    Pathak A, et al. High prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing pathogens: results of a surveillance study in two hospitals in Ujjain, India. Infect Drug Resist. 2012;5:65–73.

  7. 7.

    Ostrowsky B, et al. Lessons learned from implementing Clostridium difficile-focused antibiotic stewardship interventions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(Suppl 3):S86–95.

  8. 8.

    Al-Tawfiq JA, et al. Restrictive reporting of selected antimicrobial susceptibilities influences clinical prescribing. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8(3):234–41.

  9. 9.

    Hanberger H, et al. Antibiotic consumption and antibiotic stewardshipin Swedish hospitals. Ups J Med Sci. 2014;119(2):154–61.

  10. 10.

    de With K, Allerberger F, Amann S. Strategies to enhance rational use of antibiotics in hospital: a guideline by the German Society for Infectious Diseases. Infection. 2016;44(3):395–439.

  11. 11.

    Cerceo E, et al. Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospital setting: overview, implications for clinical practice, and emerging treatment options. Microb Drug Resist. 2016;22(5):412–31.

  12. 12.

    Ohlin B, et al. Piperacillin/tazobactam compared with cefuroxime/ metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Eur J Surg. 1999;165(9):875–84.

  13. 13.

    Thomas Z, et al. A multicenter evaluation of prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy in adult ICUs in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(12):2527–34.

  14. 14.

    Rattanaumpawan P, Sutha P, Thamlikitkul V. Effectiveness of drug use evaluation and antibiotic authorization on patients' clinical outcomes, antibiotic consumption, and antibiotic expenditures. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(1):38–43.

  15. 15.

    Youssif E, Aseeri M, Khoshhal S. Retrospective evaluation of piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem used on surgical floors at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11(4):486–90.

  16. 16.

    Khan FY, et al. Evaluation of the use of piperacillin/tazobactam (Tazocin) at Hamad general hospital, Qatar: are there unjustified prescriptions? Infect Drug Resist. 2012;5:17–21.

  17. 17.

    Wiskirchen DE, et al. Inpatient antibiotic resistance: Everyone’s problem. J Fam Pract. 2018;67(2):E1–E11.

  18. 18.

    King S, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship: the effectiveness of educational interventions to change risk-related Behaviours in the general population: a systematic review. Rand Health Q. 2016;5(3):2.

  19. 19.

    Barber KE, et al. Impact of piperacillin-tazobactam shortage on meropenem use: implications for antimicrobial stewardship programs. Braz J Infect Dis. 2016;20(6):631–4.

  20. 20.

    Gundlapalli AV, et al. Antimicrobial agent shortages: the new norm for infectious diseases physicians. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(4):ofy068.

  21. 21.

    Owens RC Jr, Rice L. Hospital-based strategies for combating resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(Suppl 4):S173–81.

  22. 22.

    Livermore DM, et al. In vitro activity of piperacillin/tazobactam and other broad-spectrum antibiotics against bacteria from hospitalised patients in the British Isles. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;22(1):14–27.

  23. 23.

    Jones RN, et al. Antipseudomonal activity of piperacillin/tazobactam: more than a decade of experience from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1997-2007). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;65(3):331–4.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very thankful to all cardiac surgery unit staff and to all patients who participated. Gratitude is also extended to KFMC research center for their support.

Funding

The author did not receive any fund for this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sanaa Mekdad contributed the idea, writing the proposal, submitting it for all necessary approval, IRB approval, responsible to respond to any comments from IRB. Progress reports, manuscript writing and submitting the manuscript for publications and being the corresponding author. Leenah AlSayed contributed in study design, reviewing the proposal before submission for approval, collecting data, recruiting subjects, analysis of data and review of manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanaa Saeed Mekdad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We obtained IRB approval for the study from our institution KFMC, with IRB NO:

Consent for publication

Consent was obtained for publication by IRB (Institution Review Board) of King Fahd Medical City and approved for publication.

Competing interests

Authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mekdad, S.S., AlSayed, L. Prospective evaluating the appropriate use of piperacillin /tazobactam in cardiac center of a tertiary care hospital. J Cardiothorac Surg 15, 70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01109-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Drug utilization review
  • Piperacillin-Tazobactam
  • Rational use of pip/Taz
  • Antibiotic stewardship program, De-escalation of antibiotics