Skip to main content

Development of a new sternal dehiscence prediction scale for decision making in sternal closure techniques after cardiac surgery

Abstract

Background

After sternotomy, the spectrum for sternal osteosynthesis comprises standard wiring and more complex techniques, like titanium plating. The aim of this study is to develop a predictive risk score that evaluates the risk of sternum instability individually. The surgeon may then choose an appropriate sternal osteosynthesis technique that is risk- adjusted as well as cost-effective.

Methods

Data from 7.173 patients operated via sternotomy for all cardiovascular indications from 2008 until 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Sternal dehiscence occurred in 2.5% of patients (n = 176). A multivariable analysis model examined pre- and intraoperative factors. A multivariable logistic regression model and a backward elimination based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) a logistic model were selected.

Results

The model showed good sensitivity and specificity (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, AUC: 0.76) and several predictors of sternal instability could be evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression showed the highest Odds Ratios (OR) for reexploration (OR 6.6, confidence interval, CI [4.5–9.5], p < 0.001), obesity (body mass index, BMI > 35 kg/m2) (OR 4.23, [CI 2.4–7.3], p < 0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) (OR 2.2, CI [1.5–3.2], p = 0.01), smoking (OR 2.03, [CI 1.3–3.08], p = 0.001). After weighting the probability of sternum dehiscence with each factor, a risk score model was proposed scaling from − 1 to 5 points. This resulted in a risk score ranging up to 18 points, with an estimated risk for sternum complication up to 74%.

Conclusions

A weighted scoring system based on individual risk factors was specifically created to predict sternal dehiscence. High-scoring patients should receive additive closure techniques.

Peer Review reports

Background

After the first description of the median sternotomy as an operative access to the mediastinum by MILTON in 1897, this is still the most common approach in cardiovascular surgery [1]. The evolution in modern cardiac surgery creates less and minimal invasive surgical approaches to the heart, but this approach is relatively safe and offers the best exposure in most of the cardiac surgical procedures [2]. As every surgical procedure bears the potential of complications, this approach also bears a potential risk of sternal dehiscence and infection that may threaten the outcome of the operation and potentially affect not only the patient’s physical but also his psychological recovery. It is also a matter of economics, as complicated postoperative courses are up to 2.8 times more expensive than uncomplicated cases [3, 4].

The incidence of surgical site infections was targeted in many studies trying to evaluate the risk factors [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] and an incidence of 3.5% for major infections was found [3]. Even risk score models were created [6,7,8,9], but they were mostly designed not for all indications but only for coronary patients and especially associated with the usage of bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [10].

The complication of sternal instability alone is focused only in some studies and reported to occur in 3% (0.5–8.0%) of patients after sternotomy [11, 12]. In order to prevent those complications, pre-emptive risk-reducing surgical techniques like sternal rigid plate fixation have been evolved [13], and superior effects over simple wiring technique concerning bone healing, postoperative pain and overall costs could be shown in a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) [4].

However, a general use of more expensive techniques is not always technically required nor economically justified. The standard sternal wires technique, which is applicable in the vast majority of cases, is fast and cost-effective. Nowadays, the increased morbidity of cardiac patients made the use of wires not as effective as before. Alternative techniques to overcome this surgical challenge comprise special wire techniques (e.g. Robicsek’s figure of eight, [11]), the usage of metallic bands (Parham bands [14]) and finally the technique of rigid plates fixation using titanium plates and screws [4]. These closure techniques are definitely more effective but on the other hand time-consuming and expensive [13]. The identification of patients who are at high risk for sternal instability and consequently adopting the suitable surgical technique is the real surgical challenge. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a risk model to predict the risk of sternal dehiscence.

In the present study, the authors have reviewed retrospectively their surgical experience over the last 10 years with sternal complications after all-type cardiothoracic operations. The aim of the study was to develop a risk model to predict sternal dehiscence in surgical patients who may receive special intervention strategies to reduce rates of sternal instability.

Methods

Study population

From 1 January 2008 throughout 2017, 8.615 adult consecutive patients with all-type heart disease underwent cardiac surgery through median sternotomy at the authors’ institution, a quaternary, acute care university hospital in northern Bavaria. Most of the patients (61%) underwent CABG, 29% underwent valve surgery and 10% aortic surgery. Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was part of every patient’s standardized medical treatment.

After checking for inclusion (age over 18 years, surgery through median sternotomy) and exclusion criteria (lateral thoracotomy, complex sternal closure techniques), the data of a cohort of 7.173 patients were analysed (Table 1).

Table 1 Preoperative patients’ characteristicsa

Human participant protection

This retrospective study complied with the Helsinki Declaration (2000) and approval to perform this analysis was given by the local Ethics Committee (EC, No.233_20 BC), based on retrospective data retrieval. For this reason, the EC waived the need for written patients’ informed consent.

Data collection and follow-up

Within the cohort of 7173 patients, a subset of 176 (2.5%) developed a sternal dehiscence, regardless of a primary ‘aseptic’ dehiscence or secondary to an infection (septic dehiscence). We have deliberately omitted the post-operative risk factors, as they could not alter the decision of the sternal closure technique.

Definitions and outcome measures

The definition of sternal dehiscence is a clinically noticeable mobility of the sternal parts that causes pain or abnormal respiratory movement and leads to a surgical intervention.

Statistical analysis

For the variables listed, a multivariable logistic regression model was estimated and within this model, the variable “complication Yes vs. No”, was the dichotomous outcome. Subsequently, a backward elimination based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to select a logistic model best suitable for prediction. Odds ratios were calculated for each variable and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined with corresponding 95% confidence interval. The analysis was performed with the software R version 3.6.3 [15] by colleagues of the IMBE, Institute of Medical informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology of the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (C.G., co-author and E.W., see acknowledgement). For the selection of the best model, the functions glm() and step() of the “stats” package were used, whereas the function roc() of the package “pROC” was used to compute the AUC.

Exclusion criterion was the primary use of any other complex techniques for sternal osteosynthesis.

Results

Risk factors for sternal dehiscence (malunion of the sternum) and uni-variable analysis

The data of 7173 patients were analysed and 176 (2.5%) patients were found to suffer from sternal dehiscence due to malunion of the sternum (MUST). These patients were compared to 6997 (97.5%) patients who did not develop a sternal complication.

The following factors were risk factors for MUST according to the univariable analysis (Table 2)

Table 2 Risk factors (univariable analysis)a (n = 7173)

Older age (age > 60 y), male gender, severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), current smoking (inhalative tobacco use within 2 months preoperatively), previous cardiac operation and rethoracotomy for re-exploration of the mediastinum.

Risk factors for sternal dehiscence (malunion of the sternum) and multi-variable analysis

Using these dependent risk factors for MUST, a multi-variable analysis model was developed to examine preoperative risk factors. The following were risk factors for MUST according to the multi-variable analysis (Table 3)

Table 3 Risk factors for sternal instability (multivariate analysis) (n = 7173)

Re-exploration of the mediastinum (e.g. for bleeding), severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), IDDM, current smoking (inhalative tobacco use within 2 months preoperatively), older age (age > 60 y), moderate obesity (BMI ≥25 and < 35 kg/m2), male gender, previous cardiac operation and former smoking (< 2 months before OP), COPD.

The new predictive scoring system for malunion of the sternum after cardiac surgery

We created a model of a new scoring system (MUST-Score) to predict mal-union of the sternum after sternotomy for cardiac surgery according to the multivariable analysis model. After performing backward selection on the full model (Table 3), the remaining factors coefficient estimates were scaled to the largest one being 5 and rounded to the nearest whole (Tables 4 and 5). This resulted in a risk score between − 1 and 18, reflecting an estimated risk for sternum complication of 0.22 to 73.65%, while the average risk is 2.5%.

Table 4 The scoring of the risk factors for MUST
Table 5 The total score and expected risk of MUST

The accuracy of prediction

The accuracy of prediction was assessed with the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the calculation of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

The predictive scoring system for MUST after sternotomy for cardiac surgery. Legend: The accuracy of prediction of the model was assessed with the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the calculation of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). The AUC was calculated 0.76 [95% CI: 0.72; 0.80]. AUC: Area under the curve. ROC Curve: Receiver Operating Characteristic curve. MUST: Mal-Union of the Sternum

In this model, the AUC was calculated 0.76 [95% CI: 0.72; 0.80]. The scoring system based on this model showed an AUC of 0.75 [95% CI: 0.72; 0.79].

According to arbitrary definitions of Sweats [16], the accuracy of prediction can be defined as moderate (AUC: 0.7–0.9).

Discussion

Sternal dehiscence after sternotomy for cardiac operations severely affect the patients’ physical and psychological recovery. It is also a matter of economics, as complicated postoperative courses are up to 2.8 times more costly than uncomplicated cases. The complication of sternal instability alone is discussed only in some studies and reported to occur in 3% (0.5–8.0%) of patients after sternotomy [11, 12]. Preventive strategies comprise the usage of vacuum-assisted wound closure therapy, special surgical techniques to reinforce the osteosynthesis and the development of models to identify patients at high risk for sternal wound complications.

Several models focus on special surgical settings like the usage of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in coronary artery bypass grafting [10]. Moreover, some models were created to prevent infections on multiple surgical sites (sternum, legs) [3, 5], the development of infections alone [3, 5, 6] or in combination with sternal instability [13]. Although sternal wound complications have a complex pathogenesis depending on specific comorbidities as well as pre-, intra– and postoperative factors, we consider the sternal instability as the initial step towards further sternal wound healing complications including deep sternal wound infections and mediastinitis. In this context, the development of a model to predict the risk of sternal dehiscence may be useful to calculate patients’ risk rationally and individually and to target these patients in the operating room for special surgical intervention strategies.

The aim of this study was both to analyse the risk factors for sternal instability and develop a predictive risk score based on the results of this analysis. Surgeons who operate their patients via sternotomy would be able to evaluate the risk of sternum instability individually, and may optimize the sternal osteosynthesis technique. Up to now, there is no scoring system specifically created to predict the individual risk for sternal instability due to mal-union of the sternum (MUST).

Among all patients (n = 8.615) who underwent all-type cardiothoracic operations in a quaternary university hospital setting over a 10-years period from 2008 to 2017 mal-union of the sternum (MUST) occurred in 2.5% of the patients (n = 176).

Other authors reported a higher sternal complication rate for wire cerclage usage compared to rigid plate fixation of the sternum (5% vs. 0% after 6 months) [4]. Although rigid plate fixation was associated with a trend toward greater index hospitalization costs, 6-month follow-up costs tended to be lower. As a result, total costs were similar between groups.

Ramann et al. [13] investigated the sternal bone healing in a multicentre RCT and compared pain scores and narcotic usage in patients who received rigid plate fixation versus conventional wire cerclage. He could find a sternal union rate of 70% at 6 months in patients with rigid plate fixation compared to 24% in patients with sternal wiring. Pain scores and narcotic usages were significantly lower in the plate fixation group.

Predictive scoring systems or computed scales for the occurrence of surgical complications

Those predictive scales are instruments to optimize patients’ outcome. Patients at a high risk for a complicated course may need more attention than patients at standard risk.

In 1992, O’Connor et al. [7] developed a multivariate clinical prediction rule using logistic regression analysis, a statistical method that allows the calculation of the conditional probability of death (in-hospital mortality associated with CABG surgery). The area under the ROC curve obtained from the training set of data was 0.74 (perfect, 1.0). The prediction rule performed well when used on a test set of data (area, 0.76). The correlation between observed and expected numbers of death was 0.99.

Prediction of major infections after cardiac surgery

Other studies focused on major all- site infections after cardiac surgery. As published in 2005, Fowler et al. [3] analysed 331.429 patients (operated 2002–2003 for CABG) from the STS National Cardiac Database to identify risk factors for major infection. A simplified risk scoring system of twelve variables accurately predicted risk for major infection (overall, 3.5%; of them, 25% mediastinitis, 33% saphenous harvest site infection, 35% septicaemia, 7% multiple sites). Patients with a major infection had a significantly higher mortality than patients without an infection (17.3% versus 3.0%).

Hussey et al. [5] performed a more specific analysis of sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery in 1998. In this study, a sternal wound infection prediction scale (SWIPS) was developed and further revised (SWIPS-R). A multivariate logistic regression with 12 risk factors provided up to 76% correct predictions.

The scoring systems were mainly considered for sternal wound infections generally after any cardiac operation [3, 5] or more specially like CABG surgery with one or bilateral use of the BITA, analysed by Gatti et al. [10]. With this special scoring system inaugurated by Gatti, deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after BITA grafting, can be predicted with a accuracy of 0.72 to 0.73 (AUC of the ROC-curve).

Until now, the most effective prevention methods including scoring systems have not been found. They remain objects of an ongoing discussion.

In a review of 2002, Losanoff, Richmann and Jones [17], described not only preoperatively known risk factors, such as insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, body- mass- index above 35 kg/m2 (BMI > 35 kg/m2), obesity in diabetic women. He also described intraoperative factors like prolonged bypass time, sternal devascularisation (by internal thoracic artery use) and harvesting technique (whether skeletonized or pedicled technique). Additionally, the authors pointed out that suboptimal primary sternal closure should be considered a significant intraoperative risk factor. This explains the necessity of a predictive scoring system that may help the surgeon in decision –making concerning the most appropriate sternal closure technique. This is called ‘a tailored approach’ in a publication of Nenna et al. [12]. They proposed a decisional algorithm based on clinical experience. The definition of high-risk patients comprises COPD, obesity, BITA use, diabetes, off-midline sternotomy. An algorithm for tailored sternal closure techniques is based on patients’ risk factors and the surgeons’ experience. The authors of this review are aware of the absence of consensus in the literature and the severe lack of RCT regarding the optimal sternal closure method.

Our scoring model is based on a multivariable logistic regression model, it predicts a sternal dehiscence more precisely than other scoring systems (AUC: 0.76). The risk factors are individually weighted and therefore, a more specific surgical technique can rationally be chosen and eventually higher costs are well justified.

How to interpret the predictive scoring system (MUST-score)

In the first step, the patients diagnoses are weighted with points in a scale from − 1 to 5 (Table 4). Secondly, the total score represents the expected risk of sternal dehiscence within a range from 0.2 to 73.7% (Table 5).

The scaling is arbitrarily divided into a coloured traffic light scheme starting from

  • green (score up to 4 points, representing an expected low risk of MUST below 1%), to

  • yellow (score up to 8 points, intermediate risk of MUST below 5%), to

  • red (score up to 11 points, high risk of MUST above 15%) (Table 6).

Table 6 Classification of risk groups and surgical technique modification

The expected risk of malunion increases with the total score. As shown in Fig. 2, the graph follows an exponential curve with an increase behind a score of 10. We consider the risk as high and recommend specially reinforced techniques for the sternal closure as described in Table 6.

Fig. 2
figure2

The relationship between the total score and the expected risk of MUST. Legend: The expected risk of Malunion of the sternum (MUST) is shown. The graph shows a nearly exponential curve on the range of 0–12 points, afterwards, the graph follows nearly a straight line

The surgeon may preoperatively calculate the patients risk group and plan the modification of the sternal closure technique. We consider this a well-tailored approach with an underlying rational score that fits the patients’ needs as well as economical requirements.

Study limitations

Even the best scoring system does not relieve the surgeon from correct judgement and proper technical quality of the employed technique. Several clinical circumstances may limit the guidance of scores and the usage of extended techniques, e.g. diffuse bleeding with a certain probability of postoperative reexploration and hemodynamic instability.

From the statistician’s point of view, the probabilities have to be interpreted with caution. The analysed complication (sternal dehiscence) is a rare event (2.5%), thus the logistic regression model is lacking of some accuracy in the marginal zones (nearby 0 and 100%). Exclusion criterion was the primary use of any other complex techniques for sternal osteosynthesis, so that some of the so-called high-risk patients potentially did not contribute to the complication group. As well as data of juvenile patients below an age of 18 years were not enrolled.

Experience and availability of special techniques cannot be taken for granted in each centre.

Further studies will have to validate the precision of the performance of this scoring system. In this future validation study, all data would be analysed that have been entered in the database after inauguration of the MUST-score in this department.

Conclusion

A weighted scoring system based on individual risk factors was specifically created to predict sternal dehiscence. This risk score accurately identifies high-risk patients who may benefit form tailored interventions aimed at the reduction of this severe complication of cardiac surgery.

High-scoring patients should receive more than standard closure techniques. Rigid plates fixation techniques even in combination with bands and external supportive techniques like retention sutures, support vests or vacuum-assisted wound closure may complete the surgeon’s technical armament.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact corresponding author for data request.

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the curve

ROC Curve:

Receiver Operating Characteristic curve

BITA:

Bilateral internal thoracic arteries

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass grafting

AIC:

Akaike Information Criterion

MUST:

Malunion of the sternum

BMI:

Body Mass Index

NIDDM:

Non- Insulin Dependent Diabetes mellitus

IDDM:

Insulin dependent Diabetes mellitus

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

References

  1. 1.

    Milton H. Mediastinal surgery. Lancet. 1897;27:872–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Julian OC, Lopez-Belio M, Dye WS, Javid H, Grove WJ. The median sternal incision in intracardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation; a general evaluation of its use in heart surgery. Surgery. 1957;42(4):753–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fowler VG Jr, O’Brien SM, Muhlbaier LH, Corey GR, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Clinical predictors of major infections after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2005;112:358–65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Allen KB, Thourani VH, Naka Y, Grubb KJ, Grehan J, Patel N, et al. Randomized, multicenter trial comparing sternotomy closure with rigid plate fixation to wire cerclage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153(4):888–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hussey LC, Leeper B, Hynan LS. Development of the sternal wound infection prediction scale. Heart Lung. 1998;27(5):326–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9563(98)90053-X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Friedman ND, Bull AL, Russo PL, Leder K, Reid C, Billah B, et al. An alternative scoring system to predict risk for surgical site infection complicating coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(10):1162–8. https://doi.org/10.1086/519534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Morton JR, Maloney CT, et al. Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England CardiovascularDisease study group. Circulation. 1992;85(6):2110–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.85.6.2110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Russo PL, Spelman DW. A new surgical-site infection risk index using risk factors identified by multivariate analysis for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23(7):372–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/502068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ariyaratnam P, Bland M, Loubani M. Risk factors and mortality associated with deep sternal wound infections following coronary bypass surgery with or without concomitant procedures in a UK population: a basis for a new risk model? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11(5):543–6. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2010.237883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gatti G, Dell’Angela L, Barbati G, Benussi B, Forti G, Gabrielli M, et al. A predictive scoring system for deep sternal wound infection after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(3):910–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Robicsek F, Fokin A, Cook J, Bhatia D. Sternal instability after midline sternotomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;48(4):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-9945.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nenna A, Nappi F, Dougal J, Satriano U, Chello C, Mastroianni C, et al. Sternal wound closure in the current era: the need of a tailored approach. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67(11):907–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01204-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Raman J, Lehmann S, Zehr K, De Guzman BJ, Aklog L, Garrett HE, et al. Sternal closure with rigid plate fixation versus wire closure: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(6):1854–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.07.085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Badellino M, Cavarocchi NC, Kolff J, Alpern JB, McClurken JB. Sternotomy closure with Parham bands. J Card Surg. 1988;3(3):235–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1988.tb00242.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Core Team R. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for statistical computing; 2020. URL https://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240(4857):1285–93. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Disruption and infection of median sternotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2002;21(5):831–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(02)00124-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Elisabeth Waldmann, PhD, (Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, IMBE) for statistical advice.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EN: Investigation; Data collection; Writing- original draft. CG: Formal analysis; Data curation. JR: Data curation. MW: Conceptualization; Supervision; Writing- review. FH: Conceptualization; Project administration; Writing – review. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Harig.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective study complied with the Helsinki Declaration (2000) and approval to perform this analysis was given by the local Ethics Committee (EC, No.233_20 BC), based on retrospective data retrieval. For this reason, the EC waived the need for written patients’ informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare no conflict of interest with respect to research, authorship and publication of the article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nooh, E., Griesbach, C., Rösch, J. et al. Development of a new sternal dehiscence prediction scale for decision making in sternal closure techniques after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg 16, 174 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01555-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cardiac surgery
  • Sternal dehiscence
  • Prediction
  • Scoring system
  • Tailored technique