- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Durvalumab supplementation for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis study
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 19, Article number: 421 (2024)
Abstract
Background
Durvalumab supplementation may have some potential in improving the efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of durvalumab supplementation on efficacy for NSCLC.
Methods
PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of durvalumab supplementation on efficacy in patients with NSCLC. Overall survival and progression-free survival were included for this meta-analysis.
Results
Four RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for NSCLC, durvalumab supplementation showed significantly improved survival rate (odd ratio [OR] = 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31 to 2.06; P < 0.0001), overall survival ( hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.87; P = 0.0003), progression-free survival rate (OR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.78 to 3.01; P < 0.00001) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.95; P = 0.02), and had the capability to reduce the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (OR = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.42; P < 0.00001).
Conclusions
Durvalumab supplementation is effective to improve the efficacy for NSCLC.
Introduction
Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or its ligand programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have important potential in treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [1,2,3,4,5]. However, not all patients with NSCLC can obtain immunotherapy in the first- or second-line setting because of many factors including approval/availability of these products at that time in some countries [6]. More therapy options are needed for patients with disease progression.
As one selective, high-affinity, human immuno-globulin G1 monoclonal antibody, durvalumab has shown the promise for the treatment of patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC by blocking PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80 [7, 8]. Especially, in patients with PD-L1 expression levels, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapies was reported to significantly improve the efficacy outcomes of lung cancers [9,10,11].
Several RCTs showed that durvalumab supplementation may have the capability to improve the efficacy for NSCLC, but the results were not well established [6, 8, 12]. Considering these inconsistent effects, we therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the effectiveness of durvalumab supplementation versus standard chemotherapy on treatment efficacy for NSCLC.
Materials and methods
Study selection and data collection
This meta-analysis of previously studies did not need ethical approval or patient consent. It was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [13, 14].
We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and the Cochrane library up to June 2022, using the search terms “durvalumab” AND “lung cancer” OR “NSCLC”. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) study design was RCT; (2) patients were diagnosed with NSCLC; (3) intervention treatments were durvalumab versus standard chemotherapy.
Assessment for risk of bias
The risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of individual studies in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [15], and the following sources of bias were considered: selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias, detection bias, reporting bias, and other potential sources of bias. The overall risk of bias for each study was evaluated and rated: low, when the risk of bias was low in all key domains; unclear, when the risk of bias was low or unclear in all key domains; and high, when the risk of bias was high in one or more key domains [16]. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Any discrepancy was solved by consensus.
Outcome measures
The following information was extracted: first author, publication year, sample size, age, male, tumor histologic subtype (squamous/nonsquamous) and methods of two groups. The primary outcomes were survival rate and overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival rate, progression-free survival, adverse events, and grade ≥ 3 adverse events.
Statistical analysis
A team consisting of three authors did the statistical analyses. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess continuous outcomes and odd ratio (OR) with 95% CI was used to assess dichotomous outcomes. I2 statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity, and significant heterogeneity was observed when I2 > 50% [17]. The random-effect model was used regardless of the heterogeneity. We conducted the sensitivity analysis through detecting the influence of a single study on the overall estimate via omitting one study in turn or using the subgroup analysis. P< 0.05 indicated statistical significance and Review Manager Version 5.3 was used in all statistical analyses.
Results
Literature search, study characteristics and quality assessment
The flow chart for the selection process and detailed identification was presented in Fig. 1. 385 publications were identified through the initial search of databases. Ultimately, four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis [6, 8, 12, 18].
The baseline characteristics of the four eligible RCTs in the meta-analysis were summarized in Table 1. The four studies were published between 2017 and 2020, and total sample size was 1399. There were similar baseline characteristics between durvalumab group and control group. The treatment duration of durvalumab supplement were different in each RCT, ranging from 2 years to 3 years. Two studies reported the same patient sample with different outcomes [8, 18].
Among the four RCTs, three studies reported survival rate and overall survival [6, 8, 12], three studies reported progression-free survival rate and progression-free survival [6, 12, 18], as well as two studies reported adverse events, grade ≥ 3 adverse events and adverse events [6, 12]. Risk of bias analysis (Fig. 2) showed that two studies had high risk of performance bias and detection bias due to the open label of two groups [6, 12], but all RCTs generally had high quality.
Primary outcomes: survival rate and overall survival
Compared to control group for NSCLC, durvalumab supplementation was associated with significantly higher survival rate (OR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.31 to 2.06; P < 0.0001) with no heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 0%, heterogeneity P = 0.40, Fig. 3) and prolonged overall survival (HR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.87; P = 0.0003) with no heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 0%, heterogeneity P = 0.79, Fig. 4).
Sensitivity analysis
No heterogeneity was observed for the primary outcomes, and thus we did not perform the sensitivity analysis by omitting one study in turn for the meta-analysis.
Secondary outcomes
Compared with control group for NSCLC, durvalumab supplementation showed substantially improved progression-free survival rate (OR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.78 to 3.01; P < 0.00001; Fig. 5) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.95; P = 0.02; Fig. 6). With regard to the safety, durvalumab supplementation showed no obvious impact on the incidence of adverse events (OR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.15 to 1.66; P = 0.26; Fig. 7), but was associated with substantially reduced grade ≥ 3 adverse events (OR = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.42; P < 0.00001; Fig. 8).
Discussion
In the phase II ATLANTIC trial, durvalumab showed important potential in improving the efficacy for heavily pretreated (third-line or higher) patients with NSCLC when compared with other anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents [2]. Durvalumab has become an increasingly important immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody to block PD-L1. In order to explore the efficacy of durvalumab supplementation for NSCLC patients, our meta-analysis included four RCTs and 1399 patients. The results suggested that compared to control intervention, durvalumab supplementation substantially benefited to improve survival rate, overall survival, progression-free survival rate and progression-free survival for patients with NSCLC.
In terms of sensitivity analysis, although there was no significant heterogeneity, several factors may produce some bias. Firstly, the stages of NSCLC were different among included RCTs, including metastatic and locally advanced cancers. Squamous and nonsquamous histologic types were both included, and they may have various sensitivity to durvalumab treatment. Thirdly, the treatment duration of durvalumab supplementation varied from 2 years to 3 years, which may affect the efficacy assessment. Indeed, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies have demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with various PD-L1 expression levels, even in those with PD-L1-negative tumors [2, 19]. Additionally, the simultaneous blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 pathways were confirmed to produce additive or synergistic antitumor activity and may be an important treatment option in patients with low/negative PD-L1 expression [20,21,22].
With regards to the safety, durvalumab supplementation led to similar incidence of adverse events compared to standard chemotherapy, but can remarkably reduce the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events for NSCLC patients. We should also consider several limitations. Firstly, our analysis was based on only four RCTs and more studies with large patient samples should be conducted to confirm this finding. Secondly, the duration of durvalumab treatment were different in the included studies, and may mainly account for some heterogeneity. Thirdly, NSCLC patients with different stages may produce some bias for efficacy assessment.
Conclusion
Durvalumab supplementation showed improved treatment efficacy for NSCLC patients with reduced incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, Kowalski DM, Cho BC, Turna HZ, Castro G Jr., Srimuninnimit V, Laktionov KK, Bondarenko I, Kubota K, Lubiniecki GM, Zhang J, Kush D, Lopes G. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London England). 2019;393(10183):1819–30.
Garassino MC, Cho BC, Kim JH, Mazières J, Vansteenkiste J, Lena H, Corral Jaime J, Gray JE, Powderly J, Chouaid C, Bidoli P, Wheatley-Price P, Park K, Soo RA, Huang Y, Wadsworth C, Dennis PA, Rizvi NA. Durvalumab as third-line or later treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ATLANTIC): an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, the Lancet. Oncology. 2018;19(4):521–36.
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhäufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crinò L, Blumenschein GR Jr., Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627–39.
Paz-Ares L, Spira A, Raben D, Planchard D, Cho BC, Özgüroğlu M, Daniel D, Villegas A, Vicente D, Hui R, Murakami S, Spigel D, Senan S, Langer CJ, Perez BA, Boothman AM, Broadhurst H, Wadsworth C, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ. Faivre-Finn, outcomes with durvalumab by tumour PD-L1 expression in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in the PACIFIC trial. Annals Oncology: Official J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2020;31(6):798–806.
Hui R, Özgüroğlu M, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Yokoi T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, Cho BC, Gray JE, Rydén A, Viviers L, Poole L, Zhang Y, Dennis PA, Antonia SJ. Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (PACIFIC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study, the Lancet. Oncology. 2019;20(12):1670–80.
Planchard D, Reinmuth N, Orlov S, Fischer JR, Sugawara S, Mandziuk S, Marquez-Medina D, Novello S, Takeda Y, Soo R, Park K, McCleod M, Geater SL, Powell M, May R, Scheuring U, Stockman P, Kowalski D. ARCTIC: durvalumab with or without tremelimumab as third-line or later treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Annals Oncology: Official J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2020;31(5):609–18.
Stewart R, Morrow M, Hammond SA, Mulgrew K, Marcus D, Poon E, Watkins A, Mullins S, Chodorge M, Andrews J, Bannister D, Dick E, Crawford N, Parmentier J, Alimzhanov M, Babcook JS, Foltz IN, Buchanan A, Bedian V, Wilkinson RW, McCourt M. Identification and characterization of MEDI4736, an antagonistic Anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(9):1052–62.
Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Kurata T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, Cho BC, Bourhaba M, Quantin X, Tokito T, Mekhail T, Planchard D, Kim YC, Karapetis CS, Hiret S, Ostoros G, Kubota K, Gray JE, Paz-Ares L, de Castro J, Carpeño C, Faivre-Finn C, Reck M, Vansteenkiste J, Spigel DR, Wadsworth C, Melillo G, Taboada PA, Dennis M, Özgüroğlu Ö. Overall survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2342–50.
Abdel-Rahman O. Correlation between PD-L1 expression and outcome of NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents: a meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2016;101:75–85.
Zhou GW, Xiong Y, Chen S, Xia F, Li Q, Hu J. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody therapy for pretreated advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Medicine. 2016;95(35):e4611.
Antonia SJ, Balmanoukian A, Brahmer J, Ou SI, Hellmann MD, Kim SW, Ahn MJ, Kim DW, Gutierrez M, Liu SV, Schöffski P, Jäger D, Jamal R, Jerusalem G, Lutzky J, Nemunaitis J, Calabrò L, Weiss J, Gadgeel S, Bhosle J, Ascierto PA, Rebelatto MC, Narwal R, Liang M, Xiao F, Antal J, Abdullah S, Angra N, Gupta AK, Khleif SN, Segal NH. Clinical activity, tolerability, and Long-Term Follow-Up of Durvalumab in patients with Advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncology: Official Publication Int Association Study Lung Cancer. 2019;14(10):1794–806.
Rizvi NA, Cho BC, Reinmuth N, Lee KH, Luft A, Ahn MJ, van den Heuvel MM, Cobo M, Vicente D, Smolin A, Moiseyenko V, Antonia SJ, Le Moulec S, Robinet G, Natale R, Schneider J, Shepherd FA, Geater SL, Garon EB, Kim ES, Goldberg SB, Nakagawa K, Raja R, Higgs BW, Boothman AM, Zhao L, Scheuring U, Stockman PK, Chand VK, Peters S. Durvalumab with or without Tremelimumab vs Standard Chemotherapy in First-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell Lung Cancer: the MYSTIC Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(5):661–74.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, Thomas J. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10(10):ED000142.
Higgins GS. JPT, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011], The Cochrane Collaboration (2011). www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA. Cochrane Bias methods, G. Cochrane Statistical methods, the Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.
Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Yokoi T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, Cho BC, Bourhaba M, Quantin X, Tokito T, Mekhail T, Planchard D, Kim YC, Karapetis CS, Hiret S, Ostoros G, Kubota K, Gray JE, Paz-Ares L, de Castro Carpeño J, Wadsworth C, Melillo G, Jiang H, Huang Y, Dennis PA, Özgüroğlu M. Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1919–29.
Carbognin L, Pilotto S, Milella M, Vaccaro V, Brunelli M, Caliò A, Cuppone F, Sperduti I, Giannarelli D, Chilosi M, Bronte V, Scarpa A, Bria E, Tortora G. Differential Activity of Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and MPDL3280A according to the Tumor expression of programmed death-Ligand-1 (PD-L1): sensitivity analysis of trials in Melanoma, Lung and Genitourinary cancers. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0130142.
Hellmann MD, Rizvi NA, Goldman JW, Gettinger SN, Borghaei H, Brahmer JR, Ready NE, Gerber DE, Chow LQ, Juergens RA, Shepherd FA, Laurie SA, Geese WJ, Agrawal S, Young TC, Li X, Antonia SJ. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study, the Lancet. Oncology. 2017;18(1):31–41.
Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu TE, Pluzanski A, Lee JS, Otterson GA, Audigier-Valette C, Minenza E, Linardou H, Burgers S, Salman P, Borghaei H, Ramalingam SS, Brahmer J, Reck M, O’Byrne KJ, Geese WJ, Green G, Chang H, Szustakowski J, Bhagavatheeswaran P, Healey D, Fu Y, Nathan F. Paz-Ares, Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a high Tumor Mutational Burden. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(22):2093–104.
Goldman JW, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, Reinmuth N, Hotta K, Trukhin D, Statsenko G, Hochmair MJ, Özgüroğlu M, Ji JH, Garassino MC, Voitko O, Poltoratskiy A, Ponce S, Verderame F, Havel L, Bondarenko I, Każarnowicz A, Losonczy G, Conev NV, Armstrong J, Byrne N, Thiyagarajah P, Jiang H, Paz-Ares L. Durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide alone in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): updated results from a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial, the Lancet. Oncology. 2021;22(1):51–65.
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Chengchen Wang and Feng Wang conducted the design, study planning, data analysis and data interpretation. Hongyi Fu wrote and revised the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, C., Fu, H. & Wang, F. Durvalumab supplementation for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis study. J Cardiothorac Surg 19, 421 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02940-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02940-3