Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pre-operative serum VCAM-1 as a biomarker of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting

  • Leanne Harling1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Jonathan Lambert3, 4,
  • Hutan Ashrafian1,
  • Ara Darzi1,
  • Nigel J. Gooderham3 and
  • Thanos Athanasiou1, 2
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery201712:70

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0632-2

Received: 3 August 2016

Accepted: 2 August 2017

Published: 18 August 2017

Abstract

Objective

Systemic inflammation is a recognised contributory factor in the pathogenesis of de novo post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. This study aims to determine whether serum soluble vascular endothelial cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM-1) may predict the onset of POAF in patients under going coronary artery bypass grafting.

Methods

34 patients undergoing non-emergent, on-pump CABG were prospectively recruited. Plasma was obtained at 24 h pre-operatively and at 48 and 96 h post-operatively. POAF was defined by continuous Holter recording. Inter-group comparisons were performed using student t-test or ANOVA as appropriate.

Results

Thirteen (13/34) patients developed POAF at a mean of 2.5 days post-operatively. Serum sVCAM-1 was significantly increased in the pre-operative serum of POAF when compared to non-POAF patients (p = 0.022). No significant difference was observed between the groups at 48 h (p = 0.073) or 96 h (p = 0.135) post-operatively. sVCAM-1 had a sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 77.27%, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 75.2% in predicting POAF.

Conclusions

sVCAM-1 concentration in the pre-operative serum of patients undergoing CABG may accurately predict the onset of de novo POAF. As such, serum sVCAM-1 may be used as a predictive biomarker for this common arrhythmia. Further work must now perform prospective, targeted validation of these results in a larger patient cohort.

Keywords

Post operative atrial fibrillation Surgery Vascular cell adhesion molecule VCAM-1 Biomarker

Background

De novo post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) may significantly increase morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery both in the short- and long-term [13]. Furthermore, through increases in hospital stay and resource utilisation it may confer considerable increased costs to patient care [4, 5]. Although factors such as infection and electrolyte imbalance are well recognised to increase the risk of POAF, the pathophysiology of this arrhythmia is multifactorial and involves a complex interaction of ‘triggering’ stimuli and ‘sustaining’ processes acting on a myocardial substrate that may be pre-disposed to developing tachyarrhythmia. It is the exact nature of this atrial substrate that seems to predispose some patients and not others that remains poorly understood.

Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) is an 81 KDa sialoglycoprotein expressed by cytokine activated vascular endothelium, dendritic and macrophage-like cells. It is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, which through interaction with integrins present on eosinophils, basophils, mast cells, monocytes and other lymphocytes mediates signal transduction and/or cell adhesion and transendothelial migration [6]. VCAM-1 expression is regulated by a number of factors including inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β), and stimulation of toll like receptors on endothelial cells, fibroblasts and dendritic cells. Furthermore, VCAM-1 gene expression is regulated by the transcription factor NF-κB, which may be activated by TNF-α and reactive oxygen species. Release of soluble VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1) into the circulation has not only been associated with a number of cardiovascular disease processes including human post-operative atrial fibrillation [7], but is also observed to rise as early as 3 h after routine cardiopulmonary bypass [8].

The purpose of this study is therefore to determine how sVCAM-1 levels vary after CABG surgery and whether changes in sVCAM-1 follow the development of POAF. Finally, we aim to clarify whether sVCAM-1 in the pre-operative serum are predictive of POAF and its predictive ability as a biomarker of this common post-operative arrhythmia.

Methods

Ethics, consent and permissions

West London Regional research Ethics Committee (Ref: 09/H0711/23) approved the study. Signed informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to inclusion.

Patient selection and recruitment

From November 2010 to September 2011, we prospectively recruited thirty-four patients undergoing non-emergent, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust were to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria included emergent procedures, adjunctive procedures (e.g. valve repair or replacement), prior history of cardiac arrhythmia, thyroid disease, pre-operative anti-arrhythmic medication, and surgery utilising techniques other than standardised cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (e.g mini-cardiopulmonary bypass).

Pre-operatively all patients were assessed in the clinic by means of a clinical history and examination as well as electrocardiogram. Any patients with evidence of arrhythmia or history of palpitations were excluded. Continuous Holter (Novocor Vista 5 lead system, 2 channel recording) recordings were taken from all patients commencing at the time of admission until the time of surgery. Any patient displaying pre-operative arrhythmia on Holter was excluded from further inclusion in the study. Holter monitoring was subsequently continued post-operatively until the time of discharge. Atrial fibrillation was defined according to Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines [9]. Patients were categorised as developing post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) when there was evidence of AF of at least 30 s documented on Holter monitoring recorded after CABG without any pre-operative arrhythmic episodes [9].

Laboratory methods

Whole blood samples were taken from all participants upon admission (24 h pre operatively) and on day 2 and day 4 post-operatively.

Enzyme linked immunosorbant assay

Plasma was extracted from whole blood by centrifugation at 5000 g for 6 min. Solid phase sandwich ELISA was used to quantify the concentration of VCAM1 target protein using a commercially available kit (Abcam® VCAM1 (CD106) Human ELISA Kit (ab46118)). ELISA was carried out according to the manufacturers protocol. Whole serum samples were diluted 1:50 prior to use. All samples, blanks, controls and standards were run in duplicate. 50 μl of biotynylated monoclonal antibody specific for VCAM1 was added to each well and the plate incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, 100 μl of streptavidin-peroxidase enzyme was added to each well and the plate incubated again for 30 min at room temperature. After a second wash, 100 μl of chromogen TMB substrate solution was added to all wells. Plates were then incubated in the dark for 15 min at room temperature before reactions were terminated 100 μl 0.9% sulphuric acid (H2SO4). Absorbance was read immediately at a primary wavelength of 450 nm.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using student t-tests or one-way ANOVA as appropriate. Significance was considered to be met where p < 0.05. Evaluation of sVCAM-1 as a pre-operative biomarker for POAF was performed using predicted probability curves and diagnostic accuracy assessment using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Calculations were performed using Graphpad Prism Version 7 (Graphpad, La Jolla, USA) and STATA version 11 (StataCorp LP, Texas, USA).

Results

A total of 34 patients were recruited. Thirteen of these patients developed de novo atrial fibrillation in the first 5 days post-operatively. The remaining 21 patients maintained sinus rhythm throughout. Mean time to onset of post-operative atrial fibrillation was 2.5 days.

Demographic data

Pre-operative demographics and echocardiographic parameters were comparable between the two groups. A summary of all demographic parameters is shown in Table 1. No patients suffered from pre-operative chronic infection or autoimmune disease. No patients received pre- or post- operative steroid therapy. Intra-operatively, there were no statistically significant differences in cross clamp or cardiopulmonary bypass time between the POAF and non-AF groups (X-clamp: mean non-AF 44.2 ± 13.6 vs. AF 49.4 ± 14.3 mins; p = 0.378. CPB time mean non-AF 77 ± 22.4 vs. AF 82.1 ± 20.7 mins; p = 0.596). Of the patients included, 8 underwent on-pump, beating-heart surgery without cardioplegic arrest. All other patients were performed on pump, with cardioplegic arrest and cross clamping. Only one of these developed post-operative AF and therefore no further analysis could be performed of these patients as a separate subgroup. Post-operatively, no patients suffered from significant neurological impairment. Rates of haemofiltration for significant renal dysfunction (p = 0.602), sternal wound infection (p = 0.296) and lower respiratory tract infection requiring antibiotic treatement (p = 0.477) were similar between POAF and non-POAF groups.
Table 1

Pre-operative Demographics

 

AF (n = 13)

nAF (n = 21)

p-value

Gender (M/F)

9/4

15/6

0.716

Age (yrs)

64.6 ± 11.3

59.6 ± 12.1

0.237

BMI (kg/m2)

30.2 ± 6.14

27.5 ± 3.41

0.247

Height (m)

1.62 ± 0.19

1.67 ± 0.08

0.475

Weight (kg)

80.1 ± 3.86

77.7 ± 2.69

0.623

MI

33%

24%

0.555

Stroke

8.3%

14%

0.614

PVD

17%

4.8%

0.252

PCI

0.0%

0.0%

1.000

Hypertension

75%

76%

0.939

Hypercholesterolaemia

92%

90%

0.909

Family History

45%

65%

0.291

Diabetes

- On Insulin

58%

25%

43%

24%

0.392

0.939

Smoking

17%

24%

0.629

Alcohol >10u per week

25%

25%

1.000

VCAM-1 ELISA

Serum sVCAM-1 was significantly increased in the pre-operative serum of patients developing post-operative atrial fibrillation when compared to controls (p = 0.022) (Fig. 1). No significant difference was observed in sVCAM-1 levels between the POAF and non-POAF groups at 48 h and 96 h post-operatively (p = 0.073 and 0.135 respectively).
Fig. 1

Concentration of pre-operative serum soluble VCAM-1 in AF vs. non-AF patients

Both POAF and non-POAF groups showed an initial significant reduction in sVCAM-1 levels between pre-operative (non-AF: Mean Diff −122 ng/ml, p = 0.0236; POAF: Mean Diff −271 ng/ml; p = 0.0111) and 48-h post-operative samples (Fig. 2). Between 48-h and 96-h post operative time points there was an increase in the mean concentration of sVCAM-1 in both non-POAF and POAF groups but this was not statistically significant (non-AF: Mean Diff 28.2 ng/ml, p = 0.5896; POAF: Mean Diff 63.7 ng/ml; p = 0.3806).
Fig. 2

Concentration of circulating sVCAM1 in plasma samples at pre-operative, 48-h and 96-h post-operative time points

No significant correlation was observed between pre-operative demographics and pre-operative serum sVCAM-1 concentration (Table 2). Similarly, there was no significant correlation between conventional markers of inflammation including blood white cell count, platelet count, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and sVCAM-1 concentration (Table 2). The use of pre-operative statins and beta-blockers was also not found to correlate with sVCAM-1 concentrations pre-operatively (Table 2).
Table 2

Univariable regression of pre-operative demographics with pre-operative serum VCAM-1 concentration

 

Coefficient

Standard Error

r^2

p-value

Gender (M/F)

38.6

88.4

0.007

0.666

Age (yrs)

3.83

3.68

0.047

0.310

BMI (kg/m2)

−0.16

9.56

0.000

0.987

Height (m)

215.5

350.0

0.018

0.545

Weight (kg)

3.48

3.77

0.037

0.366

MI

−26.3

90.7

0.003

0.774

PVD

−87.9

159.3

0.011

0.586

Stroke

288.3

215.5

0.062

0.192

Hypertension

61.9

90.1

0.017

0.498

Hypercholesterolaemia

154.8

130.0

0.050

0.244

Family History

−40.77

66.9

0.014

0.547

Diabetes

- On Insulin

113.0

19.3

78.3

90.8

0.072

0.002

0.160

0.833

Smoking

−203.4

100.1

0.133

0.052

Alcohol >10u per week

−94.8

60.76

0.086

0.131

White cell count

−22.8

40.4

0.038

0.588

Platelet count

−2.24

1.67

0.182

0.218

C-reactive protein

24.6

23.3

0.537

0.483

Beta-blocker use

−54.4

111.7

0.012

0.632

Statin use

82.8

229.8

0.007

0.723

ACE-i

70.5

104.7

0.023

0.509

Post-op medications

Beta-blocker use

−125.9

87.19

0.077

0.161

Statin use

147.0

128.5

0.050

0.264

ACE-i

138.1

83.45

0.099

0.110

Multinomial logistic regression

A multinomial logistic model was used to identify the impact of key clinical and univariable predictors of POAF. All univariable predictors with p < 0.1 were alongside the well recognised clinical predictors of age and BMI were included. Overall the model showed a good fit for prediction of POAF (p > chi2 = 0.0070, pseudo r2 = 0.5464). Pre-operative sVCAM-1 and smoking were both significant multinomial predictors of POAF (p = 0.026) in this model. Results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Multinomial logistic regression of key clinical predictors of AF and univariable factors with p < 0.10 (dependent variable: post-operative AF; independent variables: age, BMI, smoking, pre-operative serum VCAM-1) Overall model: p > chi2 = 0.0070, pseudo r2 = 0.5464

Predictor variable

Coefficient

SE

p

95% CI

Age

0.0317

0.076

0.677

−0.117, 0.181

BMI

5.468

3.060

0.074

−0.529, 11.47

Smoking

0.460

0.229

0.045

0.011, 0.909

Pre-operative sVCAM1

0.0158

0.0071

0.026

0.0019, 0.030

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and predicted probabilities of pre-operative sVCAM-1 as a predictor of POAF

Figure 3 demonstrates a graph of the predicted probabilities for POAF against pre-operative sVCAM-1 levels with 95% confidence intervals. The probability that patients did not develop AF given a mean sVCAM-1 concentration of 503.4 was 0.714, with a probability of POAF at this mean of 0.286. ROC analysis revealed that at a cut off of 587.7 ng/L the concentration of sVCAM-1 had a sensitivity of 60.0 and specificity of 77.27, giving a positive likelihood ratio of 2.64 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.52 for the prediction of de novo post-operative AF. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.752 (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

Predicted probability curve of the probability of POAF against pre-operative sVCAM-1 levels with 95% confidence intervals (Blue line- predicted probabilities; red line – 95% upper confidence limit; green line – 95% lower confidence limit)

Fig. 4

Receiver operating characteristics curve of pre-operative serum VCAM-1 as a biomarker for post-operative AF

Data were subsequently dichotomized according to this cut off value of 587.7 ng/L and outcome and predictor variables were analyzed for the separate groups. Pre-operative diabetes was the only demographic variable to be significantly different between the two sVCAM-1 cut-off groups. The number of patients with POAF did not reach statistical significance, likely given the small sample size (Table 4). A higher cut-off of 763.5 ng/L was the lowest value of sVCAM-1 allowed statistically significant prediction of POAF when patients were dichotomized into 2 groups. This corresponds to a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 84.38%, and accurately classified 84.4% of patients into POAF/non-POAF groups. The number of patients with POAF was significantly higher in the sVCAM-1 > 765.5 group (p = 0.008). No other demographic variables were statistically significant between the two groups. Results for outcome and predictor variables at this higher cut-off level are listed in Table 5.
Table 4

Effect of demographic variables on results as dichotomised by sVCAM-1 cut off of 597.7 ng/L

Continuous Variables

Coefficient

SE

p

95% CI

Pre-operative demographics

Age (yrs)

0.0209

0.0383

0.585

−0.054, 0.096

BMI (kg/m2)

−0.0265

0.113

0.815

−0.249, 0.196

Height (m)

0.500

3.992

0.900

−7.324, 8.325

Weight (kg)

−0.004

0.0438

0.923

−0.090, 0.082

Bypass time

0.0138

0.0215

0.520

−0.028, 0.056

X-clamp time

0.0066

0.0204

0.747

−0.033, 0.047

White cell count

−0.282

0.412

0.493

−1.089, 0.525

Platelet count

−0.021

0.0225

0.356

−0.065, 0.023

Dichotomous Variables

sVCAM1 < 597.7

(n = 23)

sVCAM1 ≥ 597.7 (n = 9)

Chi^2

p-value

Gender (M)

76.2%

62.5%

0.5435

0.461

MI

36.4%

0%

3.5152

0.061

PVD

9.0%

0%

0.6835

0.408

Stroke/TIA

10%

14.3%

0.1545

0.694

Hypertension

63.6%

100%

3.5152

0.061

Hypercholesterolaemia

86.4%

100%

1.0647

0.302

Family History

63.6%

42.9%

0.9453

0.331

Diabetes

- On Insulin

40.9%

27.2%

85.7%

28.5%

4.2693

0.0045

0.039*

0.947

Smoking

29.4%

0%

1.9223

0.166

Alcohol >10u per week

61.9%

60%

0.7778

0.378

LMS disease

40%

50%

0.0241

0.877

Pre-operative medication

Beta-blocker use

80%

66.7%

4.0727

0.517

Statin use

92.9%

100%

0.4511

0.502

Aspirin use

93.3%

100%

0.4200

0.517

Post-op Atrial fibrillation

22.7%

50%

2.0779

0.149

The asterisks denote standard statistical notation for significance. * - p < 0.05

Table 5

Effect of demographic variables on results as dichotomised by sVCAM-1 cut off of 763.5 ng/L (corresponds to a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 95.45%, with 84.38% of patients correctly classified)

Continuous Variables

Coefficient

SE

p

95% CI

Pre-operative demographics

Age (yrs)

0.053

0.052

0.312

−0.049, 0.155

BMI (kg/m2)

−0.134

0.172

0.436

−0.471, 0.203

Height (m)

−0.229

4.151

0.956

−8.36, 7.91

Weight (kg)

−0.047

0.050

0.351

−0.146, 0.052

Bypass time

0.010

0.026

0.708

−0.041, 0.061

X-clamp time

−0.011

0.025

0.673

−0.060, 0.038

White cell count

−0.301

0.488

0.537

−1.257, 0.655

Platelet count

−0.029

0.031

0.352

−0.090, 0.032

Dichotomous Variables

sVCAM1 < 763.5 (n = 26)

sVCAM1 ≥ 763.5 (n = 6)

Chi^2

p-value

Gender (M)

75%

60%

0.4661

0.495

MI

32%

0%

1.7676

0.184

PVD

8%

0%

0.3437

0.558

Stroke/TIA

8%

25%

1.0745

0.300

Hypertension

68%

100%

1.768

0.184

Hypercholesterolaemia

88%

100%

0.5354

0.464

Family History

64%

25%

2.1622

0.141

Diabetes

- On Insulin

48%

24%

75%

50%

1.0067

1.1669

0.316

0.280

Smoking

20%

0%

0.9667

0.326

Alcohol >10u per week

62.5%

25%

1.9688

0.161

LMS

31.8%

25%

0.0739

0.786

Pre-operative medications

Beta-blocker use

73.9%

50%

0.9345

0.334

Statin use

100%

87.0%

0.5870

0.444

Aspirin use

100%

91.3%

0.3757

0.540

Post-op Atrial fibrillation

20%

75%

7.143

0.008**

The asterisks denote standard statistical notation for significance. ** - p < 0.005

Discussion

These results have identified significantly higher levels of sVCAM-1 in the pre-operative serum of POAF patients, supporting the hypothesis that POAF is associated with pre-existing endothelial activation and systemic inflammation. Furthermore, these findings suggest that sVCAM-1 may act as a prospective biomarker able to predict POAF prior to coronary artery bypass surgery.

Vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily responsible for the mediation of signal transduction, cell adhesion and transendothelial migration of dendritic and macrophage-like cells. As such, it plays a key role in mediating the cellular response to inflammation [6]. Soluble VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1) is released from endothelial cells and leukocytes in response to cytokine activation. As sVCAM-1 is predominantly a marker of endothelial cell activation in vivo, it has previously been studied both in determining the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass and in the development of POAF. In their 2002 study, Andresen et al. demonstrated that sVCAM-1 levels peaked at 8 h following CPB, suggesting early endothelial cell activation in response to contact of human blood with the foreign material of the bypass circuit [8].

Inflammation is thought to play a key role in the pathogenesis of de novo post-operative atrial fibrillation. Indeed, a key clinical observation is the association of POAF with post-operative infection, whereby sepsis mediated inflammation and oxidative stress is thought to stimulate a cytokine surge that subsequently leads to both electrical and structural changes that promote increased automaticity and autonomic dysfunction leading to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation [10].

The role of sVCAM-1 in POAF was first identified by Verdejo et al. in their 2011 study that demonstrated increased levels of circulating sVCAM-1 in patients with no prior history of arrhythmia who went on to develop AF post-operatively [7]. Furthermore, pre-operative sVCAM-1 appeared to be a more reliable predictor of POAF than other markers of systemic inflammation such as hsCRP and IL-6, which are often confounded by age and other medical co-morbidities [11]. As sVCAM-1 more specifically reflects endothelial cell activation, it has been suggested that endothelial dysfunction and thus susceptibility to CPB related ROS generation, may be a key factor underlying the pathogenesis of POAF [7].

This study confirms the findings of Verdejo and colleagues’ [7] demonstrating significantly higher levels of sVCAM-1 in the pre-operative serum of POAF patients compared to those maintaining sinus rhythm after CABG surgery. Moreover, ROC analysis revealed that at a fold change cut off of 587.7 ng/ml sVCAM1 was associated with a diagnostic accuracy of 75.2% in the prediction of de novo POAF in our patients.

Beyond the measurement of pre-operative sVCAM-1, our results have also examined serum sVCAM-1 expression at 2 time points corresponding to the time to peak onset of POAF. At 48 and 96 h post-operatively, sVCAM-1 concentration remained higher in the POAF than non-POAF group; however, these differences were no longer significant. Interestingly, in both groups sVCAM-1 concentration fell significantly between pre-operative and 48 h time points, with a greater reduction in mean sVCAM-1 concentration in the POAF group (Mean Diff −271 vs. -122 ng/ml). This result initially seemed counter-intuitive, as we had expected an increase in sVCAM-1 levels post-operatively in line with the overall inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. However, our findings follow similar observations by Doo et al. who in their study of 55 consecutive patients undergoing coronary stenting did not observe any increase in sVCAM-1 either at 24 or 72 h post intervention [12]. As previously noted, serum VCAM-1 levels have been shown to peak at 8 h post CPB [8] and it is therefore likely that the transient increase in sVCAM-1 in the immediate post-operative/post-procedural period, is no longer apparent when measured at 24–48 h. However, the reason for a fall in sVCAM-1 below baseline concentration still remains unclear. It is possible that these observations may reflect the release of other pro-inflammatory cytokines in the post-operative or post-procedural period, which act to suppress sVCAM-1. One potential candidate for this is IL-8, a pro-inflammatory cytokine that stimulates neutrophil chemotaxis and is known to be significantly increased in the systemic circulation after cardiopulmonary bypass, remaining elevated at 48 h post-operatively [13]. In the setting of altered vascular sheer stress, similar to the disruption of normal flow dynamics known to occur as a result of cardiopulmonary bypass, IL-8 may also act to reduce the activation of p38 and NF-κB thus blocking smooth muscle release of VCAM-1 and reducing circulating sVCAM-1 concentrations [14]. As such, increased IL-8 following CPB may offer a potential explanation for the post-operative reduction in sVCAM-1 in this patient cohort.

Limitations

The results of this study should be considered in the context of their limitations. Firstly, this is a small study, and with this in mind we cannot exclude the possibility of type II error particularly when considering sVCAM-1 levels at 48 and 96 h timepoints where sample size is particularly limited. As such, these results should be considered a platform on which to build future work and should be validated prospectively in a much larger patient cohort. Secondly, we have not attempted to determine any causal link between VCAM-1 and the development of POAF, and as such our findings do not offer mechanistic information regarding the pathophysiology of POAF. Indeed, it is likely that as with biomarkers such as pro-BNP and C-reactive protein, VCAM-1 represents a measurement of an underlying pro-inflammatory state, the cause of which may itself be multifactorial. Furthermore, we cannot exclude the possibility that sVCAM-1 is a marker of another, more sensitive, clinical attribute and that it is this attribute that predicts POAF rather than sVCAM-1 which may be itself a bystander. Third, a number of confounding factors may also influence the presence or absence of pre-operative inflammation. Although no significant differences were observed in pre-operative co-morbidities, echocardiographic parameters or medical therapy, the presence of sub-clinical sepsis either pre- or post-operatively cannot be excluded. In particular, it is notable that when examining the dichotomized data only pre-operative diabetes was statistically different between sVCAM-1 groups below and above the optimal cut-off for biomarker development (587.7 ng/L) suggested by ROC analysis. Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes have been associated with increased levels of sVCAM-1 in previous studies, particularly in the setting of renal dysfunction and hypertension [15, 16]. As such, at this lower cut-off value the presence of diabetes may significantly confound the predictive role of sVCAM-1 as a pre-operative biomarker of POAF. At a higher cut-off value of 763.5 ng/L signifying higher specificity for AF (84.8%) only POAF was significantly different between high- and low- sVCAM groups. These results suggest that a higher cut-off value may be necessary to develop a pre-operative biomarker sufficiently specific for POAF and further research is required in much larger patient cohorts to examine in more detail the impact of confounders such as diabetes.

Conclusions

Evaluation of serum VCAM-1 in this patient cohort corroborated previous findings that patients developing POAF express higher levels of pre-operative sVCAM-1 than those maintaining sinus rhythm, and in addition showed a significant fall in sVCAM-1 expression within 48 h post-operatively. These findings together support the hypothesis of a systemic inflammatory substrate for this arrhythmia and highlight the potential for biomarker development.

Abbreviations

AF: 

Atrial fibrillation

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CPB: 

Cardiopulmonary bypass

ELISA: 

Enzyme linked immunosorbant assay

IL: 

Interleukin

POAF: 

Post-operative atrial fibrillation

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristics

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

VCAM-1: 

Soluble vascular endothelial cell adhesion molecule

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Nil.

Funding

We are grateful to the Wellcome Trust (Ref: WT100023MA) and Imperial College Charity (Ref: 5117/R20R) for providing the financial support that made this work possible.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available by request to the corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

LH collected data and performed analysis with second validation analysis performed by JL. Statistical analysis was performed by LH and HA. The manuscript was written by LH and HA, supervised by TA. TA and AD provided supervision of clinical aspects of the project, and laboratory work was supervised by NG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the West London Regional research Ethics Committee (Ref: 09/H0711/23). Signed informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to inclusion in the study.

Consent for publication

All participants provided informed consent for their data to be utilized in publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London
(2)
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital
(3)
Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Imperial College London
(4)
Institute for Child Health, University College London

References

  1. Filardo G, Adams J. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and late mortality after valvular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(6):2073. author reply -4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Attaran S, Shaw M, Bond L, Pullan MD, Fabri BM. Atrial fibrillation postcardiac surgery: a common but a morbid complication. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011.Google Scholar
  3. Filardo G, Hamilton C, Hamman B, Hebeler RF, Adams J, Grayburn P. New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(2):474–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mariscalco G, Klersy C, Zanobini M, Banach M, Ferrarese S, Borsani P, Cantore C, Biglioli P, Sala A. Atrial fibrillation after isolated coronary surgery affects late survival. Circulation. 2008;118(16):1612–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, Ramsay J, Duke P, Mazer CD, Barash PG, Hsu PH, Mangano DT. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2004;291(14):1720–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pepinsky B, Hession C, Chen LL, Moy P, Burkly L, Jakubowski A, Chow EP, Benjamin C, Chi-Rosso G, Luhowskyj S, et al. Structure/function studies on vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(25):17820–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Verdejo H, Roldan J, Garcia L, Del Campo A, Becerra E, Chiong M, Mellado R, Garcia A, Zalaquett R, Braun S, Garayar B, Gonzalez S, Lavandero S, Corbalan R. Systemic vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 predicts the occurrence of post-operative atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2011;150(3):270–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Andresen TK, Svennevig JL, Videm V. Soluble VCAM-1 is a very early marker of endothelial cell activation in cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2002;17(1):15–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ, Jr., Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D: 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace, 14(4):528-606.Google Scholar
  10. Scridon A, Dobreanu D, Chevalier P, Serban RC. Inflammation, a link between obesity and atrial fibrillation. Inflamm Res. 2015;64(6):383–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Boos CJ, Anderson RA, Lip GY. Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory disorder? Eur Heart J. 2006;27(2):136–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Doo YC, Han SJ, Park WJ, Kim SM, Choi SH, Cho GY, Hong KS, Han KR, Lee NH, Oh DJ, Ryu KH, Rhim CY, Lee KH, Lee Y. Associations between C-reactive protein and circulating cell adhesion molecules in patients with unstable angina undergoing coronary intervention and their clinical implication. Clin Cardiol. 2005;28(1):47–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Liangos O, Kolyada A, Tighiouart H, Perianayagam MC, Wald R, Jaber BL. Interleukin-8 and acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective cohort study. Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113(3):c148–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hastings NE, Feaver RE, Lee MY, Wamhoff BR, Blackman BR. Human IL-8 regulates smooth muscle cell VCAM-1 expression in response to endothelial cells exposed to atheroprone flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(5):725–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Boulbou MS, Koukoulis GN, Makri ED, Petinaki EA, Gourgoulianis KI, Germenis AE. Circulating adhesion molecules levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Int J Cardiol. 2005;98(1):39–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Clausen P, Jacobsen P, Rossing K, Jensen JS, Parving HH, Feldt-Rasmussen B. Plasma concentrations of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 are elevated in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus with microalbuminuria and overt nephropathy. Diabet Med. 2000;17(9):644–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement