Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Influence of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival for patients with completely resected high-risk stage IB NSCLC

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 19, Article number: 1 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in completely resected stage IB NSCLC is still controversial. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of ACT in pathological stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high risk factors.

Methods

Patients with pT2aN0M0 stage IB NSCLC who underwent complete resection from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess potential independent risk factors associated with poor prognosis. To compare survival between patients who received ACT and those who did not.

Results

In univariate and multivariate analyses, adenocarcinomas with predominantly micropapillary (MIP) and solid patterns (SOL), poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), number of lymph nodes dissected less than 16 and tumor size larger than 36 mm were identified as high-risk factors for recurrence. In patients with high risk factors for recurrence, ACT resulted in significantly longer DFS (HR, 0.4689, 95%CI, 1.193–3.818; p = 0.0108) and OS (HR, 0.4696, 95%CI, 0.6578–6.895; p = 0.2073), although OS failed to reach statistically significance. After propensity score matching (PSM), 67 pairs of patients were 1:1 matched in the two groups and all baseline characteristics were well balanced. The results also demonstrated that ACT was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.4776, 95%CI, 0.9779–4.484; p = 0.0440) while OS was not significantly different (92.5% vs. 91.0%; HR, 0.6167, 95%CI, 0.1688–2.038; p = 0.7458). In patients with low-risk factors for recurrence, DFS (HR, 0.4831, 95%CI, 0.03025-7.715; p = 0.6068) and OS (HR, 0.969, 95%CI, 0.08364-11.21; p = 0.9794) was not significantly different between those who received ACT and those who did not.

Conclusion

In patients with completely resected stage IB NSCLC, ACT can improve survival in patients with high risk for recurrence. Further large multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Lung cancer ranks as one of the most common malignancies worldwide and is the most frequent cancer and cause of cancer death in men and women combined [1, 2]. Surgical resection is the main treatment of choice for early-diagnosed lung cancers [3]. Postoperative recurrence is a major factor in poor postoperative prognosis and can be controlled with ACT in patients with resected stage II and IIIA NSCLC [4,5,6,7]. However, ACT use for stage IB NSCLC remains controversial [8, 9]. There are many guidelines for NSCLC precise therapies. The commonly used clinical guidelines include the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, the Japanese Society of Lung Cancer guideline, European Society of Cancer Internal Medicine (ESMO) guideline, and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guideline. According to the latest NCCN guideline, postoperative chemotherapy is not required as a routine treatment for patients with stage IB, but it is recommended for patients with high-risk factors (including tumor size＞4 cm, visceral pleural invasion, lymph-vascular invasion, poor tumor differentiation, wedge resection, and incomplete lymph node sampling) in stage IB [10]. In contrast, the latest CSCO guidelines in China consider that stage IB NSCLC (including lung cancer with high-risk factors) generally does not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy due to the lack of high-level evidence to support it. The ESMO clinical practice guidelines also do not recommend postoperative chemotherapy for stage IB patients [11]. The diagnosis and treatment guidelines formulated by the Japanese Society of Lung Cancer recommends the use of oral tegafur-uracil for patients with stage IA/IB/IIA with a total tumor size > 2 cm after complete resection. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9633 trial is the first multi-institutional randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed specifically for stage IB NSCLC [12]. Results of this RCT found that no significant survival advantage was observed for the entire cohort and adjuvant chemotherapy should not be considered the standard of care for stage IB NSCLC. Only a post-hoc subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant survival difference in favor of ACT for patients who had tumors ≥ 4 cm in diameter. However, a mass of this size is classified as stage IIA according to the Eighth Edition of the Lung Cancer Tumor-lymph Node Metastasis (TNM) staging system [13]. In recent years, there have been many studies on whether patients with stage IB NSCLC should receive adjuvant therapy, but there is still no consensus [9, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].

The purpose of our study was to further analyze and evaluate the role of platinum-based doublet ACT in patients with NSCLC by collecting and analyzing patients with stage IB (T2aN0M0) who underwent complete surgical resection from 2013 to 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University.

Patients and methods

Patients

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (ethical approval No.2,022,279). A total of 334 patients with stage 1b (T2aN0M0, the maximum diameter of primary tumor > 3 cm, ≤ 4 cm; Or with any of the following conditions: involving the main bronchus but not reaching the talar carina; Visceral pleura was involved; With partial or whole lung, pneumonia and atelectasis, no regional lymph node metastasis, no distant metastasis) NSCLC who had undergone VATS(video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) curative R0 resections between 2013 January and 2017 July were reviewed. NSCLC staging was performed according to the 8th edition of the TNM classification [13]. The inclusion criteria were [1] patients with primary non-metastatic NSCLC; [2] patients who received radical resection for lung cancer as the first step of treatment, without opting for other treatments such as preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy; [3] postoperative histopathological diagnosis was confirmed as NSCLC. Exclusion criteria were as follows: [1] patients who underwent sublobar resection [2] patients lost to follow up; [3] patients who received induction treatment; [4] patients who had microscopically positive (R1) or macroscopically positive (R2) resections; [5] patients who died within 30 days of operation; [6] patients who received less than four cycle of ACT [7] patients with a history of other malignant tumors [8] The patients received chemoradiotherapy before surgery (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of patients studied

Full size image

All patients received standardized preoperative examinations, including head and chest computed tomography (CT), abdominal ultrasound, lower extremity vascular and carotid ultrasound, echocardiography and electrocardiogram and lung function. Some patients also underwent radionuclide bone scans and positron emission tomography (PET/CT) prior to surgery. The surgical specimens were formalin-fixed, dehydrated, paraffin-embedded, sliced at a thickness of 5 Î¼m, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histopathological analysis of each sample was performed by an experienced pulmonary pathologist and verified by another senior pulmonary pathologist. ACT was defined as postoperative chemotherapy within 2–6 weeks of surgery and the need for more than 4 courses of treatment. The drugs used were determined by oncologists and were all platinum-based dual-drug regimens. Routine follow-up after completion of treatment included outpatient clinic visits every 3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. The contents of each follow-up examination included physical examination, chest CT, and tumor marker detection. For patients who failed to come to the outpatient clinic for re-examination, our department also conducted telephone follow-up and recorded the patient’s condition. When any symptoms or signs of recurrence are observed, further testing of the patient is completed immediately. For example, when the patient has unpleasant symptoms such as headache, dizziness, it is recommended that the patient should undergo a brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or CT scan. When the patient has bone pain, it is recommended that the patient should undergo a bone scan.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were compared by using the t-test and categorical variables were compared by using the χ² test. The duration of overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval between the date of surgical resection and the date of death from any cause. Disease free survival (DFS) was defined as the interval between the date of surgical resection and the date of the first event locoregional or distant recurrence or death from any cause. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess potential independent factors associated with DFS and OS. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was performed to compare the survival curves for DFS and OS. Considering the existence of bias in the analysis and control process, we used PSM to reduce the potential effects of bias. A logistic regression model was established to calculate the propensity score based on the following covariates: age, sex, tumor size, histologic type and grade, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), lympho-vascular invasion, surgical procedures and the number of lymph nodes dissected. Patients who received ACT were matched with patients who underwent surgery only by a 1:1 greedy algorithm without replacement.

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (SPSS 26.0 for Windows, SPSS). All the statistical tests were two-sided and p values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant.

Results

The clinical date of the 334 patients in this study are summarized in Table 1. The median follow-up period after surgery was 30.0 months. During this period, tumor recurrence was observed in 39 patients (11.67%) and 15 patients (4.2%) died of lung cancer progression. Of the 334 patients, 126 patients received ACT and 208 did not.

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics
Full size table

Because the number of deaths was too small (only 15 cases) and all of them were caused by tumor recurrence, the results of the risk factor analysis for the outcome of death were not statistically significant. Therefore, we performed the further studies using the results of risk factor analysis using tumor recurrence as the outcome. The results of univariate analysis showed that adenocarcinomas with predominantly MIP and SOL patterns, poorly differentiated SCC, number of lymph nodes dissected less than 16 and the tumor size were risk factors for tumor recurrence. However, multivariate analysis showed that in addition to the above factors, VPI was also a risk factor for tumor recurrence. The results are shown in Table 2. Although VPI was not statistically significant in the univariate logistic regression analysis, it was found to be statistically significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. VPI may be as a synergistic factor of several other risk factors in the process of tumor recurrence. Since the tumor size is a continuous variable, we decided to use the ROC curve to obtain a diagnostic cut-off point. The results of the ROC curve suggested that the tumor diameter greater than 36 mm was a risk factor for tumor recurrence (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Univariable and multivariable analyses of DFS and OS
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve, predictor: tumor diameter

