Skip to main content

Cardiac operation under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy

Abstract

Background

Certain pregnant women suffer from cardiac pathology,and a few of them need cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy. Feto-neonatal and maternal outcomes have not been sufficiently described.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 22 cases of women undergoing cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy in our hospital from Jan.2014 to Mar.2019.

Results

All 22 patients were alive after treatment. The types of cardiac disorders included congenital heart defects, rheumatic heart disease,infective endocarditis,aortic dissection, obstruction and/or thrombosis of a prosthetic valve. Only one case was a twin pregnancy,and the other 21 cases were singletons. Four fetuses died in the utero after surgery. Three patients chose termination of the pregnancy after the cardiac operations: one fetus was detected abnormity of the brain and the other two patients abandoned pregnancy. Fourteen fetuses were alive and born without any abnormity. Two fetuses suffered from neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and died after birth.

Conclusions

Cardiac operation under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy is a challenge for physicians in multidisciplinary teams. Strictly evaluating the indication is vital. On the other hand, some patients can benefit from this management.

Peer Review reports

Background

Heart disease complicates more than 1% of pregnancies and is now the leading cause of indirect maternal deaths [1]. Pregnancy creates a great burden on the cardiovascular system and can result in decompensation in women with underlying cardiac disease. To minimize the maternal and fetal risks, the first choice of treatment should be medical. In cases that are refractory to medical treatment, however, corrective cardiac operations should be undertaken [2]. As the Guangdong provincial obstetrical cardiology intensive care center in China, our hospital has accumulated a significant amount of clinical data of pregnant women with heart disease receiving cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy. To investigate feto-neonatal and maternal outcomes, we conducted this study.

Materials and methods

Subject

We searched in our medical record database from Jan.2014 to Mar.2019. The search terms included “pregnancy”, “cardiopulmonary bypass” and “cardiac operation”. We obtained 22 copies of the patients’ medical materials containing the entire pregnancy course and fetal outcomes with their consent.

NYHA classes

The NYHA classification was developed in 1928 to describe an overall cardiac appraisal of the status of a patient with heart disease. It was divided into four classes [3]: Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in a slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV:Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

Cardioplegia technique

Adequate myocardial protection is essential for achieving successful outcomes of any surgical procedure necessitating cardiac arrest. The Del Nido solution (blood and crystalloid mixed formula) was used in all the cardiac operations of our study. The route of administration was antegrade or combined antegrade & retrograde.

Cardiac surgical procedures

Corrective cardiac operations consisted of mitral or/and tricuspid valve repair, aortic valve replacement (AVR),mitral valve replacement (MVR), ruptured sinus of Valsalva repair, atrial septal defect closure, ventricular septal defect closure, right ventricle outlet obstruction repair, prosthetic mitral/aortic valve thrombectomy and Betall procedure.

Maternal, fetal and neonatal complications after operation

The most common maternal complication was arrhythmia after operation. Fetal and neonatal complications included stillbirth, preterm delivery (< 37 weeks of gestation), neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and death.

Statistical analysis

A retrospective analysis was performed. Measurement data and enumeration data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequencies.

Results

Patient general information

The average age of the patients was 29.5 ± 5.4 years, with an age range of 21 to 42 years. Half the patients were nulliparous (n = 12, 54.5%). There was one twin pregnancy(n = 1, 4.5%)and the other patients were singletons(n = 21, 95.5%). The patient’s characteristics are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient’s characteristics

Cardiac surgical procedure, intraoperatory parameters and fetal outcomes

There were 22 patients with different types of heart diseases who received cardiac operations under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy. The composition and proportion distribution of these patients by the type of heart disease,weeks of gestation during operation, NYHA functional classification, cardiac surgical procedure, intraoperatory parameters and fetal outcomes are presented in Table 1,Table 2 and Table 3.

Table 2 Cardiac surgical procedure, intraoperatory parameters and fetal outcomes
Table 3 Summary of indications for cardiac operation

Feto-neonatal and maternal outcomes

All 22 patients were alive after treatment. Three cases were complicated by arrhythmia after operations, especially atrial fibrillation, which needed medications. Four fetuses died in the utero after operations. Three patients chose termination of the pregnancy: one fetus was detected a brain abnormity and the other two patients abandoned pregnancy. Fourteen fetuses were alive and born without any abnormity. Two fetuses had complicated neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and died after birth. Feto-neonatal outcomes and mode of delivery are presented in Table 4.

Table 4 Feto-neonatal outcomes and mode of delivery

Discussion

Heart disease is the primary cause of maternal and fetal death in 1–4% of pregnancies. Pregnancy creates an increased burden on the maternal cardiovascular system and can result in decompensation in women with underlying cardiac disease. To minimize the maternal and fetal risks, the first choice of treatment should be medical. However, in some cases, medical therapy is not always sufficient,and open heart operation might be necessary [4]. In 1958, Leyse and colleagues [5] first used cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a heart operation during pregnancy. After the initial trials, pregnant women have been recognized to tolerate CPB as well as non-pregnant women, but the effects of CPB on the fetus have varied [6]. Several review articles, reported the maternal mortality rate ranged from 1.5 to 5%, and the fetal mortality rate has ranged from 16 to 33% [4, 6]. Currently, reported maternal mortality for cardiac operations is similar to the mortality rate for non-pregnant female patients [7]. Therefore, CPB during pregnancy has a greater effect on the fetus than mother. In our report, the maternal mortality rate was 0%,and fetal mortality rate was 18.2%, as same as the above mentioned reviews.

The present study demonstrated that mitral and/or aortic valve disorders were the most common surgical indications for CPB during pregnancy, although it has been recognized that coronary arterial disease is increasingly prevalent in gynecological patients [8]. The latter, however, could be managed interventionally in most patients, avoiding the risk associated with CPB for feto-neo-natal outcomes. In our report, the indications for surgical procedure under CPB during pregnancy consisted of congenital heart defect (ASD, DCRV, VSD), rheumatic heart disease (mitral or aortic valve disorders),infective endocarditis,aortic dissection, obstruction and thrombosis of the prosthetic valve. Seven patients (all with a congenital heart defect)accompanied moderate to severe PAH, which could result in sudden death and greatly increase the maternal and fetal risk. Consequently, we performed cardiac operations during pregnancy to maintain the pregnancy and to decrease the risk of adverse feto-neonatal outcomes. Other indications were life-threatening diseases, such as severe MS/AR, infective endocarditis,aortic dissection (Stanford type A), obstruction and thrombosis of the prosthetic valve. All patients were alive,and 3 cases had complicated arrhythmia after operations, especially atrial fibrillation. There were no other complications. The results indicate that cardiac operations can be performed during pregnancy with remarkable safety for mothers.

Pregnant women who have cardiac operations requiring CPB must face a nonphysiologic hemodynamic status where the tolerance is not clearly known, which can adversely affect the fetus [4]. CPB can compromise utero-placental perfusion and fetal development by potential adverse effects such as coagulation and blood component alterations, the release of vasoactive substances from leukocytes, complement activation, particulate and air embolism, nonpulsatile flow, hypothermia and hypotension [2].Three main pathophysiological changes can occur in pregnant patients under CPB: uterine contraction, placental hypo-perfusion and fetal hypoxia. Utero-placental hypo-perfusion and fetal hypoxia subjected to sustained uterine contractions during CPB are considered risk factors for fetal death [9]. Despite the limited experimental data regarding the effect of CPB on uterine/placental blood flow and its effect on the fetus, it has been postulated that pulsatile, high-flow, high-pressure, normothermic bypass poses the least risk to the fetus [10, 11].According to the above theories we applied high-flow, high-pressure, normothermic bypass to the patients and shortened the operation time to greatly decrease the influence on the fetus. Finally,the fetuses gained good outcomes,and the mortality rate was 18.2%, lower than that reported in recent literature. Fourteen fetuses were alive and born without any abnormity. Unfortunately, two fetuses suffered neonatal intracranial hemorrhage and died after birth. However, we do not think it was associated with the operation or the CPB during pregnancy. The inappropriate use of Warfarin after operations was the main cause. The results indicate that cardiac operations can be performed during pregnancy with a degree of safety for fetus.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the decision to subject a pregnant woman to operation must be made by a team composed of an obstetrician, a cardiologist, an anesthesiologist and a neonatologist. Cardiac operation under CPB during pregnancy is a challenge for physicians in multidisciplinary teams. Strictly evaluating the indication is vital. On the other hand, some patients can benefit from this form of case management.

