Skip to main content

Table 2 Rate of PPM across AVR suture techniques and aortic valve sizes.

From: Figure of eight suture technique in aortic valve replacement decreases prosthesis-patient mismatch

Valve size

Pledget (Nā€‰=ā€‰570)

Figure-of-eight (Nā€‰=ā€‰59)

p Value

Small, 19ā€“23Ā mm

Number of patients

299

18

Ā 

iEOA, cm2/m2

0.86 (0.77, 0.98)

0.89 (0.82, 0.97)

0.3

Moderate PPM

141 (47.2%)

5 (27.8%)

0.14

Severe PPM

8 (2.7%)

1 (5.6%)

0.41

Large, 25ā€“29Ā mm

Number of patients

271

41

Ā 

iEOA, cm2/m2

1.03 (0.93, 1.15)

1.05 (0.92, 1.15)

0.77

Moderate PPM

27 (9.9%)

4 (9.8%)

1

Severe PPM

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1

  1. Patients were divided into two cohorts, small (valve sizes 19ā€“23) and large (valve sizes 25ā€“29)
  2. Values are denoted as either number of patients (%) or median (IQR).
  3. PPM prosthesis-patient mismatch; AVR aortic valve replacement