Skip to main content

Surgical removal of a peripheral venous catheter fragment in the heart in a preterm infant

Abstract

Peripheral venous catheter fracture with cardiovascular embolization is a rare but potentially serious complication. Herein, we report a case of peripheral venous catheter fracture with embolization in right ventricle in a preterm infant. The catheter fragment was successfully removed by surgical procedure via median sternotomy under cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB).We hope this case will increase awareness of this rare complication and improve cannulation safety.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Peripheral venous cannulation is a widespread and routed medical procedure. Although it is generally a safe procedure, it may cause some common complications such as phlebitis, infiltration, occlusion and dislodgement [1]. Peripheral venous catheter fracture with cardiovascular embolization is a very rare but potentially serious complication. The embolized catheter fragment could cause arrhythmia, pulmonary symptoms, septic syndrome, valve insufficiency, thrombosis, and even cardiac perforation [2, 3]. Herein, we report a case of peripheral venous catheter fracture with embolization in right ventricle in a preterm infant. The catheter fragment was successfully removed by surgical procedure under CPB.

Case report

A 1-day-old female born after a 34-week gestation with a birth weight of 2.8 kg was admitted to the local hospital due to pneumonia. A peripheral venous catheter was planned to place in the right median cubital vein for medication and intravenous fluids. During cannulation, the catheter accidentally fractured and the distal fragment migrated into the vein. An immediate vascular ultrasound showed no fragment in the upper extremity veins. The patient was immediately transferred to our hospital.The echocardiography demonstrated a foreign body of 15 mm line-like strong echo in the right ventricle, which was close to the anterior wall of the right ventricle (Fig. 1, video 1), with a 2.7 mm patent ductus arteriosus(PDA) and a patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, chest X-ray could not clearly show the catheter fragment. Although the patient was asymptomatic, the embolized catheter fragment in the cardiac chamber may lead to serious complications and require prompt removal. Because the plastic catheter fragment did not have radio opaque substance, it could not be shown by X-ray, percutaneous retrieval under fluoroscopy guidance was not feasible.We had also considered ultrasound-guided percutaneous retrieval, but the catheter fragment was small and attached to the anterior wall of the right ventricle, so it was difficult to snare. The surgical removal of the catheter fragment was performed via median sternotomy with CPB established by aortobicaval cannulation, and the ductus arteriosus was ligated. After the aorta was cross-clamped, the right atrium was opened. The catheter fragment was found trapped in the chordaes of the anterior leaflet, and one tip of the fragment was in the right ventricle and the other side in the right atrium (Fig. 2). We removed the catheter fragment (Fig. 3) and closed the foramen ovale.The postoperative recovery was uneventful.The patient was discharged 12 days after operation and no complication. During the 18 months follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Echocardiography demonstrated a foreign body of 15 mm with line-like strong echo, which was close to the anterior wall of the right ventricle

Fig. 2
figure 2

The catheter fragment (yellow arrow) was found trapped in the chordaes of anterior leaflet, and one tip of the fragment was in the right ventricle and the other in the right atrium

Fig. 3
figure 3

The embolized catheter fragment was removed

Discussion

Cardiovascular embolization of iatrogenic catheter fragment is an uncommon but well-known complication. The incidence of this complication varies from 0.2 to 4.2% [3]. This kind of embolization mainly occur with port catheter fragments and peripherally inserted central catheters [3, 4], peripheral venous catheters are very rare, only a few case reports of this complication [5, 6].The guide needle reinsertion was described as the most common mechanism for peripheral venous catheter fracture [5, 7]. In this way, guide needle into an already advanced plastic sheath. The sheath might be curved due to the insertion angle or the trajectory of veins. Advancing the needle may partially or entirely transect the plastic sheath. We speculated that our case was probably above mechanism and was related to an improper procedure. The most common site of embolization is the pulmonary artery followed by the right atrium, right ventricle and the superior vena cava or peripheral vein [3, 8]. In our case, the catheter fragment was trapped in the chordaes of the anterior leaflet, and one tip of the fragment was in the right ventricle and the other in the right atrium.

Clinical symptoms of catheter embolization included catheter malfunction, arrhythmia, pulmonary symptoms, septic syndrome, valve insufficiency, thrombosis, and even cardiac perforation. Meanwhile, there were 24.2% of cases were asymptomatic [3]. Children presented higher rates of asymptomatic cases and septic symptoms [4]. In most cases, the foreign body removed as early as possible, but in a few cases, conservative management could be performed according to the symptoms, size and location of the foreign body, life expectancy and other factors [9, 10].In this case, the patient was a preterm infant, and the catheter fragment was in the right heart chamber with PDA and PFO. Even if the patient was asymptomatic, the risks of mural thrombosis and infective endocarditis remained a threat, and there was a potential risk of catheter fragment migrating into the systemic circulation through PFO or PDA. Rothman reported a case of umbilical venous catheter fragment crossed through PFO with the distal end in the left atrium [11]. Based on the above risks, we planned to remove the catheter fragment promptly.

The methods of retrieving catheter embolization include surgical procedure [5] and percutaneous retrieval [12,13,14]. A systematic review found that 93.5% of embolized catheter fragments were retrieved percutaneously, only 2.3% of cases need surgical removal [3]. Pazinato and colleagues reported that the success rate of percutaneous retrieval of embolized fragments in children was 96.6% [4]. In this case,. Based on the size and location of the catheter fragment, and it was not be shown by X-ray, we evaluated the percutaneous approach was not feasible.Finally, we chose surgical procedure.

Conclusion

Peripheral venous catheterization is a widespread medical procedure. Despite this procedure is generally simple and safe, it is essential to prevent the complication of catheter fractureand catheter fragment embolization.Repeated needle reinsertion should be avoided during cannualtion, and the integrity of the catheter should be carefully checked when it was removed. .

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Simin D, Milutinovic D, Turkulov V, Brkic S. Incidence, severity and risk factors of peripheral intravenous cannula-induced complications: an observational prospective study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(10):9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bautista AB, Ko SH, Sun SC. Retention of percutaneous venous catheter in the newborn: a report of three cases. Am J Perinatol. 1995;12(1):53–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Surov A, Wienke A, Carter JM, et al. Intravascular embolization of venous catheter–causes, clinical signs, and management: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2009;33(6):677–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pazinato LV, Leite TFO, Bortolini E, et al. Percutaneous retrieval of intravascular foreign body in children: a case series and review. Acta Radiol. 2022;63(5):684–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dell’Amore A, Ammari C, Campisi A, et al. Peripheral venous catheter fracture with embolism into the pulmonary artery. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(12):E1581–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar RR, Ranjan P. Case report:iatrogenic fracture of intravenous cannula during removal with proximal migration. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;76:562–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nyamuryekung’e MK, Mmari EE, Patel MR. A missing piece: fracture of peripheral intravenous cannula, a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;78:296–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Loughran SC, Borzatta M. Peripherally inserted central catheters: a report of 2506 catheter days. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1995;19(2):133–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schechter MA, O’Brien PJ, Cox MW. Retrieval of iatrogenic intravascular foreign bodies. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(1):276–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Chen J, Li Z, et al. Successful percutaneous transvenous retrieval of intravascular fractured port catheter: a single center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15(1):101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rothman A, Jaiswal V, Evans WN, et al. Percutaneous retrieval of fractured intravascular catheters in premature infants. J Neonatal Perinat Med. 2020;13(3):413–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng CC, Tsai TN, Yang CC, et al. Percutaneous retrieval of dislodged totally implantable central venous access system in 92 cases: experience in a single hospital. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69(2):346–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghaderian M, Sabri MR, Ahmadi AR. Percutaneous retrieval of an intracardiac central venous port fragment using snare with triple loops. J Res Med Sci. 2015;20(1):97–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahin DA, Temel MT, Baspinar O. Percutaneous retrieval of embolized catheter fragments from preterm newborn to adult: a single center experience for 10 years. Eur J Ther. 2022;28(1):22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Military Family Planning Special Research Project (20JSZ15).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Gang Wang and Zhe Zhao wrote the main manuscript text and Gang Wang and Gengxu Zhou prepared Figs. 1, 2 and 3. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhichun Feng.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

13019_2024_2818_MOESM1_ESM.avi

Supplementary Material 1: Transcription of video: Video 1. Echocardiography demonstrated a foreign body of 15 mm with line-like strong echo, which was close to the anterior wall of the right ventricle

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, G., Zhao, Z., Zhou, G. et al. Surgical removal of a peripheral venous catheter fragment in the heart in a preterm infant. J Cardiothorac Surg 19, 306 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02818-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02818-4

Keywords