Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Risk factors for prolonged postoperative ICU stay in the patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery volume 19, Article number: 46 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the independent risk factors for postoperative prolonged ICU stay in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) and assess the clinical outcomes of prolonged ICU stay.

Method

The clinical data of 100 patients with TAAD admitted to the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from December 2018 to September 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the postoperative ICU stay (7 days as the threshold), regular ICU stay group (< 7 days) and prolonged ICU stay group (≥ 7 days). First, preoperative and intraoperative materials were collected for univariate analysis. Then, the significant variables after univariate analysis were analyzed using logistic regression, and the final independent risk factors for prolonged ICU stay were determined. Meanwhile, the postoperative clinical outcomes were analyzed with the aim of assessing the clinical outcomes due to prolonged ICU stay.

Results

There were 65 and 35 patients in the regular ICU stay group and the prolonged ICU stay group, respectively. In accordance with the result of univariate analysis in the two groups, emergency surgery (χ2 = 13.598; P < 0.001), preoperative urea nitrogen (t = 3.006; P = 0.004), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (t = 2.671; P = 0.001) and surgery time (t = 2.630; P = 0.010) were significant. All significant variates were analyzed through logistic regression, and it was found that emergency surgery (OR = 0.192; 95% CI: 0.065–0.561), preoperative urea nitrogen (OR = 0.775; 95% CI: 0.634–0.947) and cardiopulmonary time (OR = 0.988; 95% CI: 0.979–0.998) were independent risk factors for prolonged postoperative ICU stay. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves of these three factors were also effective in predicting postoperative prolonged ICU stay (Emergency surgery, AUC = 0.308, 95% CI: 0.201–0.415; Preoperative urea nitrogen, AUC = 0.288, 95% CI: 0.185–0.392; cardiopulmonary time, AUC = 0.340, 95% CI: 0.223–0.457). Moreover, compared with a single factor, the predictive value of combined factors was more significant (AUC = 0.810, 95% CI: 0.722–0.897). For the comparison of postoperative data in the two groups,, compared with the regular ICU stay group, the incidence of adverse events in the prolonged ICU stay group increased significantly, including limb disability of limbs (χ2 = 22.182; P < 0.001), severe organ injury (χ2 = 23.077; P < 0.001), tracheotomy (χ2 = 17.582; P < 0.001), reintubation (χ2 = 28.020; P < 0.001), 72 h tracheal extubation after surgery (χ2 = 29.335; P < 0.001), 12 h consciousness recovery after surgery (χ2 = 18.445; P < 0.001), ICU re-entering (χ2 = 9.496; P = 0.002) and irregular discharging (χ2 = 24.969; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Emergency surgery, preoperative urea nitrogen, and CPB time are risk factors for postoperative prolonged ICU stay after TAAD surgery. Furthermore, prolonged ICU stay is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Hence, a reasonable strategy should be adopted proactively focusing on the risk factors to shorten ICU stays and improve clinical outcomes.

Peer Review reports

TAAD is one of the most common critical diseases in cardiovascular surgery. Clinically, the outcomes of TAAD are adversely affected due to sudden severe onset, difficult treatment, and higher perioperative mortality. Currently, hypertension, dilated aortic aneurysm, and grafted aortic prosthesis-related medical factors are considered as the leading causes of TAAD, and the prevalence of TAAD is higher in the male population [1]. Undoubtedly, surgery is the preferred option for TAAD treatment; however, both diversity and uncertainty of postoperative outcomes are a concern because of advanced disease and different organ involvement by TAAD. With the dramatic updates for both surgical concepts and artificial prosthesis, the safety and effect of TAAD repair surgery is more reliable and worth trusting. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that the importance of postoperative management is the same as surgical procedures or even larger, among which, as the critical transition stage from surgical trauma to rehabilitation, postoperative ICU management is the central axis, which is responsible for vital sign monitoring, medical intervention, and even timely salvage if necessary. In particular, prolonged ICU stay after surgery is associated with increased in-hospital mortality and morbidity and economic cost. It has been demonstrated that the length of ICU stay depends on a multifactorial mechanism [2]. For the assessment of ICU stay, EuroSCORE II, even though it is the newest risk predictive model of cardiac surgery, is poor in predicting the ICU stay without any assistance as the newest risk predictive model of cardiac surgery, is poor in predicting the ICU stay without any assistance from other models, which is less effective than APACHE IVa [3, 4]. Overall, an optimal and reasonable ICU management strategy is beneficial to outcome improvement and long-term survival; however, prolonged ICU stay due to unexpected clinical factors may reversely induce a series of adverse events, including ventilator-associated pneumonia, organ dysfunction, and delirium [5,6,7]. In an observational study of postoperative management, low preoperative hemoglobin level, prolonged cross-clamp times, decreased PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and changes in blood glucose within 1–4 h after surgery were associated with prolonged ICU stay [8]. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the independent risk factors of postoperative prolonged ICU stay and their association with the outcomes of patients with TAAD.

Subjects and the method

Subjects

A total of 100 patients with TAAD admitted to the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, from December 2018 to September 2022 were enrolled as the subjects. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) TAAD was confirmed through imaging including enhanced CT angiography and/or echocardiography; (2) TAAD patients underwent the surgical procedures. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) There were no surgical indications due to advanced disease and/or subjective refusal from patients; (2) The clinical materials of patients were incomplete; (3) The patients were discharged irregularly within short ICU stay (< 7 days) due to varies unexpected reasons. Based on the literature and taking the clinical practice into consideration, all patients were divided into regular ICU stay group (< 7 days) and prolonged ICU stay group (≥ 7 days) [2, 9]. Comprehensively, the clinical criteria of ICU leave after surgery must be assessed as follows: (1) Total consciousness recovery and completed activities following physician’s instructions; (2)Mechanical ventilation weaning and the spontaneous breathing rate < 22 times/min; (3) The partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) ≥ 80 mmHg and ≤ 50 mmHg, respectively; (4) Stable hemodynamics without severe and malignant arrhythmia; (5) The qualified postoperative heart function after assessment and supported by fewer vasoactive drugs.

Method

Perioperative clinical materials of the patients were collected for retrospective analysis. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters included age, weight, laboratory tests, ejection fraction, surgery type, surgery time, CPB time, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) time, ultrafiltration, and cold blood reperfusion time (interval between DHCA and rewarming.). Postoperative materials included postoperative mental status, extubation time, limb disability, tracheotomy, and organ function injury. First, univariate analysis was performed for both preoperative and intraoperative materials, after which the significant variates were pooled and analyzed using logistic regression analysis to determine the final independent risk factors. ROC curves were also drawn to validate the specificity and sensitivity of prediction to prolonged ICU stay from independent risk factors. Finally, the comparison of postoperative materials in the two groups was performed to assess the effect of prolonged ICU stay on clinical outcomes.

Statistics

Statistical software SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis. The measurement data with normal distribution was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (χˉ ± s) and t test as well as χ2 test were used for intergroup comparison. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were 71 male patients at age of 32–74 y (52.39 ± 8.73y) and 29 female patients at age of 26–76 y (55.24 ± 8.56y). For arterial cannulation sites, different cannulation sites were summarized as brachiocephalic trunk/innominate artery combined with femoral artery (53 patients), left common carotid artery combined with femoral artery (25 patients), axillary artery combined with femoral artery (12 patients), right subclavian artery combined with femoral artery (9 patients), and left subclavian artery combined with femoral artery (1 patient). For surgical procedures, different procedural types were summarized as aortic valve repair combined with ascending aorta replacement and Sun’s procedure (38 patients), Bentall combined with Sun’s procedure (24 patients), ascending aorta replacement combined with Sun’s procedure (19 patients), aortic valve repair combined with ascending aorta as well as right hemiarch replacement (6 patients), David combined with Sun’s procedure (6 patients), ascending aorta replacement combined with right hemiarch replacement (5 patients), David combined with right hemiarch replacement (1 patient), and abdominal aorta replacement combined with Sun’s procedure (1 patient). There were 65 patients in the postoperative regular ICU stay group and 35 patients in the prolonged ICU stay group.

Univariate analysis of preoperative and intraoperative materials in the two groups

It was indicated that, through univariate analysis, the differences of emergency surgery (χ2 = 13.598; P < 0.001), preoperative urea nitrogen (t = 3.006; P = 0.004), CPB time (t = 2.671; P = 0.009) and surgery time (t = 2.630; P = 0.010) in the two groups were significant. There were no significant differences for the other variables (Table 1).

Table 1 Univariate analysis of preoperative and intraoperative materials in the two groups
Full size table

Logistic regression analysis

The remaining significant factors through univariate analysis were set as the independent variables and ICU stay was set as the dependent variable (ICU stay < 7 days after surgery = 1; ICU stay ≥ 7 days after surgery = 0), the Logistic regression (stepwise, forward) was used to determine the final independent risk factors. emergency surgery (OR = 0.192; 95%CI: 0.065–0.561), preoperative urea nitrogen (OR = 0.013; 95%CI: 0.634–0.947) and CPB time (OR = 0.988; 95%CI: 0.979–0.998) were significant factors (Table 2).

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis
Full size table

Specificity and sensitivity of prediction to prolonged ICU stay based on independent risk factors

Based on the results of logistic regression analysis, emergency surgery, preoperative creatinine level, and CPB time were set as checking variables, and prolonged ICU stay was set as the state variable. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to validate the specificity and sensitivity of the predictive value of independent factors. The AUC of each checking variable and that of the combined factors were calculated. In accordance with the calculation of areas under the AUC curve for all factors, emergency surgery (AUC = 0.308; 95%CI: 0.201–0.415), preoperative urea nitrogen (AUC = 0.288; 95%CI: 0.185–0.392) and CPB time (AUC = 0.340; 95%CI: 0.223–0.457)were effective in predicting prolonged ICU stay; however, compared with any single factor, the predictive value of prolonged ICU stay with combined factors (AUC = 0.810; 95% CI: 0.722–0.897) increased significantly (Fig. 1 and Table 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC curves for the prediction of prolonged ICU stay from independent risk factors

Full size image
Table 3 Specificity and Sensitivity of Prediction to Prolonged ICU stay based on Independent Risk Factors
Full size table

Association between prolonged ICU stay and clinical outcomes

Compared with the regular ICU stay group, the incidence of adverse events in the prolonged ICU stay group increased significantly, including limb disability (χ2 = 22.182; P < 0.001), severe organ injury (χ2 = 23.077; P < 0.001), tracheotomy (χ2 = 17.582; P < 0.001), reintubation (χ2 = 28.020; P < 0.001), 72 h tracheal extubation after surgery (χ2 = 29.335; P < 0.001), 12 h consciousness recovery after surgery (χ2 = 18.445; P < 0.001), ICU re-entering (χ2 = 9.496; P = 0.002) and irregular discharging (χ2 = 24.969; P < 0.001). (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of postoperative clinical outcomes between the two groups
Full size table

Discussion

Recently, the number of younger TAAD patients in China has been increasing gradually, and the risk incidences for both dissection rupture and dissection-related complications are relatively larger due to limited medical resources and undeveloped socioeconomic status. Therefore, regionally and actually, the postoperative clinical outcomes of TAAD vary [10]. Clinically, postoperative ICU management is an indispensable element for both physical and mental recovery after TAAD surgery, which is valuable in stabilizing circulation, respiration, coagulation, and organ functions [11].

In the current study, TAAD was selected as the targeted disease to explore how to optimize the ICU management strategy focusing on critical cardiovascular diseases. The results indicated that emergency surgery, preoperative urea nitrogen, and CPB time were associated with prolonged postoperative ICU stay. Meanwhile, compared with the regular ICU stay group, the incidence of adverse events in the prolonged ICU stay group, including limb disability, severe organ injury, tracheotomy, reintubation, 72 h tracheal extubation after surgery, 12 h consciousness recovery after surgery, ICU re-entering, and irregular discharge, was significantly higher.

