Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Mean platelet volume may predict early clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting



An elevated mean platelet volume is associated with increased platelet activation and thus may predict thrombotic events. The goal of this study was to investigate the association of the mean platelet volume and the major adverse events after coronary artery bypass surgery.


Baseline clinical details and preoperative hematologic parameters were obtained prospectively in 205 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Postoperative mortality and major adverse events were recorded in the early postoperative period (median of 72 days, interquartile range 58.5-109 days).


Combined adverse events occurred in 37 patients (18.0%) during the early follow-up. The preoperative mean platelet volume and hematocrit levels were found to be associated with postoperative adverse events (p<0.001 for both variables). In multivariate logistic regression models, the preoperative mean platelet volume and hematocrit levels were strong independent predictors of combined adverse events after surgery (respectively OR 1.89, p=0.037; OR 0.87, p=0.011). After receiver-operating-characteristics curve analysis, using a cut-point of 8.75 fL, the preoperative mean platelet volume level predicted adverse events with a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 70%. In a further model with cut-off points, higher preoperative mean platelet volume levels remained a powerful independent predictor of postoperative myocardial infarction (OR 3.60, p=0.013) and major adverse cardiac events (OR 2.53, p=0.045).


An elevated preoperative mean platelet volume is associated with an adverse outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. In conclusion, we can say that mean platelet volume is an important, simple, readily available, and cost effective tool and can be useful in predicting the postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Peer Review reports


Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the definitive surgical treatment of the coronary artery disease and can be performed with a low incidence of morbidity and mortality. European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) is widely accepted and used for routine application of risk stratification in adult cardiac surgery [1]. However, there is always a tendency in search of more and more reliable and additional predictors.

Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a marker of platelet size and activation. Increased MPV reflects active and large platelets. MPV level is probably the most extensively used platelet activation marker. Activated platelets play a role in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease [2]. Increased MPV level, an indicator of larger and more reactive platelets, has been reported to be associated with some cardiovascular diseases [36]. Mean platelet volume has also been shown to be associated with late saphenous vein graft disease after CABG [7]. Little is known, however, about the association of the MPV levels with the outcome of CABG [8].

Decreased hematocrit or hemoglobin level is a clinically important condition and it is not an uncommon finding in patients undergoing CABG. Many studies have established the association of anemia with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality [911]. Patients undergoing CABG are the most sensitive to low levels of hematocrit because of their limited capacity of coronary level [9].

We hypothesized that an elevated MPV level would be associated with an increased incidence of adverse events after CABG surgery. In addition, we aimed to determine the predictive value of the preoperative MPV and hematocrit levels for the incidence of post-CABG adverse events.


From December 2011 to March 2012, 240 consecutive patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution. Five patients who underwent redo surgery, 27 patients who underwent off-pump surgery and 3 patients with hematologic problems were excluded. The study population was composed of 205 patients. This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and ethical approval was granted by the Research Committee of Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital (Ankara, Turkey). Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Exclusion criteria included, (1) emergent surgery, (2) redo CABG, (3) off-pump CABG, (4) myocardial infarction within a week, (5) preoperative severe anemia (hemoglobin level < 10 g/dl and/or hematocrit level < 30%), (6) acute or chronic infections, (7) known malignancies, and (8) other hematological problems.

The demographic and baseline clinical data, including New York Heart Association functional class, cardiovascular risk factors, medical history, the EuroSCORE II were obtained prospectively. Preoperative antecubital venous blood samples in EDTA-containing tubes were used for the baseline data. Complete blood count analysis, including differential leukocyte count, was measured using an automated flow counter (Sysmex SE 9500, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, red cell distribution width, platelet count, MPV levels, total white cell, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were recorded and neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L) ratio was calculated. The expected values for MPV in our hematology laboratory ranged from 6.1 to 8.9 fl.

Combined adverse events were defined as all-cause mortality, postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), reoperation due to hemodynamic instability, early repeat revascularization (percutaneous intervention or re-CABG), prolonged ventilation time (>24 hours), and rehospitalization because of any cardiac indication at the follow-up period.

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as postoperative MI, reoperation due to hemodynamic instability, early repeat revascularization and in-hospital mortality. Postoperative MI was defined as creatine kinase myocardial band above 5 times the upper limit of normal or high troponin I levels (troponin I level above 15 ng/ml at postoperative day 1 and above 35 ng/ml at postoperative day 2) and/or new electrocardiographic changes [12]. In-hospital mortality was the all-cause mortality during the hospitalization period.

Statistical analyses

Continuous variables were tested for normal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as ‘mean values ± standard deviation (SD)’ or median values with the interquartile range if not normally distributed. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Demographic characteristics, perioperative variables and calculated values were compared using “independent samples t-test” or “Mann–Whitney-U test” for continuous variables and “chi-square test” or “Fisher’s exact test” for categorical variables. To compare groups based on quartiles of MPV and hematocrit levels, one-way ANOVA test was used. Correlations were assessed using Pearson’s correlation test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimum cut-off levels of the preoperative MPV and hematocrit level to predict post-CABG adverse events. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with different logistic regression models that were created to determine independent predictors of post-CABG adverse events. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software (SPSS for Windows 15.0, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


Study population

Baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1. The study population was predominantly male (82%) and composed of 205 patients with a mean age of 60.9 ± 10.3 years. During a median of 72 days (interquartile range 58.5-109 days) follow-up for all patients, 8 patients (3.9%) died during their hospital stay after surgery and 4 of them occurred within the first 30 days of surgery. There was no early post-discharge mortality. During the follow-up combined adverse events occurred in 37 patients (18.0%). There was a tendency of a lower values of EF as the preoperative MPV increased between the groups based on quartiles of the preoperative MPV level (p=0.016). However, older and female patients tended to have lower preoperative hematocrit level (respectively p=0.030 and p<0.001).

Table 1 Clinical and hematologic characteristics of patients and univariable association to post-CABG adverse events

Univariate analyses

The patients who developed post-CABG adverse event were predominantly male and significantly had lower EF, greater preoperative risk score and greater NYHA class than those who had an uneventful course. The preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were lower in the patients who developed post-CABG adverse event. However, the MPV level was greater. No difference in the white cell count, differential leukocyte count and N/L ratio were found between the 2 groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and number of bypass grafts were significantly greater in the adverse event group (Table 1).

Receiver operating characteristic curves for MPV and hematocrit levels showed the relation with adverse events after CABG. The area under curve for the preoperative MPV levels was 0.63 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.73; p=0.013). Using a cut-point of 8.75 fL, the preoperative MPV level predicted adverse events with a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 70%. The OR for patients with a MPV level greater than 8.75 fL was 2.78 (95% CI 1.34 to 5.74. p=0.005. x 2=7.96).

The area under curve for preoperative hematocrit levels was 0.70 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.79; p< 0.001). Using a cut-off value of 41.5%, the preoperative hematocrit level correlated with the incidence of adverse events with a sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 72%. Patients with a hematocrit level lower than this value had a threefold increased risk of developing adverse events (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.62 to 7.03; p=0.001. x 2=11.33).

The other hematological parameters such as MCV, MCH, RDW, platelet count, total white cell, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts and N/L ratio were found not to be associated with post-CABG adverse events and mortality (Table 1).

Multivariate analyses

The preoperative MPV levels and platelet counts moderately correlated (r = −0.26, p<0.001). There was a strong correlation between hematocrit and hemoglobin levels as they are closely related measures (r = 0.972, p<0.001). Also there was a strong correlation between CPB time and cross-clamp time (r = 0.869, p<0.001) and also with number of bypass grafts (r= 0.672, p<0.001). The N/L ratio was measured and related to the neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. Therefore, the preoperative MPV level, hematocrit level, N/L ratio and CPB time were entered in the subsequent multivariate regression models. All preoperative variables listed in Table 1 except EuroSCORE, and operative variables were included in the first model. EuroSCORE was excluded because of its dependency on these variables. In this model, preoperative MPV and hematocrit levels and time on bypass were the independent predictors of post-CABG adverse event (Table 2). In an another model with the significant variables (male gender, EF, NYHA class or EuroSCORE and time on bypass) at the univariate analysis, preoperative MPV and hematocrit levels along with time on bypass were found to be predictors of post-CABG adverse event (respectively; OR 1.74 per unit, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.89, p=0.034; OR 0.88 per unit, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.97, p=0.009; OR 1.20 per 10 min, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.35, p=0.002). In a further model with the EuroSCORE, preoperative MPV and hematocrit levels remained the independent predictors of post-CABG adverse event (respectively; OR 1.83 per unit, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.02, p=0.017; OR 0.87 per unit, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.95, p=0.003). In similar models, a preoperative MPV level ≥ 8.75 fL and hematocrit level ≤ 41.5% were associated with three-fold increased risk of post-CABG adverse events separately (respectively; OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.47 to 7.42, p=0.004; OR 0.33 per unit, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.72, p=0.003).

Table 2 Multivariable predictors of post-CABG adverse events

Secondary analyses

The outcomes of the surgery were detailed into varying groups as explained earlier. When stratified for the pre-determined cut-off values of preoperative hematocrit levels (> 41.5% vs. ≤ 41.5%), combined adverse events (p=0.001), postoperative MI (p=0.048), MACEs (p=0.017), prolonged ventilation (p=0.034), re-hospitalization (p=0.019), prolonged ICU stay (p=0.005) and prolonged hospital stay (p=0.002) were found to be associated with the hematocrit cut-off value. However, only combined adverse events (p=0.005) and postoperative MI (p=0.019) were found to be associated with the MPV cut-off value (< 8.75 fL vs. ≥ 8.75 fL) (Table 3).

Table 3 Outcome parameters according to preoperative MPV level and hematocrit levels

Multivariable models for different outcomes (including the preoperative MPV and hematocrit level as a categorical variable around described cut-off values, EuroSCORE and CPB time) were created. The preoperative MPV level remained a powerful independent predictor of postoperative MI (OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.31 to 9.85, p=0.013) and MACE (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.02 to 6.31, p=0.045). Conversely, the preoperative hematocrit level remained an independent predictor of prolonged ICU stay (> 2 days) (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.11 to 5.82, p=0.027) and prolonged hospital stay (> 7 days) (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.20 to 5.14, p=0.014). The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 10.3 ± 9.6 days (median 7 days) for patients with hematocrit ≤ 41.5% versus 8.42 ± 13,48 days (median 6 days) for patients with hematocrit > 41.5% (p=0.018).


Risk factors affecting mortality and morbidity following cardiac surgery have been studied for several decades. The risk-stratification models including many variables have been introduced to the clinical use [1, 1315]. The most commonly used risk score system for evaluation of operative mortality is the EuroSCORE for our institution [1]. Although they are widely used, none of them is perfect for the prediction of the outcome. On the other hand, another scoring system, the STS score was published in 2009 [15]. In contrast to the EuroSCORE, the required data entry is more detailed. There is always a great interest to generate a better risk assessment model with additional data that is easily obtained and widely available.

Many studies have assessed the association between the preoperative hemoglobin level and adverse events after CABG [6, 16, 17]. However there are few studies regarding the relationship between the other hematologic parameters and adverse events after CABG [18, 19].

Platelet activity is a major responsible process in atherothrombosis [2]. Assessment of platelet function with MPV level gained popularity in recent years. MPV level reflects the platelet production rate and activation. It is a more reliable measurement of platelet function than the platelet count alone. Elevated levels of MPV have been demonstrated to be an independent predictor for ischemic vascular events, recurrent MI or death from coronary artery disease [4, 20, 21]. Higher MPV levels have been also found to be associated with adverse outcome after acute coronary syndrome [22]. Therefore, increased MPV is a potentially useful biomarker for thromboembolic complications in cardiovascular disorders.

Numerous factors such as hypothermia, shear forces, exposure to artificial surfaces, the use of exogenous drugs and the release of endogenous chemicals may cause platelet activation during CPB [23]. Proteins, such as P-selectin are expressed by activated platelets. P-selectin is a molecule that contributes to the development of thrombus [24]. Thrombus formation is aggravated by this mechanism in the course of CPB despite the decrease in platelet count. Furthermore, activated platelets attach to the vascular endothelium and causing the expression of adhesion molecules [25]. This produces a cascade of immunologic reactions, and these processes in molecular level may be a key point of clinical adverse events with the contribution of platelet activation.

The potential role of platelets has been evaluated for the bleeding complication after cardiac surgery [26]. However, there are limited data emphasizing the association of platelet activation with adverse outcomes following CABG [27]. Steele et al. have established a relationship between decreased platelet survival and saphenous vein graft occlusion [28]. Similarly, Tavil et al. have demonstrated that there was a significant increase in MPV levels in patients with saphenous vein disease [7]. All of these findings are associated with late-phase graft occlusion and suggests that activation of platelets may have a contribution to this outcome.

Preoperative MPV level over 8.75 fL was associated and a strong independent predictor only with combined adverse events, postoperative MI and MACE. These outcomes of the study population were mainly composed of events that may be associated with thrombosis such as postoperative MI, reoperation, early repeat revascularization and mortality. This finding may indicate that the increased MPV value may show predisposition to thrombosis.

There are a vast number of studies that have shown the predictor value of anemia in cardiac surgery patients [9, 16, 17]. Low levels of hematocrit could result in worsening of symptoms in cardiovascular patients. Decrease in hemoglobin level may lead to limited compensation through increased heart rate and stroke volume [29]. However, although the increase in post-CABG adverse events was independently associated with low preoperative hematocrit levels, cardiac adverse events were caused by other factors frequently present in anemic patients. Therefore this study was designed with patients who had hematocrit level above 30% or hemoglobin level over 10.0 g/dl. In our study, it was shown that there is a relationship between the preoperative hematocrit levels and post-CABG adverse events even in non-severe anemic patients.

Preoperative hematocrit level less than 41.5% was associated with combined adverse events, postoperative MI, MACE, re-hospitalization and prolonged stay of ICU and hospital. However it was a strong independent predictor only for combined adverse events and prolonged stay of ICU and hospital. The higher unadjusted morbidities such as mentioned above among patients with low hematocrit levels is probably the result of older age, female predominance and higher comorbidities.

All of the other hematologic parameters (including differential leukocyte count and N/L ratio) showed significant relation neither with post-CABG adverse events nor with mortality. Conversely, Gibson et al. demonstrated that the preoperative N/L ratio is a predictor of adverse outcome after CABG [19]. Also there are reports regarding neutrophil and lymphocyte components as a predictor of outcome in ischemic heart disease [30, 31].

The multiple logistic regression models clearly demonstrate that the patients who come up against adverse events after CABG have significantly higher preoperative MPV levels and lower preoperative hematocrit levels compared to the patients with uneventful course. Furthermore, this finding indicates the independent predictive value of the preoperative MPV and hematocrit levels with post-CABG adverse events.

The use of combined adverse events provides an objective measure of outcome. However, the present study has some limitations. Firstly, this is a single center experience representing a relatively small numbers of patients. All analyses were limited to short-term and operative outcomes. Analysis with long-term follow-up data would have more reliable findings. The MPV levels could be affected by platelets becoming smaller than expected when exposed to acetylsalicylic acid. Acetylsalicylic acid usage in coronary artery disease patients prior to operation might interfere with the platelet shape and might lead to different results. There could be an association between transfusion amounts that would be more prominent in lower hematocrit levels with the adverse events. The impact of transfusion during surgery or postoperative period was not included in the analyses. The different variables between the groups (male gender, EF, NYHA class, EuroSCORE, time on bypass and number of bypass grafts) were evaluated in multivariable models together with the MPV and hematocrit levels to avoid the inaccurate impact on the results. The postoperative values of the MPV and hematocrit were not included in this study. Since the cause-and-effect relationship of these measures and the outcome might be variable and we thought that this might be a subject of a different study.


To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that the MPV level is evaluated for the adverse outcomes after CABG. The current data show a clear association of preoperative MPV and hematocrit levels with post-CABG adverse events. The prognostic value of these measures is independent of other well-defined individual risk factors. In contrast, neither the N/L ratio nor the WBC count including differential leukocyte count demonstrated a significant relation with post-CABG adverse events. The MPV level along with hematocrit levels, which are readily available, may play a role in risk stratification for patients undergoing CABG. However, it is not clear if these measures have a direct contribution to outcomes, so further investigations are required to explain the underlying mechanisms.



Coronary artery bypass grafting


European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation


Major adverse cardiac events


Myocardial infarction


Mean platelet volume


Neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L)


  1. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, Gauducheau E, de Vincentiis C, Baudet E, Cortina J, David M, Faichney A, Gabrielle F, Gams E, Harjula A, Jones MT, Pintor PP, Salamon R, Thulin L: Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999, 15: 816-822. 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00106-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davi G, Patrono C: Platelet activation and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 2482-2494. 10.1056/NEJMra071014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Slavka G, Perkmann T, Haslacher H, Greisenegger S, Marsik C, Wagner OF, Endler G: Mean platelet volume may represent a predictive parameter for overall vascular mortality and ischemic heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011, 31: 1215-1218. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.221788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang RT, Li Y, Zhu XY, Zhang YN: Increased mean platelet volume is associated with arterial stiffness. Platelets. 2011, 22: 447-451. 10.3109/09537104.2011.565431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Varol E, Aksoy F, Ozaydin M, Erdogan D, Dogan A: Relationship between mean platelet volume and mitral annular calcification. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013, 24: 189-193.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guven A, Caliskan M, Ciftci O, Barutcu I: Increased platelet activation and inflammatory response in patients with masked hypertension. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2013, 24: 170-174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tavil Y, Sen N, Yazici HU, Hizal F, Açikgöz SK, Turfan M, Cengel A: Relationship between elevated platelet volume and saphenous vein graft disease. Clin Invest Med. 2010, 33: E161-E167.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erdem K, Ayhan S, Ozturk S, Bugra O, Bozoglan O, Dursin H, Yazici M, Daglar B: Usefulness of the mean platelet volume for predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation after isolated coronary bypass grafting. Platelets. 2013,  -Epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zindrou D, Taylor KM, Bagger JP: Preoperative haemoglobin concentration and mortality rate after coronary artery bypass surgery. Lancet. 2002, 359: 1747-1748. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08614-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang WC, Helm RE, Krieger KH, Rosengart TK, DuBois WJ, Sason C, Lesser ML, Isom OW, Gold JP: Impact of minimum hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass on mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Circulation. 1997, 96 (Suppl 9): 194-199.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP: Risk factors for postoperative morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996, 111: 731-738. 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70333-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW, Academic Research Consortium: Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007, 115: 2344-2351. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hannan EL, Kilburn H, O'Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP: Adult open heart surgery in New York State. An analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality rates. JAMA. 1990, 264: 2768-2774. 10.1001/jama.1990.03450210068035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Morton JR, Maloney CT, Nowicki ER, Levy DG, Tryzelaar JF, Hernandez F: Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Circulation. 1992, 85: 2110-2118. 10.1161/01.CIR.85.6.2110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand SL, DeLong ER, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS, Peterson ED, Edwards FH, Anderson RP, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009, 88 (Suppl 1): 2-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bell ML, Grunwald GK, Baltz JH, McDonald GO, Bell MR, Grover FL, Shroyer AL: Does preoperative hemoglobin independently predict short-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery?. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008, 86: 1415-1423. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kulier A, Levin J, Moser R, Rumpold-Seitlinger G, Tudor IC, Snyder-Ramos SA, Moehnle P, Mangano DT, Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group; Ischemia Research and Education Foundation: Impact of preoperative anemia on outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2007, 116: 471-479. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bagger JP, Zindrou D, Taylor KM: Leukocyte count: a risk factor for coronary artery bypass graft mortality. Am J Med. 2003, 115: 660-663. 10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00438-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson PH, Croal BL, Cuthbertson BH, Small GR, Ifezulike AI, Gibson G, Jeffrey RR, Buchan KG, El-Shafei H, Hillis GS: Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and outcome from coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J. 2007, 154: 995-1002. 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin JF, Bath PM, Burr ML: Influence of platelet size on outcome after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1991, 338: 1409-1411. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92719-I.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chu SG, Becker RC, Berger PB, Bhatt DL, Eikelboom JW, Konkle B, Mohler ER, Reilly MP, Berger JS: Mean platelet volume as a predictor of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2010, 8: 148-156. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03584.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dogan A, Aksoy F, Icli A, Arslan A, Varol E, Uysal BA, Ozaydin M, Erdogan D: Mean platelet volume is associated with culprit lesion severity and cardiac events in acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2012, 23: 324-330. 10.1097/MBC.0b013e328352cb21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zakkar M, Taylor K, Hornick PI: Immune system and inflammatory responses to cardiopulmonary bypass. Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Principles And Practice. 3rd Edition. Edited by: Gravlee GP, Davis RF, Stammers AH, Ungerleider RM. 2008, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 321-337.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Palabrica T, Lobb R, Furie BC, Aronovitz M, Benjamin C, Hsu YM, Sajer SA, Furie B: Leukocyte accumulation promoting fibrin deposition is mediated in vivoby P-selectin on adherent platelets. Nature. 1992, 359: 848-851. 10.1038/359848a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Henn V, Slupsky JR, Grafe M, Anagnostopoulos I, Förster R, Müller-Berghaus G, Kroczek RA: CD40 ligand on activated platelets triggers an inflammatory reaction of endothelial cells. Nature. 1998, 391: 591-594. 10.1038/35393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahla E, Suarez TA, Bliden KP, Rehak P, Metzler H, Sequeira AJ, Cho P, Sell J, Fan J, Antonino MJ, Tantry US, Gurbel PA: Platelet function measurement-based strategy to reduce bleeding and waiting time in clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the timing based on platelet function strategy to reduce clopidogrel-associated bleeding related to CABG (TARGET-CABG) study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012, 5: 261-269. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gurbel PA, Mahla E, Tantry US: Peri-operative platelet function testing: the potential for reducing ischaemic and bleeding risks. Thromb Haemost. 2011, 106: 248-252. 10.1160/TH11-02-0063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steele P, Battock D, Pappas G, Genton E: Correlation of platelet survival time with occlusion of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation. 1976, 53: 685-687. 10.1161/01.CIR.53.4.685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Al Falluji N, Lawrence-Nelson J, Kostis JB, Lacy CR, Ranjan R, Wilson AC: Effect of anemia on 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2002, 144: 636-641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Grau AJ, Boddy AW, Dukovic DA, Buggle F, Lichy C, Brandt T, Hacke W, CAPRIE Investigators: Leukocyte count as an independent predictor of recurrent ischemic events. Stroke. 2004, 35: 1147-1152. 10.1161/01.STR.0000124122.71702.64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Horne BD, Anderson JL, John JM, Weaver A, Bair TL, Jensen KR, Renlund DG, Muhlestein JB, Intermountain Heart Collaborative Study Group: Which white blood cell subtypes predict increased cardiovascular risk?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 45: 1638-1643. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ertekin Utku Unal.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

EUU carried out the conception and design. EUU, SK, ABD and CLB carried out the analysis and interpretation. EUU, ST, MS and ÜK participated in the data collection. EUU, AO, SK and ABD participated in the writing the article, the critical revision of the article and the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unal, E.U., Ozen, A., Kocabeyoglu, S. et al. Mean platelet volume may predict early clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg 8, 91 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: