Skip to main content

Post-pneumonectomy syndrome: a systematic review of the current evidence and treatment options



Post-pneumonectomy syndrome (PPS) is rare and predominantly characterised by dynamic airway obstruction due to mediastinal rotation at any time point following pneumonectomy. The objective of this systematic review was to identify the optimal treatment strategy for PPS based on subjective symptomatic relief, objective radiological imaging, and treatment durability.


A systematic review was performed up to and including February 2022 based on the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” guidelines. All studies that presented the management of symptomatic patients > 16 years of age with radiologically confirmed PPS were included. The primary outcome was the identification of the optimal treatment strategy and the secondary outcome was durability of the treatment. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine level was assigned to each study.


A total of 330 papers were identified and reviewed; 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data including patient demographics, indication for initial pneumonectomy, presenting symptoms, management approach, outcomes, and follow-up were assessed and analysed. Management approaches were divided into three categories: (a) mediastinal repositioning using implant prostheses; (b) endobronchial stenting; (c) other corrective procedures. One hundred and four patients were identified in total and of those, 87 underwent mediastinal repositioning with insertion of a prosthetic implant. Complications included over- or under-filling of the prosthesis (8.5%) and implant leakage (8.9%).


Management of PPS using a prosthetic implant to reposition the mediastinum is the treatment of choice. Key adjuncts to optimise surgical approach and minimise complications include pre-operative CT volumetric analysis to guide implant size and intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography to guide mediastinal repositioning.

Peer Review reports


Post-pneumonectomy syndrome (PPS) is rare and predominantly characterised by dynamic airway obstruction due to mediastinal rotation at any time point following pneumonectomy. For reasons that remain poorly understood, in some patients the mediastinum shifts excessively towards the pneumonectomy space with associated rotation of the great vessels and surrounding structures [1]. This can produce disabling respiratory, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal symptoms [2].

Progress in determining the optimal management strategy has been slow due to the sparsity of data and lack of long-term follow-up. Reports in the literature suggest benefit from both surgical management, particularly placement of breast prostheses into the pneumonectomy space, but also endobronchial stent placement [2]. There are currently no recommendations and/or consensus guidelines for PPS management from the international thoracic surgical societies.

Consequently, the objectives of this systematic review were to (a) provide an overview of the available evidence, (b) identify the optimal treatment strategy for PPS in terms of subjective symptomatic relief on follow-up, and (c) determine the durability of the treatment method employed based on long-term outcomes.


Search strategy and eligibility criteria

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE databases. Search methodology was performed with the assistance of a librarian. The search terms used were (“Post-pneumonectomy syndrome”) OR (“Postpneumonectomy syndrome”). These keywords were selected as they were broad ranging and would identify the maximum number of articles relevant to the chosen topic. The search was limited to the English language and to journal articles only, as these represent the most up-to-date clinical repository. A dedicated search of the “grey literature” (unpublished trials, theses, reports, technical and conference notes) was not undertaken as sufficient contemporaneous data was obtained through the conventional literature search. There were no restrictions to study design and no time limitations up to and including February 2022 (date range: 1979–2022). The abstracts identified in the search were reviewed independently by two reviewers. Any disagreement between reviewers about whether a paper should be included resulted in inclusion at this stage in the process. The full-text articles were then reviewed by two reviewers and a final consensus was reached.

Inclusion criteria were symptomatic patients who had undergone a pneumonectomy with rotation of mediastinal contents on CT-thorax and a clinical diagnosis of PPS. All forms of management were included. The primary outcome was to identify the optimal treatment strategy of PPS, assessed in terms of subjective symptomatic relief on follow-up and/or imaging modalities. The secondary outcome assessed durability of the treatment method used. Literature discussing post-pneumonectomy-like syndrome were excluded. Following assessment of all full-text articles, those discussing the management of PPS in patients < 16 years only were excluded, to avoid confounding factors specific to the paediatric population from affecting the final analysis. In case series and retrospective reviews discussing both paediatric and adult patients, those aged < 16 years old were excluded from the overall analysis (Table 1).

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Data collection

Information was extracted regarding study design, patient numbers, patient age, criteria for initial diagnosis, presenting symptoms, the interval between original and corrective procedures, treatment approach, short- and long-term outcomes. The latter three provided the evidence for our primary and secondary outcomes.

Analysis of data

The “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) guidelines were used to plan and perform this systematic review (Fig. 1). Following the exclusion process, a total of 41 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis. To assess the level of evidence, an Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) score [3] was assigned to each study. Data was tabulated and grouped based on the chosen treatment strategy: (a) Prostheses, (b) Endobronchial stenting, (c) Other. This was deemed to be the most comprehensive way to summarise the available research and answer our primary research objective. Data was summarised using descriptive statistics. Where applicable, data was analysed and presented as a proportion of the total. Continuous variables were reported as median values (range). Categorical variables were reported as percentages. Data were analysed using SPSS software (PASW 18.0 for Mac, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Table 2 provides a list of relevant abbreviations and acronyms (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

An overview of the literature search strategy with the identification of studies eligible for inclusion in the review

Table 2 Abbreviations & Acronyms


Study selection and patient demographics

Fourty one studies met the inclusion criteria describing the management and outcome of symptomatic adult patients (> 16 years of age) with radiologically confirmed PPS. There were 31 case reports [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], 5 case series [36,37,38,39,40] and 5 retrospective reviews [1, 41,42,43,44] that included a total of 113 patients. One patient received treatment for post-pneumonectomy-like syndrome and was excluded from the final analysis. Seven patients were excluded as they were < 16 years of age and one patient was excluded as they did not receive surgical treatment. A total of 104 patients remained for inclusion in the final analysis. Sixty eight patients were female (68.7%) and 31 were male (31.3%). Gender was not reported in one retrospective review that included five patients. PPS developed after a right pneumonectomy in 75 patients (72.1%) and left pneumonectomy in 29 patients (27.9%). Eight patients who developed PPS after a left pneumonectomy had a right-sided aortic arch (27.6%). Sixty-one patients (61.6%) underwent a pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer or pulmonary metastases, while other indications for a pneumonectomy included congenital hypoplasia/bronchial anomaly (10.1%), haemorrhage (7.1%) and pulmonary carcinoid (7.1%) (Table 3). The indication for performing a pneumonectomy was not reported in five patients.

Table 3 Patient demographics

All patients included in the review had varying levels of dyspnoea on presentation, with one patient complaining of positional dyspnoea when lying on their left side [4]. Other common presenting symptoms included audible stridor or wheeze, recurrent respiratory tract infections, persistent cough and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Less frequently reported symptoms included chest pain, haemoptysis, dysphagia and dysphonia.

Summary findings of case reports and case series

A total of 36 case reports and case series were included, with 43 patients. The median age at attempted correction was 44.6 years (range 17–75 years). The median interval between the original pneumonectomy and time of attempted correction for PPS was 2.5 years (range 1 month–49 years), with a mean interval of 5.1 years. Seven patients (16.3%) who had undergone a corrective procedure for the treatment of PPS symptoms developed a complication that required repeat intervention. The interval to development of complications following the initial corrective procedure ranged from immediately after extubation to 4 years post-operatively.

Summary findings of retrospective reviews

There were five retrospective reviews with a total of 61 eligible patients. The age range at the time of attempted correction was 17–72 years. The overall mortality rate across these studies was 6.6%, with respiratory failure representing the most common cause of death. Recurrence of symptoms or complications requiring repeat intervention was 26.2%.


The case reports, case series and retrospective reviews included in this study have been divided into three broad approaches to management:

  • Mediastinal repositioning with fixed-volume prostheses/tissue expanders;

  • Endobronchial stenting to relieve bronchial stenosis/obstruction;

  • Other corrective procedures.

Short- and long-term outcomes relating to the three broad management approaches are outlined in Tables 4, 5 and 6 respectively. Short-term outcomes included any complications within 30 days of the corrective procedure.

Table 4 Outcomes (prostheses)
Table 5 Outcomes (Endobronchial stenting)
Table 6 Outcomes (other corrective procedures)

Prostheses: safety and durability

The most common initial management method for PPS was mediastinal repositioning with fixed-volume prostheses or tissue expanders (78.6% of studies including a total of 87 patients) (Table 4). Saline-filled tissue expanders were used either alone or in combination with fixed-volume prostheses in 28 patients (32.2%), allowing percutaneous volume adjustment. Wang et al. described the use of a 3D carbon fibre-printed implant with good results [5]. Sizing of prostheses was reported in 18 studies with perioperative CVP monitoring (n = 7) and bronchoscopic assessment of airway compression (n = 8) being the most common approaches. Pre-operative CT volumetric analysis (n = 3) and intra-operative instillation of saline into the empty hemithorax (n = 3) were also described. Two studies reported the use of perioperative TOE monitoring [4, 6], while one case report described the use of silicone prosthetic sizers that were then replaced by fixed-volume prostheses [7] (Table 4).

Sixty four out of 85 patients (75.3%) had no reported complications in the short-term. Two studies did not comment on short-term outcomes. Within 4 weeks of surgery, 9.4% of patients (n = 8) presented with symptom recurrence secondary to over- or under-filling of the prosthesis [1, 8, 9, 36, 40]. The implant volume was adjusted percutaneously in 2 patients, one patient required repeat thoracotomy 5 days after the initial procedure [40], while one patient’s symptoms resolved without intervention [36]. Four patients showed evidence of haemodynamic compromise intra-operatively, requiring reopening of their partially closed incision and reduction of the prosthetic volume [1]. Macare Van Maurik et al. reported short-term complications in 2 patients; namely implant luxation 2 weeks after repositioning and malposition 3 weeks after repositioning [41]. Three patients died within one month of the corrective procedure (massive PE, multi-system organ failure, and respiratory failure) [1, 37].

Nine out of thirty-three studies did not report individual figures for length of follow-up. Of the remaining studies, median length of follow-up was 1 year (range 1 month–6 years). Long-term outcome was reported in 82 patients, with 13 patients (15.9%) requiring repeat surgical intervention. The most common long-term complication requiring surgical revision was leakage of the prosthesis (8.9%). Following implant leakage, McRae et al. reported the use of a custom-made implant with a wall three times thicker than the initial prosthesis with good results [10]. Shen et al. described a case of re-do thoracotomy at 1 year post-operatively to remove the prosthesis due to symptom recurrence [1]. The same study reported one patient who died 4 years post-operatively due to symptom recurrence secondary to airway malacia [1]. In their case report, Kelly et al., described insertion of an endobronchial stent to relieve ongoing dyspnoea due to recurrent airway malacia after the insertion of a prostheses with good outcomes [11] (Table 4).

Endobronchial stenting: safety and durability

Endobronchial stenting as the primary management method for PPS was described in six studies (n = 6) (Table 5). Metallic stents (n = 4) were associated with a 50% short-term complication rate, with reports of stent migration, partial obstruction and recurrent LRTIs [12, 38]. Two of these patients required repeat stenting for symptomatic relief. Median length of follow-up was 9 months (range 3 months–12 years). Four of the 6 patients died during the follow-up period; one died of a PE and the other of respiratory failure 6 months and 12 years later, respectively [37, 38]. Nakamura et al. reported a case of endobronchial stenting following failed endobronchial balloon dilation with limited follow-up [13]. Moser et al. described the successful use of a silastic stent with limited follow-up (n = 1) [14] (Table 5).

Other corrective procedures

Other reported corrective procedures of PPS included mediastinal graft fixation (n = 2), repositioning the mediastinum (without prostheses) (n = 4), chemical blockage of the phrenic nerve (n = 1), intra-pleural injection of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) (n = 1) and resection of a portion of the adjacent thoracic vertebra (n = 1) (Table 6). The use of bioprosthetic patches and synthetic meshes to maintain the mediastinal position have shown varying results and insufficient follow-up [15, 42]. Uyama et al. described the echocardiography-guided injection of SF6 into the pleural space in a high-risk surgical candidate with satisfactory symptomatic improvement [16]. Gullung and Halstead describe a case of dysphonia (diminished vocal volume) 6 months following a left pneumonectomy, as a result of right recurrent laryngeal nerve compression due to PPS. This was treated with Radiesse® voice gel injection, without satisfactory subjective improvement [35]. Overall outcomes following repositioning without prostheses were poor, requiring an additional procedure in all cases [16, 17].



Post-pneumonectomy syndrome is a rare condition that involves rotation of the mediastinum towards the contralateral hemi-thorax at any time point following pneumonectomy [1]. This results in extrinsic compression of the trachea or bronchus against the descending thoracic aorta and/or spine due to mediastinal shift with herniation and over-inflation of the remaining lung parenchyma [32]. Symptoms that result may take a progressive or indolent course with the potential for disabling long-term outcomes if left untreated [37]. It is therefore important to maintain a high index of suspicion in patients who have previously undergone a pneumonectomy.

A number of methods to attempt surgical correction for PPS have been reported, consisting mostly of single case reports and case series. In this review we have outlined the current evidence and potential treatment options. We sought to determine the optimal treatment strategy assessed in terms of subjective symptomatic relief and durability.

PPS occurred in 72.1% of patients after a right pneumonectomy. Amongst patients with a left pneumonectomy, 27.6% had a right-sided aortic arch, indicating the importance of site and underlying anatomy in risk stratification. Surgical correction had a significant overall mortality risk of 6.5% (n = 6) and a recurrence rate of between 16.9 and 26%. Risk factors for symptom recurrence included sub-optimal prosthetic implant sizing and implant leakage, indicating the importance of optimising implant choice and size as well as mitigating implant trauma from surrounding tissue at the time of surgical correction. Surgical management without a prosthetic implant had a 100% incidence of recurrence and should be avoided. Endobronchial stents had a 50% complication rate, albeit with small and high-risk patient numbers. Consequently, optimal management of these complex cases is challenging, however surgical management with a prosthetic implant in suitable patients under appropriate image guidance appears to offer the safest and most durable treatment strategy.

Method of mediastinal repositioning

We have identified 42 studies discussing the management of PPS in adult patients (> 16 years of age). The literature favours mediastinal repositioning and placement of implant prostheses, using either open or thoracoscopic approaches [22, 24]. Luxation and malposition are two reported implant-specific short-term complications requiring repeat thoracotomy [41]. The most common long-term complication is implant leakage (8.9%). The exposed bronchial stump staple line can be a source of trauma to the prosthesis, resulting in leakage and symptom recurrence [24]. The use of prophylactic AlloDerm did not protect the implants from trauma [10, 24]. McRae et al. described the successful use of a custom-made tissue expander with a wall three times as thick as normal implants [10]. Custom made, patient-specific prostheses, as well as 3D carbon-fibre printed prostheses, have also been described with good results [5, 26]. In cases where patients develop severe airway malacia following mediastinal repositioning, airway stenting may relieve symptoms, as described by Kelly et al. [11]. Overall mortality in the patient cohort managed with prostheses was 4.8%.

Other corrective procedures described include the use of bioprosthetic patches and synthetic meshes to maintain mediastinal position. The use of a xenopericardial graft described by Soll et al. required removal 5 months later due to infection [42]. Chujo et al. used a PTFE mesh to re-position the mediastinum through a right mini-thoracotomy with uncertain long-term effects as the patient died of cancer recurrence 6 months later [15].

Complications of non-surgical management

Endobronchial stenting with either metallic or silastic stents was described in six case reports (n = 6). These patients had multiple co-morbidities rendering surgical mediastinal repositioning inappropriate. Overall, use of metallic stents alone had unfavourable outcomes, including stent migration, obstruction, residual narrowing and recurrent LRTIs [32, 38]. Bronchial stenting with a silastic stent alone has been described with good results in one patient, despite insufficient follow-up [24]. Overall mortality in this patient cohort is 66.7%, with one patient dying of respiratory failure 12 years post-nitinol stent insertion following recurrent hospitalisations with LRTIs [17]. Stenting would be inappropriate in branching, distorted bronchi due to difficulty in stent placement and poor stent epithelialisation [30]. It is therefore important to take an individualised approach when considering the optimal treatment method in co-morbid patients with PPS.


A meta-analysis was not feasible due to the heterogeneity between the studies. Many studies did not satisfy the secondary outcome i.e. durability of treatment method used, as the follow-up period was not explicitly stated or insufficient. As a result, it was difficult to compare long-term outcomes. Moreover, the patients who had endobronchial stenting as the primary management method for PPS likely had more co-morbidities and therefore worse outcomes, making a comparison with other treatment methods biased.

The indication for a pneumonectomy was not taken into consideration when calculating survival outcomes. In particular, the initial tumour stage was not taken into account in patients with primary lung cancer who later developed PPS. This could affect survival outcomes and is therefore a limitation of this study.

An additional problem was that some retrospective reviews and case series incorporated individual patients that did not satisfy the inclusion criteria for the study. These patients were therefore excluded from our data analysis. Consequently, any results or conclusions made in these studies may not be reflected in this systematic review.


