- Letter to the Editor
- Open access
- Published:
Comment on “The diagnostic value of D-dimer with simplified Geneva score (SGS) pre-test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE)”
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 15, Article number: 246 (2020)
Abstract
Any decision in clinical practice needs to evaluate both reliability (precision) and validity (accuracy) of a diagnostic test. Without knowledge about the reliability, any judgment would be wrong. In diagnostic accuracy research, it is essential to evaluate the diagnostic added value of a test, since a diagnostic accuracy of a single test might be excellent, however for clinical purposes it can be worthless. Like evaluating discrimination, it would be possible to estimate the diagnostic added value by applying ROC of diagnostic model with and without test results in the model.
To the Editor.
I read the paper from Zhihui Fu et al. published in J Cardiothorac Surg [1]. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic value of D-dimer with simplified Geneva score (SGS) pre-test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). In a retrospective analysis, 1035 patients with suspected PE were recruited. All enrolled patients were grouped according to the computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) results: PE patients and non-PE patients. Then, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were constructed to determine the optimal D-dimer cutoff point value which is based on Yonden’s index (YI).
Although I appreciate this significant study, I would like to raise some methodological issues that can affect the interpretation of results. First, any decision in clinical practice needs to evaluate both reliability (precision) and validity (accuracy) of CTPA. Without knowledge about the reliability, any judgment would be wrong [2,3,4,5,6]. Second, in diagnostic accuracy research, it is essential to evaluate the diagnostic added value of CTPA, since a diagnostic accuracy of a single test might be excellent, however for clinical purposes it can be worthless. Like evaluating discrimination, it would be possible to estimate the diagnostic added value by applying ROC of diagnostic model with and without CTPA [2, 7, 8]. Hence, we suggest the authors to estimate both diagnostic added value and reliability of the CTPA by an appropriate method.
Availability of data and materials
NA
Abbreviations
- SGS:
-
Simplified Geneva Score
- CTPA:
-
Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiogram
- ROC:
-
Receiver Operating Characteristic
- YI:
-
Yonden’s Index
References
Zhihui F, Zhuang X, He Y, Huang H, Guo W. The diagnostic value of D-dimer with simplified Geneva score (SGS) pre-test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jul 20;15(1):176.
Grobbee DE, Hoes AW. Clinical epidemiology: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2014.
Sabour S. Reproducibility of dynamic Scheimpflug-based pneumotonometer and its correlation with a dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry device: methodological issues. Cornea. 2015;34:14–5.
Sabour S, Rutten A, van der Schouw YT, Atsma F, Grobbee DE, Mali WP, et al. Inter-scan reproducibility of coronary calcium measurement using multi detector-row computed tomography (MDCT). Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:235–43.
Sabour S. Reproducibility of semi-automatic coronary plaque quantification in coronary CT angiography with sub-mSv radiation dose; common mistakes. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:21–2.
Naderi M, Sabour S. Reproducibility of diagnostic criteria associated with atypical breast cytology: a methodological issue. Cytopathology. 2018;29:396.
Sabour S. A common mistake in assessing the diagnostic value of a test: failure to account for statistical and methodologic issues. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1182–3.
Sabour S, Ghassemi F. Accuracy, validity, and reliability of the infrared optical head tracker (IOHT). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:4776.
Acknowledgements
NA
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization; Writing - Review & Editing; Methodology; Validation. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
NA
Consent for publication
NA
Competing interests
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Sabour, S. Comment on “The diagnostic value of D-dimer with simplified Geneva score (SGS) pre-test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE)”. J Cardiothorac Surg 15, 246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01301-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01301-0