Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

The association between heparin sensitivity index and postoperative blood loss in Chinese patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a single center retrospective study

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 19, Article number: 426 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The heparin sensitivity index (HSI) is closely associated with perioperative ischemic events and increased blood loss in cardiac surgery. Previous studies have produced conflicting results. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between HSI and postoperative blood loss specifically in Chinese patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB).

Methods

Patients underwent OPCAB between March 2021 and July 2022 were retrospectively included. Enrolled patients were classified into Low-HSI (HSILOW; HSI < 1.3) and Normal-HSI (HSINORM; HSI ≥ 1.3) groups. HSI = [(activated clotting time (ACT) after heparin) – (baseline ACT)] / [loading dose of heparin (IU/kg)]. Primary outcome included postoperative blood loss at 24 h. Secondary outcomes were total postoperative blood loss, transfusion requirement of red blood cell (RBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelet concentrates (PC), and other complications.

Results

We retrospectively analyzed 303 Chinese OPCAB patients. HSILOW group had higher preoperative platelet (PLT) count (221 × 109/L vs. 202 × 109/L; P = 0.041) and platelet crit (PCT) value (0.23% vs. 0.22%; P = 0.040) compared to HSINORM group. Two groups showed no significant differences in postoperative blood loss at 24 h (460 mL vs. 470 mL; P = 0.252), total blood loss (920 mL vs. 980 mL; P = 0.063), RBC transfusion requirement (3.4% vs. 3.1%; P = 1.000), FFP transfusion requirement (3.4% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.380), and other complications. Preoperative high PLT count was associated with low intraoperative HSI value (odds ratio: 1.006; 95% confidence interval: 1.002, 1.011; P = 0.008).

Conclusions

Intraoperative HSI value was not associated with postoperative blood loss in Chinese patients undergoing OPCAB. Preoperative high PLT count was an independent predictor of low intraoperative HSI value.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is widely used as an anticoagulant to prevent thromboembolic complications in cardiac surgery. However, the complex pharmacological properties of UFH may result in significant inter-patient variability in terms of responsiveness [1]. Various criteria are available for assessing heparin responsiveness: the general definition is whether UFH loading dose ranging from 150 IU/kg to 600 IU/kg can achieve a target activated clotting time (ACT) value of at least 300 s–600 s [2, 3]. To accommodate different UFH administration practices, some scholars have proposed using heparin sensitivity index (HSI) value to indicate differences in heparin responsiveness [4,5,6]. HSI is calculated using the following equation [5, 7].

$$\text{HSI}=\frac{\text{postheparin ACT }\left(\text{s}\right)-\text{ baseline ACT}(\text{s})}{\text{loading dose of heparin }(\text{IU}/\text{kg})}$$

Previous studies have shown that low HSI value are associated with increased postoperative blood loss in cardiac surgery [8, 9]. However, these studies only enrolled patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. The relationship between interoperative HSI and postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) remains unknown.

Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between interoperative HSI and postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing OPCAB to provide a basis for individualized anticoagulation.

Methods

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Fuwai Hospital (20211636). The need for obtaining informed patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Study population and design

Consecutive patients who underwent elective OPCAB at Fuwai Hospital between March 2021 and July 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) adult patients (> 18 years of age) and (2) patients undergoing OPCAB. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) emergency surgery, (2) previous cardiac surgery, (3) OPCAB combined with other surgery, (4) use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) prior to surgery, (5) a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, (6) abnormal preoperative coagulation, thrombotic, or hematological diseases, (7) renal failure (serum creatinine > 200 mmol/L or urine output < 10 mL/h), (8) liver dysfunction (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin levels two times higher than the upper limit of normal), and (9) infectious endocarditis.

Anesthetic and surgical protocols

General anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg, etomidate 2 mg/kg, sufentanil 2 μg/kg–3 μg/kg, and cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg–0.2 mg/kg. Propofol 100 mg/h–200 mg/h, dexmedetomidine 30 μg/h–50 μg/h, cis-atracurium 8 mg/h–15 mg/h, and sevoflurane 0.5%–1.5% were administered for anesthesia maintenance. Median sternotomy was performed on all patients. Bispectral index (BIS) was maintained between 40 and 60 during surgery. All patients received intraoperative autologous blood salvage using cell-saver systems. No patient received tranexamic acid. The patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative care, and aspirin and clopidogrel were administered on the first postoperative day.

Heparin sensitivity index

Patients underwent radial artery catheterization under local anesthesia prior to general anesthesia, and a 0.5 mL blood sample was collected from each patient's radial artery to determine baseline ACT. The Hemochron Signature Elite Response Whole Blood Coagulation System (International Technidyne Corporation (ITC), San Diego and Edison, USA) was used to monitor ACT using a Hemochron ACT+ cartridge (kaolin and silica activators). With a UFH loading dose of 200 IU/kg was used to achieve an activated ACT value of at least 300 s. Five minutes after UFH administration, a blood sample (0.5 mL) was collected from the radial artery to determine the post-heparin ACT. UFH 100 IU/kg was administered hourly following the initial dose, with the maintenance of an intraoperative ACT value ≥ 300 s [10]. UFH was neutralized with 2 mg/kg protamine after the conclusion of revascularization. ACT was subsequently measured 10 min after protamine neutralization. The criterion used to indicate reduced heparin responsiveness was HSI value < 1.3 [7]. HSI value ≥ 1.3 was considered to indicate normal heparin responsiveness. Enrolled patients were classified into two groups, namely Low-HSI (HSILOW; HSI < 1.3) and Normal-HSI (HSINORM; HSI ≥ 1.3) groups.

Primary and secondary outcomes

The primary outcome was postoperative blood loss at 24 h. The secondary outcomes included total postoperative blood loss, transfusion requirement of red blood cell (RBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelet concentrates (PC), postoperative mechanical ventilation duration, chest drainage duration, length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and hospital, incidences of reoperation for blood loss, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction (MI), use of IABP, atrial fibrillation (AF), pacemaker implantation, neurological events (stroke and transient ischemic attack), delirium, renal replacement therapy, and mortality.

Criteria for allogeneic transfusions and outcomes measures

Blood products were transfused according to the following protocols: the transfusion threshold for RBC was hemoglobin < 8.0 g/L. The indication for FFP transfusion was diffuse blood loss with a prothrombin time value 1.5 times longer than the baseline value. The triggers for PC transfusion were a platelet (PLT) count of < 50 × 109/L or PLT dysfunction. Postoperative blood loss was defined based on the chest drainage volume. The patient underwent reoperation if the postoperative chest drainage volume exceeded 300 mL/h within the first 2 h or remained above 200 mL/h for 4 h. Removal of the chest drainage tubes was only considered when discharge fell below 20 mL for a period of at least 5 h–6 h [10]. Antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and/or clopidogrel) was discontinued on admission. Antithrombotic prophylaxis consisted of subcutaneous administration of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) from admission until 12 h prior to surgery. Preoperative use of clopidogrel was defined as cessation within five days, whereas preoperative use of aspirin was defined as cessation within six days [11]. The protamine/UFH dose ratio was determined using the following formula: 1 mg of protamine per 100 IU of UFH. Clinical diagnostic criteria for MI were defined as the occurrence of an increase in cardiac enzyme levels five times higher than the upper limit of normal, at the same time, it must satisfy at least one of the following conditions: newly developed ischemic electrocardiographic changes, new Q-waves formation on electrocardiogram, imaging evidence of new myocardial infarction or new localized abnormal ventricular wall motion. Cerebral stroke was defined as a novel focal or global cerebral dysfunction that persisted for more than 24 h.

Statistical analysis

The previous study [8] showed that the weighted mean difference in postoperative blood loss at 24 h between patients with Low-HSI and Normal-HSI undergoing cardiac surgery was 95 ml, with a standard deviation of 218.5 ml. Based on an independent t-test, we calculated that a sample size of 226 patients would be required to achieve a power of 90% at a two-sided significance level of 0.05. Considering a potential dropout rate of 20%, the minimum sample size was 272 patients. Our final sample size was increased to include 303 patients.

Categorical variables were used the χ2 test and expressed as numbers and percentage. Continuous variables were used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and expressed as median and interquartile range. Repeated measurements of data were analyzed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance, with data presented as mean ± standard deviation. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to examine the clinical and laboratory predictors of HSI. Baseline variables that were considered clinically relevant or variables with P < 0.20 in the univariate analysis were entered into the multivariable logistic regression model. The variables for inclusion were carefully chosen, given the number of events available, to ensure parsimony in the final model. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (SPSS version 23.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, USA).

Results

Study population

From March 2021 to July 2022, 362 patients underwent elective OPCAB, and this retrospective analysis ultimately included 303 cases (Fig. 1). Among them, 175 (57.76%) patients were classified into HSILOW group, whereas the remaining 128 (42.24%) patients were assigned to HSINORM group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the study. OPCAB, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; HSILOW, HSI value < 1.3; HSINORM, HSI value ≥ 1.3

Full size image

Characteristics of the patients and preoperative parameters

Table 1 showed the characteristics of the enrolled patients. HSILOW group had higher preoperative PLT count (221 × 109/L vs. 202 × 109/L; P = 0.041) and platelet crit (PCT) value (0.23% vs. 0.22%; P = 0.040) compared to HSINORM group.

Table 1 Characteristics of enrolled patients [median (IQR) or cases (%)]
Full size table

Intraoperative parameters

Intraoperative parameters were summarized in Table 2. The difference in baseline ACT value (111.95 ± 10.88 s vs. 110.43 ± 10.19 s; P = 0.233) and ACT value after protamine neutralization (121.29 ± 11.95 s vs. 122.14 ± 13.34 s; P = 0.624) between HSILOW group and HSINORM group were not statistically significant. However, ACT value after initial UFH administration in HSINORM group was higher than that in HSILOW group [73.64 s, 95% confidence interval (CI): -79.28, -68.01; P < 0.001). The dose of protamine in HSILOW patients was less than that in HSINORM group (150 mg vs. 160 mg; P = 0.005), but the two groups showed no significant differences in dose of UFH (21,300 IU vs. 22,200 IU; P = 0.158) and protamine/UFH dose ratio (0.67 vs. 0.68; P = 0.287).

Table 2 Intraoperative parameters [median (IQR), cases (%), or x̄ ± s]
Full size table

Postoperative parameters and complications

Postoperative parameters were shown in Table 3. The two groups showed no significant differences in terms of postoperative blood loss at 24 h (460 mL vs. 470 mL; P = 0.252), total blood loss (920 mL vs. 980 mL; P = 0.063), and transfusion requirement of RBC (3.4% vs. 3.1%; P = 1.000) and FFP (3.4% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.380). In addition, HSILOW and HSINORM groups showed no significant differences in terms of postoperative mechanical ventilation duration (MVD) (16 h vs. 16 h; P = 0.776), chest drainage duration (4 days vs. 4 days; P = 0.757), ICU LOS (46 h vs. 45 h; P = 0.114), hospital stay (7 days vs. 7 days; P = 0.329), and other complications. No patient in either group required PC transfusion or died during the postoperative hospitalization period. In thrombelastography, HSILOW group showed a shorter kinetics time (2.20 min vs. 2.50 min; P = 0.010) and a larger alpha angle (58.50° vs. 54.10°, P = 0.003) than HSINORM group.

Table 3 Postoperative parameters [median (IQR) or cases (%)]
Full size table

Multivariable logistic regression analysis

Ten variables were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 4). Age, sex, and duration of preoperative LMWH use were considered clinically relevant variables [12,13,14,15]. The other seven variables showed P < 0.20 in the univariate analysis. Although the proportion of blood type AB among preoperative patients showed P < 0.20 in the univariate analysis, owing to the limited number of available events, this factor was not included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. High preoperative PLT count (odds ratio: 1.006; 95% CI: 1.002, 1.011; P = 0.008) was significantly associated with low intraoperative HSI value.

Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis for heparin sensitivity index
Full size table

Discussion

This study showed no increase in postoperative blood loss at 24 h in Chinese patients with a low HSI undergoing elective OPCAB. In the assessment of risk factors for low intraoperative HSI value, preoperative high PLT count was identified as an independent predictor.

The low intraoperative HSI value is associated with concerns regarding potential overactivation of the clotting system due to inadequate anticoagulation, necessitating the administration of additional UFH. However, this exposes surgical patients to the risk of excessive UFH use [8]. Furthermore, repeated administration of UFH at doses exceeding the predicted range may necessitate increased protamine administration to counteract the effects of UFH, thereby exposing patients to the risk of protamine overdose [9]. An excess of protamine can attenuate thrombin-induced PLT aggregation and reduce the responsiveness of PLT to thrombin receptor agonist peptides. Additionally, excessive protamine administration weakens clot strength and shortens the time for clot lysis while promoting fibrinolysis mediated by tissue-type plasminogen activators, thereby facilitating clot breakdown [16]. These factors may contribute to increased postoperative blood loss. In this study, although the ACT value after initial UFH administration in HSILOW group was lower than that in HSINORM group, there was no increase in blood loss at 24 h or transfusion requirement was observed after OPCAB in HSILOW group. The plausible reasons for these findings are as follows: the use of UFH in HSILOW group was not greater than that in HSINORM group. Similarly, the protamine/UFH dose ratio in both groups ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 and did not differ significantly between the two groups. The reaction time of the TEG after surgery in both groups, which indicated the onset of measurable clot strength, showed no residual effect of UFH. Some studies have demonstrated a half-dose of protamine can safely reverse UFH without increasing postoperative blood loss [17, 18]. In this regard, a protamine/UFH dose ratio ranging from 0.6 to 0.7 is considered an appropriate neutralization ratio.

Another crucial factor that cannot be overlooked is the perioperative coagulation profile of OPCAB, which exhibits a lower degree of coagulation-fibrinolysis activation and PLT dysfunction [19, 20]. Moreover, in comparison with on-pump cardiac surgery, OPCAB circumvents the impact of hemodilution and hypothermia on the coagulation system [8]. The aforementioned factors collectively contribute to the development of a procoagulant state following OPCAB. Postoperative TEG revealed coagulation characteristics, indicating accelerated blood clot formation, as evidenced by the K value in both groups falling below the lower limit of normal (4 min–9 min). The K value was shorter and the alpha angle was larger in HSILOW group than in HSINORM group, indicating higher procoagulant activity reflective of increased fibrinogen function. Previous studies have highlighted potential thromboembolic risks associated with reduced heparin responsiveness [7]. Inadequate response to UFH may result in intraoperative and postoperative coagulation within the peripheral vascular system [20], thereby increasing the risk of endangering coronary anastomosis patency [21]. Despite the strong theoretical possibility of a close relationship between reduced heparin responsiveness and postoperative MI in patients undergoing OPCAB [9], no association between low intraoperative HSI value and adverse ischemic outcomes was observed in this study. The etiology of postoperative MI is multifactorial. In addition to the hypercoagulable state, surgical techniques are also considered significant contributing factors. The present study involved ten experienced faculty surgeons who had completed at least 100 OPCAB procedures as part of their institutional requirement before being qualified to perform the procedure [22]. Therefore, the quality of surgery in this study was deemed reliable.

The present study also confirmed the correlation between preoperative high PLT count and low intraoperative HSI value [12, 13, 23]. The reduced responsiveness to UFH was attributed to excessive production of platelet factor 4 (PF4), an anti-heparin agent, resulting from the accelerated rate of PLT destruction. The strong binding affinity of PF4 for UFH leads to the displacement of PF4 from vascular binding sites with lower affinity, resulting in the formation of circulating complexes with UFH that neutralize its effect. Therefore, one possible explanation for low intraoperative HSI value in patients with preoperative high PLT count may be their greater capacity to produce PF4 after PLT activation [12]. Additionally, PLT count was associated with ACT value [13, 23], which are currently regarded as the standard parameter for monitoring the anticoagulant effect of UFH. The measurement of ACT is a test of whole-blood coagulation that involves the interaction between plasma coagulation components and PLT phospholipids in the hemostatic process. Therefore, a high PLT count may shorten the ACT response time.

In this study, preoperative LMWH treatment was not associated with the incidence of low intraoperative HSI value. Some studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with LMWH use in patients with unstable angina [6]. Therefore, all patients presenting for OPCAB received LMWH before surgery. The dose of enoxaparin was 6000 IU, administered subcutaneously every 12 h. Preoperative heparin exposure was equivalent between the two groups.

Preoperative administration of antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and clopidogrel, has been linked to an increased risk of blood loss after cardiac surgery [11, 24]. According to the European guidelines [25], for clopidogrel, from the perspective of reducing the blood loss risk, elective cardiac surgery should be performed five days after stopping clopidogrel. The European guidelines also recommend that patients at low risk of perioperative blood loss should continue taking aspirin and do not need to stop taking aspirin before surgery. However, one study indicated that the preoperative use of aspirin significantly increases the risk of postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion in patients undergoing OPCAB [11], and recommended discontinuing aspirin intake six days prior to surgery. In this study, preoperative use of clopidogrel or aspirin was not included in the multivariate logistic regression model because of the limited number of available events. Further research is necessary to investigate whether clopidogrel or aspirin increases the risk of postoperative blood loss during OPCAB.

Limitations of the study include the following. First, this study had a retrospective design. The results of the current study rely heavily on the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the original documentation. We endeavored to minimize potential inaccuracies by meticulously reviewing patients’ medical records. Secondly, HSI was used as a criterion to indicate heparin responsiveness, with some studies using a threshold value of 1.3 and others using 1.0. A stringent criterion for low intraoperative HSI value was defined as an HSI value less than 1.0, which showed an incidence rate between 15.5% [26] and 20.8% [2]. Despite the low incidence of low intraoperative HSI value as measured by this stringent criteria, future studies involving large samples should pay greater attention to this issue.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that intraoperative HSI was not associated with postoperative blood loss in Chinese patients undergoing elective OPCAB. Preoperative high PLT count was an independent predictor of low intraoperative HSI value.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACT:

Activated clotting time

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

BIS:

Bispectral index

FFP:

Fresh frozen plasma

HSI:

Heparin sensitivity index

IABP:

Intra-aortic balloon pump

ICU:

Intensive care unit

LMWH:

Low-molecular-weight heparin

LOS:

Length of stay

MI:

Myocardial infarction

OPCAB:

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

PC:

Platelet concentrates

PCT:

Platelet crit

PF4:

Platelet factor 4

PLT:

Platelet

RBC:

Red blood cell

TEG:

Thromboelastography

UFH:

Unfractionated heparin

References

  1. Bull MH, Huse WM, Bull BS. Evaluation of tests used to monitor heparin therapy during extracorporeal circulation. Anesthesiology. 1975;43(3):346–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chun DH, Baik SW, Kim SY, Shim JK, Kim JC, Kwak YL. Heparin responsiveness during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: predictors and clinical implications. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2011;32(1):133–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Finley A, Greenberg C. Review article: heparin sensitivity and resistance: management during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(6):1210–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Knapik P, Cieśla D, Przybylski R, Knapik T. The influence of heparin resistance on postoperative complications in patients undergoing coronary surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(2):CR105-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietrich W, Spannagl M, Schramm W, Vogt W, Barankay A, Richter JA. The influence of preoperative anticoagulation on heparin response during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102(4):505–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bar-Yosef S, Cozart HB, Phillips-Bute B, Mathew JP, Grocott HP. Preoperative low molecular weight heparin reduces heparin responsiveness during cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(2):107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ranucci M, Frigiola A, Menicanti L, Cazzaniga A, Soro G, Isgrò G. Risk factors for fatal myocardial infarction after coronary bypass graft surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18(5):322–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma HP, Xu WF, Yu J, Wang J, Zheng H. Heparin sensitivity and postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;37(3):162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raphael J, Mazer CD, Wilkey A, Subramani S, Schroeder A, Abdalla M, et al. Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Improvement advisory for management of perioperative bleeding and hemostasis in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(3):2887–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang LH, Wang XH, Tan JC, He LX, Fu RQ, Lin Y, et al. Levosimendan administration is not associated with increased risk of bleeding and blood transfusion requirement in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective study from single center. Perfusion. 2023;38(2):270–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapoor S, Singh G, Arya RC, Singh V, Garg A, Ralhan S, et al. Effect of anti-platelet therapy on peri-operative blood loss in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Card Anaesth. 2022;25(2):182–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan T, Hwang NC, Lim CH. A statistical analysis of factors predisposing patients to heparin resistance. Perfusion. 2006;21(2):99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Y, Phoon PHY, Hwang NC. Heparin Resistance During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(11):4150–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Saydam O, Atay M, Serefli D, Doganci S, Kumabasar U, Yılmaz M, et al. Preoperative Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Prophylaxis Associated with Increased Heparin Resistance Frequency in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Cardiol Res Pract. 2019;2019:4310407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pleym H, Videm V, Wahba A, Asberg A, Amundsen T, Bjella L, et al. Heparin resistance and increased platelet activation in coronary surgery patients treated with enoxaparin preoperatively. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29(6):933–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boer C, Meesters MI, Veerhoek D, Vonk ABA. Anticoagulant and side-effects of protamine in cardiac surgery: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(5):914–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasoli S, Zeinah M, Athanasiou T, Kourliouros A. Optimal intraoperative anticoagulation strategy in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14(5):629–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Woo YJ, Atluri P, Grand TJ, Hsu V, Gardner TJ. Should Standard On-Pump Protamine Dosing Formulas Be Recalculated for Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting? Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7(1):42–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paparella D, Semeraro F, Scrascia G, Galeone A, Ammollo CT, Kounakis G, et al. Coagulation-fibrinolysis changes during off-pump bypass: effect of two heparin doses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(2):421–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boonstra PW, van Imhoff GW, Eysman L, Kootstra GJ, van der Heide JN, Karliczek GF, et al. Reduced platelet activation and improved hemostasis after controlled cardiotomy suction during clinical membrane oxygenator perfusions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89(6):900–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mariani MA, Gu YJ, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, van Oeveren W, Ebels T. Procoagulant activity after off-pump coronary operation: is the current anticoagulation adequate? Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(5):1370–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu S, Zheng Z, Yuan X, Wang W, Song Y, Sun H, et al. Increasing long-term major vascular events and resource consumption in patients receiving off-pump coronary artery bypass: a single-center prospective observational study. Circulation. 2010;121(16):1800–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bosch YP, Weerwind PW, Nelemans PJ, Maessen JG, Mochtar B. An evaluation of factors affecting activated coagulation time. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26(4):563–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Song Y, Song JW, Shim JK, Kwak YL. Optimal anticoagulation during off pump coronary artery bypass in patients recently exposed to clopidogrel. Yonsei Med J. 2013;54(5):1119–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pagano D, Milojevic M, Meesters MI, Benedetto U, Bolliger D, von Heymann C, et al. 2017 EACTS/EACTA Guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(1):79–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ranucci M, Isgrò G, Cazzaniga A, Ditta A, Boncilli A, Cotza M, et al. Different patterns of heparin resistance: therapeutic implications. Perfusion. 2002;17(3):199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to anesthesiology colleagues for their help during the conduction of this study. The authors appreciate the editors and reviewers for their constructive comments on our manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Youth Teacher Training Program of Peking Union Medical College (2014zlgc07) and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Initiative for Innovative Medicine (2021-I2M-C and T-B-038).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Bin Jia & Jinhe Deng

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 167, Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China

    Bin Jia, Chenying Ding, Jinhe Deng, Wenhui Qi & Yuntai Yao

  3. Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Hohhot, Hohhot, 010020, China

    Chenying Ding

  4. Department of Anesthesiology, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, 053000, China

    Wenhui Qi

Authors
  1. Bin Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chenying Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinhe Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenhui Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuntai Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

The Evidence in Cardiovascular Anesthesia Group

Contributions

B.J. collected and analyzed the patients’ data and wrote the original draft. C.D. collected the patients’ data. J.D. collected the patients’ data. W.Q. analyzed the patients’ data. Y.Y. designed the study and made crucial revision to the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuntai Yao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Fuwai Hospital (20211636). The need for obtaining informed patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, B., Ding, C., Deng, J. et al. The association between heparin sensitivity index and postoperative blood loss in Chinese patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a single center retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg 19, 426 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02966-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02966-7

Keywords

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

ISSN: 1749-8090

Contact us