PPS is a challenging clinical scenario. This study represents, to our knowledge, the most complete review highlighting the current evidence and treatment options in patients > 16 years of age. Post-pneumonectomy syndrome managed without a prosthetic implant had a 100% incidence of recurrence and high complication rate. Mediastinal repositioning using a prosthetic implant demonstrates the most favourable outcome in terms of anatomical realignment, symptomatic relief, and overall durability. Sizing of the prosthetic implant can be achieved with the use of CT volumetric analysis and peri-operative TOE guidance.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.


  1. Shen KR, Wain JC, Wright CD, Grillo HC, Mathisen DJ. Postpneumonectomy syndrome: surgical management and long-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1210–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hannan LM, Joosten SA, Steinfort DP, Antippa P, Irving LB. The pneumonectomy syndrome. Thorax. 2012;67(7):656–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Levels of Evidence. 2009. Available at: Accessed 28 Feb 2020.

  4. Partington SL, Graham A, Weeks SG. Pulmonary vein stenosis following left pneumonectomy: a variant contributor to postpneumonectomy syndrome. Chest. 2010;137(1):205–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang B, Tan S, Yu F. Correction of postpneumonectomy syndrome with tridimensional carbon fiber-printed implant. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:e135–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matheson JAH, Antippa PN, MacGill K. Intrathoracic tissue expanders for postpneumonectomy syndrome. JPRAS. 2014;67(12):1764–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahesh B, Haywood R, van Tornout F. Images of post-pneumonectomy syndrome: progressive mediastinal displacement causing bronchial narrowing by stretching. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86(10):841–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gebitekin C, Bayram AS. Post-pneumonectomy syndrome in an adult presenting with positional syncope. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2006;14(1):e12–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bobbio A, Alifano M, Magdeleinat P, Regnard JF. Postpneumonectomy syndrome and pre-existing thoracic scoliosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21(1):143–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McRae MC, Detterbeck FC, Narayan D. Correction of postpneumonectomy syndrome using a custom implant. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011:bcr1120103523.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly RF, Hunter DW, Maddaus MA. Postpneumonectomy syndrome after left pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:701–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harney MS, Lacy PD, O’Neill S, Walsh M. Nitinol stent insertion for post-pneumonectomy syndrome. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115(11):938–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura Y, Ohata M, Kawabe K, Ueda A, Itoh K, Fujimoto H, Kishi K. Left postpneumonectomy syndrome successfully treated with endobronchial stent. Intern Med. 1998;37:880–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moser NJ, Woodring JH, Wolf KM, Reed JC. Management of postpneumonectomy syndrome with a bronchoscopically placed endobronchial stent. South Med J. 1994;87(11):1156–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chujo M, Anami K, Kawahara K. Successful use of mediastinal repositioning employing PTFE sheet for right-sided post-pneumonectomy syndrome. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20:S525-527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uyama T, Monden Y, Sakiyama S, Fukumoto T, Sumitomo M, Harada K. Management of postpneumonectomy syndrome by intrapleural injection of sulphur hexafluoride. Case report. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;27(3–4):179–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abe J, Hasumi T, Tanaka R, Saito Y, Kanma K, Takahashi S. Long-term outcome of nitinol stenting to treat asphyxia caused by postpneumonectomy syndrome. Respirol Case Rep. 2016;5(1): e00207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Avgerinos DV, Meisner J, Harris L. Minimally invasive repair of post-pneumonectomy syndrome. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;57(1):60–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Codsi MJ, Keens TG, Stein JE, Miyasaka K, Skaggs DL. Respiratory failure in postpneumonectomy syndrome complicated by thoracic lordoscoliosis: treatment with prosthetic implants, partial vertebrectomies, and spinal fusion. Spine. 2000;25(19):2531–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boiselle PM, Shepard JA, McLoud TC, Grillo HC, Wright CD. Postpneumonectomy syndrome: another twist. J Thorac Imaging. 1997;12(3):209–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jansen JP, de la Riviere AB, Alting MPC, Westermann CJJ, Bergstein PGM, Duurkens VAM. Postpneumonectomy syndrome in adulthood: surgical correction using expandable prosthesis. Chest. 1992;101:1167–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reed MF, Lewis JD. Thorascopic mediastinal repositioning for postpneumonectomy syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:264–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bastin AJ, Karunanantham J, Lim E. Breathlessness after pneumonectomy: consider postpneumonectomy syndrome. Clin Lung Cancer. 2010;11(6):423–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ng T, Ryder BA, Maziak DE, Shamji FM. Thorascopic approach for the treatment of postpneumonectomy syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1015–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riveron FA, Adams C, Lewis JW, Ochs D, Glines C, Popovich J. Silastic prosthesis plombage for right postpneumonectomy syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:465–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsunezuka Y, Sato H, Watanabe S, Tamura M, Tsubota M, Seki M. Improved expandable prosthesis in postpneumonectomy syndrome with deformed thorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:526–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharifpour M, Bittner EA. Postpneumonectomy syndrome: a case of shifting priorities. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(6):1334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Encarnacion CO, Deshpande SP, Mondal S, Carr SR. Surgical correction of postpneumonectomy syndrome with adjustable saline implants and transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019 [Epub ahead of print].

  29. Birdi I, Baghai M, Wells FC. Surgical correction of postpneumonectomy stridor by saline breast implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:704–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cordova FC, Travaline JM, O’Brien GM, Ball DS, Lippmann M. Treatment of left pneumonectomy syndrome with an expandable endobronchial prosthesis. Chest. 1996;109(2):567–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wasserman K, Jamplis RW, Lash H, Brown HV, Cleary MG, Lafair J. Post-pneumonectomy syndrome: surgical correction using silastic implants. Chest. 1979;75:78–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Karasaki T, Tanaka M. Life-threatening postpneumonectomy syndrome complicated with right aortic arch after left pneumonectomy. Case Rep Surg. 2015;2015: 768067.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Manna L, Paras K. A case report of postpneumonectomy syndrome. Am J Crit Care. 1993;2(2):168–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Smulders SA, Marcus JT, Holverda S, Paul MA, Postmus PE, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Compression of the pulmonary vein after right-sided pneumonectomy. Circulation. 2006;113(18):e743–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gullung JL, Halstead LA. Recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis postpneumonectomy contralateral to the site of surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:628–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bédard ELR, Uy K, Keshavjee S. Postpneumonectomy syndrome: a spectrum of clinical presentations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1185–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grillo HC, Shepard JAO, Mathisen DJ, Kanarek DJ. Postpneumonectomy syndrome: diagnosis, management, and results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:638–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stratakos G, Vitsas V, Koufos N, Zissis C, Emmanouil P, Koulouris N. Post-pneumonectomy and post-lobectomy syndromes: case series and review of the literature. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2017;87:70–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Audry G, Balquet P, Vazquez MP, Dejerine ES, Baculard A, Boulé M, Grimfeld A, Gruner M. Expandable prosthesis in right postpneumonectomy syndrome in childhood and adolescence. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:323–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shamji FM, Deslauriers J, Daniel TM, Matzinger FR, Mehran RJ, Todd TRJ. Postpneumonectomy syndrome with an ipsilateral aortic arch after left pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1627–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. van Maurik AFMM, Stubenitsky BM, van Swieten HA, Duurkens VAM, Laban E, Kon M. Use of tissue expanders in adult postpneumonectomy syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:608–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Soll C, Hahnloser D, Frauenfelder T, Russi EW, Weder W, Kestenholz PB. The postpneumonectomy syndrome: clinical presentation and treatment. Eur J Cardiothor Surg. 2009;35:319–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Podevin G, Larroquet M, Camby C, Audry G, Plattner V, Heloury Y. Postpneumonectomy syndrome in children: advantages and long-term follow-up of expandable prosthesis. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(9):1425–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Valji AM, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Matzinger FR. Postpneumonectomy syndrome: recognition and management. Chest. 1998;114:1766–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



NC: involved in conception of article, article preparation, article editing, and article submission. GJF: involved in conception of article, article preparation, article editing, and article submission. IB: involved in conception of article, article preparation, article editing, and article submission. EO: involved in conception of article, article preparation, article editing, and article submission. CT: involved in conception of article, article preparation, article editing, and article submission. MG: involved in conception of article, article preparation, article editing, and article submission. KCR: involved in conception of article, article preparation, article editing, and article submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natasha Christodoulides.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christodoulides, N., Fitzmaurice, G.J., Bukowska, I. et al. Post-pneumonectomy syndrome: a systematic review of the current evidence and treatment options. J Cardiothorac Surg 18, 119 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: