Skip to main content
Download PDF

Developing a new predictive index for anastomotic leak following the anastomosis of esophageal atresia: preliminary results from a single centre

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 17, Article number: 131 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to determine a predictive index for the risk of anastomotic leak following esophageal atresia anastomosis,

Methods

This article reviewed the clinical data of 74 children with esophageal atresia in Fujian Children's hospital. The risk factors for anastomotic leak were analysed, and a new predictive index was proposed.

Results

The incidence of anastomotic leak was 29.7% after anastomosis in 74 children with esophageal atresia. Birth weight and gap length were risk factors for anastomotic leak. Logistic regression analysis showed that birth weight (Wald 2 = 4.528, P = 0.033, OR = 0.273) was a protective factor for anastomotic leak, whereas gap length (Wald 2 = 7.057, P = 0.008, OR = 2.388) was a risk factor for anastomotic leak. The ratio of gap length to birth weight had a positive predictive effect on the occurrence of anastomotic leak (AUC = 0.732, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Birth weight and gap length are important predictors of anastomotic leak in esophageal atresia. Measurement of the ratio of gap length to birth weight is a helpful predictive index for anastomotic leak following the anastomosis of esophageal atresia.

Peer Review reports

Background

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a congenital disruption of esophageal continuity with or without tracheal fistula (TEF). Up to 55% of affected infants may have other congenital malformations, especially complicated congenital heart disease (CHD), which is an important factor in poor prognosis [1]. Great progress has been made in the treatment of EA in the past 20 years. The overall survival rate is more than 90%, and thoracoscopic surgery has gradually replaced open surgery as the main surgical procedure [2].

Anastomotic leak is defined as esophageal rupture caused by poor anastomotic healing after esophageal reconstruction surgery, which is the most common complication after esophageal surgery and the main cause of death [2]. Anastomotic leak is still a serious complication of EA and has an important influence on the prognosis and the quality of life of affected infants [3, 4]. We hope to propose high-risk factors for esophageal anastomotic leak and find new risk assessment indicators.

Method

The study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave written informed consent to use their infant’s data for this study after being educated about the nature of the study, potential risks and how their data may be used. Patient and Public Involvement was not implemented in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination of our research.

Patient and public involvement

This study was conducted retrospectively in a provincial hospital along the southeast coast of China. From January 2016 to June 2020, we collected 74 infants with type III EA, including 51 males and 23 females. The inclusion criteria were infants with complete clinical data after successful surgical treatment. All infants were operated on by the same general thoracic surgeon. In this study, children who were underwent staged surgery (stage I TEF resection and stage II anastomosis after natural esophageal extension) were excluded.

Type III esophageal atresia is the most common clinical type in the classification of EA. The classification of EA classification comes from the Vgot classification. The 74 patients included in this study all had type IIIb esophageal atresia (according to the Vogt classification).

Selection of operative methods

For the selection of surgical methods, we believe that the criteria for the exclusion of thoracoscopic surgery are the cases with birth weight < 1500 g, unable to stabilize physiological parameters (circulatory failure and respiratory failure) or major cardiac abnormalities [5, 6]. For these children, we tend to choose open surgery.

Data collection

General data were collected through the medical record system, including sex, birth weight, gestational age, preoperative mechanical ventilation, and CHD status. The albumin data came from preoperative blood tests. The length of the EA defect was determined by measuring the distance between the two ends of the oesophagus after esophageal disconnection. The operative time, the amount of blood loss and the number of anastomotic lines were obtained by summarizing the operative records. A diagnosis of anastomotic leak was confirmed by the presence of contrast leakage on esophageal contrast studies. Preoperative mechanical ventilation was defined as ventilator assistance required before surgery due to the following: respiratory failure caused by tracheesophageal fistula, gastresophageal reflux and gastrointestinal flatulence.

