Skip to main content

Complications of thoracoscopic talc insufflation for the treatment of malignant pleural effusions: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

Talc pleurodesis is an effective treatment for malignant pleural effusions (MPEs). This study was designed to estimate complication rates of thoracoscopic talc insufflation.

Methods

Literature search was conducted in electronic databases and studies were selected if they reported complication rates of thoracoscopic talc insufflation in cancer patients with MPEs. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed to obtain incidence rates of complications.

Results

Twenty-six studies (4482 patients; age 62.9 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 61.5, 64.4]; 50% [95% CI: 43, 58] females) were included. Intraoperative, perioperative, 30-day, and 90-day mortality rates were 0% [95% CI: 0, 1], 2% [95% CI: 0, 4], 7% [95% CI: 3, 13] and 21% [95% CI: 5, 43] respectively. Incidence rates [95% CI] of various complications were: pain (20% [1, 2]), fever (14% [3, 4]), dyspnea (13% [5, 6]), pneumothorax (6% [7, 8]) pneumonia (4% [0, 12]), emphysema (3% [3, 7]), prolonged air leakage (3% [0, 7]), prolonged drainage (3% [9, 10]), thromboembolism (3% [9, 11]), lung injury (2% [7, 12]), respiratory insufficiency (2% [0, 5]), re-expansion pulmonary edema (1% [0, 3]), empyema (1% [0, 2]), respiratory failure (0% [0, 1]), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 0% [0, 1].

Conclusions

Whereas pain and fever were the most frequent complications of thoracoscopic talc insufflation, the incidence of ARDS was low. Pneumothorax, pneumonia, emphysema, prolonged air leakage, pulmonary embolism, arrythmia, re-expansion pulmonary edema, and empyema are important complications of thoracoscopic talc insufflation.

Peer Review reports

Background

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a fluid containing serous proteins, and lymphatic/myeloid cells which along with the cancerous cells accumulates in the pleural cavity during the advanced and terminal stages of cancer. This happens when normal fluid dynamics are disturbed due to the infiltration of tumor into thoracic lymph nodes and pleura [1]. MPEs develop more commonly in lung carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and lymphoma. Up to 15% of lung cancer patients and 11% of breast cancer patients develop MPEs during disease course [2]. Global incidence of MPEs is unknown. In the USA, annual incidence of MPEs is estimated to be between 150,000 and 250,000 cases [2,3,4].

Although, MPEs can be asymptomatic but most of the cases are symptomatic. Common symptoms are dyspnea, cough, and chest pain. MPEs are associated with 3–12 months shorter survival depending on the type of pathology. In lung cancer patients with MPEs, the survival is low (3–6 months), but survival is better (5–24 months) in breast cancer patients [5, 6]. Patients with MPEs have a diminished quality of life due to symptoms such as the shortness of breath [7]. Because patients with MPEs usually have advanced cancer therefore treatments are focused on palliative relief of symptoms. Although, therapeutic thoracentesis can provide relief, the prevention of fluid accumulation in the pleural cavity requires more invasive procedures. Generally, this is accomplished either by the implantation of an indwelling pleural catheter or by performing pleurodesis in which an inflammation-causing material such as talc, tetracycline derivatives, silver nitrate, povidone, or antineoplastic is administered into the pleural space to either through a chest tube or by thoracoscopy [7, 8].

Pleurodesis is an invasive and hospitalization requiring intervention for the resolution of MPEs. It can be performed as a thoracoscopic procedure or as video-assisted thoracic surgery [5]. Preoperative indicators including the high number of white blood cells, elevated alanine transaminase levels, body mass index < 18, hypoxemia and hypoalbuminemia are associated with worse survival after talc pleurodesis [9]. Prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy and poor performance status are also associated with poor prognosis [10, 11]. Pleurodesis with thoracoscopic talc insufflation (also called talc poudrage) is found to be more effective than other contemporary treatments for MPEs [12]. A network meta-analysis that evaluated pleurodesis failure rates found talc insufflation to be the best method of MPE treatment. Other pleurodesis agents which followed talc in ranking were talc slurry, mepacrine, iodine, bleomycin and doxycyline [13]. However, there is no comprehensive review of the complications of thoracoscopic talc insufflation in literature. The aim of the present study was to estimate the complication rates of thoracoscopic talc insufflation by performing meta-analyses of the incidence rates reported by the individual studies.

Methods

Eligibility criteria

Studies were included if they investigated the effectiveness of pleurodesis with thoracoscopic talc insufflation for the treatment of MPEs of cancer patients in a prospective or retrospective design and reported the complications of the procedure. Studies were however excluded if they a) reported the complications of talc slurry; b) involved more than one types of procedures and reported the outcomes without differentiation of treatments; c) reported the outcomes of talc insufflation in patients with pneumothorax; and d) case reports.

Literature search

The literature search was conducted in electronic databases (Ebsco, Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and Wiley) using relevant key terms in logical combinations. These included malignant pleural effusion/s, thoracoscopy, thoracoscopic, pleurodesis, talc, insufflation, poudrage, intraoperative, postoperative, recurrence, complication/s, adverse effects / events, survival, mortality, cancer, and malignancy. The literature search encompassed research articles published in English before December 2020. Bibliographic lists of selected research and review articles were also screened to strengthen the literature search.

Data analyses

Data pertaining to patient demographics, study design, follow-up, talc dose, presenting symptoms and performance status of patients, pleurodesis features, hospital stay, success and recurrence rates, survival, and adverse events / complications were extracted from the research articles of respective studies. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed with New Castle-Ottawa Scale for the Assessment of the Quality of Observational Studies or with Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials.

For each complication of thoracoscopic talc insufflation, a meta-analysis of proportions was performed to achieve the overall estimate where 95% confidence intervals of the estimate were calculated with the use of score statistics and the exact binomial method. In these meta-analyses, within-study variability was estimated from the binomial distribution. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was incorporated for variance stabilization in each meta-analysis [14]. Meta-analyses of proportions were also performed to achieve the estimates of success and recurrence rates. Survival rates reported by the individual studies were pooled under random-effects model using DerSimonian and Laird method for pooled estimates. All analyses were performed with Stata software (Stata Corporation, Texas, USA).

Results

Twenty-six studies [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] were included (Fig. 1). Of these, 5 were randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective studies and 17 were retrospective studies. Overall, these studies reported the outcomes of 4482 patients. Average age of these patients was 62.9 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 61.5, 64.4]. The percentage of females was 50% [95% CI: 43, 58]. Important characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table S1. In general, the quality of the included studies was moderate to high (Table S2a&b).

Fig. 1
figure1

A flowchart of study screening and selection process

Average dose of talc used in these studies was 4.57 g [95% CI: 4.02, 5.11]. On average, thoracoscopic pleurodesis was completed in 35 min [27, 41], chest tube drainage was completed in 4.5 days [95% CI: 3.9, 5.0], and patients required a hospital stay of 6.2 days [95% CI: 5.6, 6.9]. Intraoperative, perioperative, and 30-day, and 90-day mortality rates were 0% [95% CI: 0, 1], 2% [95% CI: 0, 4], 7% [95% CI: 3, 13], and 21% [95% CI: 5, 43] respectively (Figure S1). Pleurodesis success rate was 86% [95% CI: 82, 91]. Recurrence rate was 15% [95% CI: 7, 26] in a median follow-up duration of approximately 18.3 months [95% CI: 10.5, 26.0]. Median survival after talc insufflation was 7.8 months [95% CI: 6.4, 9.2].

Pain and fever were the most prevalent complications of thoracoscopic talc insufflation (20% [95% CI: 8, 37] and 14% [95% CI: 7, 23] respectively) (Table 1). Among the respiratory complications, emphysema (3% [95% CI: 1, 7]) was followed by the respiratory insufficiency (2% [95% CI: 0, 5]), respiratory failure (0% [95% CI: 0, 1]), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 0% [95% CI: 0, 1] (Table 1; Fig. 2). Among the pleural complications, pneumothorax (6% [95% CI: 1, 14]) was followed by the prolonged drainage (3% [95% CI: 2, 4]), prolonged air leakage (3% [95% CI: 0, 7]), lung injury (2% [95% CI: 1, 3]), re-expansion pulmonary edema (1% [95% CI: 0, 3]), and pulmonary edema (0% [95% CI: 0, 2]) (Table 1; Fig. 3).

Table 1 Complication rates of talc insufflation for MPEs
Fig. 2
figure2

A forest graph showing the incidence rates of dyspnea, emphysema, respiratory insufficiency, respiratory failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome after thoracoscopic talc insufflation

Fig. 3
figure3

A forest graph showing the complication rates of persistence of fluid, pneumothorax, prolonged drainage, prolonged air leakage, lung injury, re-expansion pulmonary edema, pulmonary edema, and bleeding after thoracoscopic talc insufflation

Infectious complications included pneumonia (4% [95% CI: 0, 12]), empyema (1% [95% CI: 0, 2]), and wound infections (1% [95% CI: 0, 2]) (Table 1; Figure S2). Other complications included thromboembolism (3% [95% CI: 2, 5]), pulmonary embolism (2% [95% CI: 0, 4]), arrythmia (2% [95% CI: 0, 4]), hypotension (2% [95% CI: 0, 5]), nausea/vomiting (2% [95% CI: 0, 5]), renal dysfunction (1% [95% CI: 0, 3]), tumor recurrence at port (0% [95% CI: 0, 1]), myocardial infarction (0% [95% CI: 0, 1]), and bleeding (0% [95% CI: 0, 1]) (Table 1; Figure S3).

Complications reported each by a single study included postoperative confusion (2%), cough (1%), syncope (1%), perforated gastric/duodenal ulcer (0.5%), fluid loculation requiring fibrinolytics (2%), bronchopleural fistula (3%), red blood cell transfusion (5%), atelectasis (1%), cellulitis (15%), pleural infections (7%), diarrhea (34%), anorexia (37%), hypoxia (2%), hypoxemia (2%), liver dysfunction (6%), wound dehiscence (2%), and hepatic encephalopathy (2%).

Discussion

Thoracoscopic talc insufflation for MPEs has been found to be associated with several complications. Whereas the incidences of ARDS and respiratory failure were low, many other adverse effects including pain, fever, pneumothorax and pneumonia had high incidence rates. Emphysema, prolonged drainage, prolonged air leakage, and thromboembolism also had considerably higher prevalence. Among other important complications, respiratory insufficiency, lung injury, re-expansion pulmonary edema, empyema, pulmonary embolism, arrythmia, hypotension, and renal dysfunction were observed at low incidence rates.

MPE is a fluid which accumulates between the visceral (lung covering) and parietal (inner chest wall covering) layers of the pleural cavity. Accumulation of MPE starts when either the resorptive capacity of the pleura exceeds or the absorptive capacity of the pleural lymphatic system is reduced. When accumulates in higher volumes, it compresses lungs due to which the function of pulmonary parenchyma is affected that results in dyspnea [41]. Talc, the hydrated magnesium silicate (H2Mg3(SiO3)4), is in use for pleurodesis since 1930s. Talc like other agents produces aseptic pleuritis to control accumulation of effusions [41]. Graded talc (talc after removal of small particle size because of their association with adverse events) is more useful than mixed talc.

Approximately 5 g (range 2 to 10), on average, of talc was used by the included studies of this meta-analysis. High doses of talc and small particle-sized talc are found hazardous for pleurodesis. Small particle-sized talc can be systemically absorbed through parietal lymphatics and can induce systemic inflammation [42]. Incidence of hypoxemia and ARDS after talc pleurodesis are thought to be due to lung and systemic inflammation as such events are noted more with the use of mixed talc in comparison with graded talc [43].

In a prospective study in which patients with MPEs were treated with small particle-sized talc, significantly higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines were found in the pleural fluid and serum. Moreover, pleural tumor burden of talc had a positive correlation with proinflammatory cytokines in serum which suggested that advanced stage of tumor induced a stronger systemic reaction to talc [44]. Animal studies with small and large sized talc particles have also shown similar inflammatory responses to talc administration [45].

ARDS is considered as a clinically important adverse effect of thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis as the incidence of ARDS leading to mortality is reported by several studies [24, 46,47,48]. We have found a low incidence of ARDS in a meta-analysis of 14 studies. Beyond the present study, a 9% incidence of ARDS was observed in a retrospective study of cancer patients with MPEs who were treated with talc pleurodesis. However, a vast majority of patients were treated with talc slurry in this study [46]. In another retrospective study in which patients were treated with talc slurry, the ARDS was observed in 1 of 33 patients [47]. Moreover, a study in which 27 patients were treated with either talc insufflation or talc slurry found no incidence of ARDS in talc insufflation group but 4% in talc slurry group [49]. It is suggested that the risk of acute respiratory complications should not be underestimated and a close monitoring of up to 72 h post-pleurodesis should be considered [21, 24].

