Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

The 100 most cited papers on total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: a bibliometric analysis

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 18, Article number: 187 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The number of citations a paper receives reflects its impact on the scientific community. We aimed to identify and explore the characteristics of the most cited papers on total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC).

Methods

Web of Science Core Collection Expanded Science Citation Index (1900 to present) was searched and papers on TAPVC were reviewed. Articles were ranked by the number of citations and the 100 most cited papers were analyzed.

Results

The 100 most cited papers were published between 1952 and 2018 with a mean number of citations of 52 (range 26 to 148). The 1990s was the most productive decade. All articles except one were written in English. The 100 most cited articles were published in 24 journals, led by Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (21 articles), followed by Annals of Thoracic Surgery (20 articles), and Circulation (16 articles). The United States of America contributed most of the 100 most cited papers (60 articles). Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto led the list of citation classics with six papers. Christopher A. Caldarone, John W. Kirklin, and P. E. F. Daubeney were the most productive authors with 3 articles each. More than half of the papers were cohort studies (51 articles). Surgery, radiology and etiology were the main topics. Thirty-one articles were funded by public foundations, and none received support from commercial companies.

Conclusions

The bibliometric analysis gives a historical perspective on scientific progress in the field of TAPVC and lays the foundation for future research.

Peer Review reports

Background

Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC) is a rare congenital anomaly, constituting ≈ 1–3% of congenital heart disease, where none of the pulmonary veins connects normally to the left atrium [1]. Despite progress in surgical intervention, it remains to be associated with disappointing prognosis [2, 3]. Experts and researchers try their best to explore the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of TAPVC, and a large number of literatures about TAPVC has been published over time. It is important to get a better understanding of the progression in the field of TAPVC and its impact on clinical practice. Among published papers, the classic papers have greatly contributed to the development of the field of TAPVC. However, how to identify these important articles remains to be resolved.

There are many ways to assess the importance of a paper. Bibliometrics uses quantitative methods like citation analysis to evaluate the impact of a literature on the scientific community. Citation analysis as a popular tool is used to measure the recognition of a paper based on the number of citations it receives. The rational is that important papers will be cited more frequently. Although drawbacks exist when evaluating the impact of a paper based only on the number of citations, it is currently the most accepted approach. The citation analysis of the most cited papers has been widespread in different research areas. However, a bibliometric analysis of the most cited papers on TAPVC is not available. The aim of this study was to identify and explore the characteristics of the 100 most cited papers on TAPVC.

Methods

The database of the Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science Core Collection Expanded Science Citation Index (1900 to present) was searched using the topic words “total anomalous pulmonary venous connection”, “total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage” or “total anomalous pulmonary venous return” on 21 May 2022. This database indexed more than 53 million records from over 9500 high impact journals across 178 scientific disciplines. The ‘document type’ was activated to limit the format of papers to ‘article’ or ‘review’. Articles retrieved were ranked by the number of citations, from highest to lowest. Two authors read the abstract or full text if needed to identify the 100 most cited papers relevant to TAPVC. The following information was recorded: title, author names, the number of citations, publication year, country origin, institution, journal, funding source, and article type or subspecialty. Disagreements between authors was resolved by consensus. The institution and country origin were defined by the address of the corresponding author. The Pearson’s test was used to determine the correlation between two continuous variables. The data of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita were retrieved from the World Bank (www.worldbank.org). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 1352 papers were identified after the initial search, with 984 as ‘article’ and 32 as ‘review’. The 100 most cited papers (Additional file 1) were published between 1952 and 2018 with a mean number of citations of 52 (range 26–148), and 7 papers were cited more than 100 times.

The decade 1990 to 1999 produced the most citation classics with 21 articles followed by the decades from 1970 to 1979 and 2010 to 2019 with 18 articles each (Table 1). The most citation classics published within a given year were 4 articles each in 1956, 1978, 1992, 1996, 2010, 2012 and 2013. More than 80% of the papers were published after 1970 (84 articles).

Table 1 Frequency distribution showing publication years of the 100 most cited articles
Full size table

The 100 most cited papers were published in 24 journals, predominantly in Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (21 articles), followed by Annals of Thoracic Surgery (20 articles) and Circulation (16 articles) (Table 2). Eleven journals indexed more than one citation classic. There was no correlation between journal impact factor and the number of 100 most cited papers (r = 0.048, P = 0.824) or the number of citations (r = 0.142, P = 0.160).

Table 2 Frequent journals of the 100 most cited papers (Included if ≥ 2 articles were in top cited list)
Full size table

The 100 cited articles originated from 13 countries, with the United States of America (USA) (60 articles), United Kingdom (11 articles) and Canada (8 articles) being the most prolific (Table 3). Ten countries contributed more than one citation classic. Only 18 papers originated from non-English speaking countries. There was no correlation between the GDP per capita and the numbers of 100 most cited papers on TAPVC (r = 0.452, P = 0.121).

Table 3 Frequent countries of the 100 most cited papers (Included if ≥ 2 articles were in most cited list)
Full size table

Eighteen institutions produced more than one citation classic (Table 4). Hospital For Sick Children, Toronto was found to be the most productive institution with 6 articles, followed by Boston Children’s Hospital, Children’s Memorial Hospital, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Texas Children’s Hospital, and Royal Brompton Hospital with 5 articles each.

Table 4 Frequent institutions of the 100 most cited papers (Included if ≥ 2 articles were in most cited list)
Full size table

The number of authors of the most cited papers ranged from one to 16. Table 5 presents a list of the most productive authors with two or more citation classics. Christopher A. Caldarone, John W. Kirklin, and P. E. F. Daubeney were the most productive authors with 3 articles each.

Table 5 Frequent authors of the 100 most cited papers (Included if ≥ 2 articles were in most cited list)
Full size table

The majority of the 100 most cited papers were clinical articles (95 articles), with the remaining basic science (5 articles) (Table 6). Of 95 clinical papers, cohort study (51 articles) was the most common type, and only 1 reported a clinical trial. Surgery (70 articles) is the main topic of the most cited papers, followed by radiology (17 articles), and etiology (6 articles). Among these articles, 31 were funded by public foundations, none received support from commercial companies, for the remaining 69 the funding source was not specified. Specifically, 15 studies received grants from the National Institutes of Health.

Table 6 Study type of the 100 most cited papers
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we identified the most cited papers on TAPVC and also summarized the characteristics of highly cited articles. The lists of the most cited papers demonstrated the history and development on TAPVC. To our knowledge, this is the first study on the most cited articles in the field of TAPVC. This list of 100 most cited papers is of substantial importance for several reasons. Authors can learn about the research hotspots and shape their research interests. This list can serve as an education tool for residents and directors so that they can be familiar with the classic papers on TAPVC [4]. Journal editors and reviewers can identify potential highly cited papers with a prior knowledge of typical characteristics of such papers when they evaluate submitted manuscripts. Clinicians can apply important findings to the clinical practice, therefore patients may obtain better outcomes.

The most cited paper on the list, which described 93 autopsied cases with TAPVC, was written by Delisle et al. in 1976 [5].This manuscript found that TAPVC was failure of development of the common pulmonary vein with collaterals between the lungs and the systemic veins. TAPVC was a rapidly fatal disease and the age at death was influenced by obstruction of the anomalous venous pathway. TAPVC could almost always be corrected by surgery according to the anatomy. This paper emphasized diagnostic and surgical considerations in TAPVC. The second most cited article, which presented the clinical and physiologic observations of 75 pediatric patients with TAPVC, was written by Gathman et al. in 1970 [6].The authors proposed an approach to managing TAPVC. Patients with pulmonary venous obstruction should undergo early surgery. Patients with pulmonary hypertension without pulmonary venous obstruction should receive medical intervention. If pulmonary hypertension was not present and particularly if there was a significant gradient across the right ventricular out flow tract, medical treatment might to be recommended until operation could be performed.

The oldest paper on the list, which described three patients with TAPVC, was written by Parsons et al. in 1952 [7].At that time, the anastomosis of pulmonary veins to the appendage was feasible only in the experimental animal. The authors proposed that it should be possible to correct anomalous pulmonary veins by transplantation of pulmonary veins in man. This paper laid the foundation for the surgical repair of TAPVC. The latest paper on the list, which explored the potential genetic abnormalities in patients with TAPVC through next-generation sequencing, was written by Shi et al. in 2018 [8]. This study identified SNAI1, HMGA2 and VAV2 as novel candidate genes associated with TAPVC and provided novel insights into pulmonary vein development. This paper is helpful to understand the pathogenesis of TAPVC.

Interestingly, one of the 100 most cited papers which ranked 21 was published by our team in Circulation. [9] This multi-institutional study used a large cohort of patients (768 patients) to assess the impact of current management strategies on the outcomes of TAPVC. This study found that contemporary outcomes after surgical repair for TAPVC were acceptable. This study examined risk factors associated with outcomes and suggested that computed tomography angiography plays an important role in the preoperative morphological evaluation of TAPVC and is useful in preoperative surgical planning. This study also found that compared with the conventional repair, the sutureless technique could reduce the restenosis rate in patients with preoperative pulmonary venous obstruction (PVO) and that no statistical difference was found in patients without preoperative PVO. Our team is dedicated to the study of TAPVC and has published some related articles recently.

Compared with bibliometric analyses in other specialties, the number of citations of the 100 most cited papers on TAPVC is much lower. The highest cited paper in a bibliometric analysis on mitral valve surgery received 1348 citations with a mean (range) citation of 248 (148–1348). [10] The highest cited paper in a bibliometric analysis on minimally-invasive cardiac surgery received 414 citations with a median (range) citation of 101 (51–414). [11] It might indicate that a lower degree of research activity within TAPVC in comparison to more established fields.

Our analysis found that the 100 most cited articles were published in 24 journals. A total of 79 articles were published in only 10 cardiovascular specialty journals. This shows a trend of publishing influential papers in specialty journals compared with non-specialty journals. Our findings supported the application of Bradford’s law, a bibliometric concept put forward by Brookes and Siegelman [12, 13]. The main idea behind Bradford’s law is that researchers obtain citations from a few core journals in their specialized field. When researchers deviate from core journals, the citations and impact fall. This trend makes most highly cited papers come from a few professional journals.

Considering the fact that the journal impact factor is calculated based on the number of citations, the journal impact factor should be positively correlated with the status of citations. But the results of previous bibliometric papers on different specialties have not been consistent in this relationship. Some studies demonstrated that the journal impact factor was positively correlated with the number of the most cited papers and citations [14], while some others did not [11]. The correlation between journal impact factor and the status of citations on TAPVC was weak in our study. Our study did not support the well-known law that the most cited articles are often published in journals with high impact factor, which in turn contribute to the high impact factor of these journals. The possible reason is that compared with other specialities, TAPVC is still a very new field of interest and currently in its infancy. The weak relationship may be due to a lack of time, and will strengthen as the field develops and time passes.

All the 100 articles except one were published in English and only 18 papers originated from non-English speaking countries. It demonstrated the dominance of English in the scientific community. The majority of highly cited papers were from the USA. This phenomenon also exists in other disciplines which indicates the leadership of the USA in the scientific community. It may be due to the large population of researchers and sufficient financial support for scientific research in USA. However, there could be many other potential factors that lead to the dominance of USA. There is a tendency that American authors cite native papers and American journals accept papers from native authors [15, 16]. It is generally accepted that scientific research output depends on the national economy [17]. But the results of previous bibliometric papers on different specialties have not been consistent in this relationship. Some bibliometric papers found a significantly positive correlation between GDP per capita and the status of citations [18], while some other bibliometric papers could not [19]. The correlation between the GDP per capita and the number of the 100 most cited papers on TAPVC was weak in our study. This may be explained by the limited number of papers and countries, government policy, the level of research and medical infrastructure, research funding, the culture around research, research and development, the number of universities and research institutions [20].

Clinical research bridges the gap between basic science and clinical practice. Our analysis demonstrated that the vast majority of papers on TAPVC were clinical studies. Similar with previous studies, there is lack of papers with high level of evidence. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) tops the evidence pyramid and facilitates the application of research findings to clinical practice decisions [21]. However, RCT-based study does not exist on TAPVC. The likely reason is that TAPVC can only be treated with surgical repair and RCT in surgery may be difficult to achieve. Another reason may be that new findings are usually initially published as observational studies, and still receive the attention of the researchers. The list of the most cited papers shows some hot topics in TAPVC research. Surgery is the most popular topic in the list as surgical repair is the only effective treatment. Diagnosis of TAPVC remains controversial. Therefore, radiology is another hot topic in the field of TAPVC.

Fund support is a great boost to medical research. In our study, 31 papers reported funding support from public foundations. However, our review showed that no research projects received grants from commercial resource. Although commercial support is debated because of the susceptibility to various kinds of biases, it has played a critical role in the research process. A remarkable thing should be considered that some old papers might not have fully reported their financial conflicts.

We also demonstrated that the majority (84 papers) of the most cited articles were published after 1970. Our finding is also verified in other bibliometric analyses [4, 14]. The body of literature has flourished tremendously and great progress has been made in recent years in the field of TAPVC, and clinicians tend to rely on the latest literatures, which may explain this phenomenon. There were no papers published before 1950 in the list which indicates that old papers have limited value in modern times. However, it is important to realize that this trend could be influenced by multiple issues. Limitations in the database for indexing older literatures, lack of online resources, and the tendency to publish papers in the form of textbooks in the early times may contribute to this trend.

Although we have tried to reduce potential biases, some limitations were inevitable and inherent to citation analysis. First, citation analysis is not a perfect method to measure the impact of an article on the scientific community. Citation analysis is not a measure of the quality of an article, but rather the recognition. In other words, the number of citations an article receives does not accurately reflect its importance. Second, The overall number of citations an article is cited used as a measure of impact will favor older articles and omit important articles from the past 10 years [22]. The number of citations an article receives depends on its publication year, since citations accrue over time. Third, there is a snowball effect in citations due to adherence to scientific paradigms [23]. Some authors tend to cite certain articles, simply because they have been cited for many times rather than for their importance. Fourth, the bibliometric phenomenon, termed “obliteration by incorporation” is also a confounder. Some pioneering studies are assimilated into current knowledge and no longer cited. These important works may be underestimated with respect to the impact on the scientific community. Fifth, authors do not necessarily cite the articles that have influenced them most. Citing is a complex process with many motives and are strongly affected by self-citation, in-house citation, citing high-impact journals and review articles, and national or language preferences [24, 25]. Last, we performed the citation analysis with only one of the many available databases. No database is considered superior, and the number of citations an article receives varies greatly across different databases [26,27,28]. It is possible that many articles that were not included on our list may be included if we use other databases for citation analysis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the bibliometric analysis gives a historical perspective on the scientific progress in the field of TAPVC and lays the foundation for future research. This study presents a detailed list and analysis of the 100 most cited articles on TAPVC. The most cited papers on the list were all except one published in English, and were mainly cohort studies. Most of the articles were published in Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Annals of Thoracic Surgery and originated from USA. The present study may help to find out the important factors that contribute to citation classics on TAPVC.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GDP:

gross domestic product

PVO:

pulmonary venous obstruction

RCT:

randomized controlled trial

TAPVC:

total anomalous pulmonary venous connection

USA:

United States of America

References

  1. Herlong JR, Jaggers JJ, Ungerleider RM. Congenital heart surgery nomenclature and database project: pulmonary venous anomalies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(4 Suppl):56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. St Louis JD, Harvey BA, Menk JS, Raghuveer G, O’Brien JE Jr, Bryant R 3 et al. rd,. Repair of “simple” total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: a review from the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(1):133-7; discussion 7–8.

  3. Bando K, Turrentine MW, Ensing GJ, Sun K, Sharp TG, Sekine Y, et al. Surgical management of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Thirty-year trends. Circulation. 1996;94(9 Suppl):II12–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Namdari S, Baldwin K, Kovatch K, Huffman GR, Glaser D. Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(12):1796–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delisle G, Ando M, Calder AL, Zuberbuhler JR, Rochenmacher S, Alday LE, et al. Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: report of 93 autopsied cases with emphasis on diagnostic and surgical considerations. Am Heart J. 1976;91(1):99–122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gathman GE, Nadas AS. Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: clinical and physiologic observations of 75 pediatric patients. Circulation. 1970;42(1):143–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parsons HG, Purdy A, Jessup B. Anomalies of the pulmonary veins and their surgical significance; report of three cases of total anomalous pulmonary venous return. Pediatrics. 1952;9(2):152–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi X, Huang T, Wang J, Liang Y, Gu C, Xu Y et al. Next-generation sequencing identifies novel genes with rare variants in total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. EBioMedicine. 2018;38(217 – 27.

  9. Shi G, Zhu Z, Chen J, Ou Y, Hong H, Nie Z, et al. Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: the current management strategies in a Pediatric Cohort of 768 patients. Circulation. 2017;135(1):48–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Allen N, O’Sullivan K, Jones JM. The most influential papers in mitral valve surgery; a bibliometric analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15(1):175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Karsan RB, Allen R, Powell A, Beattie GW. Minimally-invasive cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis of impact and force to identify key and facilitating advanced training. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;17(1):236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Brookes BC. Bradford’s law and the bibliography of science. Nature. 1969;224(5223):953–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siegelman SS. The cat’s meow: the most frequently cited papers in Radiology 1955–1986. Radiology. 1988;168(2):414–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brinjikji W, Klunder A, Kallmes DF. The 100 most-cited articles in the imaging literature. Radiology. 2013;269(1):272–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990;78(4):376–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Link AM. US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA. 1998;280(3):246–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical research productivity: factors across the countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(1):249–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kiraz S, Demir E. Global Scientific Outputs of Schizophrenia Publications from 1975 to 2020: a bibliometric analysis. Psychiatr Q. 2021;92(4):1725–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jalipa FGU, Sy MCC, Espiritu AI, Jamora RDG. Bibliometric analysis of bacterial central nervous system infection research in Southeast Asia. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Meo SA, Al Masri AA, Usmani AM, Memon AN, Zaidi SZ. Impact of GDP, spending on R&D, number of universities and scientific journals on research publications among asian countries. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e66449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med. 2016;21(4):125–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gisvold SE. Citation analysis and journal impact factors–is the tail wagging the dog? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43(10):971–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuhn TS. Historical structure of scientific discovery. Science. 1962;136(3518):760–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR. Citation analysis and the science policy arena. Trends Biochem Sci. 1989;14(1):8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dumont JE. The bias of citations. Trends Biochem Sci. 1989;14(8):327–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;3:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. Comparisons of citations in web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1092–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 82170307, and 81970267).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chen Wen and Wei Liu contributed equally to this work and thus are co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Chen Wen, Wei Liu, Jin Shentu, Ruixiang Ma, Han Zhang, Hao Zhang, Zhongqun Zhu & Huiwen Chen

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Chenhao Fang

Authors
  1. Chen Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chenhao Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jin Shentu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ruixiang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Han Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhongqun Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Huiwen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Chen Wen and Wei Liu has drafted the work or substantively revised it; Chenhao Fang, Jin Shentu, and Ruixiang Ma have made substantial contributions to the acquisition and analysis of data; Han Zhang, Hao Zhang and Zhongqun Zhu have made substantial contributions to interpretation of data; Huiwen Chen has made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work. All authors have approved the submitted version (and any substantially modified version that involves the author’s contribution to the study). All authors have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiwen Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Additional File 1:

Supplemental Material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, C., Liu, W., Fang, C. et al. The 100 most cited papers on total anomalous pulmonary venous connection: a bibliometric analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 18, 187 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02284-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02284-4

Keywords

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

ISSN: 1749-8090

Contact us