Data analysis

The data were analysed using SPSS Statistics, version 22.0 software (Armonk, NY; IBM Corp.). Univariate analysis was used for risk factors. ANOVA was used for continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for discontinuous variables. Binomial regression analysis was used for logistic regression analysis, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to indicate associations. A P value < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 lists the general characteristics of the infants. There were 51 male and 23 female infants. The average gestational age of the infants was 38.54 ± 1.81 weeks, and the average birth weight was 2.82 ± 0.52 kg. Seventeen infants had CHD preoperatively, and 5 were intubated preoperatively. Among them, 43 patients underwent thoracoscopic surgery, and 31 patients underwent open surgery. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 29.7% (22 in 74). In our study, 17 children were complicated with CHD (5 ventricular septal defects, 7 atrial septal defects, 4 patent ductus arteriosus and 1 tetralogy of Fallot), and the study showed that CHD did not increase the risk of esophageal anastomotic leak (P = 0.721).

Table 1 General characteristics of the infants
Full size table

Table 2 shows the univariate results for factors influencing anastomotic leak including the following: preoperative albumin (F = 4.833, P = 0.031), birth weight (F = 5.427, P = 0.023) and length of EA defect (F = 8.08, P = 0.006). Factors that did not influence anastomotic leak formation included the following: operation time, blood loss, and stitch number required for anastomosis.

Table 2 The differences of the risk factors between two groups
Full size table

Table 3 shows the results of logistic regression analysis. Birth weight (Wald 2 = 4.528, P = 0.033, OR = 0.273) was a protective factor against anastomotic leak, while gap length (Wald 2 = 7.057, P = 0.008, OR = 2.388) was a risk factor for anastomotic leak.

Table 3 The results of logistic regression analysis
Full size table

Table 4 shows that the ratio of gap length to birth weight in the anastomotic leak group was significantly higher than that in the no-nanastomotic leak group (0.71 ± 0.49 vs. 0.47 ± 0.32, P = 0.012). Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis method, the area under the curve (AUC) of this indicator was found to be 0.732 (Fig. 1), which means that the ratio of gap length to birth weight had a good predictive effect on the occurrence of anastomotic leak.

Table 4 The data and results of ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve

Full size image

Discussion

EA is one of the most dangerous diseases in paediatric surgery. Improvements in surgical techniques and postoperative care have improved the survival rate for EA [7]. Despite esophageal anastomosis, infants often face severe infection and even death caused by anastomotic leak. In the past, most of these patients were successfully treated conservatively with observation, drainage and the use of antibiotics. In 1990, MacKinnon was the first to propose that EA anastomotic leak was directly related to anastomotic tension [8]. Anastomotic leak is a serious complication after EA, which can lead to serious chest infection and even the possibility of refractory stenosis [9].

Possible factors associated with its onset include a poor anastomotic technique, the use of woven sutures, a two-layer anastomosis, a long-gap EA, blood transfusion, anastomosis under tension and gastresophageal reflux [10]. Factors associated with mortality included a delayed diagnosis, premature birth, low birth weight and the presence of CHD. In the Spitz classification, patients with a birth weight of more than 1.5 kg are classified as a low-risk group; however, it is still possible to be classified as a group with high mortality and poor prognosis in the Waterston classification because of severe congenital malformations [11]. In our study, the incidence of anastomotic leak was 29.7%. We found that the birth weight of the anastomotic leak group was lower than that of the non-anastomotic leak group (2.61 ± 0.58 vs. 2.91 ± 0.47, P = 0.023). Nine of seventeen infants with CHD weighed less than 2.5 kg. Low birth weight is often associated with a history of premature delivery, foetal distress and heart malformation [12]. Low birth weight may be associated with poorer peripheral circulation and lower cardiac output, which may lead to a poor blood supply at the local anastomotic site. [13].

Survival is directly related to birth weight and CHD status. Infants weighing over 1500 g with no major cardiac problems had nearly 100% survival, whereas the presence of one risk factor reduced survival to 80%, and when both risk factors were present survival was further reduced to 30–50% [14]. Folaranmi indicated that the probability of esophageal anastomosis increased significantly with increasing body weight. His results showed that birth weight was a significant variable associated with the probability of primary esophageal anastomosis (OR = 1.009, P = 0.004) [15]. A study from Turkey also reported a significantly higher incidence of anastomotic leak in very-low-birth-weight infants compared with cases in the low- and normal-birth-weight groups [16]. Our study showed that CHD did not increase the risk of esophageal anastomotic leak (P = 0.721). This is consistent with the conclusions of Japanese scholars, who believe that CHD has nothing to do with anastomotic leak or stenosis [17]. Another study found no evidence that thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia impaired outcomes in children with congenital heart disease [18]. More interestingly, survival after treatment for EA was not influenced by the presence of, or the accuracy of, the diagnosis of CHD in this series. With only a few exceptions, associated CHD should not change the strategies of EA repair [19].

