Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Results of consecutive training procedures in pediatric cardiac surgery

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery20105:105

https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-105

Received: 6 May 2010

Accepted: 8 November 2010

Published: 8 November 2010

Abstract

This report from a single institution describes the results of consecutive pediatric heart operations done by trainees under the supervision of a senior surgeon. The 3.1% mortality seen in 1067 index operations is comparable across procedures and risk bands to risk-stratified results reported by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. With appropriate mentorship, surgeons-in-training are able to achieve good results as first operators.

Background

Congenital heart surgery evolved from experimental life-saving operations to treatment algorithms, risk stratification and quality control. This environment challenges the transfer of skills to new recruits. A variety of perceptions may hamper training: time or team constraints, procedure complexity, trainee's ability, trainer's commitment, lack of 'chemistry' between mentor and apprentice, patient's family demands or a combination of these. Many talented surgeons have learned 'by osmosis', through closely assisting an expert. If one gets better by performing rather than seeing a task, then regardless of aptitude it is preferable to progress from assistant to operator while still a trainee. To reduce the variability in exposure the newly developed certificate of congenital training in the US has strict requirements for the number and types of primary surgeon cases [1]. We report in this context the results of a pediatric attending (DNC) with special interest in training.

Patients and Methods

Whenever a trainee is available it has been the senior author's policy that he/she is the primary surgeon, remaining on the operator's side throughout the case. We do not have surgical practitioners. (Procedures done at a non-academic institution as well as congenital cases done at the adult university hospital are not reported here because of lacking risk stratification in these databases. Training however was the same. At the adult university hospital the practice consists of the full range of adult congenital disease and ductal ligations in the maternity, all of which became training cases for residents on service.) The current report therefore includes 1443 consecutive operations done under supervision by 7 fellows at Denver Children's Hospital between January 2003, when the Aristotle Basic Complexity score (ABCS) was introduced, and May 2009. In 33 cases where a trainee was not available another attending operated with the senior author assisting. Recently there was a change in referral patterns, the senior author taking responsibility for the Norwood program, and 6 stage I operations became 2-attending procedures. These are the only non-training cases in the series, leaving 1404 operations for analysis. To concentrate further on main procedures, after exclusion of chest reopening, delayed closure, pacemaker and patent ductus operations, wound and drainage procedures, but including chylothorax operations, 1067 index training cases were retained (Table 1). A comparison of their risk profile with that of the 33 non-Norwood 2-attending cases suggested no selection bias (ABCS, 7.1 ± 2.0 vs. 7.3 ± 2.2, p = 0.60, t test). 435 procedures (40.7%) were in the levels 3 and 4 of complexity (ABCS ≥8.0). The operative mortality for the 1067 index cases, defined by registry criteria [2], was 33 (3.1%).
Table 1

Patient details for 1067 index training cases

Age (years), median (interquartile range) (range)

 

0.7 (0.2, 7.1) (0.0, 44.1)

Weight (kg), median (interquartile range) (range)

 

6.9 (3.9, 20.6) (0.9, 178.2)

Basic Aristotle Score, mean (standard deviation) (range)

 

7.1 (2.0) (1.5, 14.5)

Procedure

N

Hospital mortality (%)

Discharge % mortality STS database[3]

Late mortality (%) a

Coarctation of the aorta, arch surgery, aortic aneurysm

148

5 (3.4)

N/a

0

Ventricular septal defect (incl. 1 hybrid perventricular)

133

0

0-1.1

0

Heart transplantation

81

5 (6.2)

6.0

2 (2.5)

ECMO cannulation/decannulation

72

5 (6.9)

N/a

4 (5.5)

Right ventricular outflow procedure

69

0

4-5.8

0

Atrio-ventricular canal

57

0

1.3, 4.5b

0

Atrial septal defect

39

0

1.4

0

Tetralogy of Fallot repair

39

1 (2.5)

0.4-2.7

0

Systemic to pulmonary shunt

35

4 (11.4)

7.6

1 (2.8)

Glenn

35

0

2

0

Vascular ring/sling

29

1 (3.4)

N/a

0

Fontan (incl. 2 conversions)

27

1 (3.7)

3.9

0

Pericardial procedure

27

0

N/a

0

Ross, Konno, Ross-Konno

24

2 (8.3)

2.3c

0

Mitral valve replacement

20

2 (10)

N/a

0

Pulmonary artery banding debanding

17

0

N/a

0

Aortic stenosis sub-/supravalvar

17

0

0d

0

Partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage

15

0

N/a

0

Pleural drainage/decortication

14

0

N/a

0

Pectus procedure

13

0

N/a

0

Total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage

12

1 (8.3)

9.0

0

Diaphragm plication

11

0

N/a

0

Aortic root replacement (incl. 5 valve-sparing)

11

0

N/a

0

Aortic valve replacement

10

0

N/a

0

Truncus arteriosus

8

2 (25)

N/a

0

Tricuspid valve procedure

7

0

N/a

0

Pulmonary artery reconstruction

7

1 (14.3)

N/a

0

Coronary procedures

7

0

N/a

0

PA-VSD procedure

6

0

N/a

0

Mitral valve repair

6

1 (16.6)

1.4

0

Norwood stage I

6

0

31.4

1 (16.6)

Pulmonary valve/Right ventricular outflow tract enlargement

5

0

N/a

0

Cor triatriatum, supravalvar mitral ring

4

0

N/a

0

Double chambered right ventricle

4

0

N/a

0

Ventricular assist device (excl. transplantation)

3

1 (33.3)

N/a

0

Atrial septal defect creation/enlargement

3

0

N/a

0

Aortic valve repair

3

0

N/a

0

Arterial switch

2

0

2.0

0

Rastelli

2

0

N/a

0

Double outlet right ventricle, intraventricular tunnel

2

0

N/a

0

Aorto-pulmonary window

1

0

N/a

0

Pulmonary vein stenosis

1

0

N/a

0

One-and-a-half ventricle repair

1

0

N/a

0

Mustard

1

0

N/a

0

Other

33

0

 

0

Total

1067

33 (3.1)

 

7 (0.6)

N/a, not available; a - in addition to early mortality; b - for partial and complete AV canal respectively; c - for Ross operation; d - for subvalvar aortic stenosis

Discussion

Congenital training arrangements are summarized by Kogon's recent survey of 11 large programs, with 28 of 42 trainees responding (67%) [1]. Encouragingly, the vast majority were satisfied with training overall however only 10 were satisfied with the operative experience. Each fellow performed a mean of 75 (± 53) operations and 51 (± 42) open cases - note the variability. The majority did not perform any operations in the higher complexity range, as defined by a Risk Adjusted Congenital Heart Surgery Score of 4-6. The perception remains that apprenticeship, particularly for complex cases, continues even after training is over. We agree this is a reasonable expectation.

This report shows that the congenital operative experience can be maximized. All training deterrents enumerated in the introduction were consistently neutralized. By including consecutive patients and trainees selection bias is eliminated. Despite a significant number of complex cases the early outcomes were good, comparable with reports from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons [3] (Table 1). Our conclusion is limited by the absence of prospectively collected data to demonstrate that morbidity, but also cost and long-term results are not affected. However, another study in adults showed that training and non-training cardiac cases have similar long-term outcomes [4]. In summary, operative training is possible in consecutive congenital cases without increased risk to patients. We do not advocate a blanket adoption of this by other teams. It should be attempted only when everybody is comfortable and, above all, never at the patients' expense.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dept. of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute and Children's Hospital
(2)
Dept. of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital

References

  1. Kogon BE: The training of congenital heart surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006, 132: 1280-4. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jacobs JP, Mavroudis C, Jacobs ML, Maruszewski B, Tchervenkov CI, Lacour-Gayet F: What is operative mortality? Defining death in a surgical registry database: a report of the STS congenital database taskforce and the joint EACTS-STS congenital database committee. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006, 81: 1937-41. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.11.063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jacobs JP, Lacour-Gayet FG, Jacobs ML, Clarke DR, Tchervenkov CI, Gaynor JW: Initial application in the STS congenital database of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005, 79: 1635-49. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.09.065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stoica SC, Kalavrouziotis D, Martin BJ, Buth KJ, Hirsch GM, Sullivan JA: Long-term results of heart operations performed by surgeons in training. Circulation. 2008, 118: S1-6. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.756379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Stoica and Campbell; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement