- Case Report
- Open access
- Published:
Partial sternectomy with reconstruction of a giant cell tumor of the sternum, a case report, Saudi, Arabia
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 18, Article number: 296 (2023)
Abstract
Background
Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a relatively common and locally aggressive benign bone tumor that rarely affects the sternum.
Case presentation
We report a case of giant cell tumor of the sternum in a 28-year-old Saudi with painful swelling at the lower part of the sternum. Subtotal sternectomy and reconstruction with a neosternum using two layers of proline mesh, a methyl methacrylate prosthesis, and bilateral pectoralis muscle advancement flaps were performed.
Conclusions
Giant cell tumor of the sternum is a rare diagnosis. Surgical resection with negative margins is the ideal management. To avoid defects or instability of the chest wall, reconstruction of the chest wall with neosternum should be considered.
Background
Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a relatively common benign bone tumor that can be locally aggressive, although it rarely affects the sternum. Primary sternal tumors are very rare, with secondary sternal tumors being more common [1, 2]. GCT is a neoplasm of mesenchymal origin characterized by the proliferation of osteoclastic multinucleated giant cells on a background of mononuclear cell stroma. In rare cases, GCT may undergo malignant transformation and often recurs locally after surgery [1, 2]. GCTs account for 5–6% of all primary bone tumors, with an incidence of primary malignancy accounting for 1.6% of all GCTs. They usually occur in the meta-epiphyseal region of the long tubular bones, and involvement of the sternum by GCT is very rare, with only a few cases reported [1,2,3,4].
Case presentation
On September 29, 2022, a 28-year-old nonsmoking, Grocery seller Saudi patient presented with a 3-month history of persistent dull pain and gradually increasing swelling in the lower sternum. The patient denied fever, cough, dyspnea, or chest trauma. Physical examination revealed a hard mass in the lower sternum, while chest radiography lateral view showed soft tissue lesion at the lower sternum (Fig. 1a). Computed tomography (CT) of the chest showed a large, expansile lytic lesion in the lower two-thirds of the sternum, likely representing an underlying bone tumor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the chest showed a sternal large medullary lesion with a bony extent of 8.5 × 4 × 3.5 cm, which was mostly consistent with a benign chondroma or malignant chondrosarcoma (Fig. 2a, b).
Under general anesthesia, multiple True-Cut biopsies were obtained from the sternal expansile soft tissue mass using a 16-gauge needle. Histopathologic examination of the sternal biopsy revealed multiple cores and bone fragments, most of which were replaced by cellular lesion tissue consisting of numerous multinucleated giant cells seen as aggregates or scattered cells and mononuclear round to oval cells. The histologic conclusion is of giant cell-rich lesion with p63 immunohistochemistry nuclear positivity within the mononuclear cells which is in keeping with giant cell tumor of bone.
Operative procedure
Subtotal sternectomy with reconstruction
On December 29, 2022, the patient underwent excision of the sternal mass under general anesthesia (Fig. 3a), which was replaced by artificial bone. The operative procedure involved subtotal sternectomy with reconstruction. Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the supine position. The skin over the sternal mass was incised transversely, and the subcutaneous tissue was transected down to the sternal mass. The sternal resection included a wide resection of the affected portion of the sternum with a bone margin of 3 cm. The resection started above the rib margins, sparing the unaffected lateral portion of the pectoralis major muscle. A subtotal sternectomy was performed, omitting the uppermost 2 cm of the manubrium and clavicles (Fig. 3b). The left internal mammary artery was ligated, while the right was spared. The underlying pericardium and lung were not affected by the tumor. Thoracic drains were inserted before chest wall reconstruction.
Sternal reconstruction
Chest wall stability was achieved with two layers of proline mesh. The first layer was sutured to the edges of the sternal defect with nonabsorbable monofilament nylon sutures (Fig. 3c). Subsequently, chest wall stability was reinforced with methyl methacrylate. The methyl methacrylate was spread on the mesh and anchored in the surrounding tissue (Fig. 3d). A second layer of proline mesh was then sutured to the surrounding sutures covering the methyl methacrylate (Fig. 3e). Soft tissue coverage of the sternal defect was provided by the pectoralis major muscles with skin advancement. The patient was stably extubated. The postoperative course was complicated by bilateral lower lobe collapse (Fig. 2c, d), which was treated with a systemic broad-spectrum antibiotic, and was discharged in good condition.
Histopathological examination of the resected sternal specimen showed a cellular lesion composed of multinucleated giant cells and monomorphic mononuclear cells. The multinucleated giant cells were observed in aggregates or as single scattered cells, with numerous nuclei, some containing more than 30 nuclei per cell (Fig. 4a). The monomorphic mononuclear cells were polygonal, round, or spindly, without cytologic atypia. These cells were primarily embedded in a cellular mononuclear stroma with minimal collagen, although focal areas showed collagen and cartilage, and hemosiderin deposits were found within the stroma and histiocytes (Fig. 4b). In some areas, aggregates of foamy histiocytes were present (Fig. 4c). Mitotic figures were scattered within the mononuclear cells but not within the giant cells. Tumor necrosis was also observed in some areas (Fig. 4d). No osteoid formation was noted. Immunohistochemical staining for p63 was repeated in the tissue of the resected specimen and showed diffuse nuclear positivity in the mononuclear cells (Fig. 4e). Our case did not have the histologic features of a nonossifying fibroma: no spindle-shaped fibroblasts arranged in a storiform pattern. There was no characteristic round or polyhedral chondroblasts with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and well-defined cell borders with a chondroid matrix suggestive of chondroblastoma. Histologic examination of the removed tissue revealed no evidence of a preexisting aneurysmal bone cyst with secondary giant cell tumor. In addition, our case did not have the high-grade morphologic atypia characteristic of giant cell-rich osteosarcoma. Furthermore, the presence of p63 positivity in the mononuclear cells in our case was not consistent with nonossifying fibromas, chondroblastoma, or osteosarcoma tumor cells.
After 2-week, regular follow up in the cardiothoracic surgery clinic was done, he was asymptomatic and follow up chest radiograph synthetic material at the lower sternum (Fig. 1b, c).
Discussion
Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the bone are locally aggressive neoplasms that are rarely malignant or metastatic. They commonly occur at the end of long bones and can be classified as either conventional or malignant. Secondary malignant transformation after treatment is more common than primary malignant variants [4, 5]. Sternal GCTs are extremely rare and can be life-threatening due to their metastatic potential and possible mediastinal compression, leading to sudden death [6]. Only 13 cases of sternal GCT have been reported, with the sternal body involved in 61.5% and the manubrium in 38.4%. The mean age was 45 years (with a range of 28–74 years), and most cases were men (66.4%) [1].
The main clinical manifestation is intermittent localized pain with or without swelling in the affected region. The pain may be caused by local invasion of the thin cortical layer of the sternum. Signs of inflammation have been noted, especially in the sternoclavicular areas [7]. Our case is 28-year man, presented with sternal pain for 3Â months.
Chest radiography is of limited value in diagnosing small sternal lesions and evaluating intrathoracic extension; lateral radiographs may be helpful, especially in distinguishing intra- and extrathoracic lesions. CT is the preferred method for evaluation and provides excellent anatomic detail to the surgeon preoperatively, especially in determining intrathoracic extension and mediastinal invasion. MRI is indicated to define the characteristics of GCT as a solid cystic lesion [6]. In our case lateral chest radiograph detected lower sternal lesion retrograde and the diagnosis of sternal mass was done by CT and MRI.
For accurate morphologic diagnosis of GCT in chest wall tumors, incisional biopsy is usually required [8]. Sternal biopsies are also technically challenging, with a potential for puncture of the aortic arch, pleural space, and lungs. CT-guided percutaneous sternal biopsy has a relatively lower diagnostic yield [9]. Our case was diagnosed by CT guided true cut needle biopsy under GA and the diagnosis was finalized after tumor resection as GCT.
Histologic examination of the tumor reveals two major components: non-neoplastic multinucleated giant cells and neoplastic mononuclear cells that are round to oval to spindle-shaped. The giant cells and tumor cells are distributed without a specific or characteristic pattern, and the background stroma typically contains a small amount of collagen. The tumor and stroma may also contain variable amounts of hemosiderin, macrophages, necrosis, and hemorrhage [10, 11]. In difficult cases, immunohistochemistry for p63 [12] and H3G34W [13] can be used to support the diagnosis of GCT because these immunohistochemical stains are considered specific for GCT in the appropriate clinical and histologic setting. In addition, the presence of p63 positivity in the mononuclear cells in our case excluded nonossifying fibroma, chondroblastoma, and osteosarcoma.
The classic treatment for GCT of bone is curettage, usually in combination with local adjuvants, but local recurrence is common within 2Â years. En-bloc resection is associated with a lower recurrence rate but higher morbidity [4]. Subtotal sternectomy is the most common procedure for GCT of the sternum, and the extent of resection depends on the location of the tumor [1, 2, 8]. To avoid pulmonary complications such as a flutter chest and paradoxical breathing, the sternum should be adequately reconstructed after tumor resection. This will also protect the underlying structures and result in better function and cosmetic outcome [1,2,3]. Of the 13 reported cases of sternal GCT, the sternal body was involved in 9 cases (69.2%), and subtotal sternectomy was performed in 8 of 9 cases (88.8%) [1]. Futani et al., suggest that prosthetic replacement is required after subtotal sternectomy to protect the lungs, heart, and major vessels and to restore functional thoracic motion to prevent paradoxical breathing [14]. Our case underwent excision of the sternal mass under general anesthesia, which was replaced by artificial bone.
Radiotherapy is an alternative option of treatment if surgery is contraindicated or if negative surgical margins cannot be achieved with acceptable morbidity [15]. Other therapies for recurrent disease include locoregional interventions such as arterial embolization [16] or antiangiogenic therapy with interferon alpha [14], as well as systemic therapy including denosumab [17, 18]. Denosumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). It has a significant role in clinical practice for treating unsalvageable GCTs, with a favorable efficacy and safety profile. However, it is limited by its lack of long-term evaluation and potential side effects, such as hypocalcemia, adverse impact on bone density, and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Neoadjuvant denosumab could promote en bloc resection, but local disease recurrence is not improved by neoadjuvant denosumab [19]. Traub et al. conducted a prospective, nonrandomized study of patients who received denosumab for 6–11 months before surgery and reported a local recurrence rate comparable to that reported in other studies without denosumab treatment [20].
Conclusion
Giant cell tumor of the sternum is a rare diagnosis. Surgical resection with negative margins is the ideal management. To avoid defects or instability of the chest wall, reconstruction of the chest wall with neosternum should be considered.
Availability of data and materials
The data of this article are included within the article.
References
Imaduddin M, Ayyanar P, Sultania M, Muduly D, Sable MN, Naik S, et al. Primary malignant giant cell tumor of the sternum. Autops Case Rep. 2021;11:e2021281. https://doi.org/10.4322/acr.2021.281.
Muramatsu K, Tani Y, Seto T, Roces G, Yamamoto M, Ichihara Y, et al. Two cases with giant cell tumor arising from the sternum: diagnosis and options for treatment. J Orthop Sci. 2022;27(5):1143–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2019.10.014.
Fattahi SH, Yousefi Y, Moghimi A. Primary and secondary tumors of the sternum. J Cardiothoracic Med. 2020;8(1):584–6.
Sbaraglia M, Bellan E, Dei Tos AP. The 2020 WHO classification of soft tissue tumours: news and perspectives. Pathologica. 2021;113(2):70–84. https://doi.org/10.32074/1591-951X-213.
Van der Heijden L, Dijkstra PD, van de Sande MA, Kroep JR, Nout RA, van Rijswijk CS, et al. The clinical approach toward giant cell tumor of bone. Oncologist. 2014;19(5):550–61. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0432.
Singh A, Chandrashekhara SH, Triveni GS, Kumar P. Imaging in sternal tumours: a pictorial review. Pol J Radiol. 2017;82:448–56. https://doi.org/10.12659/PJR.901226.
Abate E, Banki F, Hagen JA, Klipfel N. Giant cell tumor of the sternum. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:645–7.
Gritsiuta AI, Bracken A, Downs P, Lara-Gutierrez J, Beebe K, Pechetov AA, et al. Surgical management of rare benign tumors of the sternum. MOJ Clin Med Case Rep. 2021;11(3):88–94. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojcr.2021.11.00389.
Song Y, Kwon JW. Percutaneous CT-guided sternal biopsy: factors affecting the diagnostic yield. Acta Radiol. 2017;58(7):825–33.
Montgomery C, Couch C, Emory CL, Nicholas R. Giant cell tumor of bone: review of current literature, evaluation, and treatment options. J Knee Surg. 2019;32:331–6.
De Salvo S, Pavone V, Coco S, Dell’Agli E, Blatti C, Testa G. Benign bone tumors: an overview of what we know today. J Clin Med. 2022;11:699. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030699.
Kato I, Furuya M, Matsuo K, Kawabata Y, Tanaka R, Ohashi K. Giant cell tumours of bone treated with denosumab: histological, immunohistochemical and H3F3A mutation analyses. Histopathology. 2018;72(6):914–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13448.
Kerr DA, Brcic I, Diaz-Perez JA, Shih A, Wilky BA, Pretell-Mazzini J, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of giant cell tumor of bone treated with denosumab: support for osteoblastic differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021;45(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001555.
Futani H, Okumura Y, Fukuda Y, Fukunaga S, Hasegawa S, Yoshiya S. Giant cell tumor of the sternum: a case report and review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(6B):4117–20.
Ruka W, Rutkowski P, Morysiński T, Nowecki Z, Zdzienicki M, Makula D, et al. The megavoltage radiation therapy in treatment of patients with advanced or difficult giant cell tumors of bone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(2):494–8.
He SH, Xu W, Sun ZW, Liu WB, Liu YJ, Wei HF, et al. Selective arterial embolization for the treatment of sacral and pelvic giant cell tumor: a systematic review. Orthop Surg. 2017;9(2):139–44.
Kaban LB, Troulis MJ, Ebb D, August M, Hornicek FJ, Dodson TB. Antiangiogenic therapy with interferon alpha for giant cell lesions of the jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60(10):1103–11.
Li H, Gao J, Gao Y, Lin N, Zheng M, Ye Z. Denosumab in giant cell tumor of bone: current status and pitfalls. Front Oncol. 2020;10:580605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.580605.
Singh AS, Chawla NS, Chawla SP. Giant-cell tumor of bone: treatment options and role of denosumab. Biologics. 2015;9:69–74.
Traub F, Singh J, Dickson BC, Leung S, Mohankumar R, Blackstein ME, et al. Efficacy of denosumab in joint preservation for patients with giant cell tumour of the bone. Eur J Cancer. 2016;59:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.006.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our appreciation to the patient for allowing the case to be published. We would like to express our appreciation to Almoosa specialist hospital research center.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SE wrote the manuscript. YE performed the operation, MH and HO were the assistants for the operation The histological diagnosis of GCT and the microscopic images were prepared by HA. All authors read the manuscript, made critical revisions for important intellectual content, and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval and consent to participate; written consent to participate and to publish was taken from the patient. The clinical study of this case was approved by the Ethical Committee of Almoosa specialized hospital research center.
Competing of interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests (financial or personal nature).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Eldaabossi, S., Al-Ghoneimy, Y., Antar, A. et al. Partial sternectomy with reconstruction of a giant cell tumor of the sternum, a case report, Saudi, Arabia. J Cardiothorac Surg 18, 296 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02404-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02404-0