In clinical practice, we found that infants with anastomotic leak had lower perioperative albumin. Low albumin is an independent risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leak of the oesophagus [20]. A low patient albumin level preoperatively may result in postoperative anastomotic oedema, which also increases anastomotic tension. Preoperative albumin levels in the anastomotic leak group were noticeably lower than those in the non-anastomotic leak group. However, in multiple factor analysis, albumin levels were not included in the regression equation, which may be related to the fact that the number of cases with low albumin levels (albumin < 28 g/L) was lower. The sample size should be further expanded to find a more appropriate cut-off value to evaluate the relationship between albumin level and the incidence of anastomotic leak.

The treatment of long-gap EA is still difficult [21]. There is an increased risk of anastomotic leakage in long-gap EA. It usually requires extensive mobilization of the esophageal stump, which may impair the vascular supply to the oesophagus and consequently impair the healing ability of the anastomotic site [22]. Surgeons should carefully anastomose under low tension to prevent anastomotic complications during the initial repair of EA/TEF [23]. In this study, the average defect length was 1.52 ± 0.95 cm and 1.98 ± 1.08 cm in the anastomotic leak group and 1.33 ± 0.82 cm in the non-anastomotic leak group, and the difference was statistically significant. Serious anastomotic leak was found in 6 of the 8 patients with long-gap EA. A long gap is an independent risk factor for anastomotic leak. We believe that delayed anastomosis of a long segment defect may be a better choice, especially for infants with a gap length > 3 cm (intraoperative or preoperative), and the timing of anastomosis should be carefully determined.

Using the receiver operating curve, the AUC of this indicator was found to be 0.732, which had a good predictive value. We believe the index can be used as a good predictor of anastomotic leak during the perioperative period. For infants with a preoperative evaluation of the ratio of loss length to birth weight greater than 0.7, esophageal extension and gastrostomy should be considered. Anastomosis can be attempted after the natural extension of the oesophagus within the chest reaches a gap length of less than 3 cm, therefore, delayed repair may be a better choice [24].

As with any retrospective study, there is bias associated with data collection; this study was limited to one institution, and other institutions may have produced different results. A prospective study with a large group of patients and long-term follow-up is necessary.

Conclusions

Birth weight and gap length are important predictors of anastomotic leak in EA. Our study shows that the ratio of gap length to birth weight index had a good predictive effect on the occurrence of anastomotic leak after anastomosis of EA.

Availability of data and material

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

EA:

Esophageal atresia

TEF:

Tracheal fistula

CHD:

Congenital heart disease

OR:

Odds ratio

95% CI:

95% Confidence intervals

ROC:

Operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under curve

VATS:

Video-assisted thoracic surgery

References

  1. Cassina M, Ruol M, Pertile R, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and survival of children with esophageal atresia: a 32-year population-based study including 1,417,724 consecutive newborns. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106:542–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rothenberg S. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula in neonates: the current state of the art. Pediatr Surg Int. 2014;30:979–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Legrand C, Michaud L, Salleron J, et al. Long-term outcome of children with oesophageal atresia type III. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(9):808–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dingemann C, Meyer A, Kircher G, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life after complex and/or complicated esophageal atresia in adults and children registered in a German patient support group. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(4):631–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elbarbary MM, Shalaby A, Elseoudi M, et al. Outcome of thoracoscopic repair of type-C esophageal atresia: a single-center experience from North Africa. Dis Esophagus. 2020;33:doaa001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zani A, Lamas-Pinheiro R, Paraboschi I, et al. Intraoperative acidosis and hypercapnia during thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27:841–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Lennep M, Singendonk MM, Dall’Oglio L, et al. Oesophageal atresia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mckinnon LJ, Kosloske AM. Prediction and prevention of anastomotic complications of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 1990;25(7):778–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baird R, Laberge JM, Lévesque D. Anastomotic stricture after esophageal atresia repair: a critical review of recent literature. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013;23:204–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spitz L, Kiely EM, Brereton RJ. Esophageal atresia: five year experience with 148 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1987;22(2):103–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Niramis R, Tangkhabuanbut P, Anuntkosol M, et al. Clinical outcomes of esophageal atresia: comparison between the Waterston and the Spitz classifications. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2013;42:297–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anil KC, Basel PL, Singh S. Low birth weight and its associated risk factors: health facility-based case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0234907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinoshita M, Hawkes CP, Ryan CA, et al. Perfusion index in the very preterm infant. J Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:e398-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spitz L. Oesophageal atresia. J Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Folaranmi SE, Jawaid WB, Gavin L, et al. Influence of birth weight on primary surgical management of newborns with esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 2020;56(5):929–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oztan MO, Soyer T, Oztorun CI, et al. Outcome of very low and low birth weight infants with esophageal atresia: results of the Turkish esophageal atresia registry. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2020;31(03):226–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishimaru T, Fujiogi M, Michihata N, et al. Impact of congenital heart disease on outcomes after primary repair of esophageal atresia: a retrospective observational study using a nationwide database in Japan. J Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35:1077–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandes E, Kusel A, Evans S, et al. Is thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair safe in the presence of cardiac anomalies? J Pediatr Surg. 2020;55:1511–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Encinas JL, Luis AL, Avila LF, et al. Impact of preoperative diagnosis of congenital heart disease on the treatment of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;22:150–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang J, Zhou Y, Wang C, et al. Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal-cardiac cancer. J Thorac Cancer. 2017;8:666–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stadil T, Koivusalo A, Svensson JF, et al. Surgical treatment and major complications within the first year of life in newborns with long-gap esophageal atresia gross type A and B—a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(11):2242–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morini F, Conforti A, Bagolan P. Perioperative complications of esophageal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018;28:133–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Okata Y, Maeda K, Bitoh Y, et al. Evaluation of the intraoperative risk factors for esophageal anastomotic complications after primary repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32:869–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt A, Obermayr F, Lieber J, et al. Outcome of primary repair in extremely and very low-birth-weight infants with esophageal atresia/distal tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52:1567–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciated all doctors and nurses in our center for fruitful advice and discussions.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qiang Chen and Jin-Xi Huang have contributed equally to this study

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Fujian Branch of Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Fuzhou City, China

    Song-Ming Hong, Qiang Chen, Hua Cao, Jun-Jie Hong & Jin-Xi Huang

  2. Fujian Children’s Hospital, 966 Hengyu Road, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, China

    Song-Ming Hong, Qiang Chen, Hua Cao, Jun-Jie Hong & Jin-Xi Huang

  3. Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou City, China

    Song-Ming Hong, Qiang Chen, Hua Cao, Jun-Jie Hong & Jin-Xi Huang

  4. Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou City, China

    Song-Ming Hong, Qiang Chen, Hua Cao, Jun-Jie Hong & Jin-Xi Huang

Authors
  1. Song-Ming Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hua Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jun-Jie Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jin-Xi Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be submitted for publication. J-XH had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study conception and design: QC, HC. Acquisition of data: S-MH. Analysis and interpretation of data: J-JH. Drafted manuscript: S-MH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Xi Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital and strictly adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

For all manuscripts that include details and images relating to individual person, written informed consent for the publication of these details have been obtained from the parents.

Competing interests

All authors declared that they had no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, SM., Chen, Q., Cao, H. et al. Developing a new predictive index for anastomotic leak following the anastomosis of esophageal atresia: preliminary results from a single centre. J Cardiothorac Surg 17, 131 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01878-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01878-8

Keywords

  • Esophageal atresia
  • Anastomotic leak
  • Atresia gap length
  • Birth weight

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

ISSN: 1749-8090

Contact us