It is thought that complications like pain, fever, and pneumothorax may arise from thoracoscopy rather than pleurodesis [22]. However, a prospective study found that fever developed in patients who underwent diagnostic thoracoscopy was mild but those who underwent thoracoscopic talc insufflation had significant fever due to inflammatory reaction [25]. Complications like re-expansion pulmonary edema, which is thought to develop because of the prolonged lung collapse followed by its rapid re-expansion, may require mechanical ventilation, if severe [21]. Whereas the talc pleurodesis has been found to provide relief from dyspnea in majority of the patients [50], dyspnea can be a serious complication after pleurodesis failure or can develop because of the re-accumulation of fluid [18], and in its severe forms it can lead to ARDS [51]. Air leakage can occur upon lung or visceral pleural biopsies or due to the rupturing of tumor nodules during lung re-expansion and is usually managed by progressive suction methods [17].

In a survey of over 800 pulmonologists from 8 countries, it was found that their satisfaction with pleurodesis agents was modest although they preferred talc but reported higher incidence of complications especially respiratory failure with the use of talc in pleurodesis [52]. In another survey of about 200 pulmonologists, respondents reported that pain, fever, empyema, and leukocytosis are common side effects with talc pleurodesis [53]. Retrospective studies are usually considered to have a tendency towards under-estimating complications [25]. In the present meta-analysis, approximately 65% of the included studies were retrospective in design. Thus, such a bias could had impacted the overall outcomes. However, inclusion of a good number of studies can minimize the impacts of such biases and therefore our prevalence estimates for ARDS, pain, empyema, fever, bleeding, arrythmia, pneumonia, wound infections, re-expansion pulmonary edema, emphysema, prolonged air leakage, and pulmonary embolism may have better reliability than other complications.

Conclusions

Pain and fever were the most frequent and ARDS was among the less observed complications of thoracoscopic talc insufflation. Pneumothorax, and pneumonia were also among the highly prevalent complications. Emphysema, prolonged drainage, prolonged air leakage, and thromboembolism had moderate incidence rates. Among other important complications, respiratory failure, respiratory insufficiency, lung injury, re-expansion pulmonary edema, empyema, pulmonary embolism, and arrythmia were observed at relatively lower incidence rates.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

MPEs:

Malignant pleural effusions

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. 1.

    Donnenberg AD, Luketich JD, Dhupar R, Donnenberg VS. Treatment of malignant pleural effusions: the case for localized immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):110 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0590-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Antony VB, Jantz MA. Pleural effusions. Malignant Pleural Effusions. Encyclopedia Respir Med. 2006; https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-370879-6/00304-5.

  3. 3.

    American Thoracic Society. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(5):1987–2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dresler CM. Systemic distribution of talc. Chest. 1999;166(1):266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fortin M, Tremblay A. Pleural controversies: indwelling pleural catheter vs. pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(6):1052–7 https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Keshishyan S, Harris K. Asymptomatic malignant pleural effusion: to observe or to manage. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(Suppl 10):S1146–7 https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.06.52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Light RW. Counterpoint: should thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis be the first choice management for malignant pleural effusion? No. Chest. 2012;142(1):17–9 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bibby AC, Dorn P, Psallidas I, Porcel JM, Janssen J, Froudarakis M, et al. ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions. Eur Respir J. 2018;52(1):1800349 https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00349-2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pilling JE, Dusmet ME, Ladas G, Goldstraw P. Prognostic factors for survival after surgical palliation of malignant pleural effusion. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(10):1544–50 https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e95cb8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yoon DW, Cho JH, Choi YS, Kim J, Kim HK, Zo J, et al. Predictors of survival in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion. Thorac Cancer. 2016;7(4):393–8 https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12354.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Abrao FC, de Abreu IRLB, de Oliveira MC, Viana GG, Filho JF, Younes RN, et al. Prognostic factors of recurrence of malignant pleural effusion: what is the role of neoplasia progression? J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(3):813–22 https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.01.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Xia H, Wang XJ, Zhou Q, Shi HZ, Tong ZH. Efficacy and safety of talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87060 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dipper A, Jones HE, Bhatnagar R, Preston NJ, Maskell N, Clive AO. Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;4(4):CD010529 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health. 2014;72(1):39 https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aelony Y, Yao JF. Prolonged survival after talc poudrage for malignant pleural mesothelioma: case series. Respirology. 2005;10(5):649–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00763.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Arapis K, Caliandro R, Stern JB, Girard P, Debrosse D, Gossot D. Thoracoscopic palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusions: results in 273 patients. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(6):919–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0534-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Barbetakis N, Asteriou C, Papadopoulou F, Samanidis G, Paliouras D, Kleontas A, et al. Early and late morbidity and mortality and life expectancy following thoracoscopic talc insufflation for control of malignant pleural effusions: a review of 400 cases. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bhatnagar R, Piotrowska HEG, Laskawiec-Szkonter M, Kahan BC, Luengo-Fernandez R, Pepperell JCT, et al. Effect of thoracoscopic talc poudrage vs talc slurry via chest tube on pleurodesis failure rate among patients with malignant pleural effusions: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;323(1):60–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.19997.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cardillo G, Facciolo F, Carbone L, Regal M, Corzani F, Ricci A, et al. Long-term follow-up of video-assisted talc pleurodesis in malignant recurrent pleural effusions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21(2):302–5; discussion 305-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(01)01130-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Daniel TM, Tribble CG, Rodgers BM. Thoracoscopy and talc poudrage for pneumothoraces and effusions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50(2):186–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(90)90730-t.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    de Campos JR, Vargas FS, de Campos Werebe E, Cardoso P, Teixeira LR, et al. Thoracoscopy talc poudrage: a 15-year experience. Chest. 2001;119(3):801–6. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.119.3.801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Debeljak A, Kecelj P, Triller N, Letonja S, Kern I, Debevec L, et al. Talc pleurodesis: comparison of talc slurry instillation with thoracoscopic talc insufflation for malignant pleural effusions. J BUON. 2006;11(4):463–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Diacon AH, Wyser C, Bolliger CT, Tamm M, Pless M, Perruchoud AP, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of thoracoscopic talc poudrage under local anesthesia versus bleomycin instillation for pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(4 Pt 1):1445–9. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.4.2002030.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dresler CM, Olak J, Herndon JE 2nd, Richards WG, Scalzetti E, Fleishman SB, et al. Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion. Chest. 2005;127(3):909–15. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.3.909.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Froudarakis ME, Klimathianaki M, Pougounias M. Systemic inflammatory reaction after thoracoscopic talc poudrage. Chest. 2006;129(2):356–61. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.2.356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fysh ET, Tan SK, Read CA, Lee F, McKenzie K, Olsen N, et al. Pleurodesis outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Thorax. 2013;68(6):594–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gonzalez AV, Bezwada V, Beamis JF Jr, Villanueva AG. Lung injury following thoracoscopic talc insufflation: experience of a single North American center. Chest. 2010;137(6):1375–81. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Guo H, Wan Y, Tian G, Liu Q, Kang Y, Li Y, et al. EGFR mutations predict a favorable outcome for malignant pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma with Tarceva therapy. Oncol Rep. 2012;27(3):880–90. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2011.1559.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hunt BM, Farivar AS, Vallières E, Louie BE, Aye RW, Flores EE, et al. Thoracoscopic talc versus tunneled pleural catheters for palliation of malignant pleural effusions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(4):1053–7; discussion 1057-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Inoue T, Ishida A, Nakamura M, Nishine H, Mineshita M, Miyazawa T. Talc pleurodesis for the management of malignant pleural effusions in Japan. Intern Med. 2013;52(11):1173–6. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.52.9281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Janssen JP, Collier G, Astoul P, Tassi GF, Noppen M, Rodriguez-Panadero F, et al. Safety of pleurodesis with talc poudrage in malignant pleural effusion: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2007;369(9572):1535–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60708-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kolschmann S, Ballin A, Gillissen A. Clinical efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions. Chest. 2005;128(3):1431–5. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.3.1431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Laisaar T, Palmiste V, Vooder T, Umbleja T. Life expectancy of patients with malignant pleural effusion treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006;5(3):307–10. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2005.118018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Leuzzi G, Vita ML, Porziella V, Congedo MT, Cesario A. Single center experience on talc poudrage morbidity: focus on high talc dosage. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-6-87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Love D, White D, Kiroff G. Thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(1-2):19–22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02616.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mohsen TA, Zeid AA, Meshref M, Tawfeek N, Redmond K, Ananiadou OG, et al. Local iodine pleurodesis versus thoracoscopic talc insufflation in recurrent malignant pleural effusion: a prospective randomized control trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(2):282–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Reddy C, Ernst A, Lamb C, Feller-Kopman D. Rapid pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions: a pilot study. Chest. 2011;139(6):1419–23. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-1868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Stefani A, Natali P, Casali C, Morandi U. Talc poudrage versus talc slurry in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. A prospective comparative study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(6):827–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.10.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Viallat JR, Rey F, Astoul P, Boutin C. Thoracoscopic talc poudrage pleurodesis for malignant effusions. A review of 360 cases. Chest. 1996;110(6):1387–93. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.6.1387.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yim AP, Chan AT, Lee TW, Wan IY, Ho JK. Thoracoscopic talc insufflation versus talc slurry for symptomatic malignant pleural effusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(6):1655–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Habal P, Jankovicova K, Omran N, Kondelkova K, Krejsek J, Mandak J. The dynamics of selected local inflammatory markers to talc in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2013;157(4):311–5. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Thomas R, Francis R, Davies HE, Lee YC. Interventional therapies for malignant pleural effusions: the present and the future. Respirology. 2014;19(6):809–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.12328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Maskell NA, Lee YC, Gleeson FV, Hedley EL, Pengelly G, Davies RJ. Randomized trials describing lung inflammation after pleurodesis with talc of varying particle size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(4):377–82. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200311-1579OC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Arellano-Orden E, Romero-Falcon A, Juan JM, Ocaña Jurado M, Rodriguez-Panadero F, Montes-Worboys A. Small particle-size talc is associated with poor outcome and increased inflammation in thoracoscopic pleurodesis. Respiration. 2013;86(3):201–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342042.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Genofre EH, Vargas FS, Acencio MM, Antonangelo L, Teixeira LR, Marchi E. Talc pleurodesis: evidence of systemic inflammatory response to small size talc particles. Respir Med. 2009;103(1):91–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Rehse DH, Aye RW, Florence MG. Respiratory failure following talc pleurodesis. Am J Surg. 1999;177(5):437–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00075-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Brant A, Eaton T. Serious complications with talc slurry pleurodesis. Respirology. 2001;6(3):181–5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1843.2001.00327.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Rinaldo JE, Owens GR, Rogers RM. Adult respiratory distress syndrome following intrapleural instillation of talc. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;85(4):523–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Shinno Y, Kage H, Chino H, Inaba A, Arakawa S, Noguchi S, et al. Old age and underlying interstitial abnormalities are risk factors for development of ARDS after pleurodesis using limited amount of large particle size talc. Respirology. 2018;23(1):55–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Stanton AE, Guhan A, et al. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2383–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.5535.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Genofre EH, Marchi E, Vargas FS. Inflammation and clinical repercussions of pleurodesis induced by intrapleural talc administration. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007;62(5):627–34. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322007000500015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lee YC, Baumann MH, Maskell NA, Waterer GW, Eaton TE, Davies RJ, et al. Pleurodesis practice for malignant pleural effusions in five English-speaking countries: survey of pulmonologists. Chest. 2003;124(6):2229–38. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.6.2229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Marchi E, Vargas FS, Madaloso BA, Carvalho MV, Terra RM, Teixeira LR. Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions: a survey of physicians in South and Central America. J Bras Pneumol. 2010;36(6):759–67. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37132010000600014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WZ and YLZ wrote the manuscript; SJL and YNZ collected the data; NNG and BL analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nan-nan Guo or Bo Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Important characteristics of the included studies. Tables S2a. Quality assessment with New Castle-Ottawa Scale for the Quality Assessment of the Observational Studies. Tables S2b. Quality assessment with Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials. Figure S1. A forest graph showing the pooled mortality rates after thoracoscopic insufflation with talc. Figure S2. A forest graph showing the incidence rates of pneumonia, empyema, and wound infections after thoracoscopic talc insufflation. Figure S3. A forest graph showing the incidence rates of persistent pain, fever, thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, arrhythmia, hypotension, nausea/vomiting, renal dysfunction, tumor recurrence at port, and myocardial infarction after thoracoscopic talc insufflation.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Zhao, Yl., Li, Sj. et al. Complications of thoracoscopic talc insufflation for the treatment of malignant pleural effusions: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 16, 125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01475-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Talc insufflation
  • Malignant pleural effusions
  • Pleurodesis
  • Thoracoscopy