Skip to main content

Epicardial placement of human placental membrane allografts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with reduced postoperative atrial fibrillation: a pilot study for a future multi-center randomized controlled trial

A Correction to this article was published on 01 July 2024

This article has been updated



Post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurs in up to 40% of patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and is associated with a higher risk of stroke and mortality. This study investigates how POAF may be mitigated by epicardial placement of aseptically processed human placental membrane allografts (HPMAs) before pericardial closure in CABG surgery. This study was conducted as a pilot feasibility study to collect preliminary for a forthcoming multi-center randomized controlled trial.


This retrospective observational study of patients undergoing CABG surgery excluded patients with pre-operative heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or a history of atrial fibrillation. The “treatment” group (n = 24) had three HPMAs placed epicardially following cardiopulmonary bypass decannulation but before partial pericardial approximation and chest closure. The only difference in clinical protocol for the control group (n = 54) was that they did not receive HPMA.


HPMA-treated patients saw a significant, greater than four-fold reduction in POAF incidence compared to controls (35.2–8.3%, p = 0.0136). Univariate analysis demonstrated that HPMA treatment was associated with an 83% reduction in POAF (OR = 0.17, p = 0.0248). Multivariable analysis yielded similar results (OR = 0.07, p = 0.0156) after controlling for other covariates. Overall length of stay (LOS) between groups was similar, but ICU LOS trended lower with HPMA treatment (p = 0.0677). Post-operative inotrope and vasopressor requirements were similar among groups. There was no new-onset post-operative heart failure, stroke, or death reported up to thirty days in either group.


Epicardial HPMA placement can be a simple intervention at the end of CABG surgery that may provide a new approach to reduce post-operative atrial fibrillation by modulating local inflammation, possibly reducing ICU and hospital stay, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Peer Review reports


Heart disease, including coronary artery disease, remains the leading cause of death in the United States [1]. Despite advances in guideline-directed medical therapies, as well as percutaneous interventions, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the gold standard treatment for many cases of coronary artery disease. It is therefore one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures, with over 200,000 in the US and almost 800,000 worldwide per year [2]. Up to 40% of patients who undergo CABG surgery will experience new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) [3, 4], typically occurring in the first five postoperative days [5]. Patients who develop POAF are at higher risk of inpatient mortality, extended admission, and increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), i.e., stroke and cardiac-related death [6]. Despite POAF resolving in about 90% of patients at 8 weeks post-operatively [7], POAF remains a significant independent predictor of long-term mortality [8]. Additionally, POAF confers a financial and operational burden on hospitals performing cardiac surgery, as well as health systems as a whole. The financial burden of POAF was shown clearly in a randomized trial comparing on and off-pump cardiac surgery, that demonstrated the cost difference at 1 year for patients who developed POAF was $15,593 more than those who did not, due to longer hospital admissions and complications of POAF [9]. Current clinical approaches to reduce new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation include medications such as 𝛽-blockers and amiodarone. However, since the exact pathophysiology of POAF remains to be understood [10], it is difficult to develop a pathophysiology-targeted approach. However, the time course of POAF, occurring within the first 5 days of surgery corresponds to a higher level of inflammatory biomarkers [11], such as the advanced glycation end products (AGE) pathway and reactive oxygen species (ROS), linked with high levels of epicardial and pericardial inflammation on post-operative days 3–6 [12]. Additionally, some anti-inflammatory agents have shown some early promise in reducing POAF incidence [13] with early studies of placental tissue in cardiovascular applications also showing success [14].

Placental tissue is known to be immunologically privileged, containing numerous growth factors and cytokines involved in cell behavior, inflammation, and angiogenesis [15]. Consequently, it has been used successfully as a wound covering in plastic surgery and burns treatment, for example, offering anti-inflammatory properties that foster more organized wound healing [16, 17]. The cardiac inflammation resulting from CABG surgery is likely to benefit similarly and localized application of placental membrane may reduce post-operative complications associated with disorganized healing and inflammation, including POAF. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that aseptically processed human placental membrane allograft (HPMA) placement as an epicardial tissue covering during CABG procedures would reduce POAF incidence.


This is a retrospective observational study, comprised of seventy-eight patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery performed by a single surgeon between 2019 and 2021. Institutional Review Board ethical approval was granted for outcome analysis in this study (IRB#20200195) and informed consent was obtained from all patients for the relevant surgical procedures as well as for analysis of anonymized data in this study. All methods of this study were conducted per the relevant guidelines and regulations for working with human subjects. All patients included were over the age of 18. Exclusion criteria were pre-existing diagnoses of heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or a history of atrial fibrillation (AFib). Heart failure was defined using American Heart Association (AHA) criteria for diastolic heart failure [18] – left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to 40% as measured with transthoracic echocardiography. Chronic kidney disease was defined using the internationally accepted Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria [19] – glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min/1.73m2 and albuminuria with an albumin-creatinine ratio greater than 3 mg/mmol.

Data collection

Pre-operative demographic (age and gender) and clinical data of all patients were collected from the institutional electronic medical record system [20]. Clinical data were classified as either cardiac characteristics (pre-operative LVEF, Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score, or a clinical history of myocardial infarction (MI) by ICD-10 code, coronary stenting, or 𝛽-blocker usage) or non-cardiac characteristics (height, weight, body mass index (BMI), or a clinical history of hypertension or diabetes mellitus by ICD-10 code). Additional noncardiac characteristics included were renal function indices, glomerular filtration rate, and serum creatinine, from a fasting blood sample obtained on the last pre-operative morning. Perioperative data was collected: the number of vessels bypassed in the CABG procedure as well as total cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp time (XCT). Additionally, multiple post-operative outcome parameters were collected: new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence and time to onset, amiodarone and colchicine requirement for arrhythmia treatment, post-operative LVEF, post-operative inotropic and pressor requirement, duration and type, as well as post-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence and time to onset. Lastly, data was collected for length of total hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, as well as incidence of new-onset heart failure and thirty-day incidence of stroke and death. AKI was defined using KDIGO criteria [21].

New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation was defined using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) criteria [22]. In order to detect postoperative atrial fibrillation while the patient is admitted to the hospital postoperatively, we use a three- pronged diagnostic strategy. Firstly, patients are kept on continuous, real-time telemetry electrocardiogram (EKG) monitoring from the time they leave the operating room until they are discharged home. If the telemetry monitoring detects atrial fibrillation, a confirmatory 12-lead EKG is carried out within five minutes to assess cardiac rhythm. Lastly, the physician caring for the patient is also alerted at the same time, and they confirm the rhythm to be atrial fibrillation. We recognize that varying definitions of postoperative atrial fibrillation exist, hence in our clinical practice, we exclusively use the STS criteria, which are outlined below:

  1. 1.

    Duration: The atrial fibrillation or flutter episode should last for at least 30 s.

  2. 2.

    Timing: The episode should occur during the postoperative period, which is typically defined as the time from the end of the surgical procedure until 30 days after the surgery.

  3. 3.

    Documentation: The atrial fibrillation or flutter should be documented by a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or a rhythm strip, confirming the diagnosis. AF should be documented by ECG, with irregular RR intervals and an absence of distinct P waves, lasting for at least 30 s or for the duration of the ECG recording if less than 30 s.

  4. 4.

    Exclusion of pre-existing atrial fibrillation: Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation or flutter before the surgery are not considered to have POAF unless they were in stable sinus rhythm for at least 3 months before the surgical procedure.

  5. 5.

    Exclusion of secondary causes: Other potential causes of AF, such as electrolyte imbalances, thyroid disorders, or acute infections, should be ruled out or treated accordingly.

Operative technique and clinical protocol

The HPMAs used in this study (MTF AmnioBand® Matrix, MTF Biologics, Edison, NJ) are aseptically processed amnion and chorion tissue forms regulated for use as a Human Cellular and Tissue-Based Product (HCT/P) under FDA 21 CFR 1271 and Sect. 361 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act when labeled and promoted for use in wound treatment and management as a protective covering for internal or external soft tissue defects including acute, chronic, and surgically created wounds. Three HPMAs were placed over the epicardium once the patient had been weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass and had been decannulated in preparation for partial pericardial approximation and chest closure. Each patch measured 5 cm x 6 cm, with a schematic representation shown in Fig. 1). The patches were placed as follows, and as depicted in Fig. 2:

Fig. 1
figure 1

The HPMAs used were comprised of both placenta-derived amnion and chorion, superior to amnion-only membranes, by improving handling properties due to a thicker tissue bilayer, as well as an increased amount of naturally preserved placental factors

Fig. 2
figure 2

Placement of 3 HPMAs (5 × 6 cm) prior to pericardial approximation and closure

  • Right atrium: secured with two medium clips to the pericardium which was then approximated over the right atrium.

  • Right ventricle: secured inferiorly with two medium clips to the diaphragmatic surface.

  • Left ventricle: placed topically and the pericardium approximated over the left ventricular membrane.

This placement strategy was employed to minimize movement of the membranes due to the beating heart. Twenty-four patients were treated with HPMA (treatment group) and were compared to fifty-four non-HPMA patients (control group), where the only procedural difference was the lack of HPMA placement.

Additionally, all patients in this study underwent left atrial appendage ligation (LAAL) with a 40 mm clip (AtriClip, AtriCure Inc, Mason, OH, USA), which was placed atraumatically to the base of the left atrial appendage (LAA), and a residual stump of less than 0.5 cm was confirmed using multiple angles on transesophageal echocardiography. Work from our group has shown that in a large group of similar patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery as in this study, carrying out successful left atrial appendage closure (with TEE confirmation and good LVEF postoperatively) eliminates the need for anticoagulation postoperatively even if new-onset AFib (POAF) develops [23]. Hence, patients were not formally anticoagulated even if they developed postoperative AFib.

All patients in this study, regardless of study group, underwent partial pericardial reapproximation and closure with silk sutures before chest closure. All patients were administered POAF prophylaxis in the form of beta-blockers; if a patient was not on “long-term” beta-blockers preoperatively, they were started on admission to the hospital before surgery and were continued in all patients postoperatively.

Post-operative follow-up

Follow-up appointments in the outpatient setting were scheduled at two weeks and thirty days following hospital discharge after the initial procedure. A detailed multi-system clinical evaluation and physical exam were performed at each visit. Thirty-day all-cause mortality and stroke incidence were also evaluated at follow-up. To assess for POAF following hospital discharge, every patient would have a 12-lead EKG at discharge and follow-up appointments following discharge at 14 days and 30 days. If at any point after discharge, the patient felt symptoms of AFib such as palpitations, they would be seen as soon as possible that day in the clinic and would have an urgent EKG done to assess heart rhythm.

Statistical analysis

Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. For continuous variables, mean and standard deviation (SD) were presented for normally distributed (parametric) data while median and interquartile range (IQR) were used for non-normally (non-parametric) distributed data. We compared group differences between HPMA-treated and non-HPMA-treated patients as well as POAF and non-POAF patients. Continuous variables were compared using unpaired t-tests (parametric variables) or Mann-Whitney U tests (non-parametric variables) and categorical variables were compared using Chi-square (for frequency cells > 5) or Fisher exact (for frequency cells < 5) tests. Both univariate and multivariable regression models were conducted to examine the likelihood of POAF association with HPMA treatment using unadjusted (uOR) and adjusted (aOR) odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC) and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant as is conventional.


Patient characteristics, stratified by study cohort, are summarized in Table 1. When comparing the HPMA-treated group to the control group, the treatment group was slightly younger (mean age = 62.3y vs. 66.5y, p = 0.0498), with no significant differences observed in BMI or the proportion of patients with prior MI between the two groups (Fig. 3). These characteristics are known to be risk factors for the development of POAF [24, 25].

Table 1 Pre-operative and operative patient characteristics by group. Categorical variables are expressed as N (%), with continuous variables expressed as either Mean ± SEM for parametric variables or as Median (IQR) for nonparametric variables
Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of key pre-operative risk factors for AFib (age, BMI, and history of MI) between control and treatment groups. Full comparison of characteristics is given in Table 1

According to the complete STS risk score, the treatment group is at a lower risk of operative mortality. With the sample sizes involved, it would be difficult to perfectly match study cohorts, and we therefore undertook suitable statistical analyses (univariate and multivariable) to try and account for any confounding factors such as differences in STS risk score. It must be noted, additionally, that while the STS score is a good indicator of operative risk, there is not strong evidence that it is a good predictor of POAF incidence. It is also worth noting that with mean risk scores of 0.513% and 0.814% respectively (p = 0.0217), both the treatment and control groups consisted of relatively low operative risk candidates.

The treatment group had a significantly higher proportion of patients taking 𝛽-blockers pre-operatively (70.8% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.0142). However, since there was no significant difference in the incidence of hypertension between groups, and all patients with a history of AFib were excluded from this study (any undiagnosed AFib would have been discovered on pre-operative electrocardiogram), it is unlikely that this difference in pre-operative 𝛽-blocker requirement is due to any factor that may have contributed to the outcomes and therefore the results of this study. Additionally, since it is well known that 𝛽-blockers can reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, any patients that were not on “long-term” 𝛽-blockers preoperatively were given 𝛽-blockers perioperatively. All patients received 𝛽-blockers postoperatively to achieve pharmacological POAF prophylaxis.

Due to the non-randomized nature of this study, it was not feasible to match the demographics of the two study cohorts, and therefore these demographic differences had to be accounted for in the statistical analyses. This was achieved by undertaking both univariate and multivariable analyses, the findings of which will subsequently be discussed in detail. There were no other significant differences between HPMA-treated and non-HPMA-treated patients in the other pre-operative characteristics or operative characteristics. Similar numbers of vessels were bypassed with comparable CPB and XCT between groups. A comparison of operative characteristics is shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of operative parameters (number of vessels bypassed, total cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamp time) between control and treatment groups

We further compared sample characteristics between patients with and without POAF; the results are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences in pre-operative and operative characteristics between patient populations that experienced POAF compared to those who did not.

Table 2 Pre-operative and operative patient characteristics by POAF. Categorical variables are expressed as N (%), with continuous variables expressed as either Mean ± SEM for parametric variables or as Median (IQR) for nonparametric variables

Patients treated with HPMA saw a greater than four-fold reduction in POAF compared to control patients (8.3% vs. 35.2%, p = 0.0136), illustrated in Fig. 5. Although postoperative inotropic support requirement was similar between groups, control patients tended to require treatment for a longer amount of time (p = 0.0594). Additionally, the inotrope of choice differed significantly between groups; a greater proportion of patients in the control group were prescribed dobutamine for inotropic support, whereas patients in the treatment group tended to have norepinephrine, used as Levophed (p = 0.0374). While norepinephrine is typically used for its vasopressor effects, at the doses that it was used in this study, it has a greater contribution to positive inotropy than it does to vasoconstriction. While the arrhythmogenic effects of dobutamine are known, these are typically only seen at higher “cardiac” doses, around 10 micrograms/kg/minute. However, our patients received a much lower dose, up to a maximum of 2.5 micrograms/kg/minute, to prevent a risk of arrhythmias due to the dobutamine administration.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Significant decrease (p = 0.0136) in new onset POAF with HPMA treatment from 35.2 to 8.3%

While there was no significant difference in overall hospital length of stay between groups, the median ICU length of stay trended lower in patients treated with HPMA (2 vs. 3 days, p = 0.0677), shown in Fig. 6. With the sample sizes in this pilot study, we did not observe a statistically significant difference in the length of ICU and hospital admission, however, with a larger sample size this may be noticeable.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Comparison of hospital and ICU length of stay by group. No significant difference between groups, but ICU LOS trended shorter in the treatment group

Incidence of postoperative AKI was similar among groups and there was no post-operative HF, stroke, or death reported up to thirty days. There were no other significant differences in the other post-operative outcomes, with all post-operative outcomes shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Post-operative outcomes by group. Categorical variables are expressed as N (%), with continuous variables expressed as Median (IQR).

In the univariate analysis, all pre-operative and operative characteristics were examined individually to determine whether they affected the odds of a patient experiencing POAF. None of the variables were associated with POAF except HPMA treatment. Patients who had HPMAs placed showed an 83% reduction in POAF (OR = 0.17, p = 0.0248) compared to control patients who did not have HPMAs placed (Table 4). Multivariable analysis yielded a similar result (OR = 0.07, p = 0.0156) after controlling for all pre-operative characteristics that were found to be significantly different between groups (Table 5).

Table 4 – Univariate analysis on POAF.
Table 5 – Multivariable analysis on POAF.


New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a significant concern for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, with up to 40% of patients developing POAF. POAF confers an increased risk of inpatient mortality, extended admission duration, and risk of MACE. While POAF resolves in around 90% of cases by 8 weeks post-operatively, it remains a significant independent predictor of long-term mortality [8], and therefore a post-operative complication that there is great merit in addressing. While the most significant effect of POAF is of course the morbidity/mortality burden, it is also important to consider the economic impact of POAF, which can be significant, both for the patient and the healthcare system. AF management imposes huge financial burdens on health systems with an estimated annual direct cost of $26 billion in the USA [26].

Patients who develop POAF may require additional medical attention, including prolonged hospitalization due to additional complications, additional diagnostic tests, and medications. These additional interventions and support will increase the cost of care for the patient, provider, and insurer, resulting in an increased economic burden on the healthcare system. For patients who experience a stroke, a common complication associated with AFib, the U.S. average per patient per year cost was reported to be $59,900 [27]. For AKI, the increased index hospitalization cost was $38,358 ($77,178 for patients with AKI vs. $38,820 for those without) [28].

Patients with POAF may also require additional follow-up care, including outpatient visits, rehabilitation, monitoring, and an increase in hospital readmission which can further increase the economic impact of this condition. This study explored the potential of using aseptically processed human placental membrane allografts after CABG surgery to prevent POAF, one of the most common postoperative complications, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality through thromboembolic events such as stroke as well as complications such as AKI. This study found a significant reduction in POAF in patients treated with HPMA, both in the initial analysis and also in univariate and multivariable analyses conducted to account for any differences in characteristics between groups. Due to the retrospective observational nature of this study, cohorts were not matched in demographics or clinical characteristics, though through our rigorous statistical analysis, the effects of any cohort differences were accounted for. There were no significant differences in operative characteristics between the HPMA-treated group and the control group.

The option of using HPMA was found to be safe with no significant differences in post-operative complications such as AKI, stroke, or death at thirty days. In this study, the HPMAs were placed strategically on the epicardial surface of the heart to cover key ventricular and atrial sites. The study hypothesized that the innate anti-inflammatory, anti-adhesive, and antimicrobial properties of placental tissue would offer benefits in terms of mitigation of inflammation, tissue protection, scar remodeling, and modulating the response of macrophages towards a favorable outcome. The significant decrease in POAF incidence from 35.2 to 8.3% with HPMA treatment suggests the use of HPMA to mitigate POAF is a promising approach that supports further clinical and scientific investigation. The study found that HPMA treatment did not affect the risk of AKI following the CABG procedure.

These results suggest that identifying patients who could benefit from HPMA before the CABG procedure is important for future investigation, to provide robust results that have even greater potential to change clinical practice than this work. T2-weighted cardiac MRI imaging is a well-established modality to evaluate the inflammatory burden of the myocardium and other tissues, by assessing edema and fluid distribution (pericardial edema in the case of new-onset post-operative atrial fibrillation). Previous work has also shown the association between POAF, and post-operative myocardial inflammation as evaluated by T2-weighted MRI, as well as the early success in humans of placing a human amniotic patch, resulting in reduced inflammation, pericardial edema, and freedom from AFib [29]. The present study suggests that placing HPMA on the heart topically can be a simple solution at the end of a coronary artery bypass grafting case that could save the morbidity and mortality risk of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients with possible shorter ICU and total hospital admission.

Given that there is no consensus on a molecular pathway for the pathophysiology of AFib despite the clear link with myocardial inflammation, a precise understanding of the mechanism of the therapeutic benefit conferred by HPMA is unlikely at present. It has been suggested that the pro-inflammatory AGE pathway as well as the process of fibrosis are involved in the pathogenesis of AFib [30]. AGEs are formed by nonenzymatic glycation of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids with reducing sugars, a process that occurs at significantly greater rates in metabolic syndromes such as diabetes mellitus. AGEs interact with the receptor (RAGE), to produce ROS, and consequently factors such as TNF-𝛼 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines, factors which are strongly implicated in AFib. Atrial structural remodeling due to fibrosis is also thought to be significant in AFib; both AGE and RAGE are implicated in atrial fibrosis. Data from both murine models, as well as human patients, suggests that the levels of AGEs in both plasma and tissue, specifically the atrium, are elevated in patients with AFib.

The preliminary hypothesis for the mode of action for the aseptically processed human placental membrane allograft evaluated in this study relies on the innate immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties of placental tissues. Characterization of HPMAs has shown that naturally occurring anti-inflammatory properties are retained in the aseptically processed tissue [31]. By inhibiting pathways such as RAGE, and reducing ROS activity, we suggest that HPMA placement reduces post-operative myocardial and pericardial inflammation, thus reducing the incidence of POAF. Further in-vitro and in-vivo investigations are underway to elucidate actual molecular mechanisms providing the positive clinical outcome observed in this study. All patients in the study received LAAL, using the AtriClip device, but it was not taken into consideration when interpreting the results. Recently LAAL was found to be non-inferior to warfarin treatment for stroke prevention in patients with AFib acutely and over 2 years post-intervention [32, 33]. Healey and colleagues also concluded that LAAL was preferred, as over 90% of thrombi are found to originate from the LAA. Additionally, LAAL does not significantly increase procedure time and is not thought to increase the risk of post-operative complications including HF, POAF, or bleeding [34].

However, there is anecdotal and institutional experience that the material used to clip the LAA may incite a peri-clip inflammatory reaction contributing to the incidence of POAF. The study highlights the need to consider the potential effects of LAAL when evaluating the results of using HPMA. While occlusion of the LAA is not always routine practice in patients without a history of AFib, such as the patients in this study, it was deemed to be a clinically appropriate intervention in this case. In all patients in this study, there was a valid reason for LAAL. Each patient had one or more such reasons, including a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 or on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), an LAA velocity (LAAV) of ≤ 40 cm/s. Previous work has shown that a reduced LAAV is a strong predictor of LAA thrombus formation [35]. These criteria are similar to those used by the multi-national LeAAPS randomized controlled trial, which is currently underway, and aims to show the benefit of prophylactic left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention [36]. Post-operatively, all subjects were placed on guideline-directed dual anti-platelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) [37] as well as a 𝛽-blocker post-operatively to achieve blood pressure management with rate control. If POAF did occur, the first line of defense was amiodarone. Patients who developed POAF were followed by an electrophysiologist, with the potential for future catheter or hybrid ablation [38, 39] if POAF progressed to persistent AFib.


While the lack of totally matched cohorts was a limitation, our subsequent statistical analyses attempted to account for small demographic and clinical differences between the two groups. This was achieved through not only performing univariate but also multivariable analyses. These enabled our conclusions to consider the differences in patient populations, concluding that the only characteristic or treatment associated with a difference in POAF was the epicardial placement of HPMAs. It has been shown that in the regression-based approach utilized here is superior to group-matching in retrospective studies such as this, where group differences may exist [40]. While matching is often chosen to make groups appear comparable, a regression approach has in fact been shown to be much more effective at eliciting a treatment effect, hence why it was chosen in this study, sacrificing the appearance of demographically matched study cohorts.

Additionally, our relatively small sample size meant that certain differences between groups in specific outcomes (such as length of ICU admission), remained as trends that did not quite reach statistical significance. While we recognize such trends, it is impossible to make any conclusions from them until they reach statistical significance, which will only be possible with larger sample sizes. Nonetheless, we conducted this study as a pilot study to collect preliminary data and guide the design of a multi-center randomized controlled trial. The results of this study are encouraging and have been instrumental in designing the final study protocol for the trial, which is currently undergoing deployment.

We recognize that there is a very small chance that we may have missed a patient with a history of preoperative paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. All patients who were admitted as inpatients prior to their operation were on continuous EKG telemetry monitoring, and if AFib was detected, a confirmatory 12-lead EKG would be carried out. All patients who presented to the hospital on the day of surgery had previously had multiple EKGs in the process of preoperative clinical assessment and evaluation and at least one EKG carried out by their cardiologist’s office prior to referral for cardiac surgery -- often this would be a 24-hour monitoring EKG. They also underwent EKG testing in the cardiac surgery outpatient clinic, as well as the pre-operative assessment clinic. While we cannot exclude a patient who had paroxysmal AFib preoperatively, which wasn’t picked up by any of the multiple EKGs that were carried out, we are highly confident that this did not happen.

In conclusion, this study found that the application of three aseptically processed human placental membrane allografts on the surface of the heart after coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation and did not affect the risk of AKI. The study also found a decrease in inotrope use in patients who received the HPMA. The study suggests that the application of HPMA can be a safe and effective solution to reduce POAF in CABG patients without a history of heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or prior incidence of AFib. While encouraging, the results of this study warrant further prospective studies to confirm these first positive clinical outcomes and better understand the mechanism of action associated with HPMA placement.


This study has shown that epicardial placement of aseptically processed human placental membrane allografts is a safe, simple, yet effective intervention that can be undertaken at the end of a CABG procedure. This study showed a significant 83% reduction in POAF incidence, even after accounting for differences in pre-existing demographic and clinical characteristics through undertaking univariate and multivariable analysis. While exact molecular and cellular mechanisms for the pathophysiology of AFib and POAF are not widely agreed upon, it is difficult to explain the positive impact of the HPMAs. However, given the known anti-inflammatory properties of placental tissues, as well as the implication of inflammatory pathways such as RAGE in AFib, we propose that HPMA placement may be associated with a reduction in post-operative cardiac inflammation and therefore provides a novel approach to reduce the risk of POAF, thus potentially reducing ICU and hospital admissions, while improving long-term outcomes. While the retrospective nature of this study and relatively small sample size were limitations, this study was a pilot study, with the aim of providing us with preliminary data to guide a forthcoming multi-center randomized controlled trial. This study provided encouraging results that have been instrumental in developing our randomized trial, which is currently in the process of deployment. We look forward to sharing the results from this forthcoming study in due course.

Data availability

Key data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files, with all data available on reasonable request to the corresponding author, Dr Zain Khalpey.

Change history



Atrial fibrillation


Advanced glycation end products


American heart association


Acute kidney injury


Body mass index


Coronary artery bypass grafting


Chronic kidney disease


Cardiopulmonary bypass


Heart failure


Aseptically processed human placental membrane allograft


Intensive care unit


Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes


Left atrial appendage


Left atrial appendage ligation


Left ventricular ejection fraction


Major adverse cardiovascular events


Myocardial infarction


New–onset postoperative atrial fibrillation


Reactive oxygen species


Society of thoracic surgeons


Transesophageal echocardiograph


Aortic cross–clamp time


  1. Heron M, Deaths. Leading Causes for 2018 [Internet]. National Center for Health Statistics; 2021 May [cited 2024 Feb 29].

  2. Melly L, Torregrossa G, Lee T, Jansens JL, Puskas JD. Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(3):1960–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobrev D, Aguilar M, Heijman J, Guichard JB, Nattel S. Postoperative atrial fibrillation: mechanisms, manifestations and management. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(7):417–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lopes LA, Agrawal DK. Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation: current treatments and etiologies for a Persistent Surgical complication. J Surg Res. 2022;5(1):159–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in partnership with the European Society of Cardiology and in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(11):e101–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kerwin M, Saado J, Pan J, Ailawadi G, Mazimba S, Salerno M, et al. New-onset atrial fibrillation and outcomes following isolated coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43(9):928–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kowey PR, Stebbins D, Igidbashian L, Goldman SM, Sutter FP, Rials SJ, et al. Clinical outcome of patients who develop PAF after CABG surgery. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24(2):191–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Villareal RP, Hariharan R, Liu BC, Kar B, Lee VV, Elayda M, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(5):742–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Almassi GH, Wagner TH, Carr B, Hattler B, Collins JF, Quin JA, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation impacts on costs and one-year clinical outcomes: the Veterans affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(1):109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harada M, Van Wagoner DR, Nattel S. Role of inflammation in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology and management. Circ J. 2015;79(3):495–502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Maesen B, Nijs J, Maessen J, Allessie M, Schotten U. Post-operative atrial fibrillation: a maze of mechanisms. EP Eur. 2012;14(2):159–74.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bulow NMH, Colpo E, Duarte MF, Correa EFM, Schlosser RS, Lauda A, et al. Inflammatory response in patients under coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and clinical implications: a review of the relevance of Dexmedetomidine Use. Int Sch Res Not. 2014;2014:e905238.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacob KA, Nathoe HM, Dieleman JM, van Osch D, Kluin J, van Dijk D. Inflammation in new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014;44(4):402–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hitscherich PG, Chnari E, Deckwa J, Long M, Khalpey Z. Human placental allograft membranes: promising role in cardiac surgery and repair. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:809960.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Koob TJ, Lim JJ, Massee M, Zabek N, Rennert R, Gurtner G, et al. Angiogenic properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion allografts: therapeutic potential for soft tissue repair and regeneration. Vasc Cell. 2014;6(1):10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammadi AA, Johari HG, Eskandari S. Effect of amniotic membrane on graft take in extremity burns. Burns. 2013;39(6):1137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DiDomenico LA, Orgill DP, Galiano RD, Serena TE, Carter MJ, Kaufman JP, et al. Use of an aseptically processed, dehydrated human amnion and chorion membrane improves likelihood and rate of healing in chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, randomised, multi-centre clinical trial in 80 patients. Int Wound J. 2018;15(6):950–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):e147–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Update Work Group. KDIGO 2017 clinical practice Guideline Update for the diagnosis, evaluation, Prevention, and treatment of chronic kidney disease–Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl. 2017;7(1):1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Epic Systems Corporation Ltd. Epic Hyperspace [Internet]. Online. 2023 [cited 2023 Nov 29].

  21. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pr. 2012;120(4):c179–84. 20120807th ed.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bowdish ME, D’Agostino RS, Thourani VH, Schwann TA, Krohn C, Desai N, et al. STS adult cardiac surgery database: 2021 update on outcomes, Quality, and Research. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(6):1770–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khalpey Z, Aslam U, Wilson P, Deckwa J, Kumar U. Prophylactic Left Atrial Appendage Ligation During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Allows Safe Avoidance of Anticoagulation Regardless of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation. Cureus. 2024;16(5):e59876.

  24. Camen S, Csengeri D, Geelhoed B, Niiranen T, Gianfagna F, Vishram-Nielsen JK, et al. Risk factors, subsequent Disease Onset, and prognostic impact of myocardial infarction and Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(7):e024299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shu H, Cheng J, Li N, Zhang Z, Nie J, Peng Y, et al. Obesity and atrial fibrillation: a narrative review from arrhythmogenic mechanisms to clinical significance. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation [Internet]. 2018 Mar [cited 2023 Sep 19];137(12).

  27. Strilciuc S, Alecsandra Grad D, Radu C, Chira D, Stan A, Ungureanu M, et al. The economic burden of stroke: a systematic review of cost of illness studies. J Med Life. 2021;14(5):606–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Alshaikh H, Katz N, Gani F, Nagarajan N, Canner JK, Kacker S, et al. Financial Impact of Acute kidney Injury after Cardiac operations in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(2):469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khalpey Z, Marsh KM, Ferng A, Riaz IB, Friedman M, Indik J, et al. First in Man: amniotic Patch reduces postoperative inflammation. Am J Med. 2015;128(1):e5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Prasad K. AGE–RAGE stress in the pathophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation and its treatment. Int J Angiol off Publ Int Coll Angiol Inc. 2020;29(2):72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dasgupta A, Phipps A, Eng S, Huang YC, Chnari E. Aseptically Processed Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Allografts* Possess Anti-microbial, Anti-inflammatory and Non-Immunogenic Properties that Support Wound Healing [Internet]. Symposium on Advanced Wound Care; 2016; Atlanta, GA, USA.

  32. Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial. Circulation. 2013;127(6):720–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9689):534–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Healey JS, Crystal E, Lamy A, Teoh K, Semelhago L, Hohnloser SH, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion study (LAAOS): results of a randomized controlled pilot study of left atrial appendage occlusion during coronary bypass surgery in patients at risk for stroke. Am Heart J. 2005;150(2):288–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Handke M, Harloff A, Hetzel A, Olschewski M, Bode C, Geibel A. Left atrial appendage flow velocity as a quantitative surrogate parameter for thromboembolic risk: determinants and relationship to spontaneous echocontrast and thrombus formation–a transesophageal echocardiographic study in 500 patients with cerebral ischemia. J Am Soc Echocardiogr off Publ Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(12):1366–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. AtriCure. Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion for Prophylactic Stroke Reduction Trial [Internet].; 2023 Sep [cited 2023 Jan 1]. Report No.: NCT05478304.

  37. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(1):104–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. DeLurgio DB, Crossen KJ, Gill J, Blauth C, Oza SR, Magnano AR, et al. Hybrid Convergent Procedure for the treatment of Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: results of CONVERGE Clinical Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(12):e009288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Khalpey Z, Kumar U, Aslam U, Krauthammer Y, Doshi R. Revolutionizing Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: the Robotic Convergent Plus Procedure. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e57835.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Brazauskas R, Logan BR. Observational studies: matching or regression? Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transpl. 2016;22(3):557–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was not supported by any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



UK and ZK contributed equally to this work and therefore should be considered as joint-first authors. UK - data analysis, and preparation of the initial and final manuscript; PH, EC, ML - development and implementation of the aseptically processed human placental membrane allograft technology and drafting of the manuscript; UA - data collection and preparation of the initial manuscript; ZK - conceptualization, operative procedures, preparation of the initial and final manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zain Khalpey.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The terms of the research have been reviewed and appropriately managed by HonorHealth per its conflict-of-interest policies and appropriate Institutional Review Board ethical approval was granted for outcome analysis in this study (IRB#20200195). Full informed consent for the surgical procedures as well as anonymized inclusion into this study was obtained for all patients. No patient-identifiable information is contained within this work. All methods of this study were conducted following the relevant guidelines and regulations for working with human subjects. The HPMAs used in this study (MTF AmnioBand® Matrix, MTF Biologics, Edison, NJ) are aseptically processed amnion and chorion tissue forms regulated for use as a Human Cellular and Tissue-Based Product (HCT/P) under FDA 21 CFR 1271 and Sect. 361 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act when labelled and promoted for use in wound treatment and management as a protective covering for internal or external soft tissue defects including acute, chronic, and surgically created wounds.

Consent for publication

All patients were appropriately consented for retrospective outcome analysis and inclusion in this subsequent publication.

Competing interests

ZK serves as a consultant for MTF Biologics. PH, EC, and ML are employed by MTF Biologics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: the DOI for reference 23 and ORCiD for the authors Zain Khalpey and Ujjawal Kumar were missing. Also the authors Zain Khalpey and Ujjawal Kumar were denoted as equally contributing authors.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalpey, Z., Kumar, U., Hitscherich, P. et al. Epicardial placement of human placental membrane allografts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with reduced postoperative atrial fibrillation: a pilot study for a future multi-center randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Surg 19, 315 (2024).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: