Skip to main content

Delayed aortic regurgitation after TEVAR procedure: a case report

Abstract

Background

Acute aortic regurgitation (AR) is uncommon condition and usually results in an emergent situation because the left ventricle does not adapt quickly due to a sudden increase in end-diastolic volume caused by the regurgitant flow. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a procedure that places a stent-graft on the lesion of thoracic aorta through a minimally invasive approach.

Case presentation

Here we report that a catheter-induced aortic valve injury associated with TEVAR can cause delayed AR, exemplified by the case of a patient who developed acute AR 42 months after TEVAR. For this, aortic valve replacement was performed and the patient was discharged without complications.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that when a catheter-related procedure is performed around the aortic valve, slight injury of the valve can cause aortic insufficiency even 3 years after surgery. Consequently, when performing a catheter-related procedure around the aortic valve, special attention is always required.

Peer Review reports

Background

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is the diastolic regurgitation of blood from the aorta into the left ventricle (LV) through a dysfunctional aortic valve [1]. Acute AR is uncommon and may result from type A aortic dissection, endocarditis or trauma, and less commonly iatrogenic causes [2]. Acute severe aortic regurgitation usually results in an emergent situation because the left ventricle does not adapt quickly due to a sudden increase in end-diastolic volume caused by regurgitant flow [2]. If not surgically corrected, cardiogenic shock may be induced.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a procedure that places a stent-graft on the lesion through a minimally invasive approach in various pathology situations of thoracic aorta and thoracoabdominal aorta [3]. TEVER is recommended for saccular aneurysm that occurs in the isthmus portion of the aorta after trauma [4].

We would like to report that catheter-induced aortic valve injury used during TEVAR can cause delayed aortic regurgitation through a case of a patient who had acute aortic regurgitation 42 months after TEVAR and was discharged after performing surgical aortic valve replacement.

Case presentation

The 58-year-old male patient visited a local hospital for traffic accident by bicycle and was transferred to this medical institution with isthmus portion saccular dissection of descending thoracic aorta (Fig. 1 A–C) and performed aortic stent graft insertion (Fig. 1D, Additional file : 1). Briefly, after ultrasound-guided femoral puncture, a Lunderquist extra-stiff wire (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) was introduced. Then, a stent graft (Valiant Captivia; 32–28 mm, tapered; length: 1150 mm; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was inserted along the pre-inserted wire. On the 7th day after the procedure, F/U aorta CT showed no endo-leakage of the stent graft and was discharged without any special complications. During the outpatient follow-up, no unusual findings were observed at 3 months, 9 months, 15 months, and 27 months follow-up. Severe aortic regurgitation with flail aortic valve movement (right coronary cusp), which was not observed when TEVAR treatment (Fig. 2 A–B, Additional file :  2), was observed on an echocardiogram performed through the emergency room of the hospital due to sudden dyspnea 42 months after the stent graft operation (Fig. 2 C–D, Additional file :  3). Resected sharp margin of the right coronary cusp was observed in the aortic valve during surgery (Fig. 3 A–B). For this, aortic valve replacement (Edwards tissue aortic valve#23mm) was performed and the patient was discharged on the 8th day of POD without any special complications.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Computed tomography of aorta and aortogram of patient and aortogram performed after stent graft insertion. A 3D reconstruction image of patient’s aorta computed tomography. B Sagittal image of patient’s aorta computed tomography. C Aortogram of patient’s aorta. D Aortogram performed after stent graft insertion. White arrow indicates saccular dissection of descending thoracic aorta

Fig. 2
figure 2

Echocardiograms performed at the time of aorta injury and 42 months after stent graft insertion. AB An echocardiogram performed on the fourth day after TEVAR (EF 61%, LVEDD/LVESD 51/34mm, LA 40 mm, LV mass index 107.5 g/m2, Aortic annulus/Sinus valsalva/Sinotubular junction/Ascending aorta 22 mm/38mm/31mm/38mm, Trivial MR, Trivial TR). CD An echocardiogram performed at the emergency room for sudden dyspnea 42 months after stent graft insertion (EF 63%, LVEDD/LVESD 90/46mm, LA 59 mm, LV mass index 169.7 g/m2, Aortic annulus/Sinus valsalva/Sinotubular junction/Ascending aorta 22 mm/35mm/27mm/ 40 mm, AR grade 4, MR grade 1, Trivial TR). (EF Ejection fraction, LVEDD Left ventricular end diastolic dimension, LVESD Left ventricular end systolic dimension, LA Left atrium, LV Left ventricle, MR Mitral valve regurgitation, TR  Tricuspid valve regurgitation,  AR Aortic valve regurgitation)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Aortic valve injury confirmed in the operating room and morphology of resected aortic valves. A Injured aortic valve confirmed after cardiopulmonary bypass before aortic valve replacement. Black arrow indicates injured aortic valve of right coronary cusp. B Morphology of resected aortic valves. Black arrow indicates injured aortic valve of right coronary cusp

Discussion and conclusions

TEVER was initially attempted in a situation where it could not be a surgical candidate, but as the procedure technique and materials have been developed, it is being considered as a therapeutic option in various situations [3]. However, it is also true that there are no prospective randomized trials for TEVAR trials. There are no long-term data compared with the open surgical approach yet, but it is a known fact that morbidity and mortality are superior in most cases, so the treatment range is highly likely to expand in the future.

Arterial dissection, iliac artery rupture, and arterial perforation are classified as complications as possible device delivery injuries during TEVAR implementation [5]. However, there is no literature review on catheter-induced aortic valve injury related to TEVAR. Recently, the bioprosthetic aortic acallop intentional laceration to prevenet coronary artery obstruction (BASILICA) procedure, a transcatheter laceration of aortic leaflet procedure, is being introduced to prevent coronary ostium obstruction that occurs after transcatheter aortic valve replacement [6]. This procedure is rather considered to be an important case showing that an aortic valve injury can occur at any time if care is not taken during the TEVAR procedure.

It is possible that the AR developed during the traffic accident. However, based on the following points, it is likely that the patient had delayed traumatic AR caused by TEVAR procedure. First, when multiple chest wall fractures occur, the traction force to the aortic isthmus is reduced; however, the aortic blood column rapidly decelerates, delivering a shock to the aortic valve and causing rupture [7, 8]. Our patient did not have multiple fractures, preventing heart displacement during trauma, leading to aortic stretching and isthmus injury, suggesting that AR was not caused by the traffic accident. Second, it has been known that traumatic AR found that rupture most commonly involves the non-coronary cusp, although it can involve the right and left coronary cusp because of coronary perfusion system [9]. Third, previous studies have reported that trauma damages the bottom of the valve near its nadir because this is its thinnest portion and it is easily torn when subjected to high pressure [10, 11]. Our patient had injury to a relatively thick part of the valve (near commissure portion).

Most of the catheter-induced aortic valve injury cases have been reported during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but traumatic aortic valve injury is known to be a very rare complication (0.0001%) in this field as well [12]. Most of these cases cause acute onset aortic regurgitation, requiring urgent surgical intervention. According to a literature review of coronary angiography and PCI-induced severe aortic regurgitation in 2021 [13], A total of 15 cases have been reported so far, but most of them were acute form of severe aortic regurgitation that occurred immediately after the procedure. As in this study, the cases accompanied by laceration of the aortic valve by the catheter were only a case that occurred 24 months later and a case that occurred 8 months later.

First, this case is meaningful in that it is the first to report catheter-induced aortic valve injury that occurred during the TEVER process, and secondly, the aortic that occurred after the longest period (42 months) among all cases including coronary angiography and PCI-induced severe aortic regurgitation. When performing a catheter-related procedure around the aortic valve, even if no particular problem is observed immediately after the procedure, a weak valve injury can cause acute aortic valve insufficiency even after 3 years, so special attention is always required.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed in this study.

Abbreviations

AR :

Aortic regurgitation

LV :

Left ventricle

TEVAR :

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair

BASILICA :

Bioprosthetic aortic acallop intentional laceration to prevenet coronary artery obstruction

PCI :

Percutaneous coronary intervention

References

  1. Maurer G. Aortic regurgitation. Heart. 2006;92(7):994–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamirani YS, Dietl CA, Voyles W, Peralta M, Begay D, Raizada V. Acute aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 2012;126(9):1121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes GC, Daneshmand MA, Swaminathan M, Nienaber JJ, Bush EL, Husain AH, et al. “Real world” thoracic endografting: results with the Gore TAG device 2 years after US FDA approval. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(5):1530–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Svensson L, Kouchoukos N, Miller D, Bavaria J, Coselli J, Curi M, et al. Society of thoracic surgeons endovascular surgery task force. Expert consensus document on the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease using endovascular stent-grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(1 Suppl):1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SW, Lee KB, Napolitano MA, Murillo-Berlioz AE, Sattah AP, Sarin S, et al. Complications and management of the thoracic endovascular aortic repair. AORTA. 2020;8(03):049–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan JM, Dvir D, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, Rogers T, Aldea G, et al. Transcatheter laceration of aortic leaflets to prevent coronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: concept to first-in-human. JACC: Cardiovasc Interventions. 2018;11(7):677–89.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Proudfit WL, McCormack LJ. Rupture of the aortic valve. Circulation. 1956;13(5):750–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LUNDEVALL J. The mechanism of traumatic rupture of the aorta. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica. 1964;62(1):34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Turk T, Vural H, Ata Y, Eris C, Yavuz S. Acute aortic insufficiency after blunt chest trauma: a case report. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;48(3):359.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Obadia J, Tatou E, David M. Aortic valve regurgitation caused by blunt chest injury. Heart. 1995;74(5):545–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Unal M, Demirsoy E, Gogus A, Arbatli H, Hamzaoglu A, Sonmez B. Acute aortic valve regurgitation secondary to blunt chest trauma. Tex Heart Inst J. 2001;28(4):312.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ong G, Bagur R, Barbeau G, Couture C, Trahan S, Déry J-P. Severe aortic regurgitation after transradial percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation: Cardiovasc Interventions. 2011;4(2):e8-11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wedin JO, Vikholm P, Alström U, Schiller P. Severe chronic aortic regurgitation after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case report and literature review. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021;5(3):ytab044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research has received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SJP collected data and drafted the manuscript. SL, JAS, and SH participated in the surgical procedures. DJK and SHL participated in post operative patient managements. YSH performed the surgical procedures and designed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to You Sun Hong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. Institutional review board was waived for this study by the Institutional Review Board of Ajou University School of Medicine.

Consent for publication

Informed consent for publication was obtained.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Aortogram performed before and after stent graft insertion.

Additional file 2. Echocardiogram of parasternal long/short axis view of aortic valve at the time of aorta injury.

Additional file 3. Echocardiogram of parasternal long axis view of aortic valve after stent graft insertion.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, S.J., Lee, S., Son, J.A. et al. Delayed aortic regurgitation after TEVAR procedure: a case report. J Cardiothorac Surg 17, 336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02083-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-02083-3

Keywords