Analysis of 25 surgical cases of thymic neuroendocrine tumors and thymic carcinoma

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent surgical resection for thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNET) or thymic carcinoma.

Methods

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of our surgical patients at Fukuoka University Hospital from January 1995 to December 2018.

Results

There were nine cases of TNET and 16 cases of thymic carcinoma. Regarding the pathological type, the TNET group included three atypical carcinoid cases, two large cell neuroendocrine tumor cases, two small cell carcinoma cases, and two other cases. The thymic carcinoma group included 15 squamous carcinoma cases and one case of adenosquamous carcinoma. Based on the Masaoka-Koga staging system, six TNET cases and 11 thymic carcinoma cases were stage III or IV. The complete resection rate was 77% in the TNET group and 81% in the thymic carcinoma group. Additional chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was performed in five cases of TNET and 11 cases of thymic carcinoma. The five-year survival rate and five-year disease-free survival rate were 87.5% and 75.0% in the TNET group and 58.9% and 57.1% in the thymic carcinoma group, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.248 and P = 0.894, respectively). In the univariate analysis, complete resection was a statistically significant prognostic factor (P = 0.017).

Conclusion

In this study, no difference in prognosis was observed between TNET and thymic carcinomas. To understand the characteristics of these tumors, further case accumulation and multicenter clinical studies are needed. (243words)

Introduction

Thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNET) and thymic carcinoma are rare thymic malignancies, with incidences of 2–3% and 15–20%, respectively [1, 2]. According to the fourth and latest fifth edition World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart, TNET are introduced as a single major category, although they used to belong to different categories in the third edition [3,4,5]. The comparative clinical characteristics of TC and TNET have not been well studied. As such, it is currently unclear whether these two distinct histological subtypes will benefit from existing customized treatment strategies in real-world clinical settings. In this study, we reviewed cases of TNET and thymic carcinoma that were resected at our department to analyze their clinical features, prognosis, and the significance of multidisciplinary treatment with surgical therapy. The purpose of researching and comparing thymic carcinoma and thymic neuroendocrine tumors is to understand the distinct clinical outcomes, survival rates, and factors influencing the progression of these rare thymic malignancies. We believe that our clinical data can contribute to data accumulation so as to understand the biological properties of these tumors.

Patients and methods

Patient and data Collection

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who underwent thymectomy for TNET or thymic carcinoma at our department from January 1995 to December 2018. We looked over the background (age and sex), intraoperative and perioperative data (surgical approach, combined resected organs, completeness of resection, neoadjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy), pathological findings (histology, Masaoka stage, maximum specimen diameter, and lymph node metastasis), and follow-up data (presence or absence of recurrence, recurrence site, recurrence treatment, and cause of death). The histological type was determined according to the latest WHO classification, and staging was performed for all patients according to the Masaoka-Koga system [6]. Preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was planned for patients who were suspected to have infiltration of the surrounding structures. The resection status was classified into three groups: R0 (complete resection as determined macroscopically and microscopically), R1 (microscopical incomplete resection), and R2 (macroscopical incomplete resection). Postoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was planned for those patients with recurrence or incomplete resection, as well as for those with a high risk of recurrence, such as a close surgical margin.

After discharge, all the patients were followed up. Chest computed tomography and blood tumor markers were reviewed every 3 months in the first year, every 6 months in the next 4 years, and then once a year after 5 years of surgery. Positron emission tomography - computed tomography, cranial magnetic resonance imaging, and whole body bone scans were reviewed as needed. The follow-up time was calculated from the date of surgery, and the last follow-up date was December 31, 2022.

The pattern of recurrence after resection was classified according to the protocol of the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group [7].

All survival rates were calculated from the time of resection. The overall survival (OS) rate was defined as the time from surgery to death from any cause. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from surgery to clinical progression or death.

All specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, and 4 μm sections were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemical studies, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 were used as neuroendocrine markers to evaluate neuroendocrine differentiation of the thymic neoplasm. CD5, c-kit, and p40 were used as thymic carcinoma markers to identify thymic carcinoma.

Statistical analysis

Differences between the two groups were examined using the t test and chi-square test. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan‒Meier method, and P < 0.05 was considered significant by the log-rank test. Univariate analysis by Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to evaluate prognostic factors. StateMate V (ATOMOS: JAPAN) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Patient characteristics

There were 25 patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with TNET or thymic carcinoma. They included nine cases of TNET (including two cases with neuroendocrine tumor components) and 16 cases of thymic carcinoma. Their backgrounds are summarized in Table 1. TNET cases are summarized in Table 2, and cases of thymic carcinoma are summarized in Table 3. The median follow-up period in all cases was 1126 days (9–4939 days). The average age at the time of surgery was 60.0 (45–83) years for TNET and 61.6 (39–82) years for thymic carcinoma. TNET were comparatively larger than thymic carcinoma, as the average tumor diameter was 61.8 mm (34–104 mm) in TNET and 53.0 mm (20–100 mm) in thymic carcinoma. Six cases (67%) of TNET and 11 cases (69%) of thymic carcinoma were Masaoka stage III or IV.

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants

Table 2 Clinical findings in patients with TNET

Table 3 Clinical findings in patients with TC

Preoperative therapy

In the TNET group, we preoperatively added chemoradiotherapy to two patients. In the thymic carcinoma group, we added preoperative chemoradiotherapy for one patient and chemotherapy for one patient. These patients were mainly treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. In particular, TNET were treated with cisplatin (CDDP)/etoposide (VP-16) chemotherapy following the regimen used for small cell lung cancer. TNET Case 5 was an atypical carcinoid diagnosed as MEN type 1 with parathyroid tumor, pituitary tumor, and pancreatic tumor. The patient underwent one course of CDDP + VP-16 and 40 Gy radiotherapy and showed a partial response (PR). TNET Case 9 showed a PR after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for small cell carcinoma. Thymic carcinoma Case 6 underwent preoperative chemotherapy for suspicious invasion into the aorta and brachiocephalic vein and showed stable disease (SD). Thymic carcinoma Case 12 underwent chemotherapy for possible infiltration into the aorta and was identified as an SD, requiring salvage surgery.

Surgical treatment

Sternotomy was performed in all nine cases of TNET. For thymic carcinoma, sternotomy was performed in 11 cases, posterolateral thoracotomy was performed in one case and sternotomy and intercostal thoracotomy was performed in one case. Thoracoscopic surgery was performed in three cases. Combined resection of adjacent organs was performed in six cases (67%) of TNET and 13 cases (81%) of thymic carcinoma, with no statistically significant difference. In all cases, no operative (30-day) mortality occurred, and postoperative morbidity rate was 12% (one case of patients, pleural effusion, gastrointestinal bleeding, atelectasis out of 25 cases).

Pathological findings

Regarding the pathological type, the TNET group included three atypical carcinoid cases, two large cell neuroendocrine tumor cases, two small cell carcinoma cases, and two other cases. The thymic carcinoma group included 15 squamous carcinoma cases and one case of adenosquamous carcinoma. Lymph node metastasis was positive in one case (11%) of TNET and three cases (18%) of thymic carcinoma. Complete resection was achieved in eight cases (89%) of TNET and 13 cases (81%) of thymic carcinoma. In the TNET group, one patient had R2 residual disease with pleural dissemination. In the thymic carcinoma group, two cases were R1 with a positive surgical margin, and one case was R2 with pleural dissemination.

Postoperative treatment

Four cases of TNET and 10 cases of thymic carcinoma needed additional postoperative treatment. For TNET, we added adjuvant chemotherapy in two patients and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in one patient, as shown in Table 2. In Case 5 of TNET, Sandostatin® for recurrence was discontinued due to the side effect of diarrhea, followed by everolimus for six months, which was again discontinued for financial reasons. For thymic carcinoma, radiotherapy was given postoperatively in eight cases, and chemotherapy was given postoperatively in one case and at the time of recurrence in two cases, as shown in Table 3.

Recurrence and survival

Some patients developed recurrence even after radical surgery, as described below. In TNET and thymic carcinoma, local recurrence was observed in two cases and one case, respectively, and distant metastasis was observed in three cases and four cases, respectively. Survival curves of TNET and thymic carcinoma are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The five-year survival rate and five-year disease-free survival rate were 87.5% and 75.0% in TNET and 58.9% and 57.1% in thymic carcinoma, respectively, with no significant difference between the two tumor groups. In univariate analysis, complete resection was found to be a significant prognostic factor, while pathological type, Masaoka stage, and tumor size showed no significance (Table 4).

Fig. 1

Kaplan‒Meier curves comparing the survival of patients with TNET and TC. TNET, thymic neuroendocrine tumors; TC, thymic carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval

Fig. 2

Kaplan‒Meier curves comparing the disease-free survival after complete resection in patients with TNET and TC. TNET, thymic neuroendocrine tumors; TC, thymic carcinoma; CI, confidence interval

Table 4 Univariate analysis of parameters influencing OS

Discussion

In the NCCN guidelines, TNET belongs to neuroendocrine tumors and is treated in a different protocol than thymic carcinoma [8, 9]. In both TNET and thymic carcinoma, the grade of malignancy is determined based on histologic features. However, it is not easy to compare the degree of malignancy, as both groups include several histologic types. Suster et al. investigated 60 cases of malignant thymic tumors and found that squamous cell carcinoma showed low-grade histology, and small cell/neuroendocrine carcinoma showed high-grade histology [10]. On the other hand, TNEThas a pathological variety, including typical carcinoids, atypical carcinoids, large cell neuroendocrine tumors, and small cell carcinomas. They are classified as follows, based on histologic features such as tumor growth pattern, cell atypia, and mitosis number: typical carcinoids and atypical carcinoids, and both large cell neuroendocrine tumors and small cell carcinomas are classified as low grade, intermediate grade, and high grade, respectively [11]. High-grade TNET, such as large cell neuroendocrine tumors and small cell carcinomas, often develop infiltration and cause lymph node metastasis. Therefore, they generally have a poor prognosis similar to that of lung primary neuroendocrine carcinomas [12, 13].

In our investigation encompassing nine cases of thymic endocrine tumors and 16 cases of thymic carcinoma, no statistically significant differences were observed in patient backgrounds. However, it is noteworthy that a male predominance was observed, consistent with previous reports. This is in clear contrast to other neuroendocrine tumors, where the incidence in males and females is usually more equal.

In this study, there was no statistically significant difference between their five-year survival rates. Although this result does not agree with previous reports [10, 11], some studies regarding surgical cases show similar results to ours. Table 5 summarizes reports comparing the prognosis of TNET and thymic carcinoma [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Filosso et al. investigated surgical cases of TNET and thymic carcinoma and found that the five-year survival rates were 68% and 60% in TNET and thymic carcinoma, respectively, with no difference in prognosis [16]. It is not easy to simply compare the previous reports, as each report on thymic malignancy includes different histological types, with different diagnostic or treatment protocols. The variety of histological types, as well as the rarity of TNET and thymic carcinomas, make it difficult to understand their biologicalnature.

Table 5 Summary of studies related to TC and TNET

Our results showed that TNET tended to exhibit a better prognosis than thymic carcinoma, despite the absence of statistical significance. (Fig. 1) This observation could be attributed not only to the inclusion of low-grade tumors, such as typical carcinoid or atypical carcinoid, but also to the high rate of complete resection in the TNET group. In fact, in our study, the TNET group included only three cases of atypical carcinoid as low-grade tumors. Univariate analysis showed that complete resection was a possible prognostic factor. According to past reports, possible prognostic factors of TNET include the pathological type, surgical indication, Masaoka stage, complete resection, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis [1, 16, 21,22,23,24,25,26]. In particular, complete resection has been reported to be a strong prognostic factor [16, 21, 22, 24]. In this study, the subjects included only surgical cases, and most of them underwent complete resection. Especially for TNET, complete resection was performed in eight out of nine cases, which included six cases requiring extended resection, as shown in Table 2. We assumed that the high rate of complete resection led to comparatively good outcomes, although there were many high-grade TNET. For instance, in TNET Case 9, the patient underwent complete resection and survived longer than 10 years, even though the histological type was small cell carcinoma. There are few past reports on surgical cases of high-grade TNET. Hamaji et al. investigated 21 surgical cases of TNET and reported that the five-year survival rate was 64.6% [23]. The results of our study were comparable to their results. Among pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors, small cell lung carcinoma grows rapidly and develops quickly to lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. Hence, surgical indications are limited only for some localized small cell lung cancers [27]. On the other hand, some aggressive TNET show a comparatively longer prognosis after surgical resection. Even in high-grade TNET, surgical treatment, especially complete resection, can possibly extend the prognosis, unlike small cell lung carcinoma. Therefore, surgical treatment should be taken into consideration, even if extensive surgery is needed.

Even in cases of complete resection, distant metastasis was likely to occur if the Masaoka stage was III or higher in these tumors (Tables 2 and 3). It suggested the importance of tumor control through systemic therapy. In our department, additional treatment is often performed before and/or after surgery for either high-grade TNET, advanced stage, incomplete resection, or postoperative recurrence. As there is no unified protocol regarding additional perioperative treatment for TNET, each institution has to decide on their indications for perioperative treatment. In fact, some reports conclude that preoperative chemotherapy reduces tumor size and leads to complete resection. Additionally, there is a study showing that postoperative radiotherapy prolongs prognosis [28, 29]. On the other hand, one study shows that postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy for TNET do not contribute to prognosis [30]. In our study, we added chemotherapy to five of nine patients with TNET before or after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy to nine of 16 patients with thymic carcinoma. Even among high-grade TNET, preoperative chemoradiotherapy enabled complete resection, and postoperative chemotherapy led to a long-term prognosis without recurrence, as shown in Table 2. These results suggested that pre/postoperative additional treatment possibly prolonged the prognosis in TNET or thymic carcinoma. For thymic carcinoma, the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is reported to be comparatively effective, as the overall response rate was 22 to 36% for stage IV or recurrent cancer in a phase II trial [31, 32]. In addition to chemotherapy, there appeared some other options. We expect the potential efficacy of new molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Lenvatinib was approved in Japan for the additional treatment of unresectable thymic carcinoma in 2021 [33]. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported to be effective in recurrent and progressive cases [34, 35]. For TNET, the NCCN guidelines state the efficacy of somatostatin analogs and molecular-targeted drugs [9]. In this study, we used a somatostatin analog, everolimus, only in one case for short-term treatment. There are no large-scale prospective studies regarding perioperative therapy for TNET and thymic carcinoma. Effective additional treatment need to be established, in the future.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, selection bias was inevitable, as this study was a retrospective study with a limited number of cases at a single institution and included only surgical cases. Second, some of our diagnoses and classifications may not be comparable with other studies since lymph node dissection was not systematically performed and the TNET group included one borderline lesion with NET components. Finally, assessment for prognostic factors was based on univariate analysis instead of multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was not performed because the number of samples was small and the reliability of the analysis results would be low.

Conclusion

We investigated TNET and thymic carcinomas that were surgically resected in our department, and there was no statistically significant difference in prognosis between the two types of tumors. Even with high-grade TNET and thymic carcinoma, some patients achieve long-term survival after aggressive multidisciplinary treatment, including surgery. Complete resection may be a valuable treatment in TNET and thymic tumors, although more data are needed.