Availability of data and materials

The data were presented in the main manuscript.

Abbreviations

y:

Year

kg:

Kilogram

w:

Week

S:

Singleton

T:

Twin

mm:

Millimetre

L:

Litre

ASD:

Atrial septal defect

VSD:

Ventricular septal defect

MR:

Mitral valve regurgitation

DCRV:

Double cavity of right ventricle

MS:

Mitral valve stenosis

AR:

Aortic valve regurgitation

IE:

Infective endocarditis

MR:

Mitral valve regurgitation

PAH:

Pulmonary artery hypertension

AD:

Aortic dissection

AS:

Aortic valve stenosis

AVR:

Aortic valve replacement

MVR:

Mitral valve replacement

SD:

Standard deviation

CPB:

Cardiopulmonary bypass

References

  1. Simpson LL. Maternal cardiac disease: update for the clinician. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Pt 1):345–59. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318242e260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chambers CE, Clark SL. Cardiac surgery during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37:316–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hurst JW. The value of using the entire New York heart Association’s classification of heart and vascular disease. Clin Cardiol. 2006;29:415–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahli A, Izdes S, Coskun D. Cardiac operations during pregnancy: review of factors influencing fetal outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 May;69(5):1622–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01178-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leyse R, Ofstun M, Dillard DH, Merendino KA. Congenital aortic stenosis in pregnancy, corrected by extracorporeal circulation: offering a viable male infant at term but with anomalies eventuating in this death at four months of age—report of case. JAMA. 1961;176:1009–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker RM. Intracardiac surgery in pregnant women. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;36:453–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gopal K, Hudson IM, Ludmir J, Braffman MN, Ewing S, Bavaria JE, Wong KL, Bridges CR. Homograft aortic root replacement during pregnancy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(1):243–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03590-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jantzen J-P, Bader W. The cardiac risk patient presenting for gynecological surgery. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2011;71:183–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan SM. Indications for cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy and impact on fetal outcomes. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014 Jan;74(1):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Westaby S, Parry AJ, Forfar JC. Reoperation for prosthetic valve endocarditis in the third trimester of pregnancy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:263–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(92)91329-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pomini F, Mercogliano D, Cavalletti C, Caruso A, Pomini P. Cardiopulmonary bypass in pregnancy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:259–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00818-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the physicians involved in the treatment, as well as the financial supports.

Funding

This work was supported by the Chinese National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFC1002600],the Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province [No. 2014A050503048,2017A070701013,2017B090904034 and 2017B030314109,2019B3020230003], Guangdong Peak Project [No. DFJH201802] and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yanli Liu: design the study, collect and analyze the data and write the paper. Fengzhen Han: design the study and explain the data. Jian Zhuang: financial and professional support. Xiaoqing Liu: professional support. Jimei Chen: financial and professional support. Huanlei Huang: professional support. Sheng Wang: professional support. Chengbin Zhou: professional support. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fengzhen Han or Jian Zhuang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms and also have abided by the statement of ethical standards.

Consent for publication

All of the authors agree to the publication of the article.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Han, F., Zhuang, J. et al. Cardiac operation under cardiopulmonary bypass during pregnancy. J Cardiothorac Surg 15, 92 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01136-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01136-9

Keywords