Full size image

Based on the above results, we decided to use adenocarcinomas with predominantly MIP and SOL patterns, poorly differentiated SCC, number of lymph nodes dissected less than 16 and the tumor diameter greater than 36 mm as risk factors for tumor recurrence. We use risk factors for tumor recurrence to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Patients with one or more risk factors for recurrence were included in the high-risk group, while patients without risk factors for recurrence were included in the low-risk group. According to this standard, a total of 232 patients were included in the high-risk tumor group, including 106 patients who received ACT and 126 patients who did not receive. After PSM, 67 pairs of patients were 1:1 matched in the two groups and all baseline characteristics were well-balanced. Details of each confounding variable before and after matching are summarized in Table 3. And a total of 102 patients were included in the low-risk tumor group, including 20 patients who received ACT and 82 patients who did not receive. The results are shown in Table 4.

Table 3 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with high risk before and after PSM
Full size table
Table 4 Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with low risk
Full size table

Survival curves were used to evaluate whether postoperative ACT was beneficial for patients with high-risk factors. With DFS (HR, 0.4689, 95%CI, 1.193–3.818; p = 0.0108) as the outcome, the survival curve of patients receiving ACT was significantly better than those who did not, while there was no significant difference in OS (HR, 0.4696, 95%CI, 0.6578–6.895; p = 0.2073) between the two groups (Fig. 3). After PSM in high-risk groups, ACT was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.4776, 95%CI, 0.9779–4.484; p = 0.0440; Fig. 3) either. Similarly, there was no significant difference in OS (HR, 0.6167, 95%CI, 0.1688–2.038; p = 0.7458). In the low-risk group, there were no significant differences in DFS (HR, 0.6068, 95%CI, 0.03025-7.715; p = 0.4831) and OS (HR, 0.9794, 95%CI, 0.08364-11.21; p = 0.9794) between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for DFS (A) and OS (B) in high-risk patients with or without adjuvant chemotherapy before PSM. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of DFS (C) and OS (D) in high-risk patients with or without adjuvant chemotherapy after PSM

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for DFS (A) and OS (B) in high-risk patients with or without adjuvant chemotherapy before PSM

Full size image

Discussion

Although ACT is the standard therapy for NSCLC in stage II–IIIA [7, 22,23,24], it is still controversial whether ACT improves survival in patients with stage IB NSCLC [9, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In this study, we summarize the clinical data of patients with stage IB NSCLC who underwent complete surgical resection in our hospital from January 2013 to June 2017 to investigate the benefit of ACT in completely resected stage IB NSCLC. Based on the results of univariate and multivariable analysis, we identified patients with pathologic stage IB NSCLC that was at high risk for recurrence using tumor size larger than 36 mm, adenocarcinomas with predominantly MIP and SOL patterns, poorly differentiated SCC, number of lymph nodes dissected less than 16. For patients in the low-risk group, the survival period was relatively long regardless of chemotherapy. In contrast, in high-risk patients, the use of ACT improved DFS and OS. Although OS failed to reach statistical significance, this may be there were no sufficient death cases deaths in this study, and further studies are needed to expand the sample size in the future. These results suggest that our definitions of low-and high-risk groups was appropriate and that this grouping may be useful for decision-making in ACT for stage IB NSCLC.

Several studies have shown that tumor size predicts prognosis in patients with NSCLC after surgical resection [25,26,27,28,29]. Consistent with most previous studies, our findings suggest that patients with stage IB NSCLC with larger tumors (36 mm < tumor ≤ 40 mm) had significantly worse prognosis than those with smaller tumors. The first multi-institutional RCT study [12] designed specifically for stage IB NSCLC concluded that ACT can improve outcomes in patients with tumors ≥ 40 mm. However, according to the latest NSCLC TNM staging criteria [13], this population has been classified as category IIA patients. Our findings suggest that ACT can improve the prognosis of patients with stage IB lung cancer with a tumor size larger than 36 mm. For stage IB patients, it is still questionable whether to accept ACT therapy based solely on the size of the tumor. In clinical diagnosis and treatment, poorly differentiated NSCLC often progresses faster and has a worse prognosis than well and moderately differentiated tumors [30]. According to our univariate and multivariate outcome analysis, adenocarcinomas with predominantly MIP and SOL patterns, poorly differentiated SCC had a poor prognostic outcome. The World Health Organization (WHO) updated the pathological classification of lung tumors in 2015 and reclassified lung adenocarcinoma, dividing mixed adenocarcinoma into several subtypes including lepidic (LEP), acinar (ACN), papillary (PAP), MIP and SOL tumors [31]. Due to the small number of patients in some of the five subtypes and with reference to relevant cutting-edge research, we divided lung adenocarcinoma patients into three categories: LEP, ACN/PAP, and MIP/SOL [32]. In a report related to the Lung Assisted Cisplatin Evaluation (LACEBIO) study, patients with MIP/SOL adenocarcinoma (but not ACN/PAP adenocarcinoma) achieved DFS and specific DFS, but OS did not benefit from ACT [32, 33]. Hung et al. [15] found that ACT was a favorable prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in patients with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma, especially in patients with a MIP/SOL pattern. In our study, we found that the MIP/SOL group had worse OS and DFS than LEP and ACN/PAP groups and ACT could improve the prognosis of these patients. The MIP/SOL pattern may be considered a stratification factor in the design of future clinical trials of ACT in patients with stage IB NSCLC. Furthermore, for patients with early-stage SCC, evidence from previous studies suggests that early-stage SCC may be associated with a higher probability of recurrence compared with patients with adenocarcinoma [34,35,36]. In addition to the relatively high risk of SCC recurrence, related studies also show that SCC histology is better than adenocarcinoma histology in predicting the efficacy of chemotherapy, which may partly explain the efficacy of ACT in patients with stage IB SCC [37, 38]. Xu et al. [16] demonstrated that ACT can improve the survival rate of patients with surgically resected stage IB lung SCC. We also concluded that ACT is beneficial to the prognosis of poorly differentiated SCC, but there was no statistical significance. It may be because the vast majority of SCC patients in our study were poorly differentiated SCC, and the number of patients with moderately and well-differentiated SCC was very small. Lymph node (LN) status is of great significance for the staging and prognosis of NSCLC. Extensive lymph node dissection can help detect occult lymph node metastasis and provide appropriate adjuvant therapy, thereby improving long-term survival. But at the same time, this step will increase the operation time and may lead to an increased probability of postoperative complications [39, 40]. Several studies have included the number of dissected LNs as an indicator of surgical quality and investigated the relationship between the number of dissected LNs and the prognosis of NSCLC [39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Data from the ACOSOG Z0030 trial suggested that resection of 10 LNs might be considered adequate [39]. Similarly, the American College of Surgeons supports the removal of at least 10 lymph nodes as a quality indicator [46]. Liang et al. [40]proposed that in patients with stage I-IIIA resected NSCLC, more dissected LNs were associated with more accurate lymph node staging and better long-term survival. The study recommended 16 dissected LNs as the threshold for evaluating the quality of LN examination. For patients with stage IB NSCLC with poor LN evaluation, there is no clear recommendation for further adjuvant chemotherapy. According to the above cutting-edge research, we chose 16 lymph node dissections as the measurement standard when analyzing the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients. To sum up, we chose 16 lymph node dissections as the measurement standard when analyzing the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients. And according to univariate and multivariate logistic regression results, patients with less than 16 lymph node dissections had a worse prognosis, and chemotherapy could improve the prognosis of this population. The number of LNs examined at the time of NSCLC resection, to date, remains a forum of open discussion. VPI represents the ability of the tumor to penetrate the pleural elastin layer, indicating an elevated risk of seeding into the pleural cavity. The visceral pleura is rich in lymphatic vessels, and tumor cells eventually flow into the hilar lymph nodes [10, 17, 47]. Several studies have demonstrated that VPI is a major determinant of tumor stage and a risk factor for recurrence and poor survival [48, 49]. In the present study, multivariate regression analysis indicated that VPI stage IB NSCLC patients had worse prognosis, which was consistent with previous studies. Interestingly, univariate logistic regression did not show that VPI was a risk factor for tumor prognosis. We consider that VPI may be a synergistic factor for several other risk factors in the prognosis of stage IB NSCLC which is consistent with the results of some previous studies [50, 51]. These studies showed that VPI was a significant poor prognostic factor in node-negative patients with tumor size > 3 but ≤ 5 cm. Further multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Our study should be interpreted with caution because of several limitations. This study was retrospective in nature and single-center study, which may lead to patient selection bias and time trend bias. Another limitation is that the use of ACT and selection of the regimens used for adjuvant therapy were not randomized but were according to physician preference. In the future, multi-institutional studies and randomized clinical trials with large sample sizes are needed to further verify the value of ACT for the treatment of patients with stage IB NSCLC in the future.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ACT improves survival in patients with stage IB NSCLC at high risk of recurrence. Further large multicenter larger sample size randomized clinical trials are needed to further identify the role of ACT and better systemic strategies need to been developed in resected stage IB NSCLC.

Data Availability

The data supporting this study can be obtained from the corresponding author [Jun Zhao]; As the research data involve patient privacy and informed consent, the data will not be disclosed.

Abbreviations

ACT:

adjuvant chemotherapy

NSCLC:

non-small cell lung cancer

LEP:

lepidic

ACN:

acinar

PAP:

papillary

MIP:

micropapillary

SOL:

solid

SCC:

squamous cell carcinoma

NCCN:

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

ESMO:

European Society of Cancer Internal Medicine

CSCO:

Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology

RCT:

randomized controlled trial

OS:

overall survival

DFS:

disease-free survival

PSM:

propensity score matching

VPI:

visceral pleural invasion

CT:

computed tomography

PET/CT:

positron emission tomography

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

LN:

Lymph node

HR:

hazard ratio

CI:

confidence interval

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu S, Hu C, Li M, An J, Zhou W, Guo J, et al. Estrogen receptor beta promotes Lung cancer invasion via increasing CXCR4 expression. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(1):70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Videtic GMM, Donington J, Giuliani M, Heinzerling J, Karas TZ, Kelsey CR, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell Lung cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO evidence-based Guideline. Practical Radiation Oncology. 2017;7(5):295–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zou B, Xu Y, Li T, Li W, Tang B, Zhou L, et al. A multicenter retrospective analysis of survival outcome following postoperative chemoradiotherapy in non-small-cell Lung cancer patients with N2 nodal Disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77(2):321–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, Carpagnano F, Ramlau R, Gonzáles-Larriba JL, et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell Lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(9):719–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Butts CA, Ding K, Seymour L, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Graham B, Gandara D, et al. Randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine plus cisplatin compared with observation in completely resected stage IB and II non-small-cell Lung cancer: updated survival analysis of JBR-10. J Clin Oncology: Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010;28(1):29–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kubota K, Kunitoh H, Seto T, Shimada N, Tsuboi M, Ohhira T, et al. Randomized phase II trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with completely resected non-small cell Lung cancer: TORG 0503. Lung cancer (Amsterdam Netherlands). 2020;141:32–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitsudomi T, Soh J. Adjuvant therapy of operable nonsmall cell Lung cancer: an update. Curr Opin Oncol. 2021;33(1):47–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao S, Teng J, Xu J, Han B, Zhong H. Value of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected stage IB solid predominant and solid non-predominant lung adenocarcinoma. Thorac cancer. 2019;10(2):249–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, et al. NCCN guidelines Insights: Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Cancer Network: JNCCN. 2021;19(3):254–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dingemans AC, Früh M, Ardizzoni A, Besse B, Faivre-Finn C, Hendriks LE, et al. Small-cell Lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up(☆). Annals of Oncology: Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2021;32(7):839–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Strauss GM, Herndon JE 2nd, Maddaus MA, Johnstone DW, Johnson EA, Harpole DH, et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell Lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study groups. J Clin Oncology: Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2008;26(31):5043–51.

  13. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM Stage groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncology: Official Publication Int Association Study Lung Cancer. 2016;11(1):39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li X, Zhang C, Sun Z, Yang F, Xiao R, Sui X, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected Stage IB non-small-cell Lung cancer patients. Lung cancer (Amsterdam Netherlands). 2019;133:75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hung JJ, Wu YC, Chou TY, Jeng WJ, Yeh YC, Hsu WH. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves the probability of Freedom from recurrence in patients with Resected Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1346–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu J, Wang S, Zhong H, Zhang B, Qian J, Yang W, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in surgically resected Stage IB squamous Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(6):1683–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang HJ, Cho S, Kim K, Jheon S, Yang HC, Kim DK. Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Complete Resection for Pathologic Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma in High-Risk patients as defined by a New Recurrence Risk Scoring Model. Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49(4):898–905.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yao ZY, Feng BW, Liu CS, Liu YM, Zhou HY, Zhang XH, et al. The application of a bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell membrane in the vascularization of a Decellularized Tracheal Scaffold. Stem Cells International. 2021;2021:6624265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Wu N, Lv C, Yan S, Yang Y. Should patients with stage IB non-small cell Lung cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy? A comparison of survival between the 8th and 7th editions of the AJCC TNM staging system for stage IB patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019;145(2):463–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sereno M, He Z, Smith CR, Baena J, Das M, Hastings RK, et al. Inclusion of multiple high-risk histopathological criteria improves the prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in lung adenocarcinoma. Histopathology. 2021;78(6):838–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Morgensztern D, Du L, Waqar SN, Patel A, Samson P, Devarakonda S, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with T2N0M0 NSCLC. J Thorac Oncology: Official Publication Int Association Study Lung Cancer. 2016;11(10):1729–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell Lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(4):351–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Burdett S, Pignon JP, Tierney J, Tribodet H, Stewart L, Le Pechoux C et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected early-stage non-small cell Lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(3):Cd011430.

  24. Pirker R. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small cell Lung cancer. Translational Lung cancer Research. 2014;3(5):305–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Raman V, Jawitz OK, Voigt SL, Rhodin KE, D’Amico TA, Harpole DH, et al. The Effect of Tumor size and histologic findings on outcomes after Segmentectomy vs Lobectomy for clinically node-negative Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Chest. 2021;159(1):390–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang F, Chen H, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Hu H, et al. Relationship between Tumor size and Disease stage in non-small cell Lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:474.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hung JJ, Wang CY, Huang MH, Huang BS, Hsu WH, Wu YC. Prognostic factors in resected stage I non-small cell Lung cancer with a diameter of 3 cm or less: visceral pleural invasion did not influence overall and disease-free survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(3):638–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duma N, Santana-Davila R, Molina JR. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2019;94(8):1623-40.

  29. Padilla J, Calvo V, Peñalver JC, Sales G, Morcillo A. Surgical results and prognostic factors in early non-small cell Lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(2):324–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Biaoxue R, Hua L, Tian F, Wenlong G. Increased stathmin in serum as a potential Tumor marker for lung adenocarcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47(4):342–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR, Yatabe Y, et al. International association for the study of Lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncology: Official Publication Int Association Study Lung Cancer. 2011;6(2):244–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsao MS, Marguet S, Le Teuff G, Lantuejoul S, Shepherd FA, Seymour L, et al. Subtype classification of lung Adenocarcinoma Predicts Benefit from Adjuvant Chemotherapy in patients undergoing complete resection. J Clin Oncology: Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015;33(30):3439–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. al BEMSLTGe. Prognostic and predictive value of a new IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification in a pooled analysis of four adjuvant chemotherapy trials: a LACE-BIO study. J Thorac Oncology: Official Publication Int Association Study Lung Cancer. 2013;8(Suppl 2):201.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kawase A, Yoshida J, Ishii G, Nakao M, Aokage K, Hishida T, et al. Differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung: are adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma prognostically equal? Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42(3):189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fukui T, Taniguchi T, Kawaguchi K, Fukumoto K, Nakamura S, Sakao Y, et al. Comparisons of the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between Lung cancer patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63(9):507–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Maeda H, Matsumura A, Kawabata T, Suito T, Kawashima O, Watanabe T, et al. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung: surgical results as compared with squamous cell and adenocarcinoma cases. Eur J cardio-thoracic Surgery: Official J Eur Association Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2012;41(2):357–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liao WY, Chen JH, Wu M, Shih JY, Chen KY, Ho CC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel-cisplatin in patients with stage III N2 non-small-cell Lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013;14(4):418–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shukuya T, Yamanaka T, Seto T, Daga H, Goto K, Saka H, et al. Nedaplatin plus docetaxel versus cisplatin plus docetaxel for advanced or relapsed squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (WJOG5208L): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1630–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Darling GE, Allen MS, Decker PA, Ballman K, Malthaner RA, Inculet RI, et al. Number of lymph nodes harvested from a mediastinal lymphadenectomy: results of the randomized, prospective American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 trial. Chest. 2011;139(5):1124–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Liang W, He J, Shen Y, Shen J, He Q, Zhang J, et al. Impact of examined Lymph Node count on Precise Staging and Long-Term Survival of Resected Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: a Population Study of the US SEER database and a Chinese multi-institutional Registry. J Clin Oncology: Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2017;35(11):1162–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Surgeons AC. CoC quality of care measures; standard 4.4 and 4.5 expected performance rates,2019 surveys. https://www.facsorg/quality-programs/cancer/ncdb/qualitymeasures Accessed July 20, 2018.

  42. Jiang K, Zhi X, Shen Y, Ma Y, Su X, Zhou L. Impact of examined lymph node count on long-term survival of T1-2N0M0 double primary NSCLC patients after Surgery: a SEER study. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8692.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Osarogiagbon RU, Ogbata O, Yu X. Number of lymph nodes associated with maximal reduction of long-term mortality risk in pathologic node-negative non-small cell Lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(2):385–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. David EA, Cooke DT, Chen Y, Nijar K, Canter RJ, Cress RD. Does Lymph Node Count Influence Survival in surgically resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer? Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):226–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dai J, Liu M, Yang Y, Li Q, Song N, Rocco G, et al. Optimal Lymph Node Examination and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage I Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncology: Official Publication Int Association Study Lung Cancer. 2019;14(7):1277–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Handy JR Jr., Costas K, Nisco S, Schaerf R, Vallières E, Hussain SX, et al. Regarding American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Quality of Care measure 10RLN. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(4):1040–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shimizu K, Yoshida J, Nagai K, Nishimura M, Ishii G, Morishita Y, et al. Visceral pleural invasion is an invasive and aggressive indicator of non-small cell Lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(1):160–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kinoshita T, Ohtsuka T, Hato T, Goto T, Kamiyama I, Tajima A, et al. Prognostic factors based on clinicopathological data among the patients with resected peripheral squamous cell carcinomas of the lung. J Thorac Oncology: Official Publication Int Association Study Lung Cancer. 2014;9(12):1779–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Y, Wang R, Zheng D, Han B, Zhang J, Zhao H, et al. Predicting the recurrence risk factors and clinical outcomes of peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma ≤ 3 cm with wedge resection. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143(6):1043–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fibla JJ, Cassivi SD, Brunelli A, Decker PA, Allen MS, Darling GE, et al. Re-evaluation of the prognostic value of visceral pleura invasion in Stage IB non-small cell Lung cancer using the prospective multicenter ACOSOG Z0030 trial data set. Lung cancer (Amsterdam Netherlands). 2012;78(3):259–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jiang L, Liang W, Shen J, Chen X, Shi X, He J, et al. The impact of visceral pleural invasion in node-negative non-small cell Lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2015;148(4):903–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation for the Youth of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20200196) and the Research Project of Gusu Health Talents in Suzhou (No. GSWS2021013).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zi-Qing Shen and Kun-Peng Feng contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, China

    Zi-Qing Shen, Kun-Peng Feng, Zi-Yao Fang, Tian Xia, Shu Pan, Cheng Ding, Chun Xu, Sheng Ju, Jun Chen, Chang Li & Jun Zhao

Authors
  1. Zi-Qing Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kun-Peng Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zi-Yao Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tian Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shu Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cheng Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sheng Ju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jun Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

(I) Conception and design: Zi-Qing Shen, Kun-Peng Feng, Jun Zhao, Chang Li; (II) Administrative support: Jun Zhao, Chang Li, Shu pan; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Jun Zhao, Chang Li; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Zi-Qing Shen, Kun-Peng Feng, Zi-Yao Fang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chang Li or Jun Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was a retrospective cohort study and was approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (ethical approval no. 2022279). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All patients participating in this study signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, ZQ., Feng, KP., Fang, ZY. et al. Influence of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival for patients with completely resected high-risk stage IB NSCLC. J Cardiothorac Surg 19, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02457-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023-02457-1

Keywords

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

ISSN: 1749-8090

Contact us