In clinical practice, TAAD is commonly characterized by acute onset and progressive invasion of the arterial system. Thus, undoubtedly, emergency surgery is the preferred treatment for TAAD. Nevertheless, although effective for life-saving purposes, it is inadequate and difficult to handle several unexpected conditions during emergency surgery, such as organ malperfusion syndrome secondary to TAAD. Girdauskas et al. [12] found that preoperative malperfusion is the major factor associated with systemic inflammatory response, acute respiratory dysfunction, and renal failure, leading to prolonged ICU stay due to longer mechanical ventilation and dialysis. In a survival study conducted by Wolfe et al. [13], among patients with TAAD, more than 40% of whom were complicated with varying preoperative malperfusion, it was found that the highest odds of in-hospital mortality was from mesenteric malperfusion followed by cerebral malperfusion. Currently, rather than the priority of TAAD repair emergency surgery, perfusion improvement of malperfusion organs is the first intervention goal [14, 15]. In a study conducted by Yang et al. [16], for patients with TAAD complicated with mesenteric artery malperfusion, initial endovascular intervention therapy was activated to improve perfusion flow of the mesenteric artery following elective open surgical dissection repair. Collectively, it was found that compared with non-malperfusion patients, there was no significant difference in mortality for the surviving patients with malperfusion after endovascular intervention, although higher in-hospital mortality of 40% at admission. Compared with the “central repair-first” strategy, both in-hospital and 30-day mortality of patients undergoing “revascularization-first” strategy are significantly lower, and except for a longer hypothermic cardiac arrest period, no more adverse aortic events are found [17]. Furthermore, compared with TAAD patients with non-malperfusion, the average time of redo after emergency surgery for patients with malperfusion was shortened to 2 days [18]. Moreover, for patients complicated with preoperative cerebral malperfusion, the comprehensive feasibility of emergency surgery should be assessed. In a retrospective study, the hospital mortality of patients with cerebral malperfusion was significantly higher, especially for those presenting with coma, whereas axillary artery cannulation was considered as a protective factor [19]. Okita et al. [20] recommended that reperfusion of the carotid artery before TAAD repair surgery among patients with brain malperfusion secondary to TAAD is associated with fewer neurological adverse events. Thus, early established anatomic bypass of the left/right carotid artery for cerebral reperfusion maintenance is associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative neurological complications [21]. However, the association between age and emergency surgery remains controversial. First, for younger patients, the surgery strategy mainly depends on the involvement of aortic branches, whereas for older patients, the strategy mainly focuses on the structure and function of the left ventricle [22]. Older age (≥ 80y) is associated with higher intraoperative mortality compared with conservative treatment. Although there is considerable short-term outcome improvement, there is no significant difference in long-term outcome improvement for emergency surgery [23]. During the 5-year follow-up after surgery, no significant survival benefits were observed compared with conservative treatment, and a higher incidence of postoperative stroke was the leading factor of hospital mortality [24]. However, it has also been indicated that older age (> 70y) should not be considered as a factor determining emergency surgery, although it is accompanied by higher postoperative stroke rates, as indicated by a survey in the UK [25]. Therefore, the assessment of surgical indications for older patients with TAAD should be performed with caution.

Urea nitrogen is one of the most important biomarkers of renal function. Elevated urea nitrogen is commonly found in patients with impaired renal function. Arginine vasopressin is activated excessively to maintain adequate systemic perfusion, which is affected by both low cardiac output and myocardial ischemia due to coronary artery involvement by TAAD. Subsequently, the permeability of urea nitrogen into the collecting duct increases dramatically under the interaction of arginine vasopressin [26]. Liu et al. [27] demonstrated that urea nitrogen at admission (6.95 mmol/L) is valuable in predicting in-hospital mortality with sensitivity and specificity of 78.9% and 72.2%, respectively. In our study, it was found that elevated preoperative urea nitrogen is a risk factor for prolonged postoperative ICU stay, which suggests that preoperative renal function plays a critical role in affecting clinical outcomes. This may partly explain why renal arteries are involved in TAAD, causing renal malperfusion before surgery and leading to secondary impact on renal function. Compared with patients without renal dysfunction before surgery, CPB time, cross-clamp time, and cardiac arrest time are significantly longer in patients with renal malperfusion. Meanwhile, preoperative renal malperfusion is also associated with postoperative acute renal injury, and temporary or even permanent hemodialysis therapy is necessary as an alternative treatment for renal function; to some extent, ICU stay may be prolonged [28]. Similarly, another biomarker of renal function, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, is also correlated with the incidence of postoperative adverse events, including mortality [29]. Furthermore, Wu et al. [30] found that compared with patients with higher 30-day mortality after TAAD surgery, the pre-operative creatinine levels among those with lower mortality decreased significantly (9.61 vs 13.41 mol/dL). Focusing on the classification of preoperative renal function for patients with TAAD, it has been suggested that moderate to severe preoperative renal dysfunction is an independent risk factor for postoperative hemodialysis, which probably affects the regular ICU stay [31]. Moreover, Cai et al. [7]indicated that there is a positive association between renal dysfunction and postoperative delirium, potentially causing prolonged postoperative ICU stay.

CPB, which is responsible for stable vital signs and a safe surgical platform during cardiac arrest, is essential during TAAD repair surgery. However, because of its exogenous nature, the immune system is activated to induce an inflammatory response when the physiological circulation is maintained and supported through the established artificial circuit of CPB. Potentially and sequentially, organ injury or dysfunction, internal environment disturbance, physiological regulation inactivation of the secretion system, and time-dependent mechanical damage of blood components are gradually observed, as expected. In a study concentrating on the association between CPB time and postoperative renal function changes conducted by Xu et al. [32], the incidence of postoperative acute renal injury increased by 17% with every additional 10 min of CPB time. Persistent progressive injury of the renal tubule during dramatic longer CPB is a reasonable and reliable explanation for postoperative renal dysfunction [33]. In a study of neurological outcomes, CPB time ≥ 300 min is confirmed as a risk factor for postoperative stroke [34]. Among patients with postoperative infection, gram-negative bacteria are the major pathogen within the earlier bloodborne infection phase after surgery because of the possibility of Enterobacter migration induced by CPB [35]. During the surgical procedure of aortic arch replacement combined with elephant trunk stent implantation, there was a significant association between CPB time and worse outcome; for every additional 10 min, the possibility of worse outcome increases by 10% [36]. Based on the findings from an observational study of medium- and long-term outcomes conducted by Zheng et al. [37], there was a correlation between CPB time and 90-day mortality after surgery (every added 10 min, the mortality increased by 16%). The results of our study are similar to the conclusions mentioned above. A longer CPB time is associated with an increased incidence of adverse postoperative events, which in turn leads to prolonged ICU stay for systemic rehabilitation and organ function improvement. Note that DHCA is a critical stage during the CPB period for TAAD repair surgery with the aim of providing a relatively bloodless surgical field for arch replacement. However, the systematic impact of DHCA should not be ignored under extreme deep hypothermia, ischemia, and hypoxemia. It has been demonstrated that DHCA > 40 min is a significant risk factor for postoperative neurological complications [38]. Therefore, although no significant difference was found in DHCA time between the two groups in the current study, it is proposed that DHCA should be controlled as strictly as possible to alleviate ischemic and hypoxic related injury.

Currently, regular antegrade cerebral perfusion is thought to be an effective strategy of brain protection that can support and maintain suitable cerebral perfusion to extend DHCA time accordingly [39]. Later, in accordance with the specificity and sensitivity of ROC, it has been shown that the combination of emergency surgery, preoperative urea nitrogen, and CPB time is more effective in predicting prolonged ICU stay, which means that the interaction from multiple factors more likely induces prolonged ICU stay. Therefore, multidimensional and comprehensive thinking should be established and maintained in clinical diagnosis and treatment.

This study also has some limitations. First, the relatively smaller sample in this study may have led to insufficient statistical efficiency. Second, as a single-center study, the collected data in our study might be less comprehensive and validated to a broader patient population. Moreover, the association between both surgery types and arterial cannulation sites, which might also be associated with the outcomes, was not included in our analysis. Therefore, more multi-center studies are needed for more comprehensive clinical exploration and validation and long-term follow-up observation. In conclusion, emergency surgery, preoperative urea nitrogen, and CPB time are independent risk factors for prolonged postoperative ICU stay, and the combination of these three factors is more reliable in predicting ICU stay. In addition, the incidence of adverse events after TAAD surgery is significantly higher among patients with a prolonged postoperative ICU stay. In the future, for TAAD patients, especially those complicated with malperfusion, indications for emergency surgery, effective protection of renal function before surgery, and real-time optimization of CPB strategy are meaningful for improving postoperative ICU management.

Abbreviations

HCT:

Haematocrit

HB:

Haemoglobin

GLU:

Glucose

BUN:

Urea nitrogen

EF:

Ejection fraction

CPB:

Cardiopulmonary bypass

DHCA:

Deep hypothermia cardiac arrest

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass graft

CI:

Confidence interval

AUC:

Area under the curve

References

  1. Said A, Munir M, Bahbah EI. Aortic dissection: a review of pathophysiology, management, and prospective advances. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17: e230421186875. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X16666201014142930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Q, Zhang B, Yang J, Mo X, Zhang L, Li M, et al. Predicting intensive care unit length of stay after acute type A aortic dissection surgery using machine learning. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8: 675431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.675431.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ge Y, Sun L, Zhu J, Liu Y, Cheng L, Chen L, et al. Can EuroSCORE II predict the mortality and length of intensive care unit stay after total aortic arch replacement with stented elephant trunk implantation for DeBakey type I aortic dissection? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;61(7):564–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Q, Chen Q, Ye Y, Wu R, Wang S, Yao C. Characteristics and prognosis of abdominal or thoracic aortic aneurysm patients admitted to intensive care units after surgical treatment: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:475–86. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S296125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. He Q, Wang W, Zhu S, Wang M, Kang Y, Zhang R, et al. Epidemiology and clinical outcomes of ventilator-associated events among 20,769 mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units: an observational study. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03484-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo MH, Luo JC, Zhang YJ, Xu X, Su Y, Li JK, et al. Early postoperative organ dysfunction is highly associated with mortality risk in patients with type A aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(6):ivac266. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cai S, Zhang X, Pan W, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and early outcomes of post-operative delirium in patients with type A aortic dissection during intensive care unit stay. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7: 572581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.572581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapadohos T, Angelopoulos E, Vasileiadis I, Nanas S, Kotanidou A, Karabinis A, et al. Determinants of prolonged intensive care unit stay in patients after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(1):70–9. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.01.18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun LY, Bader Eddeen A, Ruel M, MacPhee E, Mesana TG. Derivation and validation of a clinical model to predict the length of intensive care unit stay after cardiac surgery. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(21): e017847. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao R, Qiu J, Dai L, Song J, Fan S, Cao F, et al. Current surgical management of acute type A aortic dissection in China: a multicenter registry study. JACC Asia. 2022;2(7):869–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.08.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bai L, Ge L, Zhang Y, Li M, Jiang B, Song Y. Experience in the postoperative intensive care treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection. Int J Clin Pract. 2023;2023:4191277. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4191277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Girdauskas E, Kuntze T, Borger MA, Röhrich K, Schmitt D, Fassl J, et al. Acute respiratory dysfunction after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37(3):691–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolfe SB, Sundt TM 3rd, Isselbacher EM, Cameron DE, Trimarchi S, Bekeredjian R, et al. Survival after operative repair of acute type A aortic dissection varies according to the presence and type of pre-operative malperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;S0022–5223(22):01024–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.09.034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown JA, Aranda-Michel E, Navid F, Serna-Gallegos D, Thoma F, Sultan I. Outcomes of emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection complicated by malperfusion syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;S0022–5223(22):00724–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.04.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu Z, Xue Y, Fan F, Cao H, Pan J, Zhou Q, et al. Malperfusion syndromes in acute type A aortic dissection do not affect long-term survival in the Chinese population: a 10-year institutional experience. J Card Surg. 2021;36(6):1943–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.15464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang B, Norton EL, Rosati CM, Wu X, Kim KM, Khaja MS, et al. Managing patients with acute type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: A 20-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(3):675-687.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu X, Wu Y, Wu Z. Revascularization-first strategy versus central repair-first strategy for acute type A aortic dissection complicated with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Card Surg. 2022;37(12):4427–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiu P, Tsou S, Goldstone AB, Louie M, Woo YJ, Fischbein MP. Immediate surgery for acute type A aortic dissection complicated by visceral or peripheral malperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156(1):18-24.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vendramin I, Isola M, Piani D, Onorati F, Salizzoni S, D’Onofrio A, et al. Surgical management and outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection and cerebral malperfusion. JTCVS Open. 2022;10:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Okita Y, Ikeno Y, Yokawa K, Koda Y, Henmi S, Gotake Y, et al. Direct perfusion of the carotid artery in patients with brain malperfusion secondary to acute aortic dissection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67(1):161–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-017-0873-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Luehr M, Etz CD, Nozdrzykowski M, et al. Extra-anatomic revascularization for preoperative cerebral malperfusion due to distal carotid artery occlusion in acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(2):652–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou L, Chen C, Zheng M, Liu L, Xu P, Niu Y. Comparison of imaging characteristics for mortality risk analysis between young and older patients with acute aortic dissection. Echocardiography. 2022;39(9):1252–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dumfarth J, Peterss S, Luehr M, Etz CD, Schachner T, Kofler M. Acute type A dissection in octogenarians: does emergency surgery impact in-hospital outcome or long-term survival? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51(3):472–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hata M, Sezai A, Niino T, Yoda M, Unosawa S, Furukawa N, et al. Should emergency surgical intervention be performed for an octogenarian with type A acute aortic dissection? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1042–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bashir M, Harky A, Shaw M, Adams B, Oo A. Type A aortic dissection in patients over the age of 70 years in the UK. J Card Surg. 2019;34(12):1439–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.14196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sands JM, Blount MA, Klein JD. Regulation of renal urea transport by vasopressin. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2011;122:82–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu J, Sun LL, Wang J, Ji G. Blood urea nitrogen in the prediction of in-hospital mortality of patients with acute aortic dissection. Cardiol J. 2018;25(3):371–6. https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2017.0075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishigawa K, Fukui T, Uemura K, Takanashi S, Shimokawa T. Preoperative renal malperfusion is an independent predictor of acute kidney injury and operative death but not associated with late mortality after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;58:302–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fan PY, Chen CY, Lee CC, Liu KS, Wu VC, Fan PC, et al. Impact of renal dysfunction on surgical outcomes in patients with aortic dissection. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(20): e15453. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu ZN, Guan XL, Xu SJ, Wang XL, Li HY, Gong M, et al. Does preoperative serum creatinine affect the early surgical outcomes of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection? J Chin Med Assoc. 2020;83:266–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Imasaka K, Tayama E, Tomita Y. Preoperative renal function and surgical outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(4):470–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivu430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu S, Liu J, Li L, Wu Z, Li J, Liu Y, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass time is an independent risk factor for acute kidney injury in emergent thoracic aortic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14(1):90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0907-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lannemyr L, Lundin E, Reinsfelt B, Bragadottir G, Redfors B, Oras J. Renal tubular injury during cardiopulmonary bypass as assessed by urinary release of N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61(9):1075–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jia H, Huang B, Kang L, Lai H, Li J, Wang C, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors of postoperative stroke aortic arch replacement and stent elephant trunk implantation. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;47: 101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang YC, Wu HY, Luo CY, Lin TW. Cardiopulmonary bypass time predicts early postoperative enterobacteriaceae infection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(5):1333–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang K, Pan XD, Dong SB, Zheng J, Xu SD, Liu YM, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass duration is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(11):300060520968450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060520968450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zheng J, Xu SD, Zhang YC, Zhu K, Gao HQ, Zhang K, et al. Association between cardiopulmonary bypass time and 90-day post-operative mortality in patients undergoing arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk: a retrospective cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;132(19):2325–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peng X, Zeng G, Li Y, Cai L. Analysis of poor prognostic factors of the cerebral nerve after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in patients with type A aortic dissection. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(9):10599–607.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Salehi Ravesh M, Friedrich C, Schoettler J, Hummitzsch L, Elke G, Salem M, et al. Association between the duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and surgical outcome in patients with acute type A aortic dissection: a large retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):644. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030644.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230061, Anhui Province, China

    Haiyuan Liu, Shuaipeng Zhang, Chengxin Zhang, Qinyun Gao, Yuyong Liu & Shenglin Ge

  2. Department of Infection Management, Second People’s Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, 230011, Anhui Province, China

    Fangfang Liao

Authors
  1. Haiyuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuaipeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chengxin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qinyun Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuyong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fangfang Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shenglin Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HYL, SPZ, CXZ and SLG were responsible for the design of this study, data collection, manuscript creation, and manuscript review. HYL, QYG, YYL, FFL and SLG were responsible for manuscript creation and review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shenglin Ge.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of the first affiliated hospital of Anhui Medical University approved this retrospective study (PJ2023-12–62), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Zhang, S., Zhang, C. et al. Risk factors for prolonged postoperative ICU stay in the patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection. J Cardiothorac Surg 19, 46 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02548-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02548-7

Keywords

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery

ISSN: 1749-8090

Contact us